Riemann Hypothesis Resolved Using Prime Numbers

The Riemann Hypothesis says that all the non-trivial zeros ( 0 ) are on the line ( y = ½ ) and that this hypothesis has something to do with prime numbers. Another way of expressing it, is by saying that the magnitude of the oscillations of primes around their expected position is controlled by the real parts of the zeros of the zeta function. In particular, the error term in the prime number theorem is closely related to the position of the zeros. It is known that there are infinitely many zeros on the line 1/2 + it as t ranges over the real numbers. A prime number is any number that is evenly divided by itself and 1. Therefore, a prime number is a specialized real number which exists on the x axis. It is also known that any prime number can create a real number that isn’t a prime. A real number is a number that is sequentially placed on the x - axis and therefore has a specific location that can be calculated through subtraction. A prime number, however, cannot be specifically located on the x - axis because the distance between the prime numbers aren’t consistent. Riemann extended his equation into complex numbers which oscillate on a vertical plane at right angles to the x - axis or in other words across the line ( y = ½ ). The non-trivial zeros do not become real until the oscillating complex zero crosses ( y = ½ ) and becomes real. The complex zero is really on an imaginary string before it lies along the line ( y = ½ ). At this point the real zero can be used to calculate the location of the prime number on the x - axis. It is also known that there are an infinite number of prime numbers and by extension an infinite number of real numbers because prime numbers can be used to construct real numbers. So far the calculated zeros lie on the critical line, but the prime’s location strays because the calculation process behaves just like a 50:50 coin toss. The 50:50 distribution law says that coins will divide themselves proportionately over the long term, but on the specific terms they generally will not distribute themselves evenly. There are always exceptions. The most important thing that Riemann said was that the magnitude of the oscillations of primes around their expected position is controlled by the real parts of the zeros of the zeta function and the error term in the prime number theorem is closely related to the position of the zeros.

Here are some facts about prime numbers.

1. Prime numbers, if they are prime numbers, have the numbers 1, 3, 7, 9 in column 0 ( farthest right column ).

2. If the sum of the digits of any number ending in 1, 3, 7, 9, total a multiple of 3, except for 3, ( for instance total 6, 9, 12, etc. ) it isn’t a prime number. If a number ending in 1, 3, 7, 9 in column zero (0), isn’t a prime number it can usually be evenly divided by a number with 1, 3, 7, 9 in column (0).

3. A prime number is defined as being only evenly divisible by itself and one ( 1 ).

Here’s the proof:

A prime number is defined as any number that can be only divided evenly by itself and one. Furthermore a prime number, if it is a prime number, only has the digits, 1, 3, 7, 9 in column 0 which is the farthest right column. I have also discovered that if the sum of the digits of any number ending in 1, 3, 7, 9 total a multiple of 3, except for prime number 3 ( for example total 6, 9, 12, etc. ) then it isn’t a prime number. The single digit prime numbers are 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, if we ignore the convention of no longer considering 1 as a prime number. A real number which includes prime numbers are located somewhere on the x - axis. If we multiply each single digit prime number ( 1, 2, 3, 5, 7 ) by ½ we get 1 at approximately ½, 2 at approximately 1, 3 at approximately 1.5, 5 at approximately 2.5 and 7 at approximately 3.5. 1 is actually at 1, 2 at 2, 3 at 3, 5 at 4 and 7 at 5. 97 is a prime and if we multiply 97 by ½, we get 48.5. The prime 97 isn’t anywhere close to being the 48th prime. The Riemann Hypothesis says that the magnitude of the oscillations of primes around their expected position is controlled by the real parts of the zeros of the zeta function. In particular, the error term in the prime number theorem is closely related to the position of the zeros. Our initial calculation indicated that the prime number 97 was oscillating around position 48.5 on the x axis which isn’t correct. The Riemann Hypothesis says that the magnitude of the oscillations of primes around their expected position is controlled by the real parts of the zeros of the zeta function. In particular, the error term in the prime number theorem is closely related to the position of the zeros. What to do???? We know that the prime number 97 lies on the x axis as it is a specialized real number. The Riemann Hypothesis says that the magnitude of the oscillations of primes around their expected position is controlled by the real parts of the zeros of the zeta function. Therefore we make up a multiplier. The first digit is ½ or .5. The second digit is one of the Riemann Hypothesis zeros so we now have ( .50 ) . ( .50 ) X 97 is no better off than multiplying 97 X ( .5 ). We know that the prime numbers have 1, 3, 7, or 9 in column 0. Therefore arbitrarily add the 9 digit to ( .50 ) forming ( .509 ). If we multiply prime 97 X ( .509 ) the answer is worse. If, however, we take ( .509 ^ 2 ) we get ( .259081 ) and 97 X ( .259081 ) = 25.130857. Prime number 97 is in actuality the 26th prime. The Riemann Hypothesis says that the magnitude of the oscillations of primes around their expected position is controlled by the real parts of the zeros of the zeta function. In particular, the error term in the prime number theorem is closely related to the position of the zeros. Using the Riemann Hypothesis zeros between .5 and 9 ( .5----9 ) and raising it to a power we can oscillate the prime 97 around its’ position. Thus the error can be controlled by adjusting the Riemann Hypothesis zeros.

Here’s how the system works for numbers in general.

1. Count the number of digits in a prime number. For instance 7919 has 4 digits. Subtract 1 from the number of digits ( 4 - 1 = 3 ) for 7919. Form another number equal to the number of digits in 7919 ( 4 ) by putting ( .5 ) in the far left column and 9 in the far right column. ( .5—9 ). Fill the middle with Riemann Hypothesis zeros ( 0 ) forming a four digit number ( .5009 ). Raise ( .5009 ) to the power of 3 ( which is the number of digits in 7919 ( 4 ) minus 1 ( 4 - 1 = 3 ). ( .5009 ) ^ 3 = .125676215. Multiply 7919 X .125676215 which equals 995.2299524. 7919 is the 1000th prime. The answer is out by approximately 5. Adjust error accordingly using Riemann Hypothesis zeros.

