1. Take any number which is a multiple of 9 starting at zero ( 0 ) ( 0, 9, 18, 27, etc. ) .

2. Add 1, 2, 4, 5. 7, 8 to the number so that the first column of the number ends in ( 1, 3, 7, 9 ) . For example ( 11, 13, 17, 19 ) .

3. Test to see if it is a prime . A prime number is defined as being only evenly divisible by itself and 1.

## Saturday, December 31, 2011

## Sunday, December 25, 2011

### Time Is Gravity, Entropy, Chaos In Disguise

Gravity appears to us as a weak force, but it is really the effects of time in disguise. Einstein said that mass bends space around the mass and that mass and energy are the same thing in two forms. The more that the mass / energy flexes the space string, the greater the gravity which is seen by us as a force . Time follows the flexed space string at differing velocities depending on the amount of flex in the space string near the mass / energy . Time has a numerical value of nine ( 9 ) and can be broken up into 9 segments ( 1/9 ). The 9 segments can have different velocities and can effect what happens. We can see this phenomena in our own life. Each of us, have adventures in life which may appear spontaneous or random . The things that happen to you or I aren't always at the same time. This is because the energy around us is flexed arbitrarily by either outside , random , or self induced actions that flexes the energy string . If you and I experience the same thing, the length of time may be different because the time segments travel at different speeds. In addition, if something bad happens, it usually follows in units of three ( 3 ), because the universe runs on the number three ( 3 ) and tries to stabilize around the number three ( 3 ) when things get out of whack.

In summary:

1. Mass

2. Weight

3. Time

are all related to space strings. If the space strings flex, time follows the flexed string at different velocities and we see the effects of this flexing as gravity if a mass is involved or entropy / chaos if a mass isn't involved but the results are mild or severe.

In summary:

1. Mass

2. Weight

3. Time

are all related to space strings. If the space strings flex, time follows the flexed string at different velocities and we see the effects of this flexing as gravity if a mass is involved or entropy / chaos if a mass isn't involved but the results are mild or severe.

## Friday, December 09, 2011

### Being Good

I got to thinking about being good. For most people, the connotation of being good is equivalent to having a dull and boring life. Most religions stress the need to be good in life and to help others. I also got to thinking about God or in other words the person who designed this universe so you and I would have a reasonable chance of survival. Looking at it from a science perspective it suddenly occurred to me, that being good is necessary to survive. Our universe is filled with energy and mass. Einstein said that energy and mass are equivalent which means that energy and mass can be converted from one to the other and back again. String theory says that all the energy is basically in the format of a string. A vibrating string in a loop gives the mass including us its' properties and behavior. A flexed string around a mass, such as the earth gives the earth its' gravity. The wind or other force is simply strings of energy or mass in motion. Velocity or acceleration is just a form of rolled up energy string ( think car here ) disturbing the energy fields as the mass ( car ) moves along. You and I are essentially a mass doing its' own thing by moving in a space occupied by strings. If we design something such as a car we have to round out its' rough edges so it won't cause any disturbance to the energy strings commonly known as turbulence. Similarly we want to round out our own rough edges in order to be acceptable to other people. Time in our universe is just energy that is still creating strings of space from dark energy and dark matter as it moves in a forward direction. Sometimes dark energy and dark matter break off from time before it gets converted into space. This broken off dark energy and dark matter sometimes brings disaster to ordinarily good people. This is the chance that keeps our world from getting too dull.

## Wednesday, November 30, 2011

### The Quantum World

The quantum world is made up of individual particles that don't have to travel through space to go somewhere. This world looks like foam continuously bubbling away. Travel in the quantum world is through the action of cloning, superposition and entanglement. Cloning is the method by which the individual particle reproduces itself at new locations. Superposition means that more than one particle can occupy the same space at the same time because space hasn't a physical reality in the quantum world. Quantum particles don't have to travel through space to get from A to B because space doesn't exist. Entanglement is the method by which a particle transfers information from one point to another point . A quantum particle can bubble many copies of itself at the same approximate location. This means that the bubbling quantum particle at the new location forms a cloud. This cloud may also appear as a wave which we can measure. We can also measure the position of the quanta, but we can't do both measurements at the same time. Different quanta may come together to form units of something else. If these quanta can't be separated out then we say a strong nuclear ( cloud ) force exists between them. This strong nuclear ( cloud ) force can also be considered as an unbreakable wave. If these quanta can be separated out in a reaction then we can say it has a weak nuclear force and a breakable wave that forms relationships with other quanta. Sometimes quanta form a rotational cloud with each other and these clouds carry plus and minus charges. These are your electromagnet quanta forces.

## Tuesday, November 22, 2011

### Time

Time is the basis of everything. When the universe was initially created, time separated out into dark matter, dark energy and string space. Dark matter acts like a thick honey which tends to keep everything in its' place like inertia. Dark Energy acts as an accelerator for the universe. String space when forming circles creates things and the string's circular vibration creates different characteristics which we see as that thing's properties. Unattached curved strings, when vibrating, appear to us a waves which when modulated transmit information. Radios use that technology. A non-vibrating curved string is gravity or mass. Inertia is related to the mass of the object. Spaceless time from another universe that existed before the creation of our universe is now our quantum world. In the quantum world there is time but not space. Einstein spoke of spooky action at a distance which is true in the abstract but not existing physically. If space doesn't exist in the quantum world, you don't have any delays. The absence of space means you can have superposition because more than one thing can exist literally on / in the same spot. You can also have entanglement which means that if something happens in one location the something immediately happens / clones in the other location. This happens because the something doesn't have to travel through physical space. The speed of change is infinite ( timeless ), because the limitation on the speed of light only applies when it is moving through space and not time. To take it one step further, suppose that something went wrong and spaceless time in another universe cloned space creating an expanding bubble resulting in our universe. Since our space includes classical time, and at the time of the creation of our universe everything wasn't immediately converted there would be more space than we first calculated from our perspective of logical events. Also not all the time would be converted which meant dark time, dark matter and dark energy still exists. In fact there is much more dark time, dark matter and dark energy in comparison to matter and anti-matter.

## Friday, November 18, 2011

### Holographic Projections, Black Holes & Event Horizons

The whole universe is organized and run by time which has a mathematical value of nine ( 9 ). Space is composed of a series of strings whose basic value is one to nine ( 1 – 9 ). The zero ( 0 ) string holds imaginary numbers. Everything that isn't time, is associated with a string that is equal to the one digit sum of its' digits . For instance ( 97 ) contains the digits 9 and 7 which total 16 ( 9 + 7 = 16 ) 16 contains the digits 1 and 6 which total 7 ( 1 + 6 = 7 ). Therefore something with the value of 97 rests on the 7th string. If you take the numbers from 1 to 99, and add the digits until one digit is left you will find that the sequence of the one digit numbers go from 1 to 9 and then repeat themselves. These strings can be thought of as strings of space. These space strings rest on a complex woven background string whose value is zero ( 0 ) and is equivalent to imaginary numbers since you can't show any values on string zero ( 0 ) except zero ( 0 ). The world around us ,including you and I, appears to be solid because our vision can't see finer detail on its' own. You and I including the quantum world is really like a swarm of flies. If you look at a swarm of flies, and someone asks you its' location, you tend to answer in terms of where the densest part of the fly swarm is located. In essence when someone asks you where someone or something is located, you answer in terms where the densest part of someone or something is located. Obviously in this instance the someone or something appears solid because that is where our sight begins and ends. If everything is basically similar to a fly swarm, you can also say it is a holograph of what exists on the average at that location. Dark matter in which the universe rests is really sticky time acting as inertia and gravity while dark energy is the force of time or entropy pulling / accelerating the expansion of the universe. Dark matter as disguised time also appears to us as time or inertia which tends to keep things from falling apart. Dark energy or expanding time appears to us as entropy which tends to pull things apart which we also see as aging, force or deterioration. If you think of the universe as having direction, west to east is the expansion of the strings ( 1 to 9 ) into larger numbers totaling the value of that particular string . For instance the east to west expansion of string seven could create the value of 250 ( 2 + 5 + 0 = 7 ). The value of 250 would be on string seven ( 7 ) since the digits of ( 250 ) would total 7 ( 2 + 5 + 0 = 7 ). This east to west expansion would form a holographic pattern of information or processes which time would then project north and south which we would see as an image, process or new facts depending on our location. Time only moves outward in our universe which we see as entropy, otherwise called deterioration, force and aging. If a holographic projection reaches a black hole, the first thing it sees is an event horizon. At this point the holographic projection is changed because only time and location enter the black hole while space information stays at the event horizon. If time and location leave the holographic projection, the only thing left is the space information string 7 since ( 2 + 5 + 0 = 7 ). Thus the information at the event horizon is proportional to the area of the event horizon rather than the volume of the black hole since the black hole doesn't contain space except from our perspective. The time and location which enters the black hole from the holographic projection is a non – physical distorted quantum representation of the holographic projection without the space string which represents physical space in our seen world. Thus in a spaceless quantum world represented by time and location you get superposition, entanglement and cloning which is instantaneous. If the black hole contracts in size, time and location reverses itself and rejoins its' string which appears to us as Hawking radiation due to the creation of , to us , a new holographic projection. Time and location for the old particle is destroyed in the black hole so conservation of energy is preserved.

## Wednesday, November 16, 2011

### Holographic Universe

Let's suppose the whole universe is organized and run by time which has a value of nine ( 9 ). Everything that isn't time, is associated with a string that is equal to the one digit sum of its' digits . For instance ( 97 ) contains the digits 9 and 7 which total 16 ( 9 + 7 = 16 ) 16 contains the digits 1 and 6 which total 7 ( 1 + 6 = 7 ). Therefore something with the value of 97 rests on the 7th string. If you take the numbers from 1 to 99, and add the digits until one digit is left you will find that the sequence of the one digit numbers go from 1 to 9 and then repeat themselves. These strings can be thought of as strings of space. These space strings rest on a complex woven background string whose value is zero ( 0 ) and is equivalent to imaginary numbers since you can't show any values on string zero ( 0 ) except zero ( 0 ). The world around us ,including you and I, appears to be solid because our vision can't see finer detail on its' own. You and I including the quantum world is really like a swarm of flies. If you look at a swarm of flies, and someone asks you its' location, you tend to answer in terms of where the densest part of the fly swarm is located. In essence when someone asks you where someone or something is located, you answer in terms where the densest part of someone or something is located. Obviously in this instance the someone or something appears solid because that is where our sight begins and ends. If everything is basically similar to a fly swarm, you can also say it is a holograph of what exists on the average at that location. Dark matter in which the universe rests is really sticky time acting as inertia and gravity while dark energy is the force of time or entropy pulling / accelerating the expansion of the universe. Dark matter as disguised time also appears to us as time or inertia which tends to keep things from falling apart. Dark energy or expanding time appears to us as entropy which tends to pull things apart which we also see as aging, force or deterioration. If you think of the universe as having direction, west to east is the expansion of the strings ( 1 to 9 ) into larger numbers totaling the value of that particular string . For instance the east to west expansion of string seven could create the value of 250 ( 2 + 5 + 0 = 7 ). The value of 250 would be on string seven ( 7 ) since the digits of ( 250 ) would total 7 ( 2 + 5 + 0 = 7 ). This east to west expansion would form a holographic pattern of information or processes which time would then project north and south which we would see as an image, process or new facts depending on our location. Time only moves outward in our universe which we see as entropy, otherwise called deterioration, force and aging.

## Sunday, November 06, 2011

### Riemann's Hypothesis – Calculating Zeros On ( y = ½ )

Sometimes in life you stumble upon something that is basically true and it's up to other people to prove it. Riemann, in his Riemann's Hypothesis, said that the zeros in his hypothesis all have the value of ½ and lie on the line ( y = ½ ) . Riemann also said that the zeros can be manipulated ( positions changed or zeros added ) in order to get the primes closer to their true location. Riemann provided a formula to prove his belief which was ( s = ½ + it ). The current method of calculating the position of the zeros is by plugging numbers into the formula and calculating. I don't have any quarrel with this method except that there isn't any guarantee that you haven't missed a zero which is supposed to be on the line ( y = ½ ) and is actually off the line ( y = ½ ) . The rub in the calculation is that if you miss a “t” or an “i”, it might be the number that proves Riemann's Hypothesis is incorrect. Personally, I don't think it matters because Riemann accidentally stumbled onto something that is correct so missed numbers in “t” or “i” are academic. I don't know what numbers they are using but the available literature says the first few zeroes were calculated around 14.1344725, 21.022040, 25.010858, 30.424876, 32.935062, and 37.586178. Even if you proved that all the zeros lay on the line ( y = ½ ), that proof still doesn't tell you how all these zeros relate to the position of the primes on the line ( y = ½ ) in useable terms.

Here's my proof for what it is worth:

Riemann said that all his non – trivial zeros lie on the line ( y = ½ ) . These zeros are at the location that the primes form a right angle line to ( y = ½ ) or in other words, are vertical to the line ( y = ½ ) . Prime numbers are defined as numbers that can only be divided by themselves and ( 1 ). An example of one digit primes are ( 1, 2, 3, 5, 7 ). You can see from these numbers that primes aren't linear ( 1, 2, 3, 4 ) but form harmonics. If all the primes were played musically, you would get a tune. The physical distance between the primes would be similar to the value of the rests in a musical piece. Calculations have been done on the location that some of Riemann's zeros lie on the line ( y = ½ ) using Riemann's formula ( ½ + it ). The first few zeroes were calculated around 14.1344725, 21.022040, 25.010858, 30.424876, 32.935062, and 37.586178. These numbers are not close to the position of the beginning one digit primes ( 1, 2, 3, 5, 7 ). You will see that the distance between ( 1, 2, 3, ) is ( 1 ) and the distance between 3 & 5, 5 & 7, is 2. Riemann, in his Riemann's Hypothesis, said that the zeros in his hypothesis all have the value of ½ and lie on the line ( y = ½ ) . Riemann also said that the zeros can be manipulated ( positions changed or zeros added ) in order to get the primes closer to their true location. This manipulation changes the physical distance between the primes which is equivalent to altering the value of the rests in a musical piece.

1. 1 X .99 = .99 ( 1 )

2. 2 X .99 = 1.98 ( 2 )

3. 3 X .99 = 2.97 ( 3 )

If we add the digit ( ½ ) or ( .5 ) in Riemann's line ( y = ½ ) and Riemann's zero ( 0 ) to .99, we form the number ( .509999 ).

1. 5 X ( .509999 ) = 2.549995 (4)

2. 7 X ( .509999 ) = 3.569993 ( 5 )

3. 11 X ( .509999 ) = 5.609989 ( 6 )

This basic principle calculates the position of the primes fairly accurately up to prime 31.

Using the same multipliers on the next prime ( 37 ) we get ( 37 X .509999 = 18.869963. Prime ( 37 ) is actually the 13th prime. Riemann said that the zeros can be manipulated ( positions changed or zeros added ). We still need the ( ½ ) in Riemann's line ( y = ½ ) and the ( 9's ). If we take ( .509999 ) and multiply it by itself ( ( .509999 X .509999 = .26009898 ).

1. ( 37 X .509999 X ,509999 = 9.62366226 ( 13 )

This calculation shows that the calculated position is short of the true position by about ( 13 – 9.62366226 = 3.37633774 ). The difference is approximately equal to Pi ( 3.141592654 ). In some calculations the difference is about the natural number ( e ) ( 2.71828`828 ).

In summary, Riemann's intuition told him that the zeros had a real value of ( ½ ) which was true since the digit ( ½ ) is used in the calculation. Riemann's intuition also told him that the zeros can be manipulated ( position changed or zeros added ) which is also true. What Riemann missed was that the calculation involved the number 9 and that Pi ( 3.141592654 ) and the natural number ( e ) ( 2.718281828 ) might have to be added or subtracted from the final answer. Riemann also missed that powers would also have to be used.

In general for calculating the location of any prime you:

1. Count the number of digits in a prime number. For instance 7919 has 4 digits. Subtract 1 from the number of digits ( 4 - 1 = 3 ) for 7919. Form another number equal to the number of digits in 7919 ( 4 ) by putting ( .5 ) in the far left column and 9 in the far right column. ( .5—9 ). Fill the middle with Riemann Hypothesis zeros ( 0 ) forming a four digit number ( .5009 ). Raise ( .5009 ) to the power of 3 ( which is the number of digits in 7919 ( 4 ) minus 1 ( 4 - 1 = 3 ). ( .5009 ) ^ 3 = .125676215. Multiply 7919 X .125676215 which equals 995.2299524. 7919 is the 1000th prime. The answer is out by approximately 5. Adjust the error by adding or subtracting Pi or (e).

