Showing posts with label Fractals. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Fractals. Show all posts

Sunday, March 25, 2012

Numbers Into Attractors & Fractals

In the beginning mathematics was based on numbers which we all use every day to add, subtract, multiply and divide. Next we developed symbols such as ( x, y, z ) to put into formulas to solve for numbers. Later on we developed trigonometry which is essentially the study of ratios involving geometry and then came calculus which was the study of what happens when you continually shrink / change distances until you get something very small. Somewhere along the line, people started to put ideas into mathematical form and solved for an outcome which was later proved / disproved in experiments. Einstein's Theory of Relativity is an example of that phenomena. Mandelbrot discovered fractals using equations which resulted into some very beautiful designs. The discovery of fractals also revealed something called an attractor which was a number, around which these beautiful fractal designs seem to evolve. If you live long enough, most of us will realize at some point or another that most of the time there is stability in our lives, then sometimes instability and finally outright chaos. Fortunately, cycling also exists, so with a little luck we all survive without too much damage. When you think about it, there is a possibility that all seemingly chaotic systems retain some shreds of order. Usually statistics is used to find these correlations of order which drives most people batty. Maybe there is a simpler way. If you take the numbers from 1 to infinity and add their digits, you will find that the one digit totals will be one of ( 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6,7, 8, 9 ) in sequence. These one digit numbers are the fractal attractors of our numbering system.

For instance, the number ( 97 ) has the digits ( 9 and 7 ). Add the digits ( 9 + 7 = 16 ). Keep adding until you have a one digit total ( 1 + 6 = 7 ). Number ( 97 ) has the number ( 7 ) as its' attractor.

If you graph the one digit attractors of all the numbers from one to infinity you will have a series of even right angle triangles ( _!, _!, _! , etc. ) that look like waves or the teeth of a hand saw which in essence form a fractal.

If you subtract the one digit total attractor ( 7 ) from the number ( 97 ), ( 97 – 7 = 90 ) and graph the results for all the numbers you will get a series of elongated climbing steps which is really a series of butted rectangles forming a fractal in the shape of an elongated staircase.

If you divide ( 90 ) by 9 ( 90 / 9 = 10 ) and do the same to all the other numbers and then graph you will also get a series of elongated climbing steps which is, once again, a series of butted rectangles forming an elongated staircase.
The single digit numbers are the attractors of our numbering system. The single digit numbers repeat themselves in an ordered pattern, from 1 to 9 and then repeat 1 to 9 again and again. You will see from the graph that the 1 digit numbers form a series of uniform right angled waves ( _!, _!, _!, etc. ) which is an infinite saw toothed fractal.

This is the model for the quantization of any number or set / system of numbers whether sequential, harmonic, energy related, chaotic, decimal, fractional or otherwise into attractors and fractals. The only limitation is your imagination. You then graph the attractors or rectangles which form into waves, steps, mountains or, in general, fractals.

Tuesday, September 27, 2011

The Complicated Fractal Nature Of Prime Numbers

Mandelbrot, the inventor of fractals, when he worked for IBM was presented with a problem involving interference in the transmission of information. Every so often parts of the transmitted information would seem to randomly drop off / scramble which, needless to say, caused problems with the transmitted informational message. The problem had to be fixed, but as the information drop off / scramble appeared to be random , everyone was flummoxed because of the lack of a recognizable pattern. Mandelbrot thought about it and started experimenting. One time he decided to take a straight line and divide it into 1/3rd . He discarded the middle 1/3rd and kept the other 2/3rd separated by a space ( ------ ------ ). He continued on and discovered that the pattern produced by this method matched the pattern of the informational message drop off / scramble. This discovery proved that the informational drop off / scramble wasn't random but followed a fractal pattern.

Prime Numbers also follow a fractal pattern. Prime Numbers are defined as numbers that can be only divided by themselves and one ( 1 ).

Prime Numbers follow a complicated fractal pattern. First of all, if you look at a list of prime numbers you will find that they always have the numbers 1, 3, 7, 9 in column zero or otherwise known as the far right column ( 11, 13, 17, 19 ). The second thing you will notice is that all numbers ending in ( 1, 3, 7, 9 ) aren't prime numbers ( 21, 33, 27, 39 ).

The second thing you will notice is that if the sum of the digits of any number ending ending in 1, 3, 7, 9 total a multiple of 3 ( divide by 1/3rd and discard the potential prime just like Mandelbrot discarded his string sections ), except for 3, ( for instance 6, 9, 12, etc. ) it isn't a prime number. If a number ending in 1, 3, 7, 9 in column zero ( far right column ) isn't a prime number it can usually be evenly divided by a number with 1, 3, 7, 9 in column zero ( far right column ).

Lastly, except for the one digit prime number 3 in the one digit prime number series ( 1, 2, 3, 5, 7 ) you will find if you continuously add the digits of a prime number ( for instance 97 = ( 9 + 7 = 16 ) ( 1 + 6 = 7 ) you will find the column zero or far right column one digit totals are ( 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 8 ). All the rest of the columns are zero ( 01, 02, 04, 05, 07, 08 ).

In summary:

1. Prime numbers, if they are prime numbers, have the numbers 1, 3, 7, 9 in column 0 ( farthest right column ).

2. If the sum of the digits of any number ending in 1, 3, 7, 9, total a multiple of 3, except for 3, ( for instance total 6, 9, 12, etc. ) it isn’t a prime number. If a number ending in 1, 3, 7, 9 in column zero (0), isn’t a prime number it can usually be evenly divided by a number with 1, 3, 7, 9 in column (0).

3. Except for the one digit prime number 3 in the one digit prime number series ( 1, 2, 3, 5, 7 ) if you add the digits of a prime number ( for instance 97 = ( 9 + 7 = 16 ) ( 1 + 6 = 7 ) the column zero or far right column one digit totals are ( 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 8 ).