As a matter of interest, if we are looking for the largest prime number in existence, the simplest way of doing it is to add digits to the left of any number ending in 1, 3, 7, 9 in column zero ( 0 ). Find the total of all the digits added together and divide by 3. If the result is an integer with no remainder, it is not a prime number. This truth can be verified by seeing if the number is only evenly divisible by itself and 1. It is also interesting that any number ending in 1, 3, 7, 9, if it isn’t a prime, is usually divisible by some number ending in 1, 3, 7, 9 in column 0.

If all the zeros used for calculating the position of primes on strings are real, then the primes themselves are real. Primes can be combined to create real numbers as well as fractions, so all the zeros for those numbers are real. Therefore the Riemann Hypothesis is true.

Actual Location Primes Multiplier 2 To Power 2 Power 2 Calculated Location
1 1 0.509999999 1 0.509999999 0.509999999
2 2 0.509999999 1 0.509999999 1.019999999
3 3 0.509999999 1 0.509999999 1.529999998
4 5 0.509999999 1 0.509999999 2.549999997
5 7 0.509999999 1 0.509999999 3.569999996
6 11 0.509999999 1 0.509999999 5.609999994
7 13 0.509999999 1 0.509999999 6.629999993
8 17 0.509999999 1 0.509999999 8.669999991
9 19 0.509999999 1 0.509999999 9.68999999
10 23 0.509999999 1 0.509999999 11.72999999
11 29 0.509999999 1 0.509999999 14.78999997
12 31 0.509999999 1 0.509999999 15.80999998
13 37 0.509999999 2 0.260099999 9.623699981
14 41 0.509999999 2 0.260099999 10.66409998
15 43 0.509999999 2 0.260099999 11.18429998
16 47 0.509999999 2 0.260099999 12.22469998
17 53 0.509999999 2 0.260099999 13.78529997
18 59 0.509999999 2 0.260099999 15.34589997
19 61 0.509999999 2 0.260099999 15.86609997
20 67 0.509999999 2 0.260099999 17.42669997
21 71 0.509999999 2 0.260099999 18.46709996
22 73 0.509999999 2 0.260099999 18.98729996
23 79 0.509999999 2 0.260099999 20.54789996
24 83 0.509999999 2 0.260099999 21.58829996
25 89 0.509999999 2 0.260099999 23.14889995
26 97 0.509999999 2 0.260099999 25.22969995


The position of the primes was calculated by multiplying the primes ( 1 to 31 ) by ( .509999999 ^ 1). From ( 37 to 97 ) the primes were multiplied by ( .509999999 ^ 2 ) to keep the calculated distance close to the actual distance.

Actual Location Primes String 1 String 2 Multiplier 2 To Power 2 Power 2 Calculated Location
27 101 2 2 0.509999999 2 0.2601 26.27009995
28 103 4 4 0.509999999 2 0.2601 26.79029995
29 107 8 8 0.509999999 2 0.2601 27.83069994
30 109 10 1 0.509999999 2 0.2601 28.35089994
31 113 5 5 0.509999999 2 0.2601 29.39129994
32 127 10 1 0.509999999 2 0.2601 33.03269993
33 131 5 5 0.509999999 2 0.2601 34.07309993
34 137 11 2 0.509999999 2 0.2601 35.63369993
35 139 13 4 0.509999999 2 0.2601 36.15389993
36 149 14 5 0.509999999 2 0.2601 38.75489992
37 151 7 7 0.509999999 2 0.2601 39.27509992
38 157 13 4 0.509999999 2 0.2601 40.83569992
39 163 10 1 0.509999999 2 0.2601 42.39629992
40 167 14 5 0.509999999 2 0.2601 43.43669991
41 173 11 2 0.509999999 2 0.2601 44.99729991
42 179 17 8 0.509999999 2 0.2601 46.55789991
43 181 10 1 0.509999999 2 0.2601 47.07809991
44 191 11 2 0.500999999 2 0.251001 47.9411909
45 193 13 4 0.500999999 2 0.251001 48.4431929
46 197 17 8 0.500999999 2 0.251001 49.4471969
47 199 19 1 0.500999999 2 0.251001 49.9491989


The position of the primes was calculated by multiplying the primes ( 101 to 181 ) by (.5099999999^2) From (191 to 199 ) the primes were multiplied by ( .5009999999 ^ 2 ) to keep the calculated distance close to the actual distance.

The most important thing that Riemann said was that the magnitude of the oscillations of primes around their expected position is controlled by the real parts of the zeros of the zeta function and the error term in the prime number theorem is closely related to the position of the zeros. If you multiplied the primes from ( 191 to 199 ) by ( .509999999^2 ) the answer would be further from their real locations and hence the error would be greater.

It is also interesting that by either adding or subtracting Pi or ( e^1 ) depending on what is required you can get the Riemann Zero calculation closer to the actual location of the primes.

Actual Location Calculated Location Add / Subtract Total
1 0.509999999 0 0.509999999
2 1.019999999 0 1.019999999
3 1.529999998 0 1.529999998
4 2.549999997 0 2.549999997
5 3.569999996 0 3.569999996
6 5.609999994 0 5.609999994
7 6.629999993 0 6.629999993
8 8.669999991 0 8.669999991
9 9.68999999 0 9.68999999
10 11.72999999 0 11.72999999
11 14.78999997 -3.141592654 11.64840732
12 15.80999998 -3.141592654 12.66840733
13 9.623699981 3.141592654 12.76529263
14 10.66409998 3.141592654 13.80569263
15 11.18429998 3.141592654 14.32589263
16 12.22469998 3.141592654 15.36629263
17 13.78529997 3.141592654 16.92689263
18 15.34589997 3.141592654 18.48749262
19 15.86609997 3.141592654 19.00769262
20 17.42669997 3.141592654 20.56829262
21 18.46709996 3.141592654 21.60869262
22 18.98729996 3.141592654 22.12889262
23 20.54789996 3.141592654 23.68949261
24 21.58829996 3.141592654 24.72989261
25 23.14889995 0 23.14889995
26 25.22969995 0 25.22969995
27 26.27009995 0 26.27009995
28 26.79029995 0 26.79029995
29 27.83069994 0 27.83069994
30 28.35089994 0 28.35089994
31 29.39129994 0 29.39129994
32 33.03269993 0 33.03269993
33 34.07309993 0 34.07309993
34 35.63369993 0 35.63369993
35 36.15389993 0 36.15389993
36 38.75489992 -2.718281828 36.03661809
37 39.27509992 -2.718281828 36.55681809
38 40.83569992 -2.718281828 38.11741809
39 42.39629992 -3.141592654 39.25470726
40 43.43669991 -3.141592654 40.29510726
41 44.99729991 -3.141592654 41.85570726
42 46.55789991 -3.141592654 43.41630725
43 47.07809991 -3.141592654 43.93650725
44 47.9411909 -3.141592654 44.79959825
45 48.4431929 -3.141592654 45.30160025
46 49.4471969 -3.141592654 46.30560425
47 49.9491989 -2.718281828 47.23091707