The Clay Mathematics Institute is offering a $1,000,000 prize for the solution to the Riemann Hypothesis. From my reading, it seems to involve proving whether or not all the zeros lie on the line ( y = ½ ) . Since I have shown how the Riemann Hypothesis relates to the location of the primes and by extension how many primes precede that prime ( counting 1, 2, 3, 4 ), it seems to me it is largely academic as to whether all the zeros lie on the line ( y = ½ ) . I have also found the missing pieces to Riemann's Hypothesis which was correct as far as it went.

Here's my proof for what it is worth:

Riemann said that all his non – trivial zeros lie on the line ( y = ½ ) . These zeros are at the location that the primes form a right angle line to ( y = ½ ) or in other words, are vertical to the line ( y = ½ ) . Prime numbers are defined as numbers that can only be divided by themselves and ( 1 ). An example of one digit primes are ( 1, 2, 3, 5, 7 ). You can see from these numbers that primes aren't linear ( 1, 2, 3, 4 ) but form harmonics. If all the primes were played musically, you would get a tune. The physical distance between the primes would be similar to the value of the rests in a musical piece. Calculations have been done on the location that some of Riemann's zeros lie on the line ( y = ½ ) using Riemann's formula ( ½ + it ). The first few zeroes were calculated around 14.1344725, 21.022040, 25.010858, 30.424876, 32.935062, and 37.586178. These numbers are not close to the position of the beginning one digit primes ( 1, 2, 3, 5, 7 ). You will see that the distance between ( 1, 2, 3, ) is ( 1 ) and the distance between 3 & 5, 5 & 7, is 2. Riemann, in his Riemann's Hypothesis, said that the zeros in his hypothesis all have the value of ½ and lie on the line ( y = ½ ) . Riemann also said that the zeros can be manipulated ( positions changed or zeros added ) in order to get the primes closer to their true location. This manipulation changes the physical distance between the primes which is equivalent to altering the value of the rests in a musical piece.

1. 1 X .99 = .99 ( 1 )

2. 2 X .99 = 1.98 ( 2 )

3. 3 X .99 = 2.97 ( 3 )

If we add the digit ( ½ ) or ( .5 ) in Riemann's line ( y = ½ ) and Riemann's zero ( 0 ) to .99, we form the number ( .509999 ).

1. 5 X ( .509999 ) = 2.549995 (4)

2. 7 X ( .509999 ) = 3.569993 ( 5 )

3. 11 X ( .509999 ) = 5.609989 ( 6 )

This basic principle calculates the position of the primes fairly accurately up to prime 31.

Using the same multipliers on the next prime ( 37 ) we get ( 37 X .509999 = 18.869963. Prime ( 37 ) is actually the 13th prime. Riemann said that the zeros can be manipulated ( positions changed or zeros added ). We still need the ( ½ ) in Riemann's line ( y = ½ ) and the ( 9's ). If we take ( .509999 ) and multiply it by itself ( ( .509999 X .509999 = .26009898 ).

1. ( 37 X .509999 X ,509999 = 9.62366226 ( 13 )

This calculation shows that the calculated position is short of the true position by about ( 13 – 9.62366226 = 3.37633774 ). The difference is approximately equal to Pi ( 3.141592654 ). In some calculations the difference is about the natural number ( e ) ( 2.71828`828 ).

In summary, Riemann's intuition told him that the zeros had a real value of ( ½ ) which was true since the digit ( ½ ) is used in the calculation. Riemann's intuition also told him that the zeros can be manipulated ( position changed or zeros added ) which is also true. What Riemann missed was that the calculation involved the number 9 and that Pi ( 3.141592654 ) and the natural number ( e ) ( 2.718281828 ) might have to be added or subtracted from the final answer. Riemann also missed that powers would also have to be used.

In general for calculating the location of any prime you:

1. Count the number of digits in a prime number. For instance 7919 has 4 digits. Subtract 1 from the number of digits ( 4 - 1 = 3 ) for 7919. Form another number equal to the number of digits in 7919 ( 4 ) by putting ( .5 ) in the far left column and 9 in the far right column. ( .5—9 ). Fill the middle with Riemann Hypothesis zeros ( 0 ) forming a four digit number ( .5009 ). Raise ( .5009 ) to the power of 3 ( which is the number of digits in 7919 ( 4 ) minus 1 ( 4 - 1 = 3 ). ( .5009 ) ^ 3 = .125676215. Multiply 7919 X .125676215 which equals 995.2299524. 7919 is the 1000th prime. The answer is out by approximately 5. Adjust the error by adding or subtracting Pi or (e).

The Clay Mathematics Institute is offering a $1,000,000 prize for the solution to the Riemann Hypothesis. From my reading, it seems to involve proving whether or not all the zeros lie on the line ( y = ½ ) . Since I have shown how the Riemann Hypothesis relates to the location of the primes and by extension how many primes precede that prime ( counting 1, 2, 3, 4 ), it seems to me it is largely academic as to whether all the zeros lie on the line ( y = ½ ) . I have also found the missing pieces to Riemann's Hypothesis which was correct as far as it went.

## Monday, October 31, 2011

### The Riemann Hypothesis Resolved ( Hopefully finally)

Riemann said that all his non – trivial zeros lie on the line ( y = ½ ) . These zeros are at the location that the primes form a right angle line to ( y = ½ ) or in other words, are vertical to the line ( y = ½ ) . Prime numbers are defined as numbers that can only be divided by themselves and ( 1 ). An example of one digit primes are ( 1, 2, 3, 5, 7 ). You can see from these numbers that primes aren't linear ( 1, 2, 3, 4 ) but form harmonics. If all the primes were played musically, you would get a tune. The physical distance between the primes would be similar to the value of the rests in a musical piece. Calculations have been done on the location that some of Riemann's zeros lie on the line ( y = ½ ) using Riemann's formula ( ½ + bi ). The first few zeroes were calculated around 14.1344725, 21.022040, 25.010858, 30.424876, 32.935062, and 37.586178. These numbers are not close to the position of the beginning one digit primes ( 1, 2, 3, 5, 7 ). You will see that the distance between ( 1, 2, 3, ) is ( 1 ) and the distance between 3 & 5, 5 & 7, is 2. Riemann, in his Riemann's Hypothesis, said that the zeros in his hypothesis all have the value of ½ and lie on the line ( y = ½ ) . Riemann also said that the zeros can be manipulated ( positions changed or zeros added ) in order to get the primes closer to their true location. This manipulation changes the physical distance between the primes which is equivalent to altering the value of the rests in a musical piece.

1. 1 X .99 = .99 ( 1 )

2. 2 X .99 = 1.98 ( 2 )

3. 3 X .99 = 2.97 ( 3 )

If we add the digit ( ½ ) or ( .5 ) in Riemann's line ( y = ½ ) and Riemann's zero ( 0 ) to .99, we form the number ( .509999 ).

1. 5 X ( .509999 ) = 2.549995 (4)

2. 7 X ( .509999 ) = 3.569993 ( 5 )

3. 11 X ( .509999 ) = 5.609989 ( 6 )

This basic principle calculates the position of the primes fairly accurately up to prime 31.

Using the same multipliers on the next prime ( 37 ) we get ( 37 X .509999 = 18.869963. Prime ( 37 ) is actually the 13th prime. Riemann said that the zeros can be manipulated ( positions changed or zeros added ). We still need the ( ½ ) in Riemann's line ( y = ½ ) and the ( 9's ). If we take ( .509999 ) and multiply it by itself ( ( .509999 X .509999 = .26009898 ).

1. ( 37 X .509999 X ,509999 = 9.62366226 ( 13 )

This calculation shows that the calculated position is short of the true position by about ( 13 – 9.62366226 = 3.37633774 ). The difference is approximately equal to Pi ( 3.141592654 ). In some calculations the difference is about the natural number ( e ) ( 2.71828`828 ).

In summary, Riemann's intuition told him that the zeros had a real value of ( ½ ) which was true since the digit ( ½ ) is used in the calculation. Riemann's intuition also told him that the zeros can be manipulated ( position changed or zeros added ) which is also true. What Riemann missed was that the calculation involved the number 9 and that Pi ( 3.141592654 ) and the natural number ( e ) ( 2.718281828 ) might have to be added or subtracted from the final answer. Riemann also missed that powers would also have to be used.

In general for calculating the location of any prime you:

1. Count the number of digits in a prime number. For instance 7919 has 4 digits. Subtract 1 from the number of digits ( 4 - 1 = 3 ) for 7919. Form another number equal to the number of digits in 7919 ( 4 ) by putting ( .5 ) in the far left column and 9 in the far right column. ( .5—9 ). Fill the middle with Riemann Hypothesis zeros ( 0 ) forming a four digit number ( .5009 ). Raise ( .5009 ) to the power of 3 ( which is the number of digits in 7919 ( 4 ) minus 1 ( 4 - 1 = 3 ). ( .5009 ) ^ 3 = .125676215. Multiply 7919 X .125676215 which equals 995.2299524. 7919 is the 1000th prime. The answer is out by approximately 5. Adjust the error by adding or subtracting Pi or (e).

The Clay Mathematics Institute is offering a $1,000,000 prize for the solution to the Riemann Hypothesis. From my reading, it seems to involve proving whether or not all the zeros lie on the line ( y = ½ ) . Since I have shown how the Riemann Hypothesis relates to the location of the primes and by extension how many primes precede that prime ( counting 1, 2, 3, 4 ), it seems to me it is largely academic as to whether all the zeros lie on the line ( y = ½ ) . I have also found the missing pieces to Riemann's Hypothesis which was correct as far as it went.

1. 1 X .99 = .99 ( 1 )

2. 2 X .99 = 1.98 ( 2 )

3. 3 X .99 = 2.97 ( 3 )

If we add the digit ( ½ ) or ( .5 ) in Riemann's line ( y = ½ ) and Riemann's zero ( 0 ) to .99, we form the number ( .509999 ).

1. 5 X ( .509999 ) = 2.549995 (4)

2. 7 X ( .509999 ) = 3.569993 ( 5 )

3. 11 X ( .509999 ) = 5.609989 ( 6 )

This basic principle calculates the position of the primes fairly accurately up to prime 31.

Using the same multipliers on the next prime ( 37 ) we get ( 37 X .509999 = 18.869963. Prime ( 37 ) is actually the 13th prime. Riemann said that the zeros can be manipulated ( positions changed or zeros added ). We still need the ( ½ ) in Riemann's line ( y = ½ ) and the ( 9's ). If we take ( .509999 ) and multiply it by itself ( ( .509999 X .509999 = .26009898 ).

1. ( 37 X .509999 X ,509999 = 9.62366226 ( 13 )

This calculation shows that the calculated position is short of the true position by about ( 13 – 9.62366226 = 3.37633774 ). The difference is approximately equal to Pi ( 3.141592654 ). In some calculations the difference is about the natural number ( e ) ( 2.71828`828 ).

In summary, Riemann's intuition told him that the zeros had a real value of ( ½ ) which was true since the digit ( ½ ) is used in the calculation. Riemann's intuition also told him that the zeros can be manipulated ( position changed or zeros added ) which is also true. What Riemann missed was that the calculation involved the number 9 and that Pi ( 3.141592654 ) and the natural number ( e ) ( 2.718281828 ) might have to be added or subtracted from the final answer. Riemann also missed that powers would also have to be used.

In general for calculating the location of any prime you:

1. Count the number of digits in a prime number. For instance 7919 has 4 digits. Subtract 1 from the number of digits ( 4 - 1 = 3 ) for 7919. Form another number equal to the number of digits in 7919 ( 4 ) by putting ( .5 ) in the far left column and 9 in the far right column. ( .5—9 ). Fill the middle with Riemann Hypothesis zeros ( 0 ) forming a four digit number ( .5009 ). Raise ( .5009 ) to the power of 3 ( which is the number of digits in 7919 ( 4 ) minus 1 ( 4 - 1 = 3 ). ( .5009 ) ^ 3 = .125676215. Multiply 7919 X .125676215 which equals 995.2299524. 7919 is the 1000th prime. The answer is out by approximately 5. Adjust the error by adding or subtracting Pi or (e).

The Clay Mathematics Institute is offering a $1,000,000 prize for the solution to the Riemann Hypothesis. From my reading, it seems to involve proving whether or not all the zeros lie on the line ( y = ½ ) . Since I have shown how the Riemann Hypothesis relates to the location of the primes and by extension how many primes precede that prime ( counting 1, 2, 3, 4 ), it seems to me it is largely academic as to whether all the zeros lie on the line ( y = ½ ) . I have also found the missing pieces to Riemann's Hypothesis which was correct as far as it went.

## Sunday, October 30, 2011

### The Universe Is Built On Strings

There is an old joke which said that all the things I needed to know were covered in kindergarten. Strings appear to be in that category. If you try to measure the definitive length of a string you will find that the task is impossible. First of all the string isn't rigid so you don't know where it begins and ends. Secondly, the length of the string depends on your measuring instrument. Different measuring instruments give different results. To add to the fun, the measuring instrument is not always accurate. Lastly the measurer may need glasses or alternately disturbs the measurement when he observes it ( quantum measurement ). If you tie the ends of a string so it forms a loop and vibrate it, you have illustrated that vibrating strings have different properties when they vibrate and by extension represent different things. For instance, metals, bricks, sand, etc. all look different to each of us because we can't see all their detail. If you hold a string straight it represents quantum time which doesn't have space. Therefore, without space to travel through, in the quantum world, you have cloning, entanglement and superposition .Everything is instantaneous and reproducable without space,having to be traveled and superposition because everything can be in the same location because there is no space to interfere with location. If you hold a string in an arc without moving it, you have gravity which is otherwise inertia. The closer the ends of the string are together in a loop the stronger the gravity ( inertia ). If a string is held in a loop and moved while in a loop, the movement of the string represents entropy, force, acceleration and velocity. The best demonstration of this phenomena is watching a car accelerate from a standing start. First of all the back end dips until the force of gravity or inertia is broken. Then entropy, force, acceleration and velocity happen. You can see this phenomena as soon as the front end of the car comes down and entropy, acceleration and velocity begin. Entropy is the deterioration of the car from position to position as it goes down the track. You and I can't see it because we can't see fine detail.

In summary:

1. A straight string represents spaceless quantum time leading to cloned copies, entanglement and superposition.

2. A tied vibrating looped string represents various properties which we see as things ( bricks, buildings, people ).

3. A static untied looped string represents gravity and inertia.

4. A dynamic, moving untied looped string represents entropy, force, velocity and acceleration.

In summary:

1. A straight string represents spaceless quantum time leading to cloned copies, entanglement and superposition.

2. A tied vibrating looped string represents various properties which we see as things ( bricks, buildings, people ).

3. A static untied looped string represents gravity and inertia.

4. A dynamic, moving untied looped string represents entropy, force, velocity and acceleration.

## Wednesday, October 26, 2011

### Patterns, Harmonics, Disorder, Chaos

Our universe is based on fundamental patterns. The use of fundamental patterns in our universe is necessary because they help us to organize our surroundings into something that is understood. An example of patterns is language, mathematics and speech. We may have variations on the fundamental pattern such as language, accents and spelling. Mathematics is broken down into adding, subtracting, multiplying and dividing as well as algebra, geometry, calculus and trigonometry. Speech is broken down into sounds that convey a message. Wild animals use speech in the form of sound to communicate. These variations on the fundamental patterns could be called harmonics, similar to harmonics in music as a common example. We also have the opposite to patterns which could be called disorder or in the extreme, chaos. Disorder can be as innocuous as designing a different type of car, building, or inventing a new word. Chaos is basically extreme disorder. An example of this is death or other forms of extensive destruction. Common examples of disorder leading to eventual chaos is aging in ourselves, our possessions or the environment ( read climate change here ). The problem with chaos is that you don't always know it is present unless you can see it or are in the midst of it. Our universe is based on mathematics. Theoretically if you mapped all the incoming data, you could see when chaos is about to start or has started. That is a great theory but it breaks down in its' applicability when the incoming data is overwhelming. A simple example is counting from one ( 1 ) to infinity. If you graph all the numbers you will see it climbs up in one direction like climbing a hill. A simple method is to add all the digits in a number until you get a one column number ( for instance 476, ( 4 + 7 + 6 = 17, ( 1 + 7 =8 ) ). You will find that all the numbers from one to infinity total from ( 1 to 9 ) and then repeat themselves in a pattern. The resulting pattern looks like a saw tooth. You could call this a fractal pattern since it repeats itself indefinitely. Prime numbers are an example of a seemingly patternless chaos in our world, but they have an underlying complicated fractal pattern . Prime Numbers are defined as numbers that can be only divided by themselves and one ( 1 ). Prime Numbers follow a complicated fractal pattern. First of all, if you look at a list of prime numbers you will find that they always have the numbers 1, 3, 7, 9 in column zero or otherwise known as the far right column ( 11, 13, 17, 19 ). The second thing you will notice is that all numbers ending in ( 1, 3, 7, 9 ) aren't prime numbers ( 21, 33, 27, 39 ). This is our first pattern. The second thing you will notice is that if the sum of the digits of any number ending in 1, 3, 7, 9 total a multiple of 3 , except for prime number 3, ( for instance 6, 9, 12, etc. ) it isn't a prime number. If a number ending in 1, 3, 7, 9 in column zero ( far right column ) isn't a prime number it can usually be evenly divided by a number with 1, 3, 7, 9 in column zero ( far right column ). These are more patterns. Lastly, except for the one digit prime number 3 in the one digit prime number series ( 1, 2, 3, 5, 7 ), you will find if you continuously add the digits of a prime number you will find the column zero or far right column one digit totals for prime numbers are ( 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 8 ). These numbers ( 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 8 ) are the strange attractors of the prime numbers.