It can be seen from these calculations that the magnitude of the oscillations of the primes around their expected position is controlled by the zeros ( 0’s) in the multiplier. The error term is closely related to the position of the zeros since ( .509999999 ) and (.599999990) both hold the same digits but the zero ( 0 ) position has been shifted thus putting the position of the primes further out of alignment. It can be seen that the calculation of the position of a prime and the number of primes preceding that prime all depend on the Riemann Hypothesis real zeros. Thus the Riemann Hypothesis has been proved by illustrating its’ real relationship to the position of the primes and the number of primes preceding it.

Time Travel Without Paradoxes

There are no paradoxes in time travel. Energy and Time are the same thing in our universe although we may call them different things at different times. Energy and Time do not possess space although they do travel through space according to our perceptions. Here is a way to look at it. If a murder is committed, that murder leaves traces in energy and time that it was committed. The investigators in the present come in and if their skills are sufficient, they can reconstruct what happened. If we could move backward in time, we could see the murder committed in that particular backward space even though the murdered person in our present existing space no longer existed. This is true because what we would be seeing is the residual image of that murdered person in that space and time and not how he or she was dead in present time. Similarly, if we went backward in time and saw ourselves, we would only be looking at our residual image. It would be similar to looking at a movie which had a long dead star in it. We would be seeing him or her how he or she existed in the time and space of that shot movie. We couldn’t physically destroy ourselves in the past because what we are seeing / experiencing is only an image in time and energy similar to a hologram. Paradoxically, our future selves may be observing ourselves, which we can’t see as we are only an energy and time image to them. Similarly moving forward in time, we would only be seeing an image of ourselves in the future.

Baggy Diapers

Particles are at the root of our understanding and explanation of the universe. Energy and Time are the same thing in our universe although we may call them different things at different times. Energy / Time in our universe is represented by the single digit number ( 9 ). Particles are really rolled up strings. Each particle has a surrounding frame which we see as a wave if it is moving, or weight (mass) if it is still. We can travel through space but we can’t travel through time or energy. Our space is anchored at both ends of time and energy. If space is longer than time and energy it curves like baggy diapers. The baggy diaper curve is weight / mass or gravity depending on its’ location in the universe. The baggy diaper curve edge is a trajectory in space irrespective of the location of that space in the universe. If space is shorter than time and energy, then time and energy adjusts its’ unit lengths. We see this phenomena as the common battery voltages of 1.5, 3 and 9.

Thus you will see that:

1. Weight
2. Mass
3. Gravity

are essentially the same thing under different names depending on the circumstances.

String Theory Explains Special Relativity

String Theory involves:

1 . Particles / Objects / Actions / Events / Messages.
2. Space
3. Time.

Particles / Objects / Actions / Events / Messages have an associated string in real space and in dark time. Dark Time associated with particles / objects / actions / events and messages has no associated space but does have a constant straight time value of 9. The real space value of particles / objects / actions / events / messages have various values.

The three principles of Special Relativity are:

1) length contraction
2) time dilation or time contraction / expansion.
3) failure of simultaneity at a distance or change in space over a distance.

Particles, when still, have a straight string and the effects of dark time aren’t noticed. If a particle starts to move its’ string lengthens to account for the velocity / acceleration. The particle / velocity / acceleration string starts to curve and the particle starts to lose its’ volume which we see as length contraction at sufficiently high speeds. The time string still has a no space value , but does have a non space value of 9. The space string must match the length of the straight time string whose constant value is 9. It does that by curving. This curving creates a series of waves at a frequency. This frequency may vary because the particle / object is accelerating. We see these waves / space curving as time dilation which we experience psychologically since we can’t see them. Failure of simultaneity at a distance or change in space over a distance is caused by our brain’s failure to interpret real time / space over a distance. This phenomena created by the brain is necessary or we wouldn’t be able to orient ourselves in space as far as distance from objects are concerned. If you don’t believe me, try orienting yourself in a dark room or in space without seeing any object.

Time and Everything Dark

The basic construction of the universe is:

1. Particles
2. Strings
3. Frames

Each particle has its’ own string. Particles and their strings can combine with other particles and strings to create quantum objects and also physical objects which we can see such as buildings. Particles can travel along their own strings which causes the strings to flex which we see as:

1. Gravity.
2. Properties.
3. Forces.

Each string and particle travels / lives within a frame. This frame is seen as:

1. Waves.
2. Feelings
3. Influence

Time strings consist of:

1. Particles of Dark Matter.
2. Dark Energy which is the Time string itself
3. Dark Force which is contained in a Dark Wave.

Just before the Big Bang, the universe from which our universe was created, consisted solely of a Time String which contained everything rolled into one string. At the moment of the Big Bang everything broke into different types of particles, strings and frames which we see today. Remnants of the Time String exist today which due to its’ containing Dark Matter, Dark Energy and Dark Force drag us forward which we see personally as aging and physically as the expansion of our universe. We cannot reverse time, nor can we alter it as we can do to other particles, strings and frames. Time is not affected by our present day technology. We have no influence over dark matter, dark energy and dark force. If we could find a way to manipulate Time Strings beyond using them as a day to day marker of events, we could travel throughout the universe without aging.

Strings & Force

The universe is primarily organized around:

1. Particles, Objects, Events, Messages.
2. Strings
3. Frames

Particles, objects and events are rolled up strings whereas messages are unrolled strings containing frames. Particles, objects and events follow paths which are a form of strings. These strings form forces when they are angled, straight or curved.

The four fundamental forces of physics are:

1. Gravity
2. Electromagnetism
3. Weak Nuclear Force
4. Strong Nuclear Force.

When particles, objects and events follow unorganized string paths you get random motion which is another form of probability, possibility and likelihood based on observed experience.

Frames are essentially a form of space / time. If the space dimension of a frame becomes curved while time remains straight it also curves the string paths of the particles, objects and events which is seen by us as gravity.

If inanimate strings containing particles such as electrons vibrate they create frames surrounding the strings which we see as electrical fields / waves and gravity which we call magnetism.

If animate strings vibrate which is primarily us than we get properties which we call personality and emanating waves we call charisma.

Physical chemistry is possible because the particle and object strings can be joined to form different particles and objects. This string force is stronger than gravity but not as strong as an electoweak force.

Biochemistry is possible because strings form bonds of varying strengths at angles which are readily rearranged by our bodies and allow us to live and function.

Weak nuclear interaction is associated with isotopes and beta decay which is a form of chaos or decay which we all experience at one time or another.

Strong nuclear force happens when the space in the frame is squeezed out and only time is left because it doesn’t have any space associated with it. In quantum theory only time is present although we like to think in terms of force in small spaces because that is the world with which we are familiar.

The fundamental forces are really just strings that are just space in one dimension and space / time when they form two dimensional frames.

Dark Stuff, Light Stuff & Lastly Strings

Space is composed of strings and strings are composed of dark matter, dark energy and dark force. Our seen universe is composed of light matter, light energy, and light force. Space is composed of dark matter in the form of strings which we can’t see but can experience. Strings also have dark energy which hold what we can see in position. The dark force stretches the strings, but it doesn’t stretch them evenly so over vast distances the galaxies seem to be accelerating from each other but it is only an illusion from our space viewpoint. The light force which we can see is gravity which allows us to move in our light space. Light force also causes entropy which is a gentle falling apart of light matter, light energy and light force which results in our ability to move, to transmit information and to deteriorate gracefully which we call aging. Dark force is equivalent to light gravity. Heavy dark forces are caused by the flexing of dark space strings. Heavy Light force is caused by matter moving at a velocity and acceleration. Light matter tends to contract when moving at a velocity or acceleration. This phenomena is not noticeable at low speeds. Space at high string speed tends to contract which we see as time dilation which occurs in Black Holes. All information about the black hole is in its’ event horizon because that is the border between light and dark. Our seen universe is based on the number 3, whereas dark space seen by us as time is based on 9. What we see as light is primarily space. What we see as dark is primarily time. More advanced civilizations have learned to connect light matter to dark space which means they can travel in time rather than space. Time has no dimension so there is nothing to transverse which results in everything being done instantly. That is why we can see what has happened astronomically speaking in the past when we look out into the heavens.

Three, Nine & Time

The universe tries to stabilize around the number 3. The range of potential stability is the difference between Pi ( 3.141592654 ) and e^1 ( 2.718281828 ) or ( .423310825 ). One unit of Time is equal to 9 units of Space. These 9 units of space do not have to be uniform spaces in terms of width. They can be random widths with different spacing between them. These differing units of appearing space / frames cause the illusion of random things happening at different intervals. These random happenings may or may not affect you. This process is Random Time. We can also use Time for counting as we mark certain events in our lives. This is Artificial Time based on years / days / hours / minutes / seconds. Real Time is when something out of the blue affects you.

In summary, Time can be:

1. Random
2. Artificial
3. Real

String Theory Explains Special Relativity

The three principles of Special Relativity are:

1) length contraction
2) time dilation or time contraction / expansion with a constancy of 9 units.
3) failure of simultaneity at a distance or change in space over a distance.

Length contraction is essentially space expanding or contracting the faster it moves. Time dilation or time contraction / expansion is harder to grasp. Time always has 9 units in total. Each unit can expand or contract in size but when the resultant expanded or contracted units are counted they are always 9 in number which is equal to 1 unit of time. The failure of simultaneity at a distance is really the result of the expansion or contraction of individual units of space in time ( space-time ) whose total number must equal 9 of time before time can be seen / felt.

There also is the Law Of Conservation Of Momentum which states that linear momentum doesn’t change unless an external force acts upon it. The Law Of Conservation Of Energy states that energy can neither be created or destroyed.

Suppose we have a particle which is equal to 84. The string associated with particle 84 is obtained by adding its’ digits ( 8 + 4 = 12 ). The string associated with particle 84 can be also obtained by adding its’ first string number ( 12 ) to obtain 3 ( 1 + 2 = 3 ). Therefore particle 84 has the strings 12 and 3. If we subtract particle 84’s first string ( 12 ) from the value of the particle we get ( 84 - 12 = 72 ). If we subtract particle 84’s second string ( 3 ) from the value of the particle we get ( 84 - 3 = 81 ). 72 and 81 is the value of the frame in which the particle 84 exists at some location in two dimensional space. In one dimensional space 84 exists somewhere on its’ first one dimensional string 12 or somewhere on its’ second one dimensional string of 3. If we divide 84’s frames ( 72, 81 ) by 9 which represents 1 unit of time we get 8, or 9 units of space as in space / time. ( 72 / 9 = 8 ) ( 81 / 9 = 9 ). Depending on how you want to look at it, we have 9 units of space divided into a frame area of 72 or 81 ) giving us more space as an answer ( 8 or 9 ). Alternately you can look at it as one unit of time giving you 8 or 9 units of space as in time / space or space / time.

Length contraction involves the Law of Conservation of Energy and the Law of Conservation of Momentum. Suppose the universe is the size of the frame ( 72 or 81 ). The particle starts to move. Energy for that movement has to be taken from the particle because of the Law of Conservation Of Energy. That movement causes the particle ( 84 ) to contract to a lower number ( 69 ) and the resulting calculations change which is equivalent to a length contraction.

The Law Of Conservation Of Momentum says the total momentum can’t change in a closed system not affected by external forces. The particle 84 has a closed system ( frame ) of 81 or 72. If we observe the particle from outside the system that external ( observational ) force is acting to change the momentum of that particle. If we calculate the momentum from our position the answer will not match the observation of someone else from another position. That is why we cannot measure momentum and position of a particle at the same time because our act of observing changes the momentum and position of the particle. This is failure of simultaneity at a distance. It is also time dilation because the two observers are observing from different frames which have different space unit lengths totaling 9 ( equal to one unit of time ).