In summary:

1. Prime numbers, if they are prime numbers, have the pattern numbers 1, 3, 7, 9 in column 0 ( farthest right column ).

2. If the sum of the digits of any number ending in 1, 3, 7, 9, total a multiple of 3, except for prime number 3, ( for instance total 6, 9, 12, etc. ) it isn’t a prime number.

3. If a number ending in 1, 3, 7, 9 in column zero (0), isn’t a prime number it can usually be evenly divided by a number with 1, 3, 7, 9 in column (0).

4. If you add the digits and there is more than one total ( for instance 97 has a first digit total of 16 ( 9 + 7 = 16 )) then 16 is a harmonic of ( 7 ), since ( 1 + 6 = 7 ).

5. The column zero or far right column one digit totals for primes are ( 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 8 ).

6. The one digit totals ( 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 8 ) are all strange attractors of the complex prime number fractals.

The adding of these digits is a neat way of quantizing energy levels or Riemann numbers, which really is only a series of numbers in which we simplify the pattern in order to study it. Any chaotic system can be quantized in this manner similar to any harmonic oscillator or anything else for that matter.

In summary:

1. Prime numbers, if they are prime numbers, have the pattern numbers 1, 3, 7, 9 in column 0 ( farthest right column ).

2. If the sum of the digits of any number ending in 1, 3, 7, 9, total a multiple of 3, except for prime number 3, ( for instance total 6, 9, 12, etc. ) it isn’t a prime number.

3. If a number ending in 1, 3, 7, 9 in column zero (0), isn’t a prime number it can usually be evenly divided by a number with 1, 3, 7, 9 in column (0).

4. If you add the digits and there is more than one total ( for instance 97 has a first digit total of 16 ( 9 + 7 = 16 )) then 16 is a harmonic of ( 7 ), since ( 1 + 6 = 7 ).

5. The column zero or far right column one digit totals for primes are ( 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 8 ).

6. The one digit totals ( 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 8 ) are all strange attractors of the complex prime number fractals.

The adding of these digits is a neat way of quantizing energy levels or Riemann numbers, which really is only a series of numbers in which we simplify the pattern in order to study it. Any chaotic system can be quantized in this manner similar to any harmonic oscillator or anything else for that matter.

## Thursday, October 20, 2011

### The Riemann Digits ½ , Zero ( 0 ) & My 9.

Prime numbers and the Riemann Hypothesis digits are all intertwined. A prime number is defined as a number that can only be divided by itself and one ( 1 ) ( 1, 2, 3, 5, 7 ).

Here's the skinny on prime numbers:

1. Prime numbers, if they are prime numbers, have the digits 1, 3, 7, 9 in column 0 ( farthest right column ) ( 11, 13, 17, 19 ).

2. If the sum of the digits of any number ending in 1, 3, 7, 9, total a multiple of 3, except for 3, ( for instance total 6, 9, 12, etc. ) it isn’t a prime number.

3. If a number ending in 1, 3, 7, 9 in column zero (0), isn’t a prime number it can usually be evenly divided by a number with 1, 3, 7, 9 in column (0). If not try other numbers.

The calculation of the location of the prime numbers on a line or calculating the number of previous primes on a line involve the digits ( ½, 0 & 9 ). Riemann in his Riemann's Hypothesis said that the zeros in his hypothesis all have the value of ½ and lie on the line ( y = ½ ) . Riemann also said that the zeros can be manipulated ( positions changed or zeros added ) in order to get the primes closer to their true location. I have separately discovered that the location of the prime numbers on the line ( y = ½ ) or any other line for that matter involves the digit 9.

The primary number for the location of a prime on any line from the Riemann Hypothesis is ( .509999 ). For the primes ( 1, 2, 3, ) you multiply them by ( .99 ) since their actual positions are ( 1, 2, 3 ). For the primes (5 to 23 ) you multiply them by ( .509999 ). For the primes 29 & 31 you multiply them by ( .509999 ) and subtract Pi ( 3.141592654 ) to bring them closer to their true position.

For the rest of the primes up to 97 you raise ( .509999 ) to the power of 2 and adjust using either Pi or the natural number e ( 2.718281828 ).

In summary, Riemann anticipated the number ( ½ ) & ( zero ( 0 ) and zero adjustment, but missed my discovery of the number 9 and the necessity of Pi and ( e ).

For calculating the location of any prime you:

1. Count the number of digits in a prime number. For instance 7919 has 4 digits. Subtract 1 from the number of digits ( 4 - 1 = 3 ) for 7919. Form another number equal to the number of digits in 7919 ( 4 ) by putting ( .5 ) in the far left column and 9 in the far right column. ( .5—9 ). Fill the middle with Riemann Hypothesis zeros ( 0 ) forming a four digit number ( .5009 ). Raise ( .5009 ) to the power of 3 ( which is the number of digits in 7919 ( 4 ) minus 1 ( 4 - 1 = 3 ). ( .5009 ) ^ 3 = .125676215. Multiply 7919 X .125676215 which equals 995.2299524. 7919 is the 1000th prime. The answer is out by approximately 5. Adjust the error by adding or subtracting Pi or (e).

It would seem from the above, that Riemann anticipated the zeros ( 0 ) and the value of those zeros being ( ½ ) since they were on the line ( y = ½ ). Riemann didn't anticipate the number 9 or the option of adjusting the calculation by adding Pi or ( e ).

The Clay Mathematics Institute is offering a $1,000,000 prize for the solution to the Riemann Hypothesis. From my reading, it seems to involve proving whether or not all the zeros lie on the line ( y = ½ ) . Since I have shown how the Riemann Hypothesis relates to the location of the primes and by extension how many primes precede that prime ( counting 1, 2, 3, 4 ), it seems to me it is largely academic as to whether all the zeros lie on the line ( y = ½ ) .

Here's the skinny on prime numbers:

1. Prime numbers, if they are prime numbers, have the digits 1, 3, 7, 9 in column 0 ( farthest right column ) ( 11, 13, 17, 19 ).

2. If the sum of the digits of any number ending in 1, 3, 7, 9, total a multiple of 3, except for 3, ( for instance total 6, 9, 12, etc. ) it isn’t a prime number.

3. If a number ending in 1, 3, 7, 9 in column zero (0), isn’t a prime number it can usually be evenly divided by a number with 1, 3, 7, 9 in column (0). If not try other numbers.

The calculation of the location of the prime numbers on a line or calculating the number of previous primes on a line involve the digits ( ½, 0 & 9 ). Riemann in his Riemann's Hypothesis said that the zeros in his hypothesis all have the value of ½ and lie on the line ( y = ½ ) . Riemann also said that the zeros can be manipulated ( positions changed or zeros added ) in order to get the primes closer to their true location. I have separately discovered that the location of the prime numbers on the line ( y = ½ ) or any other line for that matter involves the digit 9.

The primary number for the location of a prime on any line from the Riemann Hypothesis is ( .509999 ). For the primes ( 1, 2, 3, ) you multiply them by ( .99 ) since their actual positions are ( 1, 2, 3 ). For the primes (5 to 23 ) you multiply them by ( .509999 ). For the primes 29 & 31 you multiply them by ( .509999 ) and subtract Pi ( 3.141592654 ) to bring them closer to their true position.

For the rest of the primes up to 97 you raise ( .509999 ) to the power of 2 and adjust using either Pi or the natural number e ( 2.718281828 ).

In summary, Riemann anticipated the number ( ½ ) & ( zero ( 0 ) and zero adjustment, but missed my discovery of the number 9 and the necessity of Pi and ( e ).

For calculating the location of any prime you:

1. Count the number of digits in a prime number. For instance 7919 has 4 digits. Subtract 1 from the number of digits ( 4 - 1 = 3 ) for 7919. Form another number equal to the number of digits in 7919 ( 4 ) by putting ( .5 ) in the far left column and 9 in the far right column. ( .5—9 ). Fill the middle with Riemann Hypothesis zeros ( 0 ) forming a four digit number ( .5009 ). Raise ( .5009 ) to the power of 3 ( which is the number of digits in 7919 ( 4 ) minus 1 ( 4 - 1 = 3 ). ( .5009 ) ^ 3 = .125676215. Multiply 7919 X .125676215 which equals 995.2299524. 7919 is the 1000th prime. The answer is out by approximately 5. Adjust the error by adding or subtracting Pi or (e).

It would seem from the above, that Riemann anticipated the zeros ( 0 ) and the value of those zeros being ( ½ ) since they were on the line ( y = ½ ). Riemann didn't anticipate the number 9 or the option of adjusting the calculation by adding Pi or ( e ).

The Clay Mathematics Institute is offering a $1,000,000 prize for the solution to the Riemann Hypothesis. From my reading, it seems to involve proving whether or not all the zeros lie on the line ( y = ½ ) . Since I have shown how the Riemann Hypothesis relates to the location of the primes and by extension how many primes precede that prime ( counting 1, 2, 3, 4 ), it seems to me it is largely academic as to whether all the zeros lie on the line ( y = ½ ) .

## Tuesday, October 18, 2011

### The Riemann Hypothesis Resolved Using ½ , 0 and 9

Like a lot of people, I've been fooling around trying to prove Riemann's Hypothesis without much success. Let's suppose for the sake of argument that all the zeros lie on the line ( y = ½ ) . If they do, the solution for the Riemann Hypothesis brings us no closer to showing what the deep connection is between the zeta function and the distribution of the primes. My reading of the literature on the Riemann Hypothesis indicates that the zeros lie on the line ( y = ½ ) and that if the zeroes are manipulated in some fashion you can calculate the location of the primes to a greater and greater accuracy. If you know the location of one prime you know how many primes precede it because you are counting ( 1, 2, 3, 4 etc. ). Riemann's genius or intuition was that the distribution of the primes involve the number zero ( 0 ) and ½. The line is important because if you count something, that something is being placed on a line. If the something is a prime it lies on a line. Riemann's Hypothesis says that all the zeros lie on a line so for the sake of argument you have primes on a line and zeros ( 0 ) on a line. Riemann said that if you manipulate the zeros ( 0 ), you can bring the prime sitting on the line closer and closer to its' true position. What the line ( y = ½ ) means is a mystery, although the number ( ½ ) may prove useful. The Riemann Hypothesis equation brings the zeros ( 0 ) to the line ( y = ½ ) depending on what you are using for ( t ) or the other variables. Let's suppose the primes lie on a straight line which also has zeros ( 0 ) on it.

The first five primes are:

1. 1 ( Yeah, I know it shouldn't be included )

2. 2

3. 3

4. 5

5. 7

The closest you can get these primes to their true position is multiplying them by ( .99 ) if we ignore multiplying them by 1 which will tend to distort their position after prime 3 .

1. 1 X .99 = .99

2. 2 X .99 = 1.98

3. 3 X .99 =2.97

4. 5 X .99 = 4.95

5. 7 X .99 = 6.93

The primes from 6 to 10 are:

6. 11

7. 13

8. 17

9. 19

10. 23

Up to this point we have the number 9, and the Riemann Hypothesis numbers zero ( 0 ) and ( ½ ) . Riemann said we can also manipulate the zeros ( 0 ) to bring the calculated location of the primes closer to their true location.

For example prime number 11's true location is 6. If we multiply ( 11 X Riemann's Number ( ½ ) including Riemann's ( 0 ) and some of the missed number ( 9 ) we get ( 11 X .5099999 = 5.609989 ). Riemann said that we can also manipulate the zeros ( 0 ) which means we can add zeros or put them somewhere else in the multiplier. ( 11 X .5909999 = 6.5009989 ) or (11 X .50990099 = 5.608910891). You will see from these calculations that the best multiplier is .5099999 since the multiplication ( answer ) is the closest to 6.

The above example is ridiculous because the prime number is so small, but the principle is the same. The calculation of a prime's true position is more complicated, but this is the basic idea.

In summary you need:

1. ½

2. 0

3. 9

I calculate that the best usable number for the location of a prime is ( .5099999 ). Riemann said that the proportion of primes is about ( 1 / ln (x) ) where ( ln(x) is the natural logarithm of x to base ( e ) or ( 2.718281828 ) . Using Riemann's formula the proportion of primes below prime number 11 is ( 1 / ln(11) or ( .417032391 ). The number of primes below ( 11 ) using this formula is ( 11 X .4107032391 = 4.587356306) or in round numbers ( 5 ). My calculation using ( .5099999 ) is ( 6 ) in round numbers which is the exact location of prime number ( 11 ). Riemann worked out that if the zeros really do lie on the critical line, then the primes stray from the ( 1/ln(x) ) distribution exactly as much as a bunch of coin tosses stray from the 50:50 distribution law. I have proved that the non-trivial zeros have to lie on the line, because my calculation for the location of the primes uses Riemann's non-trivial zeros that have to be on the line ( y = ½ ) or a line since you are calculating the location of the primes in a sequence ( or the number of preceding primes ).

The Clay Mathematics Institute is offering a $1,000,000 prize for the solution to the Riemann Hypothesis. So far no one has solved it. From my limited understanding of the Riemann Hypothesis the available calculations don't always show where the zeros cross the line ( y = ½ ) in terms of where each prime is situated. The Riemann Hypothesis only conjectures the zeros are on the line ( y = ½ ) . The primes aren't evenly spaced so it is doubtful that one equation is going to provide a decent formula for the location of all the primes. My solution is strictly arithmetic so it isn't as elegant as a function, but it works with some tweaking which is exactly what Riemann conjectured when he said the zeros can be manipulated. I believe that I have proved that the Riemann zeros are all on the line whether it be ( y = ½ ) or some other line, because those zeros have to be used in a calculation while being on a line to prove that the location of the primes are on a straight line and not somewhere else in space.

The first five primes are:

1. 1 ( Yeah, I know it shouldn't be included )

2. 2

3. 3

4. 5

5. 7

The closest you can get these primes to their true position is multiplying them by ( .99 ) if we ignore multiplying them by 1 which will tend to distort their position after prime 3 .

1. 1 X .99 = .99

2. 2 X .99 = 1.98

3. 3 X .99 =2.97

4. 5 X .99 = 4.95

5. 7 X .99 = 6.93

The primes from 6 to 10 are:

6. 11

7. 13

8. 17

9. 19

10. 23

Up to this point we have the number 9, and the Riemann Hypothesis numbers zero ( 0 ) and ( ½ ) . Riemann said we can also manipulate the zeros ( 0 ) to bring the calculated location of the primes closer to their true location.

For example prime number 11's true location is 6. If we multiply ( 11 X Riemann's Number ( ½ ) including Riemann's ( 0 ) and some of the missed number ( 9 ) we get ( 11 X .5099999 = 5.609989 ). Riemann said that we can also manipulate the zeros ( 0 ) which means we can add zeros or put them somewhere else in the multiplier. ( 11 X .5909999 = 6.5009989 ) or (11 X .50990099 = 5.608910891). You will see from these calculations that the best multiplier is .5099999 since the multiplication ( answer ) is the closest to 6.

The above example is ridiculous because the prime number is so small, but the principle is the same. The calculation of a prime's true position is more complicated, but this is the basic idea.