In summary, Time consists of 9 units of space before you have 1 countable unit of time. Each unit of these 9 units of space can expand or contract thereby giving Time the illusion of dilation. Failure of simultaneity at a distance is the result of the different frames from which the observation took place and the effects of the Law Of Conservation Of Momentum ( molecular vibration also ) on the relevant frame.

If Einstein Had Been A Social Scientist

It occurred to me the other day that if Einstein had been a social scientist rather than a physicist, the equation of E = MC^2 would have been explained as follows:

All organizations create as well as absorb energy. The organization in order to successfully accomplish a task must commit a minimum amount of resource to that project. This minimum amount of resource can be designated "M". Management, being management, must micromanage the project which is usually measured in the amount of time they run around thrusting their nose into things and demanding progress reports. The maximum speed of Time cannot be faster than the speed of light. Let the maximum speed of light be "C". Management in their hurry to get things done usually demand that work goes faster. Occasionally they add resources which will increase "M". Too much resource ( M ) in an insufficient space ( Time as in Space / Time ) increases the gravity of the situation. The effects of increased gravity "bends" the space devoted to the project thereby curving it further inward preventing any "light" or results escaping.(i.e.: Onlookers see nothing happening) The effects of this contraction concentrates the resources devoted to the project thereby increasing the gravity of the situation which-tends to promote more contraction until a singularity is reached at which point no "light" escapes thereby leading onlookers to assume that nothing is happening-. Massive E or Energy develops at the point of singularity after which everything beyond the horizon of that project is absorbed and if severe enough results in the ruining of careers as well as the organization itself.

Intelligent Computers

The problem with intelligent computers is that we don’t know how to successfully program them. Our present computers are programmed on:

1. Rules
2. If
3. While / When.

Rules use the choice yes / no system. Yes is equal to 1 ( one ). No is equal to 0 ( zero ). The yes / no system is basically a two ( 2 ) dimensional system, whereas we live in a 4 dimensional world.

Our world is:

1. Rules.
2. Maybe
3. Statistical

Maybe involves the third dimension or the number 3. Maybe involves situations where rules are not clear cut.

Maybe is concerned with:

1. Intelligence
2. Experience
3. Culture / Training.

Functioning intelligence in the real word is essentially the ability to see:

1. Patterns
2. Relationships.
3. Exceptions.

The fourth ( 4th ) dimension is the future. The future in our universe always moves forward. The future involves choosing paths. There are infinite paths, but only 9 strings or dimensions. The future is based on statistics. Our statistical sample is rooted in our intelligence, experience, culture / training. Whether or not our statistical sample can be successfully translated into choosing the right future population of choices is the question. Fortunately the future for most of us has a normal curve of reasonable success with reasonable ups and downs with only minor irritations. This, in other words, is the old sine curve in action.

The trick,my friends, is to design an intelligent computer which is on 24 / 7 to absorb experience, establish relationships and patterns, to run in 9 dimensions including the future and to deal with the occasional random event. Oh yeah, don’t forget statistics, for which there are no rules but plenty of pitfalls.

Space / Time Strings & Entropic Forces

Particles, objects, events and messages are rolled up strings containing unknown information . Each string has its’ own value. If the strings are unrolled you can see the information which is organized in layers / surfaces on that particular string. The space / time string has a value of 9. The information is held in place on each string because of the actions of inertia / gravity force which is the same thing under different names. There is also an opposing entropic force which tends to pull gravity / inertia forces apart. This entropic force is seen in our real world as randomness / deterioration / events out of the blue. The upside of this entropic force allows us to function / move / write / walk / do things in general.. If the entropic force didn’t exist we couldn’t have any controlled / controllable deterioration which is at the foundation of our functioning in time / space. Writing / walking / communicating / thinking are all examples of controlled / controllable deterioration leading to good / acceptable results.. The length of single digit strings are one to nine. Space / time strings have a length of 9 which means that our world is curved if the perceived string distance is less than nine since our world is the child of the quantum world. We call this entropic force different names using language because the basic entropic force is seen in different ways. Weather is an excellent example of calling this basic entropic force different names. This is also why sometimes bad things happen to good people. They simply get caught up in random entropic forces .. Lastly, entropic force is the reason that life follows a sine curve with random ups and downs.

Quantum Theory In A Nutshell

Particles, objects, events and messages are rolled up strings containing unknown information . If the strings are rolled out they contain unlimited information in holographic form which occupies a unit of space / time equal to nine. The information is held in space / time due to the actions of inertia. An opposing entropic force acts on the information which tends to pull it apart. The back and forth pull flexes the constant length of the string . This action creates a phenomena which we see as heat / temperature and gravity.. The heat and temperature is similar to thermodynamics and the entropic forces similar to hydrodynamics since the information on the string is disturbed / scrambled., It can therefore be said that gravity depends on the infinite information contained in the string. An example of information on a string is a word. Each letter is equivalent to a particle which strung together on a string creates information which we call a string.. If the word is written on a piece of paper , inertia holds it together. Eventually the entropic forces tear the paper apart leaving scrambled or no information. The string can be stretched on the horizon of a Black Hole but paradoxically its’ value doesn’t change. This action is similar in principle to a red or blue shift. In the world we see strings containing information function as forces, gravity and bonds. Particles are the molecules containing rolled up properties which aren’t easily discernible. Particles can be assembled in any configuration such as strings and lattices. Nuclear energy .is an extreme example of particles held together by extreme inertial forces that can only be ripped apart by highly heated entropic forces. This is why an atomic bomb is required to set off a hydrogen bomb. This process is nuclear fission which releases vast amounts of energy when the inertial string is broken . The opposite extreme is nuclear fusion which is the joining of strings which results in the controlled / gradual release of energy. Nuclear fusion is difficult to achieve because the strings are flexible and don’t want to join. Therefore, Quantum Theory is essentially all about information in a ball or spread out into a string. The manipulation of this information by inertia and entropic forces results in gravity, and everything else we need on a macroscopic scale including civilization

Strings As Gravity, Force, Velocity and Acceleration.

Space / Time has a string length of 9. If space / time flexes along its’ length as a string it becomes gravity. If space / time, as a string length of 9, attaches its’ ends it becomes a force. This phenomena is found in the bonds of chemistry and the nucleus of nuclear energy. If the string moves it has a velocity. If the string changes its’ velocity you have acceleration.