In summary you need:

1. ½

2. 0

3. 9

I calculate that the best usable number for the location of a prime is ( .5099999 ). Riemann said that the proportion of primes is about ( 1 / ln (x) ) where ( ln(x) is the natural logarithm of x to base ( e ) or ( 2.718281828 ) . Using Riemann's formula the proportion of primes below prime number 11 is ( 1 / ln(11) or ( .417032391 ). The number of primes below ( 11 ) using this formula is ( 11 X .4107032391 = 4.587356306) or in round numbers ( 5 ). My calculation using ( .5099999 ) is ( 6 ) in round numbers which is the exact location of prime number ( 11 ). Riemann worked out that if the zeros really do lie on the critical line, then the primes stray from the ( 1/ln(x) ) distribution exactly as much as a bunch of coin tosses stray from the 50:50 distribution law. I have proved that the non-trivial zeros have to lie on the line, because my calculation for the location of the primes uses Riemann's non-trivial zeros that have to be on the line ( y = ½ ) or a line since you are calculating the location of the primes in a sequence ( or the number of preceding primes ).

The Clay Mathematics Institute is offering a $1,000,000 prize for the solution to the Riemann Hypothesis. So far no one has solved it. From my limited understanding of the Riemann Hypothesis the available calculations don't always show where the zeros cross the line ( y = ½ ) in terms of where each prime is situated. The Riemann Hypothesis only conjectures the zeros are on the line ( y = ½ ) . The primes aren't evenly spaced so it is doubtful that one equation is going to provide a decent formula for the location of all the primes. My solution is strictly arithmetic so it isn't as elegant as a function, but it works with some tweaking which is exactly what Riemann conjectured when he said the zeros can be manipulated. I believe that I have proved that the Riemann zeros are all on the line whether it be ( y = ½ ) or some other line, because those zeros have to be used in a calculation while being on a line to prove that the location of the primes are on a straight line and not somewhere else in space.

## Sunday, October 16, 2011

### The Position Of Primes Using The Riemann Hypothesis Numbers & The One That Was Missed

Like a lot of people, I've been fooling around trying to prove Riemann's Hypothesis without much success. Let's suppose for the sake of argument that all the zeros lie on the line ( y = ½ ) . If they do, the solution for the Riemann Hypothesis brings us no closer to showing what the deep connection is between the zeta function and the distribution of the primes. My reading of the literature on the Riemann Hypothesis indicates that the zeros lie on the line ( y = ½ ) and that if the zeroes are manipulated in some fashion you can calculate the location of the primes to a greater and greater accuracy. If you know the location of one prime you know how many primes precede it because you are counting ( 1, 2, 3, 4 etc. ). Riemann's genius or intuition was that the distribution of the primes involve the number zero ( 0 ) and ½. The line is important because if you count something, that something is being placed on a line. If the something is a prime it lies on a line. Riemann's Hypothesis says that all the zeros lie on a line so for the sake of argument you have primes on a line and zeros ( 0 ) on a line. Riemann said that if you manipulate the zeros ( 0 ), you can bring the prime sitting on the line closer and closer to its' true position. What the line ( y = ½ ) means is a mystery, although the number ( ½ ) may prove useful. The Riemann Hypothesis equation brings the zeros ( 0 ) to the line ( y = ½ ) depending on what you are using for ( t ) or the other variables. Let's suppose the primes lie on a straight line which also has zeros ( 0 ) on it.

The first five primes are:

1. 1 ( Yeah, I know it shouldn't be included )

2. 2

3. 3

4. 5

5. 7

The closest you can get these primes to their true position is multiplying them by ( .99 ) if we ignore multiplying them by 1 which will tend to distort their position after prime 3 .

1. 1 X .99 = .99

2. 2 X .99 = 1.98

3. 3 X .99 =2.97

4. 5 X .99 = 4.95

5. 7 X .99 = 6.93

The primes from 6 to 10 are:

6. 11

7. 13

8. 17

9. 19

10. 23

Up to this point we have the number 9, and the Riemann Hypothesis numbers zero ( 0 ) and ( ½ ) . Riemann said we can also manipulate the zeros ( 0 ) to bring the calculated location of the primes closer to their true location.

For example prime number 11's true location is 6. If we multiply ( 11 X Riemann's Number ( ½ ) including Riemann's ( 0 ) and some of the missed number ( 9 ) we get ( 11 X .5099999 = 5.609989 ). Riemann said that we can also manipulate the zeros ( 0 ) which means we can add zeros or put them somewhere else in the multiplier. ( 11 X .5909999 = 6.5009989 ) or (11 X .50990099 = 5.608910891).

The above example is ridiculous because the prime number is so small, but the principle is the same. The calculation of a prime's true position is more complicated, but this is the basic idea.

In summary you need:

1. ½

2. 0

3. 9

The Clay Mathematics Institute is offering a $1,000,000 prize for the solution to the Riemann Hypothesis. So far no one has solved it. From my limited understanding of the Riemann Hypothesis the available calculations don't always show where the zeros cross the line ( y = ½ ) in terms of where each prime is situated. The Riemann Hypothesis only proves the zeros either cross the line or are on the line ( y = ½ ). The primes aren't evenly spaced so it is doubtful that one equation is going to provide a decent formula for the location of all the primes. My solution is strictly arithmetic so it isn't as elegant as a function, but it works with some tweaking which is exactly what Riemann conjectured when he said the zeros can be manipulated. The most fascinating part is that the tweaking involves Pi and the natural number ( e ) but that is another story.

The first five primes are:

1. 1 ( Yeah, I know it shouldn't be included )

2. 2

3. 3

4. 5

5. 7

The closest you can get these primes to their true position is multiplying them by ( .99 ) if we ignore multiplying them by 1 which will tend to distort their position after prime 3 .

1. 1 X .99 = .99

2. 2 X .99 = 1.98

3. 3 X .99 =2.97

4. 5 X .99 = 4.95

5. 7 X .99 = 6.93

The primes from 6 to 10 are:

6. 11

7. 13

8. 17

9. 19

10. 23

Up to this point we have the number 9, and the Riemann Hypothesis numbers zero ( 0 ) and ( ½ ) . Riemann said we can also manipulate the zeros ( 0 ) to bring the calculated location of the primes closer to their true location.

For example prime number 11's true location is 6. If we multiply ( 11 X Riemann's Number ( ½ ) including Riemann's ( 0 ) and some of the missed number ( 9 ) we get ( 11 X .5099999 = 5.609989 ). Riemann said that we can also manipulate the zeros ( 0 ) which means we can add zeros or put them somewhere else in the multiplier. ( 11 X .5909999 = 6.5009989 ) or (11 X .50990099 = 5.608910891).

The above example is ridiculous because the prime number is so small, but the principle is the same. The calculation of a prime's true position is more complicated, but this is the basic idea.

In summary you need:

1. ½

2. 0

3. 9

The Clay Mathematics Institute is offering a $1,000,000 prize for the solution to the Riemann Hypothesis. So far no one has solved it. From my limited understanding of the Riemann Hypothesis the available calculations don't always show where the zeros cross the line ( y = ½ ) in terms of where each prime is situated. The Riemann Hypothesis only proves the zeros either cross the line or are on the line ( y = ½ ). The primes aren't evenly spaced so it is doubtful that one equation is going to provide a decent formula for the location of all the primes. My solution is strictly arithmetic so it isn't as elegant as a function, but it works with some tweaking which is exactly what Riemann conjectured when he said the zeros can be manipulated. The most fascinating part is that the tweaking involves Pi and the natural number ( e ) but that is another story.

## Saturday, October 08, 2011

### Riemann Hypothesis & Strings

Riemann's Hypothesis is that all the non-trivial zeros lie on the line ( y = ½ ) and these zeros have something to do with prime numbers. The calculations done up to the present time have shown that the zeros are on the line ( y = ½ ) and there are yet more calculations to go. Let us suppose that each of Riemann's zeros are part of separate strings of numbers and each time the Riemann equation crosses the line ( y = ½ ) it does so where a zero is located. To make it simple, suppose that the zeros are in the middle of the number and the number 1 is on both ends ( 101, 1001, 10001 etc. ). If we add up the digits in these numbers we find the total is always 2 ( 1 + 0 + 1 = 2 ), ( 1 + 0 + 0 + 1 = 2 ), ( 1 + 0 + 0 + 0 +1 = 2 ). To take it one step further we could say these numbers are on the line ( y = 2 ) since all the numbers total 2. Riemann's Hypothesis is that the non- trivial zeros lie on the line ( y = ½ ). If we flip our analogy, the numbers on the line ( y = ½ ) become ( 1 / 101, 1/1001, 1/ 10001, etc. ). Riemann's equation still crosses the line ( y = ½ ) where the zeros are located. Riemann's equation isn't exact in terms of the positions of the zeros. It has been calculated that the first position of the zeros is around 14 and the second calculated position around 21. Our analogy is exact because we can create these numbers to infinity and the principle is the same. Riemann said that the zeros have a real value of ½ or .5 . If we add ( ½ + 1/101 ) we obtain ( .50990099 ). Prime number ( 11 ) is the 6th prime ( 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 11 ). ( 11 X .50990099 = 5.6089108911 ) or 6 rounded to one digit. The zeros in these numbers are Riemann Zeros and the 9's are Riemann 9's and can be adjusted to get a more accurate estimate. As a matter of interest prime number 97 is the 26th prime. If you multiply ( 97 X ( .50990099 ) X ( .50990099 )) you get ( 25.22969903 )which is very close to 26. If you adjust the Riemann zeros to form the number ( .509999 ) and do the multiplication ( 97 x (.509999 X .509999) ) you get ( 25.22960106 ) which is further away from 26. You can see from these calculations that if the Riemann zeros are manipulated as Riemann has suggested to obtain the location of the prime ( or calculate the number of primes up to that point ) you can vary the distance to the true position of the prime. As a matter of interest Riemann's equation first cuts the line ( y = ½ ) at a position just over 14. The 14th prime is 41. ( 41 X ( ½ + 1/ 101) X ( ½ + 1 / 101 ) is ( 10.664099959 ) which is just off 14 by the value of Pi ( 3.141592554 ). The 21st prime is 71. It's position is calculated at 18 using the same method ( 71 X ( ½ + 1/ 101 ) X ( ½ + 1 / 101 )) which is very close to 21. The calculation of the prime numbers and their positions are a little bit more complicated than this illustration but this is the basics.

## Wednesday, October 05, 2011

### Riemann Hypothesis Solved Using A Quantum Mechanical System ( Revised )

Riemann's Hypothesis is that all the non-trivial zeros lie on the line ( y = ½ ) and these zeros have something to do with prime numbers. Since Riemann's Hypothesis includes the line ( y = ½ ), let's chose a quantum energy system in which the energy levels are 2. Riemann's equation also included complex numbers. In a quantum energy system Riemann's complex numbers could be represented by zero's ( 0 ) since ( 2 + 0 = 2 ). ( 1 + 1= 2 ) also equals 2. Riemann also went on to say that the prime number locations were influenced by the position of the zeros. To extend our ( 1 + 1 = 2 ) analogy, we now have ( 1 + 0 + 1 = 2 ). We can convert these additions to numbers ( 11, 101, etc. ). We can now say that we have a real axis ( y = 2 ) with infinite numbers with zeros between their ones ( 11, 101, 1001, 10001, etc. ) on an infinite real axis line ( y = 2 ). We can also say that each of the zero's in ( 101, 1001, 10001, etc. ) are on the line ( y = 2) since the numbers ( 101, 1001, 10001, etc. are also on this line. Riemann also said that the values of the zeros ( 0's ) on the line are equal to ( ½ ) which is also true when the line ( y = 2 ) is flipped. We could also extend this argument to one which says that the value of the ones ( 1's ) are also ( ½ ) since the reciprocal of one ( 1 ) is ( 1 ) and the fraction ( 1 / 1 ) when added ( 1 / 101 ) has the value ½ on the line ( y = ½ ) . These numbers would also be evenly spaced on the real axis line ( y = 2 ) since each infinite number would total energy level 2 which means the distance between the numbers would be ( 2 + 2 = 4 ) or a spacing of 4. Flipped the distance between the numbers would be one ( 1 ) since ( ½ + ½ = 1 ). Riemann's Hypothesis says that all his formula's non-trivial zero's are on the line ( y = ½ ) and this is what we've proved up to now since the non-trivial zeros are in the numbers ( 101, 1001, 10001, etc. ). If we flip our infinite real axis line ( y = 2 ), we create a real axis line ( y = ½ ) with flipped infinite real numbers ( 1/11, 1/ 101, 1/1001, etc. ) all the way to infinity. If we add ( ½ + 1/101 ) we obtain ( .50990099 ). Prime number ( 11 ) is the 6th prime ( 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 11 ). ( 11 X .50990099 = 5.6089108911 ) or 6 rounded to one digit. The zeros in these numbers are Riemann Zeros and the 9's are Riemann 9's and can be adjusted to get a more accurate estimate.. As a matter of interest prime number 97 is the 26th prime. If you multiply ( 97 X ( .50990099 ) X ( .50990099 )) you get ( 25.22969903 )which is very close to 26. If you adjust the Riemann zeros to form the number ( .509999 ) and do the multiplication ( 97 x (.509999 X .509999) you get ( 25.22960106 ) which is further away from 26. You can see from these calculations that if the Riemann zeros are manipulated as Riemann has suggested to obtain the location of the prime ( or calculate the number of primes up to that point ) you can vary the distance to the true position of the prime. The calculation of the prime numbers and their positions are a little bit more complicated than this illustration but this is the basics.

## Sunday, October 02, 2011

### Riemann Hypothesis Solved Using A Quantum Mechanical System

Riemann's Hypothesis is that all the non-trivial zeros lie on the line ( y = ½ ) and these zeros have something to do with prime numbers. Since Riemann's Hypothesis includes the line ( y = ½ ), let's chose a quantum energy system in which the energy levels are 2. Riemann's equation also included complex numbers. In a quantum energy system Riemann's complex numbers could be represented by zero's ( 0 ) since ( 2 + 0 = 2 ). ( 1 + 1= 2 ) also equals 2. Riemann also went on to say that the prime number locations were influenced by the position of the zeros. To extend our ( 1 + 1 = 2 ) analogy, we now have ( 1 + 0 + 1 = 2 ). We can convert these additions to numbers ( 11, 101, etc. ). We can now say that we have a real axis ( y = 2 ) with infinite numbers with zeros between their ones ( 11, 101, 1001, 10001, etc. ) on an infinite real axis line ( y = 2 ). These numbers would also be evenly spaced on the real axis line ( y = 2 ) since each infinite number would total energy level 2 which means the distance between the numbers would be ( 2 + 2 = 4 ) or a spacing of 4. Riemann's Hypothesis says that all his formula's non-trivial zero's are on the line ( y = ½ ). If we flip our infinite real axis line ( y = 2 ), we create a real axis line ( y = ½ ) with flipped infinite real numbers ( 1/11, 1/ 101, 1/1001, etc. ) all the way to infinity. If we add ( ½ + 1/11+ 1/ 101 + 1001 + etc. ) we eventually start to get numbers resembling ( .509999. .500999, etc. ) The zeros in these numbers are Riemann Zeros and the 9's are Riemann 9's. If you raise these numbers to the power of 2, you get somewhere over ¼ . As a matter of interest prime number 97 is the 26th prime. If you multiply ( 97 X ( .5099999 ) X ( .5099999 ) you get very close to 26. The calculation of the prime numbers are a little bit more complicated than this illustration but this is the basics.

## Tuesday, September 27, 2011

### The Complicated Fractal Nature Of Prime Numbers

Mandelbrot, the inventor of fractals, when he worked for IBM was presented with a problem involving interference in the transmission of information. Every so often parts of the transmitted information would seem to randomly drop off / scramble which, needless to say, caused problems with the transmitted informational message. The problem had to be fixed, but as the information drop off / scramble appeared to be random , everyone was flummoxed because of the lack of a recognizable pattern. Mandelbrot thought about it and started experimenting. One time he decided to take a straight line and divide it into 1/3rd . He discarded the middle 1/3rd and kept the other 2/3rd separated by a space ( ------ ------ ). He continued on and discovered that the pattern produced by this method matched the pattern of the informational message drop off / scramble. This discovery proved that the informational drop off / scramble wasn't random but followed a fractal pattern.

Prime Numbers also follow a fractal pattern. Prime Numbers are defined as numbers that can be only divided by themselves and one ( 1 ).

Prime Numbers follow a complicated fractal pattern. First of all, if you look at a list of prime numbers you will find that they always have the numbers 1, 3, 7, 9 in column zero or otherwise known as the far right column ( 11, 13, 17, 19 ). The second thing you will notice is that all numbers ending in ( 1, 3, 7, 9 ) aren't prime numbers ( 21, 33, 27, 39 ).

The second thing you will notice is that if the sum of the digits of any number ending ending in 1, 3, 7, 9 total a multiple of 3 ( divide by 1/3rd and discard the potential prime just like Mandelbrot discarded his string sections ), except for 3, ( for instance 6, 9, 12, etc. ) it isn't a prime number. If a number ending in 1, 3, 7, 9 in column zero ( far right column ) isn't a prime number it can usually be evenly divided by a number with 1, 3, 7, 9 in column zero ( far right column ).

Lastly, except for the one digit prime number 3 in the one digit prime number series ( 1, 2, 3, 5, 7 ) you will find if you continuously add the digits of a prime number ( for instance 97 = ( 9 + 7 = 16 ) ( 1 + 6 = 7 ) you will find the column zero or far right column one digit totals are ( 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 8 ). All the rest of the columns are zero ( 01, 02, 04, 05, 07, 08 ).

In summary:

1. Prime numbers, if they are prime numbers, have the numbers 1, 3, 7, 9 in column 0 ( farthest right column ).

2. If the sum of the digits of any number ending in 1, 3, 7, 9, total a multiple of 3, except for 3, ( for instance total 6, 9, 12, etc. ) it isn’t a prime number. If a number ending in 1, 3, 7, 9 in column zero (0), isn’t a prime number it can usually be evenly divided by a number with 1, 3, 7, 9 in column (0).

3. Except for the one digit prime number 3 in the one digit prime number series ( 1, 2, 3, 5, 7 ) if you add the digits of a prime number ( for instance 97 = ( 9 + 7 = 16 ) ( 1 + 6 = 7 ) the column zero or far right column one digit totals are ( 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 8 ).

Prime Numbers also follow a fractal pattern. Prime Numbers are defined as numbers that can be only divided by themselves and one ( 1 ).

Prime Numbers follow a complicated fractal pattern. First of all, if you look at a list of prime numbers you will find that they always have the numbers 1, 3, 7, 9 in column zero or otherwise known as the far right column ( 11, 13, 17, 19 ). The second thing you will notice is that all numbers ending in ( 1, 3, 7, 9 ) aren't prime numbers ( 21, 33, 27, 39 ).

The second thing you will notice is that if the sum of the digits of any number ending ending in 1, 3, 7, 9 total a multiple of 3 ( divide by 1/3rd and discard the potential prime just like Mandelbrot discarded his string sections ), except for 3, ( for instance 6, 9, 12, etc. ) it isn't a prime number. If a number ending in 1, 3, 7, 9 in column zero ( far right column ) isn't a prime number it can usually be evenly divided by a number with 1, 3, 7, 9 in column zero ( far right column ).

Lastly, except for the one digit prime number 3 in the one digit prime number series ( 1, 2, 3, 5, 7 ) you will find if you continuously add the digits of a prime number ( for instance 97 = ( 9 + 7 = 16 ) ( 1 + 6 = 7 ) you will find the column zero or far right column one digit totals are ( 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 8 ). All the rest of the columns are zero ( 01, 02, 04, 05, 07, 08 ).

In summary:

1. Prime numbers, if they are prime numbers, have the numbers 1, 3, 7, 9 in column 0 ( farthest right column ).

2. If the sum of the digits of any number ending in 1, 3, 7, 9, total a multiple of 3, except for 3, ( for instance total 6, 9, 12, etc. ) it isn’t a prime number. If a number ending in 1, 3, 7, 9 in column zero (0), isn’t a prime number it can usually be evenly divided by a number with 1, 3, 7, 9 in column (0).

3. Except for the one digit prime number 3 in the one digit prime number series ( 1, 2, 3, 5, 7 ) if you add the digits of a prime number ( for instance 97 = ( 9 + 7 = 16 ) ( 1 + 6 = 7 ) the column zero or far right column one digit totals are ( 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 8 ).

## Thursday, September 22, 2011

### One Small Step For The Riemann Hypothesis

The Riemann Hypothesis says that all the non-trivial zeros ( 0 ) are on the line ( y = ½ ) and that this hypothesis has something to do with prime numbers. Another way of expressing it, is by saying that the magnitude of the oscillations of primes around their expected position is controlled by the real parts of the zeros of the zeta function. In particular, the error term in the prime number theorem is closely related to the position of the zeros.

In summary:

1. We have a line ( y = ½ ) .

2. We have some zeros that are real and we can use them since they touch / cross the line ( y = ½ )

3. The error term in the prime number theorem is related to the position of the zeros.

The Prime Number Theorem is concerned with the number of primes preceding a number. Due to the nature of mathematics when you multiply, it is probably better to have the number as a prime number for considerations of accuracy. In other words, if you can calculate the location of a prime number in the prime number series you automatically know how many prime numbers precede it.

We have the line ( y = ½ ) . Therefore let the first digit of the multiplier be ½ or .5. We have some zeros that are real and we can use them since they touch / cross the line ( y = ½ ) . Therefore let the middle digits be zeros ( 0 ). We now have the number .50. To finish our multiplier add the digit 9 to the end forming the number ( .5099999999 ).

The first prime numbers from 1 to 12 in order are 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, 23, 29, 31. If we multiply these numbers by ( .509999999 ) our answer is very close to their actual position ( 23 X .509999999 = 11.72999999 ). The actual position of prime number 23 is 10. There are 9 prime numbers preceding 23 ( 1, 2, 3, 5,7,11,13, 17, 19 ).

The prime numbers from 13 to 26 in order are ( 37, 41, 43, 47, 53, 59, 61, 67, 71, 73, 79, 83, 89, 97 ). If you multiply these primes by ( .509999999 ) you will find that the prime number positions are hugely incorrect. You will see in the “ In summary “ list that I indicated under ( 3. ) that the error term in the prime number theorem is related to the position of the zeros. You can increase the number of zeros by either adding them between ½ and 9 (for instance .5000999999) or by raising ( .509999999 ) to the power of 2 ( .509999999 X.509999999 = ( .2600999 )). You will see from ( .2600999 ) that we have adjusted the error term in the prime number theorem by adjusting the zeros ( 0 ) from one to two. Multiply the prime numbers by ( .2600999 ) to obtain the prime number location.

If you do the multiplication, you will find that some of the prime number locations are still out. For instance, ( 37 X .2600999 = 9.623699981). The actual location is 13. For some inexplicable reason if you add Pi ( 3.141592654 ) to this number you get ( 12.76529263 ). This trick of either adding or subtracting Pi works in the majority of cases. In some cases adding or subtracting the natural number ( 2.718281828 ) also works.

Here’s how the system works for numbers in general.

1. Count the number of digits in a prime number. For instance 7919 has 4 digits. Subtract 1 from the number of digits ( 4 - 1 = 3 ) for 7919. Form another number equal to the number of digits in 7919 ( 4 ) by putting ( .5 ) in the far left column and 9 in the far right column. ( .5—9 ). Fill the middle with Riemann Hypothesis zeros ( 0 ) forming a four digit number ( .5009 ). Raise ( .5009 ) to the power of 3 ( which is the number of digits in 7919 ( 4 ) minus 1 ( 4 - 1 = 3 ). ( .5009 ) ^ 3 = .125676215. Multiply 7919 X .125676215 = 995.2299524. 7919 is the 1000th prime number. The calculation is short by approximately the value of Pi ( 3.141592654 ). Pi + 995.2299524 is 998.3715451 which is very close to 1000.

It can be seen from these calculations that the magnitude of the oscillations of the primes around their expected position is controlled by the zeros ( 0’s) in the multiplier. The error term is closely related to the position of the zeros in the number ( .509999999 ). The error term can be controlled by either adding zeros ( .500999999, .50009999 ) or by raising these numbers to a power ( multiply the numbers by themselves ) thereby increasing the zeros. A further adjustment can be made by adding or subtracting Pi ( 3.141592654 ) or the natural number “e” ( 2.718281828 ).thereby creating a range. The present method of proving the Riemann Hypothesis consists of calculating whether or not zeros cross or touch the line ( y = ½ ) . While I appreciate the effort, it seems to me that I have proved the Riemann Hypothesis because my zeros can be infinitely added between the digits ½ and 9 ( .5----9 ). It can be seen that the calculation of the position of a prime and the number of primes preceding that prime all depend on the Riemann Hypothesis' real zeros. Thus the Riemann Hypothesis has been proved by illustrating its’ real relationship to the position of the primes and the number of primes preceding it.

In summary:

1. We have a line ( y = ½ ) .

2. We have some zeros that are real and we can use them since they touch / cross the line ( y = ½ )

3. The error term in the prime number theorem is related to the position of the zeros.

The Prime Number Theorem is concerned with the number of primes preceding a number. Due to the nature of mathematics when you multiply, it is probably better to have the number as a prime number for considerations of accuracy. In other words, if you can calculate the location of a prime number in the prime number series you automatically know how many prime numbers precede it.

We have the line ( y = ½ ) . Therefore let the first digit of the multiplier be ½ or .5. We have some zeros that are real and we can use them since they touch / cross the line ( y = ½ ) . Therefore let the middle digits be zeros ( 0 ). We now have the number .50. To finish our multiplier add the digit 9 to the end forming the number ( .5099999999 ).

The first prime numbers from 1 to 12 in order are 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, 23, 29, 31. If we multiply these numbers by ( .509999999 ) our answer is very close to their actual position ( 23 X .509999999 = 11.72999999 ). The actual position of prime number 23 is 10. There are 9 prime numbers preceding 23 ( 1, 2, 3, 5,7,11,13, 17, 19 ).

The prime numbers from 13 to 26 in order are ( 37, 41, 43, 47, 53, 59, 61, 67, 71, 73, 79, 83, 89, 97 ). If you multiply these primes by ( .509999999 ) you will find that the prime number positions are hugely incorrect. You will see in the “ In summary “ list that I indicated under ( 3. ) that the error term in the prime number theorem is related to the position of the zeros. You can increase the number of zeros by either adding them between ½ and 9 (for instance .5000999999) or by raising ( .509999999 ) to the power of 2 ( .509999999 X.509999999 = ( .2600999 )). You will see from ( .2600999 ) that we have adjusted the error term in the prime number theorem by adjusting the zeros ( 0 ) from one to two. Multiply the prime numbers by ( .2600999 ) to obtain the prime number location.

If you do the multiplication, you will find that some of the prime number locations are still out. For instance, ( 37 X .2600999 = 9.623699981). The actual location is 13. For some inexplicable reason if you add Pi ( 3.141592654 ) to this number you get ( 12.76529263 ). This trick of either adding or subtracting Pi works in the majority of cases. In some cases adding or subtracting the natural number ( 2.718281828 ) also works.

Here’s how the system works for numbers in general.

1. Count the number of digits in a prime number. For instance 7919 has 4 digits. Subtract 1 from the number of digits ( 4 - 1 = 3 ) for 7919. Form another number equal to the number of digits in 7919 ( 4 ) by putting ( .5 ) in the far left column and 9 in the far right column. ( .5—9 ). Fill the middle with Riemann Hypothesis zeros ( 0 ) forming a four digit number ( .5009 ). Raise ( .5009 ) to the power of 3 ( which is the number of digits in 7919 ( 4 ) minus 1 ( 4 - 1 = 3 ). ( .5009 ) ^ 3 = .125676215. Multiply 7919 X .125676215 = 995.2299524. 7919 is the 1000th prime number. The calculation is short by approximately the value of Pi ( 3.141592654 ). Pi + 995.2299524 is 998.3715451 which is very close to 1000.

It can be seen from these calculations that the magnitude of the oscillations of the primes around their expected position is controlled by the zeros ( 0’s) in the multiplier. The error term is closely related to the position of the zeros in the number ( .509999999 ). The error term can be controlled by either adding zeros ( .500999999, .50009999 ) or by raising these numbers to a power ( multiply the numbers by themselves ) thereby increasing the zeros. A further adjustment can be made by adding or subtracting Pi ( 3.141592654 ) or the natural number “e” ( 2.718281828 ).thereby creating a range. The present method of proving the Riemann Hypothesis consists of calculating whether or not zeros cross or touch the line ( y = ½ ) . While I appreciate the effort, it seems to me that I have proved the Riemann Hypothesis because my zeros can be infinitely added between the digits ½ and 9 ( .5----9 ). It can be seen that the calculation of the position of a prime and the number of primes preceding that prime all depend on the Riemann Hypothesis' real zeros. Thus the Riemann Hypothesis has been proved by illustrating its’ real relationship to the position of the primes and the number of primes preceding it.

## Monday, September 19, 2011

### Theory Of Everything

Here's The Theory Of Everything in a nutshell without the mathematics. The classical world that you and I see every day consists of:

1. Time

2. Energy / Weight / Mass

3. Space

Einstein in his equation E = MC^2 said that energy and mass were equivalent. Weight is the pull of gravity on an object. That is why Newton's apple fell from the tree since the pull of the earth ( gravity ) is greater than the pull of the apple ( gravity ) on the earth. Mass is the same thing as weight without gravity pulling on you and I. As far as space is concerned, Einstein said that space doesn't exist unless something extends into it. If you look at something you are extending your sight ( observation ) into space. If you drive a car you are extending it into space ( distance ). If we didn't have space there wouldn't be velocity, acceleration or force ( Force = Mass X Acceleration ( into space) ). Time is a marker for something happening ( The apple fell from the tree at 2:00 a.m.. ). Time is also a measure of distance ( I traveled 30 kilometers / miles in 30 minutes ).

In the quantum world there is time but not space. Einstein spoke of spooky action at a distance which is true in the abstract but not existing physically. If space doesn't exist in the quantum world, you don't have any delays. The absence of space means you can have superposition because more than one thing can exist literally on / in the same spot. You can also have entanglement which means that if something happens in one location the something immediately happens / clones in the other location. This happens because the something doesn't have to travel through physical space. The speed of change is infinite ( timeless ), because the limitation on the speed of light only applies when it is moving through space and not time. Information also travels using the same principle. If we attempt to measure the quantum / spaceless world from our classical / space world, by using particles ( light / x-ray etc. ) we disturb the something we are measuring by adding quanta / energy ( particles ) to it. This energy addition changes the original quantum something so that we aren't measuring the original.

In summary quantum time world without classical space is:

1. Cloning

2. Superposition

3. Entanglement

In summary our classical world is:

1. Time

2. Space

3. Energy / Weight / Mass

1. Time

2. Energy / Weight / Mass

3. Space

Einstein in his equation E = MC^2 said that energy and mass were equivalent. Weight is the pull of gravity on an object. That is why Newton's apple fell from the tree since the pull of the earth ( gravity ) is greater than the pull of the apple ( gravity ) on the earth. Mass is the same thing as weight without gravity pulling on you and I. As far as space is concerned, Einstein said that space doesn't exist unless something extends into it. If you look at something you are extending your sight ( observation ) into space. If you drive a car you are extending it into space ( distance ). If we didn't have space there wouldn't be velocity, acceleration or force ( Force = Mass X Acceleration ( into space) ). Time is a marker for something happening ( The apple fell from the tree at 2:00 a.m.. ). Time is also a measure of distance ( I traveled 30 kilometers / miles in 30 minutes ).

In the quantum world there is time but not space. Einstein spoke of spooky action at a distance which is true in the abstract but not existing physically. If space doesn't exist in the quantum world, you don't have any delays. The absence of space means you can have superposition because more than one thing can exist literally on / in the same spot. You can also have entanglement which means that if something happens in one location the something immediately happens / clones in the other location. This happens because the something doesn't have to travel through physical space. The speed of change is infinite ( timeless ), because the limitation on the speed of light only applies when it is moving through space and not time. Information also travels using the same principle. If we attempt to measure the quantum / spaceless world from our classical / space world, by using particles ( light / x-ray etc. ) we disturb the something we are measuring by adding quanta / energy ( particles ) to it. This energy addition changes the original quantum something so that we aren't measuring the original.