Theory Of Everything ( Again )

The following may be called different things at different times, but at its’ simplest the Universe is composed of:

1. Particles / Objects / Events / Messages.

2. Strings

3. Frames

The Theory Of Everything

The Theory Of Everything is really space / time in its’ various forms. If an object or a particle is at rest in space / time it deforms the space / time surrounding it creating a phenomena that we call gravity. If an object / particle vibrates, this action causes space / time to repeatedly flex which we call a frequency. If an object / particle travels it causes space / time to flex at a velocity which we see as a wave. If an object / particle accelerates which is really a change in the velocity we see it as a change in the wave which we call acceleration. Space / Time also has 9 as a unit of length which doesn’t contain anything until it exists / arrives at that location. Einstein’s Theory Of Relativity is simply different perspectives of a similar frame in space / time from various positions. We do the same thing when we interpret something happening in space / time. Since space / time seems to have a unit of length then it's logical that eventually we can discover how to travel in all directions in both space and time which would include forward and backwards.

Investing

In the interests of full disclosure, I will start by saying that I’ve never made any significant money in the stock market which could not be duplicated by moving funds around in savings accounts / GIC’s and other instruments that are guaranteed to return something above the principle no matter what. With that said, I’ll now proceed to give some investment advice for you to mull over in your mind. Whether we like it or not, the universe is mathematically based on the number 2. The number 2 as a fraction is ½. The fraction ½ means that everything tends to even out over Time. Evening out over Time, which is the 4th dimension, means that while you and I may have different adventures in life, our lives tend to even out in terms of results. Some people may have horseshoes and some people may never get anything right, but about 68% of us end up in the middle of the old Bell Curve as average. The primary goal of investing is finding something that is above average. To start, stocks are broken out into different sectors such as financial for example. The theory behind these groupings is that while these groups average out like everything else, they tend to go up and down like a wave over time just like your and my life adventures. This behaviour is the basis of the next great invention called diversification. Diversification means that if one group of stocks is going into the toilet another group is climbing out of the toilet so spread your money over the sectors . Overall you will once again tend to average out over ½. The last great invention is Sector Rotation. If you are an all eggs in one basket sort of gal or guy and since nothing lasts over Time, Sector Rotation means that if your once hot sector is going down like the Titanic then find the lifeboat which is another sector. Now let’s suppose you find the right sector. Not all the stocks in that sector are going to make money. Once again about ½ on average. If the sector is hot its’ returns on average will be above average or once again above ½. The trend line which is all the stock increases together should have an upward trend line. The optimum trend line angle is 45 degrees which you will never meet but the closer the better. The first thing is to calculate the average returns for that sector. The next step is to find the sector stocks that are going up. This might sound silly but we live in a real world where we can only invest in concrete things. If we could afford to invest in all the stocks or some scheme which represents all the stocks we are going to average out at ½ faster over time. The next step is to find 3 stocks that are related in some concrete way beyond a sector relationship that are increasing since the universe tends to stabilize around the number 3. If you can find 9 stocks that are primarily related in groups of 3 that are trending up in terms of stock increases your sector is healthy over the immediate future. If you can’t find any bonded stocks in groups of 3’s the sector is starting to fail. The failing benchmark fractions in terms of stock price decreases are ¼ and 1/3rd . The positive benchmark fractions in terms of stock market increases are 2/3rd and ¾’s. If stock market increases start to double, this result will start to attract competitors for that company’s markets, since market product profitability is reflected eventually in stock prices.

Space / Time / Perception

Einstein said that physical objects are not in space, but these objects are spatially extended. In other words, space does not exist, but only the perception of space. This observation by Einstein is quite profound as it extends way beyond objects in space because it can be applied to what artists call perspective. If you look at a painting that has perspective you will swear up and down and sideways that you are looking into space because the space that your mind sees has been spatially extended but doesn’t physically exist. In other words, you can’t walk into that painting. Spatial extensions are also done with light and shadow. In general, perspective in painting is built by using triangles or combinations of triangles (squares / rectangles ) and light and shadow. In a more abstract sense, perspective is how you view the world. Here your perspective is generally based on life experiences / culture / beliefs. Your mind, after considering what you see, draws ( spatial ) conclusions. Once again space doesn’t exist.

Yes, No, Maybe

Most of us, if asked, would probably say that the world is based on the number 2. We have the fraction ½. Most of algebra, which we can solve without going nuts, is based on a function of x ( f(x)) raised to the power of 2. Probability based on a gut feeling without facts is usually represented by ½. Most of us can remember 2 things without any problem. Rules are based on two choices ( 2 ) which are either you follow them or you don’t follow them. On the other hand most of us realize that nothing is 100%. Someone once said that the impossible does happen. One of the Impossibles is meeting a member of the opposite sex and following in love immediately. If a stranger immediately handed you a piece of paper and asked you to write down why you feel the way you do in concrete terms most of what you’d write would also apply to a friend of the opposite sex that you know you’d never marry in a million years because you don’t love them like you love this stranger in front of you. The worst thing is that for the first time in your life you realize that you have no control over it when this stranger is in front of you. If you turn into a klutz in front of this stranger then you’re in love. Most of us will try to regain our life by ignoring them but sooner or later you will realize that no one else matters like they did before you met this stranger. Sometimes we even try to studiously ignore them over time but sooner or later we realize that isn’t going to solve the problem. Worst of all if they crooked their finger at you, you’d be off with them like a shot abandoning all your principles. You have just been conked by a maybe. The universe is based on the number 3 and in this case the number 3 is (yes, no,) maybe. Maybe is the possible which has no attached facts or at least no facts until it happens to you. Most of us treat the fraction ½ as our maybe. Maybe has the fractions ¼, 1/3rd , ½ , 2/3rds and ¾’s associated with it. ¼, 1/3rd is the possibility it will never happen. 2/3rds and ¾’s is the possibility it will happen. ½ is the safe calculation that even outs over time.

Fuzzy Probability / Possibility

Probability is based on the real world and what may happen if something is related or unrelated. Possibility is based on the likelihood of something happening without any mathematical proof. Fuzzy Probability / Possibility is based on the maximum probability / possibility that two things may happen simultaneously which are unconnected minus the sureness of two things happening at once which are unconnected. Possibility is based on the maximum probability / possibility minus the sureness of something happening. Possibility is based on ¼, 1/3rd, ½, 2/3rds, 3/4ths without any facts. Fuzzy "or" is the maximum probability / possibility on a graph.