In summary quantum time world without classical space is:

1. Cloning

2. Superposition

3. Entanglement

In summary our classical world is:

1. Time

2. Space

3. Energy / Weight / Mass

Labels:
Energy,
Energy / Time Theory,
Mass,
Weight

## Wednesday, July 06, 2011

### Quantum Gravity

One of the mysteries of life is gravity. Gravity is a peculiar form of energy but you can't do much with it because all it does is curve string space around a mass to create a force. Essentially, the denser the mass, the more the string space around the mass is curved and the stronger the force of gravity. The further you travel from the mass with its' gravity, the less the string space is curved and hence the weaker the force of gravity but it never goes away. Time in our reality is primarily used as a marker for the passing of, presence of, or future of, objects, particles, actions and events . Space in our universe is composed of flexible strings. Einstein says that space doesn't exist until something extends itself into it. That extension into space causes the string space to flex creating gravity. In the quantum world strings do not function as space. Strings function as quantum gravity which connects rolled up quantum Time that appears to us as various particles. This phenomena creates a graininess below the Planck length. Quantum gravity provides instantaneous entanglement and superposition. Entanglement means everything is instantaneous because there isn't any space which has to be traveled. Superposition means that more than one thing can be in the same location, because string space doesn't exist. This was the situation at the instance of the birth of our universe. Quantum Time connected by quantum gravity which we see as quantum particles. Once our universe started, quantum time converted into particles, objects, actions and events. Quantum gravity converted into string space, string forces and string energy. All of quantum time and quantum gravity wasn't converted, so we now see quantum gravity as nuclear force and quantum time as various nuclear particles.

## Wednesday, June 22, 2011

### The Helping Principle

One of the toughest principles is the helping principle. It could also be called the father's principle, the mother's principle, the ex-lover's principle, the friend's principle or any other principle with an appropriate adjective. Thinking about it, it seems to me it also could be called the God Principle. Whether we like it or not, each of us is programmed to help each other. Most of us are also Jack or Jill Average. This means that most of us will live in obscurity, be known only to our families and associates and when we die, unremembered except for our family on odd occasions. Thinking about it, the helping principle, to work effectively, requires you to have guts, fortitude, and the realization that there isn't any glory. The helping principle isn't about you. It also means that most of the time you will have to eventually let go, yet be available for any stumbles. One of the toughest components is the realization that you mustn't let them consciously realize that you are helping them. The helping principle demands that you, yourself, open up emotionally and empathetically. Another part, is that you can't screw up their life, for the self gratification of staying around. If you think that what I'm saying is all mostly airy – fairy just look at the social media. One of the social media's advantages is that you can make it private or eliminate friends. It is one thing in life to suspect that you don't quite measure up to someone's idea of perfection, but quite another to have to cope with the idea that someone's private doesn't include you and to rub it in you are no longer a friend or alas, moved further into the friendless column. One of the most debilitating aspects, is that you may be extremely sensitive to what is coming next, yet you have no chance of bailing. The easiest example, is the Christians that were thrown to the lions for their principles. I, like you, have principles, but if I were about to be thrown to the lions, I'd start to think that maybe I should have been slightly less principled. I'm a Christian. You may be of another faith, but the principle may be the same. One of the people in my faith is Jesus Christ. The older I get, the more I suspect he had more guts than most of us will ever have. I sense that God told him what was going to happen in excruciating detail and that furthermore, that he had no choice in the matter. I'm told that Jesus spent 40 days in the desert but the Bible doesn't say why. I sense that Jesus wanted to discuss what was coming and was it absolutely necessary that he had to do it. Perhaps, Jesus pointed out to God that he wasn't particularly qualified. I, sad to say, am following in Jesus' footsteps. I'm telling God that I'm too old for The Helping Principle and she's telling me, that I've got too much experience to retire. God is going to be the death of me, yet.

## Sunday, June 19, 2011

### Quantum Gravity

One of the mysteries of life is gravity. Gravity is a peculiar form of energy but you can't do much with it because it is a property of mass. Essentially, the bigger the mass, the more the space around the mass is curved and the stronger the gravity according to Einstein. The further you travel from the mass with its' gravity, the weaker the force of gravity but it never goes away. Time in our reality is primarily used as a marker for the passing of, presence of, or future of, objects, particles, actions and events . Space in our universe is also unique. Einstein says that space doesn't exist until something extends itself into it. In the quantum world space doesn't exist at all. This means that quantum time doesn't have any space yet we have entanglement and superposition. If space doesn't exist, yet we have entanglement and superposition, then we need a spaceless quantum force. The spaceless quantum force is quantum gravity because it's instantaneous and spaceless. This was the situation at the instance of the birth of our universe, but as soon as space was created, quantum gravity or at least the part we see, became a property of mass.

## Monday, June 13, 2011

### Quantum Time

The hardest thing to grasp about quantum time is that it hasn't any associated space. If quantum time doesn't have space, it means that anything existing in time, exists anywhere in all places and combinations at the same time. This phenomena is at the root of the multi-universe argument. This phenomena is also at the root of the concept of God in the christian religion. This concept is that God is everywhere at the same time and knows everything. I'm not familiar with all religions, but I suspect that most religions have the same expressed belief. Similarly, if you or I exist in quantum space, we exist everywhere and know everything at the same time. The knowing everything at the same time is due to quantum entanglement because knowledge hasn't any space to travel through from one point to another. Death doesn't exist in quantum time, because death requires space in which to operate and space doesn't exist in quantum time. That is why you and I would live forever. This concept is also the basis of heaven in the christian religion and probably in other religions too. Quantum Time also involves superposition, which is different things existing literally at the same location. The different things can be possibilities as well as things. This is possible because space doesn't exist in quantum time.

Quantum Time can be summarized as :

1. Space less.

2. Entanglement

3. Superposition

Quantum Time can be summarized as :

1. Space less.

2. Entanglement

3. Superposition

## Sunday, March 20, 2011

### The Quantum World In A Nutshell

In our everyday universe, we all have to travel through space to get from A to B. Our travel through space essentially involves our making a decision about:

1. Velocity

2. Acceleration

3. Trajectory ( direction ).

The quantum world doesn't require us to travel through space to get from A to B. To get around this problem, the quantum world uses a phenomena called entanglement. Entanglement is basically a reproductive mechanism which reproduces us / information from point A to point B's without travel through space being involved. Since travel through space isn't an option, entanglement reproduces us / information in all directions:

1. Past

2. Present

3. Future

In the quantum world, we can exist in all places at the same time, whereas in our everyday universe, we can only exist in all places at the same time through our imagination. This means that if we can exist in all places at the same time in a quantum world we can choose a preferred location from the locations generated by quantum entanglement, while our other selves choose their locations and proceed on their own paths and adventures.

Existing in all places at the same time, means that we are now subject to probability ( ½ ), possibility ( yes, no, maybe = 1/3rd ) and Likelihood ( 1/9 ( When does Time ( equal to 9 ) kick in ??? )).

Probability, possibility, and likelihood, in the quantum world relies on randomness for a decision. These random happenings in the quantum world appear in our familiar universe as bad or good luck. A probability, possibility and likelihood choice is also instigated as soon as we observe / try to measure the quantum world because we have to use energy in some form to do it.

In summary:

1. Entanglement

2. Probability, Possibility, Likelihood

3. Randomness / outside forces.

1. Velocity

2. Acceleration

3. Trajectory ( direction ).

The quantum world doesn't require us to travel through space to get from A to B. To get around this problem, the quantum world uses a phenomena called entanglement. Entanglement is basically a reproductive mechanism which reproduces us / information from point A to point B's without travel through space being involved. Since travel through space isn't an option, entanglement reproduces us / information in all directions:

1. Past

2. Present

3. Future

In the quantum world, we can exist in all places at the same time, whereas in our everyday universe, we can only exist in all places at the same time through our imagination. This means that if we can exist in all places at the same time in a quantum world we can choose a preferred location from the locations generated by quantum entanglement, while our other selves choose their locations and proceed on their own paths and adventures.

Existing in all places at the same time, means that we are now subject to probability ( ½ ), possibility ( yes, no, maybe = 1/3rd ) and Likelihood ( 1/9 ( When does Time ( equal to 9 ) kick in ??? )).

Probability, possibility, and likelihood, in the quantum world relies on randomness for a decision. These random happenings in the quantum world appear in our familiar universe as bad or good luck. A probability, possibility and likelihood choice is also instigated as soon as we observe / try to measure the quantum world because we have to use energy in some form to do it.

In summary:

1. Entanglement

2. Probability, Possibility, Likelihood

3. Randomness / outside forces.

## Wednesday, March 16, 2011

### Quantum Slits, Quantum Information & Schrodinger's Cat

Suppose we have a quantum photon whose electron volt value is 632 electron volts. The quantum photon can be represented by a ball of string. It's surrounding electromagnetic wave can be represented by curved strings. This ball of string ( photon ) with its' surrounding waves ( curved strings ) represent a quantum electron particle and its' waves create an electromagnetic field. The surrounding electromagnetic field has a value of 11 ( add the digits in 632 ( 6 + 3 + 2 = 11 ). The electromagnetic field ( value = 11 )will radiate out forever in a circle from the photon unless something interferes with its' path. If you put a single vertical slit in a barrier, you will find that the electromagnetic field ( value 11 ) shows the most light behind the slit and dimmer light to the side since the electromagnetic wave starts to radiate outward after it leaves the back of the slit.

If you add more slits beside the first one, you will see bright bars and dark bars where no light seems to hit at all. The electromagnetic wave ( value 11 ) went through all the slits and it started to radiate outward after it left the slits. Unfortunately, the radiating wave from each of the slits either interfered with other slits or reinforced other slits. Thus you either got light ( reinforcement ) or dark bands ( interference ).

The fun starts after you decide to measure the electromagnetic field behind some slits as the electromagnetic field comes through all the slits. The problem arises over how you intend to do it. In our universe we have to use energy in some form to measure something. This energy usually comes in the form of a particle ( electrons or photons ). If the electromagnetic field is strong enough the use of electrons or photons or anything else, usually doesn't prevent ( or significantly corrupt ) our measurement. If we try to measure something in the quantum world, our added measurement energy changes the electromagnetic field we are trying to measure. In this case, our measurement destroys the electromagnetic field coming through some slits and we get a series of one slit results ( shows the most light behind the non-interfered slit and dimmer light through the interfered with slit since the electromagnetic wave starts to radiate outward after it leaves the back of the non-interfered slit ).

Most things in our universe is either yes or no. One choice out of 2 possibilities ( either yes or no ). One choice out of two possibilities is ( ½ ) . There is a third choice, which I like to think of as an unknown result ( one choice out of 3 possibilities ( 1/3rd ). So poor old Schrodinger’s cat goes into the old box. After awhile, the old cat is either alive or dead or maybe somewhere in between or not there at all. Anyway there is a third unknown ( can't guess ) possibility. In our universe, we don't know until we look. If Schrodinger's cat has shrunk into a quantum state, we'll never know for sure, because we can't measure without destroying the state of the electromagnetic field containing the information surrounding the cat.

The most interesting part is that if there are many possibilities contained in the third possibility ( sort of all things to all people ) then we can extract different possibilities ( information ) from the same electromagnetic field. Of course, what is right and what is wrong, is the question. It is sort of like a crowd of people coming to different conclusions after seeing the same thing in our world .

If you add more slits beside the first one, you will see bright bars and dark bars where no light seems to hit at all. The electromagnetic wave ( value 11 ) went through all the slits and it started to radiate outward after it left the slits. Unfortunately, the radiating wave from each of the slits either interfered with other slits or reinforced other slits. Thus you either got light ( reinforcement ) or dark bands ( interference ).

The fun starts after you decide to measure the electromagnetic field behind some slits as the electromagnetic field comes through all the slits. The problem arises over how you intend to do it. In our universe we have to use energy in some form to measure something. This energy usually comes in the form of a particle ( electrons or photons ). If the electromagnetic field is strong enough the use of electrons or photons or anything else, usually doesn't prevent ( or significantly corrupt ) our measurement. If we try to measure something in the quantum world, our added measurement energy changes the electromagnetic field we are trying to measure. In this case, our measurement destroys the electromagnetic field coming through some slits and we get a series of one slit results ( shows the most light behind the non-interfered slit and dimmer light through the interfered with slit since the electromagnetic wave starts to radiate outward after it leaves the back of the non-interfered slit ).

Most things in our universe is either yes or no. One choice out of 2 possibilities ( either yes or no ). One choice out of two possibilities is ( ½ ) . There is a third choice, which I like to think of as an unknown result ( one choice out of 3 possibilities ( 1/3rd ). So poor old Schrodinger’s cat goes into the old box. After awhile, the old cat is either alive or dead or maybe somewhere in between or not there at all. Anyway there is a third unknown ( can't guess ) possibility. In our universe, we don't know until we look. If Schrodinger's cat has shrunk into a quantum state, we'll never know for sure, because we can't measure without destroying the state of the electromagnetic field containing the information surrounding the cat.

The most interesting part is that if there are many possibilities contained in the third possibility ( sort of all things to all people ) then we can extract different possibilities ( information ) from the same electromagnetic field. Of course, what is right and what is wrong, is the question. It is sort of like a crowd of people coming to different conclusions after seeing the same thing in our world .

## Monday, March 14, 2011

### Particles & Waves

Both the real and the quantum world consists of:

1. Particles

2. Waves

3. Time

In the quantum world a particle generates electromagnet waves and electron waves. In the real world a particle ( us ) generates charisma which is the equivalent to an electromagnet wave. Sometimes a particle ( us ) generates a confidence and belief aura which is equivalent to an electron wave. What we call it is dependent on our language and culture but it is basically the same thing in two universes. The quantum world hasn't any space and in our world Einstein says that something extends into space, but space doesn't exist on its' own even though you and I instinctively see space. There isn't any space in the quantum world, so Time operates like a possibility or probability. That means that Time automatically comes into existence and at that point something statistically happens. The general concept of Time in our universe is that Time marks events when it is used as a clock ( meet me at 1:00 pm. at Frank's ) or as a measure of distance. ( 50 minutes in the oven at 350 degrees ). Quantum Particles or Atoms are also associated with their own personal waves. These quantum particles or mass can be represented by a ball of string. Surround the ball of string with curved strings which represent the ball of string's wave. This ball of string with its' surrounding waves ( curved strings ) represent a quantum particle and its' waves creating an electromagnetic field. Let's assume for the sake of argument that the quantum particle mass is 23. Since it has surrounding curved strings representing an electromagnetic field ( because quantum particle masses are measured in electron volts ) we can let this electromagnetic field be represented by 5 ( add the digits in 23 ( 2 + 3 = 5 ). Since we now have a quantum particle mass of 23 electron volts with a surrounding personal electromagnetic field of 5 we can assume it will interact with other quantum particle masses and their personal electromagnetic fields forming new particles and fields. Suppose we have another quantum particle whose mass is ( 47 ). Its' electromagnet string wave is ( 11 ) ( 4 + 7 = 11 ) or 2 ( 1 + 1 = 2 ). The electromagnet wave fields of the 23 mass electron ( 5 ) and the 47 mass electron ( 2 ) become intertwined. The combined electromagnetic fields have a value of ( 5 + 2 ) = 7. If Space – less quantum Time doesn't switch on, we will continue to have two separate quantum particles whose value is 23 and 47 with separate intertwined electromagnetic fields of 5 and 11(or 2). If Space-less quantum Time, with a quantum value of (9) and a possibility / probability of ( 1/9 ), switches on the two electron volt masses will combine into one mass of 70 electron volts ( 23 + 47 = 70 ). The new electron volt mass of 70 will have an electromagnetic wave of 7 ( 7 + 0 = 7 ).

1. Particles

2. Waves

3. Time

In the quantum world a particle generates electromagnet waves and electron waves. In the real world a particle ( us ) generates charisma which is the equivalent to an electromagnet wave. Sometimes a particle ( us ) generates a confidence and belief aura which is equivalent to an electron wave. What we call it is dependent on our language and culture but it is basically the same thing in two universes. The quantum world hasn't any space and in our world Einstein says that something extends into space, but space doesn't exist on its' own even though you and I instinctively see space. There isn't any space in the quantum world, so Time operates like a possibility or probability. That means that Time automatically comes into existence and at that point something statistically happens. The general concept of Time in our universe is that Time marks events when it is used as a clock ( meet me at 1:00 pm. at Frank's ) or as a measure of distance. ( 50 minutes in the oven at 350 degrees ). Quantum Particles or Atoms are also associated with their own personal waves. These quantum particles or mass can be represented by a ball of string. Surround the ball of string with curved strings which represent the ball of string's wave. This ball of string with its' surrounding waves ( curved strings ) represent a quantum particle and its' waves creating an electromagnetic field. Let's assume for the sake of argument that the quantum particle mass is 23. Since it has surrounding curved strings representing an electromagnetic field ( because quantum particle masses are measured in electron volts ) we can let this electromagnetic field be represented by 5 ( add the digits in 23 ( 2 + 3 = 5 ). Since we now have a quantum particle mass of 23 electron volts with a surrounding personal electromagnetic field of 5 we can assume it will interact with other quantum particle masses and their personal electromagnetic fields forming new particles and fields. Suppose we have another quantum particle whose mass is ( 47 ). Its' electromagnet string wave is ( 11 ) ( 4 + 7 = 11 ) or 2 ( 1 + 1 = 2 ). The electromagnet wave fields of the 23 mass electron ( 5 ) and the 47 mass electron ( 2 ) become intertwined. The combined electromagnetic fields have a value of ( 5 + 2 ) = 7. If Space – less quantum Time doesn't switch on, we will continue to have two separate quantum particles whose value is 23 and 47 with separate intertwined electromagnetic fields of 5 and 11(or 2). If Space-less quantum Time, with a quantum value of (9) and a possibility / probability of ( 1/9 ), switches on the two electron volt masses will combine into one mass of 70 electron volts ( 23 + 47 = 70 ). The new electron volt mass of 70 will have an electromagnetic wave of 7 ( 7 + 0 = 7 ).

## Thursday, March 10, 2011

### Quantum Atom Theory

Quantum Atom Theory is associated with both Quantum Chaos and the Nature Of Reality. Each is organized and run by Time moving in a forward direction. A minor offshoot of these processes is entropy, a process which allows us to disassemble things / processes and rearrange them into new forms of usefulness like communication. The opposite of entropy is gravity which tends to hold things together. The general concept of Time in our universe is that Time marks events when it is used as a clock ( meet me at 1:00 pm. at Frank's ) or as a measure of distance. ( 50 minutes in the oven at 350 degrees ). Quantum Particles or Atoms are also associated with their own personal waves. These quantum particles or mass can be represented by a ball of string. Surround the ball of string with curved strings which represent the ball of string's wave. This ball of string with its' surrounding waves ( curved strings ) represent a quantum particle and its' waves creating an electromagnetic field. Let's assume for the sake of argument that the quantum particle mass is 23. Since it has surrounding curved strings representing an electromagnetic field ( because quantum particle masses are measured in electron volts ) we can let this electromagnetic field be represented by 5 ( add the digits in 23 ( 2 + 3 = 5 ). Since we now have a quantum particle mass of 23 electron volts with a surrounding personal electromagnetic field of 5 we can assume it will interact with other quantum particle masses and their personal electromagnetic fields forming new particles and fields. The problem is we don't know when ( Time ). This is the so called arrow of Time because Time is unidirectional in an outward ( forward ) direction. We can see the same phenomena in our real world. In the quantum world it is called Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle and in our real world fate or bad luck. In addition, everything in our universe is associated with Space ( particles, actions, events extended into space ) and Time ( when did it happen ??? ). Time itself is being extended outward in a unidirectional direction, but due to the electromagnetic nature of quantum particles, our space per time or Space / Time is being curved. It can be said that Time is a hidden variable of Quantum Mechanics. Each interaction creates an individual Space / Time or reference Frame relative to its' energy and mass. The greater the mass, the slower Time will run in that reference frame ( not speed ( distance / time ) because there is no space in the quantum world ). Going back to our example, the quantum particle mass is 23. Its' electromagnetic field is 5 ( 2 + 3 = 5 ). Subtract ( mass – string ( 23 – 5 = 18 ) to get the Space / Time Frame of 18. The Time string is rather unique. It doesn't have any space in the traditional sense, but the Time string is related to the number 9. The number 9 in the Time string can pop up at any time which means we neither know when it will happen nor the consequences ( Heisenberg again ). Mathematically ( Particle 23 – wave 5 = Space / Time Frame 18 ). ( Frame 18 / Time Value 9 = Space 2 ). The Space that must be covered in the Space / Time Frame is 2. So the dimensions of this Space / Time Frame is Constant Time Value ( 9 ) X Space ( 2 ) = Frame ( 18).

If we have a greater quantum mass particle ( 47 ), its' electromagnet string wave is ( 11 ) ( 4 + 7 = 11 ). Frame ( 47 – 11 = 36 ). The Space / Time Frame is 36 and the Space is ( 36 / 9 = 4 ) in the Space / Time Frame. Therefore it can be seen that the greater the mass ( 47 vs. 23 ), the slower Time ( not speed ( distance / time )) because there is no space in the quantum world. The slower part isn't speed ( distance / time ) but rather the length of Time the phenomena will take to appear in both the quantum and our real world before generating the division ( Frame / Time ) or in this case (36 / 9 = 4 ).

You can also look at it in terms of Space in our real world. If we have a greater quantum mass particle ( 47 ), its' electromagnet string wave is ( 11 ) ( 4 + 7 = 11 ). Frame is ( 47 – 11 = 36 ). The Space / Time Frame is 36 and the Space is ( 36 / 9 = 4 ) in the Space / Time Frame. Therefore it can be seen that the greater the mass ( 47 vs. 23 ), the slower Time ( not speed ( distance / time )) will appear to happen in terms of Space ( 2 vs. 4 ). The slower part isn't speed ( distance / time ) but rather the length of Time the phenomena will take to appear in both the quantum and our real world before generating the division ( Frame / Time ) or in this case (36 / 9 = 4 ).

This basic principle is why things that are better made last longer, because the thing's quantum world can hold together longer before Time generates the ( Frame / Time ) division creating a Space for things to happen.

This principle also generates uncertainty, probability, what will happen ( future ) in both our world and the quantum world because:

1. Don't know when ( Frame / Time = Space ) division will happen.

2. Probability – ½.

3. What will happen ( future particle / event / action ).

Here's another generator of uncertainty:

If we have a mass particle ( 47 ), it can have two electromagnetic waves of 11 and 2 ( 4 + 7 = 11 ), ( 1 + 1 = 2 ). Frame 1 is ( 47 – 11 = 36 ). Frame 2 is ( 47 – 2 = 45 ).The Space / Time Frame 1 is 36 and the Space is ( 36 / 9 = 4 ) in the Space / Time Frame 1 . The Space / Time Frame 2 is 45 and the Space is ( 45 / 9 = 5) in the Space / Time Frame 2 . Therefore we have two potential outcomes and the probability that either one will occur is 1 result out of two ( 2 ) choices or ½. Most decisions / processes / choices in our world are calculated on the probability of ½ or one (1 ) out of two ( 2 ) choices .

Lastly, future events in terms of what will happen in the quantum world ( Heisenberg ) and our real world ( bad luck / good luck ) is based on the interaction of electron volt quantum particles and their electromagnetic waves which can have different values and consequently different actions.

The funniest part is that in most religions we are taught to love ( help ) one another and to be generally good. The reason for it is the way God set up the universe's real and quantum worlds. The key to success and less aggravation is to prevent the electromagnetic fields of the quantum particles from being disturbed to our detriment. Yoga, anyone?????

Oh by the way, telling your ( hyperactive ) friend to “Chill” is based on Quantum Atom Theory and science in general, much to everyone's surprise, including my own!!!

If we have a greater quantum mass particle ( 47 ), its' electromagnet string wave is ( 11 ) ( 4 + 7 = 11 ). Frame ( 47 – 11 = 36 ). The Space / Time Frame is 36 and the Space is ( 36 / 9 = 4 ) in the Space / Time Frame. Therefore it can be seen that the greater the mass ( 47 vs. 23 ), the slower Time ( not speed ( distance / time )) because there is no space in the quantum world. The slower part isn't speed ( distance / time ) but rather the length of Time the phenomena will take to appear in both the quantum and our real world before generating the division ( Frame / Time ) or in this case (36 / 9 = 4 ).

You can also look at it in terms of Space in our real world. If we have a greater quantum mass particle ( 47 ), its' electromagnet string wave is ( 11 ) ( 4 + 7 = 11 ). Frame is ( 47 – 11 = 36 ). The Space / Time Frame is 36 and the Space is ( 36 / 9 = 4 ) in the Space / Time Frame. Therefore it can be seen that the greater the mass ( 47 vs. 23 ), the slower Time ( not speed ( distance / time )) will appear to happen in terms of Space ( 2 vs. 4 ). The slower part isn't speed ( distance / time ) but rather the length of Time the phenomena will take to appear in both the quantum and our real world before generating the division ( Frame / Time ) or in this case (36 / 9 = 4 ).

This basic principle is why things that are better made last longer, because the thing's quantum world can hold together longer before Time generates the ( Frame / Time ) division creating a Space for things to happen.

This principle also generates uncertainty, probability, what will happen ( future ) in both our world and the quantum world because:

1. Don't know when ( Frame / Time = Space ) division will happen.

2. Probability – ½.

3. What will happen ( future particle / event / action ).

Here's another generator of uncertainty:

If we have a mass particle ( 47 ), it can have two electromagnetic waves of 11 and 2 ( 4 + 7 = 11 ), ( 1 + 1 = 2 ). Frame 1 is ( 47 – 11 = 36 ). Frame 2 is ( 47 – 2 = 45 ).The Space / Time Frame 1 is 36 and the Space is ( 36 / 9 = 4 ) in the Space / Time Frame 1 . The Space / Time Frame 2 is 45 and the Space is ( 45 / 9 = 5) in the Space / Time Frame 2 . Therefore we have two potential outcomes and the probability that either one will occur is 1 result out of two ( 2 ) choices or ½. Most decisions / processes / choices in our world are calculated on the probability of ½ or one (1 ) out of two ( 2 ) choices .

Lastly, future events in terms of what will happen in the quantum world ( Heisenberg ) and our real world ( bad luck / good luck ) is based on the interaction of electron volt quantum particles and their electromagnetic waves which can have different values and consequently different actions.

The funniest part is that in most religions we are taught to love ( help ) one another and to be generally good. The reason for it is the way God set up the universe's real and quantum worlds. The key to success and less aggravation is to prevent the electromagnetic fields of the quantum particles from being disturbed to our detriment. Yoga, anyone?????

Oh by the way, telling your ( hyperactive ) friend to “Chill” is based on Quantum Atom Theory and science in general, much to everyone's surprise, including my own!!!

## Monday, March 07, 2011

### Strings Solve The Riemann Hypothesis

Let's look at the Riemann Hypothesis from the aspect of a string. Suppose we have 9 strings numbered from one to nine ( 1 – 9 ). The only rule for any number on any particular string is that the total of the digits total the value of that string. For instance, string 2, would have digits totaling 2 ( 2, 11, 101, 1001, etc. ) since the digits in all the numbers total 2 ( 1 + 0 + 1 = 2 ) etc.. The question remaining is what do we do about string zero ( 0 ). String zero ( 0 ) in strings has the same function as √ -1 in particle math using numbers, formulas, and symbols. This is so because string zero ( 0 ) cannot be realistically graphed so it means anything as a real string. If string ( 0 ) is imaginary it is on the imaginary plane at right angles to string 2 or any other string for that matter. Each string number ( 2, 11, 101, 101 ) has a tail ( 2 ) on string 2 because the digits total 2 ( 101 = ( 1 + 0 + 1 = 2 )). The next question is concerning the distance between each number that is on string 2. If we add the number 11 ( 2 ) and 101 ( 2 ) number we get 4 ( 2 + 2 = 4 ) so we have a distance of 4 between each number similar to the distance in Calculus. At each location of 4 units we have an imaginary String 0 running vertically from String 2. The Riemann Hypothesis says that all the non-trivial zeros ( 0 ) are on the line ( y = ½ ) running off a line represented by the equation 1/2 + it. Our non-trivial zeros ( 0 ) become real when they cross string 2 at the “4” locations. If we can add zero to the addition of the digits without changing the digit total our zeros ( 0 ) are real. The Riemann Hypothesis, on the other hand, using particle math of numbers, formulas and symbols has to prove the zeros ( 0 ) have to cross ( y = ½ ) . Riemann's formula also uses fractions and imaginary numbers which he adds. Strings can also use fractions and imaginary String 0 which is equivalent to Riemann's method.

String 2 Whole Numbers:

2

101

1001

10001

100001

etc.

String 2 Fractions:

½

( 1/101)

(1 / 1001)

( 1 / 10001)

( 1/ 100001)

etc.

Take the fractions ( 1 / 101 ) etc. and raise them by the power of 2, since the numbers are on string 2. Fraction ( 1 / 101 ) ^ 2 = .2583624924.

Sum the powers which peak around .2583635005.

Prime number ( 97 ) which is the last of the two digit primes is the 26th prime. If we multiply ( 97 X .2583635005 ) we get ( 25.0612595501).

The Riemann Hypothesis says that the location of the prime numbers is dependent on the position of the zeros in the calculation.

If we take the square root of ( 25.0612595501) we get ( .5082946985 ).

Experimentation will show that the square root containing the most accurate zero (s) for the calculation is ( .509999999 ).

Prime number ( 97 ) which is the last of the two digit primes is the 26th prime. If we take the new square root ( .509999999 ) and raise it to the power of 2 ( .509999999 ^2 ) we get ( .260099999). If we multiply ( 97 X .260099999 ) we get ( 25.229699995) which is closer to 26 than using ( .5082946985) in the calculation.

Prime number 29 is the 11th prime. If we multiply ( 29 X (( .50999999 )^1) we get ( 14.78999997 ) which is approximately off 11 by the value of Pi ( 3.141592654 ). Therefore subtract the value of Pi.

Prime number 43 is the 15th prime. If we multiply ( 43 X (( .50999999 )^1) we get ( 11.18429998 ) which is approximately off 15 by the value of Pi ( 3.141592654 ). Therefore add the value of Pi.

Prime number 149 is the 36th prime. If we multiply ( 149 X (( .50999999 )^2) we get ( 38.75489992) which is approximately off 36 by the value of e^1 ( 2.718281828 ). Therefore subtract ( 2.718281828 ).

In summary:

1. The Riemann Hypothesis says that the location of the prime numbers is dependent on the position of the zeros in the calculation. The basic number which involves zero(s) in the calculation is the number ( .50999999 ). The prime number 191 is the 44th prime number The basic number which involves zero(s) in the calculation for the position ( 44th ) of the prime number 191 is the number ( .50099999 ).

2. You may have to add or subtract Pi ( 3.141592654 ) from the calculated position to obtain the most accurate position.

3. You may have to add or subtract the natural number ( e ) or ( 2.718281828 ) from the calculated position to obtain the most accurate position.

String 2 Whole Numbers:

2

101

1001

10001

100001

etc.

String 2 Fractions:

½

( 1/101)

(1 / 1001)

( 1 / 10001)

( 1/ 100001)

etc.

Take the fractions ( 1 / 101 ) etc. and raise them by the power of 2, since the numbers are on string 2. Fraction ( 1 / 101 ) ^ 2 = .2583624924.

Sum the powers which peak around .2583635005.

Prime number ( 97 ) which is the last of the two digit primes is the 26th prime. If we multiply ( 97 X .2583635005 ) we get ( 25.0612595501).

The Riemann Hypothesis says that the location of the prime numbers is dependent on the position of the zeros in the calculation.

If we take the square root of ( 25.0612595501) we get ( .5082946985 ).

Experimentation will show that the square root containing the most accurate zero (s) for the calculation is ( .509999999 ).

Prime number ( 97 ) which is the last of the two digit primes is the 26th prime. If we take the new square root ( .509999999 ) and raise it to the power of 2 ( .509999999 ^2 ) we get ( .260099999). If we multiply ( 97 X .260099999 ) we get ( 25.229699995) which is closer to 26 than using ( .5082946985) in the calculation.

Prime number 29 is the 11th prime. If we multiply ( 29 X (( .50999999 )^1) we get ( 14.78999997 ) which is approximately off 11 by the value of Pi ( 3.141592654 ). Therefore subtract the value of Pi.

Prime number 43 is the 15th prime. If we multiply ( 43 X (( .50999999 )^1) we get ( 11.18429998 ) which is approximately off 15 by the value of Pi ( 3.141592654 ). Therefore add the value of Pi.

Prime number 149 is the 36th prime. If we multiply ( 149 X (( .50999999 )^2) we get ( 38.75489992) which is approximately off 36 by the value of e^1 ( 2.718281828 ). Therefore subtract ( 2.718281828 ).

In summary:

1. The Riemann Hypothesis says that the location of the prime numbers is dependent on the position of the zeros in the calculation. The basic number which involves zero(s) in the calculation is the number ( .50999999 ). The prime number 191 is the 44th prime number The basic number which involves zero(s) in the calculation for the position ( 44th ) of the prime number 191 is the number ( .50099999 ).

2. You may have to add or subtract Pi ( 3.141592654 ) from the calculated position to obtain the most accurate position.

3. You may have to add or subtract the natural number ( e ) or ( 2.718281828 ) from the calculated position to obtain the most accurate position.