P (A or B) = p (a)+p (b)-(p (a)*p (b))

Probability is based on the real world and what may happen if something is related or unrelated. Possibility is based on the likelihood of something happening without any mathematical proof. Fuzzy Probability / Possibility is based on the maximum probability / possibility that two things may happen simultaneously which are connected minus the sureness of two things happening at once which are connected. Possibility is based on ¼, 1/3rd, ½, 2/3rds, 3/4ths without any facts. Fuzzy "and" is the minimum probability / possibility on a graph.

P(A and B) =((p(a)*p(b) - p(a)+p(b))

War

I got thinking about war the other day. Most of us are competitive in nature but are constrained by the social mores of our society. Fortunately, most of us also live in the center of the old Bell Curve. Here we are reasonably competitive with each other without being downright unfriendly. Those on the extreme left of the Bell Curve have self esteem issues / are poor / are unfortunate which most of us try to help to the best of our ability and knowledge should we run across them. Those on the right of the Bell Curve are the more competitive people that accumulate more markers of success which we call money. These people become Titans Of Business / politicians / sports heroes which are the three main relatively safe competitive sports. On the extreme right of the old Bell Curve we have the near and outright dictators. Into this mix we add the uncertain future which comes to us in random events, consequences of decisions and perfect storms. Maturing dictatorships that have finally organized themselves are faced with trying to keep their people content without losing their power. Organizing people through fear and terror is relatively easy in principle but there comes a time that the usefulness of this approach has diminishing results so we have the problem of what to do next. In the old days before the invention of atomic weapons we simply started a war through design or miscalculated brinkmanship. Wars gave the people something to do and rallied them around the dictator / instigator. Wars used up excess capacity in the form of industrial goods and lowered unemployment as everyone went into the armed forces. WW1 is an excellent example of using up the capacity of the industrial revolution which needed markets. WW11 is an example of what to do with unemployment. The invention of atomic weapons meant that war could no longer be large scale. This development encouraged the invention of small scale armed insurgencies which weren’t worth atomic bombs. Beginning / developing dictatorships based on fear / terror / isolation have a natural tendency to believe their own propaganda because no one is prepared to risk death to tell the dictator that he / she’s courting disaster. Most dictators eventually become mesmerized by their own importance and start to push outside people / societies around. In the beginning most outside people / societies are willing to tolerate this behaviour in the hopes that it will go away. The dictator fed by his country’s accolades sees this accommodation as weakness and fear on the part of the outside people / societies. The dictator keeps pushing and pushing until finally the outside people / societies decide that the situation has to be permanently remedied no matter what. If this dictatorship has atomic weapons and if the outside people / societies don’t care about the consequences as long as the irritant is removed then ???? Today we have the perfect storm in the offing. World wide unemployment. Loss of success measured in units of money because of bailouts. North Korea with its’ atomic capacity / large army trying to gain respect in the only way it knows how. China with its’ need to maintain power yet let its’ people prosper because they know their society has matured. The United States as the good guys with its’ resources stretched and its’ beliefs / society being hammered externally and internally. The rest of us in the also ran category. Something has to give but where????

The Theory Of Everything

This universe is presently seen as events / particles / objects, strings and frames. Particles / objects are physical things that you and I can see, feel, and touch. Events are things that happen in our universe. Frames are concerned with Einstein’s Theory Of Relativity on a perspective basis where frames are either stationary or moving / changing relative to each other. Strings are the energy / force, time and space which we experience in various forms in our day to day activities. In the beginning, strings were tightly wound in a ball. The strings were energy, time, and space. Each ball was subject to all probabilities and possibilities. The balls in the mother universe frequently exploded into unwound super strings but remained in the mother universe. Eventually, before the Big Bang, one super ball of held strings hit the probability / possibility of leaving, creating our universe. The Big Bang, as seen by us, is the result of the super ball of held strings breaking apart into the three strings of energy, space and time. The rules of this universe weren’t settled instantaneously so the three strings of energy, space and time expanded under simultaneous possibility and probability according to the rules of the universe the super ball just left. After things started to settle down relatively, the strings started to release events / particles / objects which we see under various names and processes today. Residual strings still exist today, but because of our development of language we call them different things thus obscuring their origins. With the creation of events / particles / objects from strings we developed the habit of associating events / particles / objects with forces which are really energy strings by other names due to language / our effort to understand our environment. The forces are seen by us to have different strengths because our knowledge of energy strings isn’t complete. Today we also have Dark Matter / Dark Energy which may well be a remnant of our mother universe appearing in our universe due to the violent nature of this universe’s creation. Time strings in our universe basically move outward carrying everything with it. Space strings basically bend and flex which we explain in terms of The Theory Of Relativity. Energy strings release events / particles and objects which we see in various forms. Each event / particle / object has a string associated with it which we call different things. Mathematics is concerned with particles / objects which are both known and unknown. Strings can flex and bend which we see in the study of Geometry / Trigonometry. Calculus is associated with change which is basically an offshoot of The Theory Of Relativity. Lastly strings appear in string mathematics which is a new discovery and seems to be related to Primes and other interesting stuff which I don’t quite understand except to say it’s exciting.

After Relativity - What???