## Friday, March 04, 2011

### Energy / Time Theory

Space / Time generally means that you can't travel through space without traveling through time. Space in our universe is length, width and height. Time in our universe is a marked by a measure of time ( clock ) or a distance in time. Einstein extended this idea when he brought observation into the picture explaining what happened when two observers saw the same phenomena when either at rest or moving in the same frame or different frames. Later on, Einstein brought in his famous equation ( E = mc^2 ) which said that Mass and Energy were the same thing in different forms.

So in summary we now have:

1. Space / Time.

2. Mass / Energy.

But there is something missing and that is Energy / Time. Time and Energy don't contain any space. This may seem very hard to believe because if you and I look out a window we can see time and energy existing in various forms in space. In our world everything has the illusion of being solid simply because our eyes don't have the ability to see into the quantum world without assistance. Even if we could see into the quantum world, the information that we would gain would be very limited because our eyes run on photons for information and photons are so large that they can't always bounce off of what they hit and return to our eye. Sometimes the photons smother the quantum object which we want to see and therefore can't bounce back to our eye with information. It seems to me that in a quantum world all we have are strings which appear to us as Time and Energy. Strings do not contain space in the sense that strings have to travel through it in order to go from A to B. Rolled up Energy strings are a mass in our world and electron volts in a quantum world which we call atoms or particles because there isn't any space in a quantum world. Since the rolled up strings are flexed in a ball you get gravity without movement or inertia with movement. Also, the rolled up energy string ball we call Mass flexes the surrounding strings that aren't part of the ball thus creating gravity that distorts the path of passing photons causing things to appear to be elsewhere. Time is a unidirectional outward going string that doesn't react with the seen universe. Energy is also a string which when moving outward provides force, velocity and acceleration and when acting inward provides the strong and weak nuclear force depending on its' location. If the energy string flexes rapidly you get frequency or different property characteristics if associated with a mass ( energy string ball ). If you attempt to get information from the quantum world you are adding energy strings to it which affects what you are trying to measure or alternately changes its' characteristics ( properties ) so it now appears to be either a wave ( string ) or particle ( a ball of energy string we call a mass ). Since quantum space doesn't exist, how does Energy /Time work together ???? You can think of Energy, and Time as being parallel strings when they are quiescent in a quantum world. If you could see into a quantum world you would notice that the quantum world had areas of cloudiness which we call nuclear particles and atoms ( rolled up energy strings ). These nuclear particles and atoms are rolled up energy strings joined together by energy strings which we call the strong and weak nuclear force. There is no quantum space in the quantum world so everything is instantaneous because of the Time string which hasn't space. In addition because there isn't any space we measure energy in electron volts. An electron is a rolled up energy string with an electron charge on it. The Time string is rather unique. It doesn't have any space in the traditional sense, but the Time string is related to the number 9. The number 9 in the Time string can pop up at any time and so we can relate it to an infinite number of space measurements in our world.

Here's an example:

The common battery which you can readily buy at a store is 1.5 volts or 1.5 electron volts. If you put the 1.5 volt battery in something you will find that over time ( Time string ) it will cease to operate. If you measure the remaining voltage in the battery you will find it is approximately 1.34 volts. If you add the digits in 1.34 volts it will total ( 1 + 3 + 4 = 8 ). Adjust the number 8 so it can be subtracted from 1.34 volts ( 1.34 – 0.08 = 1.26 ). The value of the Time / Energy Frame is 1.26. Divide the Time / Energy Frame ( 1.26 ) by 9 which is the value of the Time String when it appeared ( how long did the battery last ??? ) ( 1.26 / 9 = 0.14 ). If you add ( 1.34 + 0.14 = 1.48 ) which is approximately 1.5.

You can see what happened, but it is an illusion because it actually happened in the quantum world where there isn't any ( quantum ) space. The most interesting thing of all is that probability is birthed in the quantum world when the Time String pops a nine and energy is released into the quantum world. This energy is seen by us as energy, action and events. There are many Time strings in the quantum world busy popping 9's at any time from our space / time perspective. Since the result of all this popping has to go somewhere in a quantum spaceless world we see the results as dark matter, dark mass and dark energy because we can't use our Space / Time to react with it. It is also interesting that our whole universe was created when one of the Time strings in the quantum world popped and didn't do what it was supposed to do.

So, in summary:

1. Space / Time.

2. Energy / Time.

3. Mass / Energy.

So in summary we now have:

1. Space / Time.

2. Mass / Energy.

But there is something missing and that is Energy / Time. Time and Energy don't contain any space. This may seem very hard to believe because if you and I look out a window we can see time and energy existing in various forms in space. In our world everything has the illusion of being solid simply because our eyes don't have the ability to see into the quantum world without assistance. Even if we could see into the quantum world, the information that we would gain would be very limited because our eyes run on photons for information and photons are so large that they can't always bounce off of what they hit and return to our eye. Sometimes the photons smother the quantum object which we want to see and therefore can't bounce back to our eye with information. It seems to me that in a quantum world all we have are strings which appear to us as Time and Energy. Strings do not contain space in the sense that strings have to travel through it in order to go from A to B. Rolled up Energy strings are a mass in our world and electron volts in a quantum world which we call atoms or particles because there isn't any space in a quantum world. Since the rolled up strings are flexed in a ball you get gravity without movement or inertia with movement. Also, the rolled up energy string ball we call Mass flexes the surrounding strings that aren't part of the ball thus creating gravity that distorts the path of passing photons causing things to appear to be elsewhere. Time is a unidirectional outward going string that doesn't react with the seen universe. Energy is also a string which when moving outward provides force, velocity and acceleration and when acting inward provides the strong and weak nuclear force depending on its' location. If the energy string flexes rapidly you get frequency or different property characteristics if associated with a mass ( energy string ball ). If you attempt to get information from the quantum world you are adding energy strings to it which affects what you are trying to measure or alternately changes its' characteristics ( properties ) so it now appears to be either a wave ( string ) or particle ( a ball of energy string we call a mass ). Since quantum space doesn't exist, how does Energy /Time work together ???? You can think of Energy, and Time as being parallel strings when they are quiescent in a quantum world. If you could see into a quantum world you would notice that the quantum world had areas of cloudiness which we call nuclear particles and atoms ( rolled up energy strings ). These nuclear particles and atoms are rolled up energy strings joined together by energy strings which we call the strong and weak nuclear force. There is no quantum space in the quantum world so everything is instantaneous because of the Time string which hasn't space. In addition because there isn't any space we measure energy in electron volts. An electron is a rolled up energy string with an electron charge on it. The Time string is rather unique. It doesn't have any space in the traditional sense, but the Time string is related to the number 9. The number 9 in the Time string can pop up at any time and so we can relate it to an infinite number of space measurements in our world.

Here's an example:

The common battery which you can readily buy at a store is 1.5 volts or 1.5 electron volts. If you put the 1.5 volt battery in something you will find that over time ( Time string ) it will cease to operate. If you measure the remaining voltage in the battery you will find it is approximately 1.34 volts. If you add the digits in 1.34 volts it will total ( 1 + 3 + 4 = 8 ). Adjust the number 8 so it can be subtracted from 1.34 volts ( 1.34 – 0.08 = 1.26 ). The value of the Time / Energy Frame is 1.26. Divide the Time / Energy Frame ( 1.26 ) by 9 which is the value of the Time String when it appeared ( how long did the battery last ??? ) ( 1.26 / 9 = 0.14 ). If you add ( 1.34 + 0.14 = 1.48 ) which is approximately 1.5.

You can see what happened, but it is an illusion because it actually happened in the quantum world where there isn't any ( quantum ) space. The most interesting thing of all is that probability is birthed in the quantum world when the Time String pops a nine and energy is released into the quantum world. This energy is seen by us as energy, action and events. There are many Time strings in the quantum world busy popping 9's at any time from our space / time perspective. Since the result of all this popping has to go somewhere in a quantum spaceless world we see the results as dark matter, dark mass and dark energy because we can't use our Space / Time to react with it. It is also interesting that our whole universe was created when one of the Time strings in the quantum world popped and didn't do what it was supposed to do.

So, in summary:

1. Space / Time.

2. Energy / Time.

3. Mass / Energy.

## Tuesday, March 01, 2011

### Theory Of Everything

The Theory Of Everything presupposes that there is one standard equation which when the right numbers are inserted, you have a mathematical explanation for everything. I think the one standard mathematical equation for the explanation for everything is the mathematical representation of a string. I'm not bright enough to write that equation, but I can tell you how the common string represents / can explain everything in our 4 dimensional universe as well as our quantum universe.

The basic construction of the universe in terms of a string is:

1. Energy

2. Mass

3. Time

If you hold out a piece of string in front of you, you will see that the string occupies space, but the string itself has no space because you can't stretch it. Einstein said that things occupy space, but space doesn't exist on its' own as a separate entity. If you try to stretch the string, you are applying an outward motion or force. Eventually, if you are strong enough, it will suddenly break and at the instance of the breakage, you will experience acceleration of the string. The string won't accelerate forever, but it will reach a constant speed which we call velocity ( distance / time ). Conversely, if you take a string and push it inward, you will see that you can't break it. This happens because the string on a quantum level is being held together by a strong nuclear force. Lastly if the string can be combined chemically to make something, then the new combination of whatever you are making is held together by the weak nuclear force on a quantum level. All this is energy in some form or another.

Mass is demonstrated by creating a ball of string. Each string in the ball of string is curved in some degree and not all of the strings are equally curved. A curved or flexed string represents gravity. This is why gravity is notoriously weaker than any other energy force associated with a ball of string. Also, since the curve in all the strings in the ball of string aren't exact you get a different gravity pull just like it happens on earth. Lastly, if you lay out a series of strings in any direction around the ball you will find that the strings surrounding the ball are generally curved representing the pull of gravity for anything traveling close to the ball of curved strings. Finally, if you could make the ball of curved string vibrate you could read its' characteristics. If you could make a string extended into space vibrate in a pattern you could transmit information at a designated frequency. This is the basis of electronics which uses a charged particle ( electron ) to vibrate its' string in a pattern which we call communication.

Time seems to me to be dark matter. It moves outward in one direction. We can't interact with it in terms of changing its' direction or stopping it. We also can't travel backward or forward along a string of time. You can think of Energy, and Time as being parallel strings when they are quiescent in a quantum world. If you could see into a quantum world you would notice that the quantum world had areas of cloudiness which we call nuclear particles and atoms. These nuclear particles and atoms are rolled up mass strings joined together by energy strings which we call the strong and weak nuclear force. There is no quantum space in the quantum world so everything is instantaneous because of the Time string which hasn't space. In addition because there isn't any space we measure energy in electron volts. An electron is a rolled up mass string with an electron charge on it. The Time string is rather unique. It doesn't have any space in the traditional sense, but the Time string is related to the number 9. The number 9 in the Time string can pop up at any time and so we can relate it to an infinite number of space measurements in our world.

Here's an example:

The common battery which you can readily buy at a store is 1.5 volts or 1.5 electron volts. If you put the 1.5 volt battery in something you will find that over time ( Time string ) it will cease to operate. If you measure the remaining voltage in the battery you will find it is approximately 1.34 volts. If you add the digits in 1.34 volts it will total ( 1 + 3 + 4 = 8 ). Adjust the number 8 so it can be subtracted from 1.34 volts ( 1.34 – 0.08 = 1.26 ). The value of the Time / Energy Frame is 1.26. Divide the Time / Energy Frame ( 1.26 ) by 9 which is the value of the Time String when it appeared ( how long did the battery last ??? ) ( 1.26 / 9 = 0.14 ). If you add ( 1.34 + 0.14 = 1.48 ) which is approximately 1.5.

You can see what happened, but it is an illusion because it actually happened in the quantum world where there isn't any ( quantum ) space. The most interesting thing of all is that probability is birthed in the quantum world when the Time String pops a nine and energy is released into the quantum world. This energy is seen by us as space, energy, action and events. There are many Time strings in the quantum world busy popping 9's at any time from our space / time perspective. Since the result of all this popping has to go somewhere in a quantum spaceless world we see the results as dark matter, dark mass and dark energy because we can't use our Space / Time to react with it. It is also interesting that our whole universe was created when one of the Time strings in the quantum world popped and didn't do what it was supposed to do.

So, in summary:

1. Space / Time.

2. Energy / Time.

3. Mass / Energy.

It's interesting that Einstein proved that Mass / Energy were the same thing and that Space / Time are related. Since Time has the common value of 9 in the quantum world it seems that Space / Time and Energy / Time are the same thing since both can be divided by Time which has the same value ( 9 ).

So, once again:

1. Space

2. Energy

3. Mass

are three peas in the same pod called Time whose value is 9.

The basic construction of the universe in terms of a string is:

1. Energy

2. Mass

3. Time

If you hold out a piece of string in front of you, you will see that the string occupies space, but the string itself has no space because you can't stretch it. Einstein said that things occupy space, but space doesn't exist on its' own as a separate entity. If you try to stretch the string, you are applying an outward motion or force. Eventually, if you are strong enough, it will suddenly break and at the instance of the breakage, you will experience acceleration of the string. The string won't accelerate forever, but it will reach a constant speed which we call velocity ( distance / time ). Conversely, if you take a string and push it inward, you will see that you can't break it. This happens because the string on a quantum level is being held together by a strong nuclear force. Lastly if the string can be combined chemically to make something, then the new combination of whatever you are making is held together by the weak nuclear force on a quantum level. All this is energy in some form or another.

Mass is demonstrated by creating a ball of string. Each string in the ball of string is curved in some degree and not all of the strings are equally curved. A curved or flexed string represents gravity. This is why gravity is notoriously weaker than any other energy force associated with a ball of string. Also, since the curve in all the strings in the ball of string aren't exact you get a different gravity pull just like it happens on earth. Lastly, if you lay out a series of strings in any direction around the ball you will find that the strings surrounding the ball are generally curved representing the pull of gravity for anything traveling close to the ball of curved strings. Finally, if you could make the ball of curved string vibrate you could read its' characteristics. If you could make a string extended into space vibrate in a pattern you could transmit information at a designated frequency. This is the basis of electronics which uses a charged particle ( electron ) to vibrate its' string in a pattern which we call communication.

Time seems to me to be dark matter. It moves outward in one direction. We can't interact with it in terms of changing its' direction or stopping it. We also can't travel backward or forward along a string of time. You can think of Energy, and Time as being parallel strings when they are quiescent in a quantum world. If you could see into a quantum world you would notice that the quantum world had areas of cloudiness which we call nuclear particles and atoms. These nuclear particles and atoms are rolled up mass strings joined together by energy strings which we call the strong and weak nuclear force. There is no quantum space in the quantum world so everything is instantaneous because of the Time string which hasn't space. In addition because there isn't any space we measure energy in electron volts. An electron is a rolled up mass string with an electron charge on it. The Time string is rather unique. It doesn't have any space in the traditional sense, but the Time string is related to the number 9. The number 9 in the Time string can pop up at any time and so we can relate it to an infinite number of space measurements in our world.

Here's an example:

The common battery which you can readily buy at a store is 1.5 volts or 1.5 electron volts. If you put the 1.5 volt battery in something you will find that over time ( Time string ) it will cease to operate. If you measure the remaining voltage in the battery you will find it is approximately 1.34 volts. If you add the digits in 1.34 volts it will total ( 1 + 3 + 4 = 8 ). Adjust the number 8 so it can be subtracted from 1.34 volts ( 1.34 – 0.08 = 1.26 ). The value of the Time / Energy Frame is 1.26. Divide the Time / Energy Frame ( 1.26 ) by 9 which is the value of the Time String when it appeared ( how long did the battery last ??? ) ( 1.26 / 9 = 0.14 ). If you add ( 1.34 + 0.14 = 1.48 ) which is approximately 1.5.

You can see what happened, but it is an illusion because it actually happened in the quantum world where there isn't any ( quantum ) space. The most interesting thing of all is that probability is birthed in the quantum world when the Time String pops a nine and energy is released into the quantum world. This energy is seen by us as space, energy, action and events. There are many Time strings in the quantum world busy popping 9's at any time from our space / time perspective. Since the result of all this popping has to go somewhere in a quantum spaceless world we see the results as dark matter, dark mass and dark energy because we can't use our Space / Time to react with it. It is also interesting that our whole universe was created when one of the Time strings in the quantum world popped and didn't do what it was supposed to do.

So, in summary:

1. Space / Time.

2. Energy / Time.

3. Mass / Energy.

It's interesting that Einstein proved that Mass / Energy were the same thing and that Space / Time are related. Since Time has the common value of 9 in the quantum world it seems that Space / Time and Energy / Time are the same thing since both can be divided by Time which has the same value ( 9 ).

So, once again:

1. Space

2. Energy

3. Mass

are three peas in the same pod called Time whose value is 9.

Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)