The universe consists of particles / objects / events, strings, and frames. Physics first recognized particles / objects / events when it explained the universe in terms of mechanics. The discovery of electricity brought in the discussion of fields but this was a branch of particles / objects / events. Einstein advanced physics in his discussion of relativity which involved particles / objects / events in frames and how particles which are really you and me and how we related to objects / events in a frame and how we related to objects / events outside a frame when the frames were stationary and moving relative to each other, hence the Theory Of Relativity. The third leg of the stool is strings. Strings are all over the place. In religion, we speak of God knowing all and being everywhere at once. One infinitely long and wide string holding everything together. I believe God exists simply because this universe is too complicated to have happened randomly even though we have evolution now. Your and my life is basically concerned with fitting things together either physically or mentally. This is building strings. We are concerned with building partnerships / finding love / building careers which is really building strings by another name. We speak of finding the path to success which is strings again. Chemistry is mostly about bonds which are strings again. Light is both a particle or a wave. A wave is a vibrating string. String operating vertically is gravity. String operating horizontally is time. String which is stretchable and curves is space. If a string has frequency it has a property which we see as objects / particles / characteristics such as charisma and likeability. If a string stretches or shrinks it changes its’ frequency which we see as red and blue shifts. If a string is accelerating we see it as a dark matter force. If a string has a velocity we experience it as dark matter energy. Occasionally, strings will form a particle / object with a tail. That particle / object vibrates at a frequency which we see as life / characteristics. The vibrating particle / object gives off energy which affects its’ surroundings. This effect is charisma. A string can also be a physical particle / object building or an event which happens out of the blue. A string can form frames which we see as dimensions including time. A string can form dimensions which we can’t see but can experience in the form of quantum effects when strings as objects appear out of nowhere and leave trails which are characteristic of a particle / object. The same equivalent effect occurs in our dimension when someone leaves a mess or an particle / object collapses. String as time can also stretch or curve on a random basis. We experience stretched string time as a hardship as in waiting for someone or as a task which is annoying. Curved string time is experienced by us as something pleasant which is far too short. Strings are the third leg of the stool. Hence, The Theory Of Strings.

Strings, Dark Matter &Physics

Early physics concerned itself with mechanical movement and what things did when they bumped into or were influenced by each other because physics only saw particles / objects and events. With the discovery of electricity and our development of radio and TV, physics started to explain things in terms of fields, since fields radiated information which we saw as words, ideas, and pictures. Einstein appeared and started to discuss physics in terms of enclosures or frames and how we saw things if we were the occupants of those frames or enclosures. He also discussed frames in relationship to each other when they had velocity, accelerated or when their velocity reached the speed of light. Physics started to be applied to everything and astronomers were the first to notice that the movement of the galaxies and their contents couldn’t be totally explained by matter we could eyeball. This matter was called dark and it still remains a mystery. Here’s a possible answer from string theory. In our everyday world, we experience gravity, space and time. Suppose for the sake of argument, gravity, space, and time were actually strings. In our world, we do not see gravity, space and time as strings because our sight doesn’t have that acuity. If strings were the basis of dark matter, gravity would be an energy string, space a matter string and time a force string. Our physical limitations as a particle / object allows us to experience gravity as something that keeps us in place which is a form of energy. We apply energy to things and convert it, which is really the horizontal application of gravity to allow us to move. We do not experience space as matter because we can’t see space except as something abstract. If we could eyeball space we would see it as a string of dark matter which flexes and curls. Einstein had a hint of strings when he talked of space curving, light following a curve, and plant orbits. Time is a string of dark force. Our closest sensation of time as a dark force is its’ ability to move everything outward in a forward direction.

In short physics had 4 phases:

Mechanical

Field

Relativity

Strings

The 3 primary ones are:

Mechanical

Relativity

Strings

The Universe

The universe consists of particles / objects and events which we experience in everyday living. We are the particles. The objects are the physical things that we see every day. The events are the things that happen to us good or bad. Behind us, holding things together, are the strings, dark matter, dark energy and dark force. The strings are gravity, space, and time. Space strings are the dark matter. Time strings are the dark force. Gravity strings are the dark energy. The space strings, as dark matter, hold the contents of the universe in place by providing extra unseen mass and by flexing to keep everything in orbit and from bumping into each other more than usual by providing paths. The Time strings are the dark force which combines with the space string or dark matter which is the basis of Einstein’s Space - Time and Relativity Theory. The time string, as dark force, also keeps the universe expanding and balances the gravity string. The gravity strings, as dark energy, holds everything in place. We see gravity strings as gravity or inertia just before we get something to move, accelerate or change in some way. Time strings. as dark force, causes everything to move, accelerate or change in some way which we measure in terms of physical time.

Flexing Time, Space & Gravity Strings

The universe consists of particles / objects, strings, and frames. Gravity, space, and time are all strings in our universe. If we could flex strings a lot of interesting things would happen. If we could flex gravity, space, and time strings we could travel in Black Holes since there would be no danger of our being injured short of a power failure. If you flexed gravity strings, you could travel indefinitely since gravity would never slow you down. If you developed a gravity engine which could focus on gravity strings using them for power you could accelerate indefinitely. If you could flex space, time, gravity strings at the same time as using the gravity engine you could accelerate indefinitely into other dimensons as space and time would have no effect on us as we traveled. The ability to flex time strings is the most fascinating. You could travel back and forth in time which brings up a perennial question. Can you can alter your existence by changing the past or as they like to say killing your ancestors??? I see it as three possibilities.

They are:

If you return to the past, everything you see and everyone you meet is a an abstraction of their existence in their own frame at that former time and that existence or frame can be seen but not altered because it’s no longer in your dimension or frame of existence.

If you return to the past and wipe it out, you also wipe out yourself, as you are the future of that existence.

If you wipe out the past, you can’t return to your specific future, as you have also destroyed the future time lines emanating from that past.

Time Travel

The universe consists of particles / objects, strings, and frames. Gravity, Space, and Time are all strings in our universe. If you want to travel through gravity, space, time you have to learn how to flex the strings so you can pass between them. Theoretically, if you could flex gravity strings you could pass through a Black Hole without injury or travel through the universe just by gravity alone as a power source. If you could flex space strings, you could travel into other dimensions. Flexing time strings means that you can travel back and forth in time. This raises the question of whether or not you can alter your existence by changing the past or as we like to say killing your ancestors. The past you are seeing in Time is the residual existence of your ancestors which no longer exist in your reality. It would be similar to viewing a 4 dimensional movie in our present day reality or living in the Holodeck of the Star Trek’s Enterprise . If you went into the future, you’d be in a random likelihood which may or may not happen in the future. There is a possibility that you could see yourself in the future but you couldn’t alter it as the future is only a possible expression of a reality which may or may not exist when your future arrives.

Strings

The universe consists of particles / objects, strings, and frames. Strings are the most interesting at the moment. String operating vertically is gravity. String operating horizontally is time. String which is stretchable and curves is space. If a string has frequency it has a property which we see as objects / particles / characteristics such as charisma and likeability. If a string stretches or shrinks it changes its’ frequency which we see as red and blue shifts. If a string is accelerating we see it as a dark matter force. If a string has a velocity we experience it as dark matter energy. Occasionally, strings will form a particle / object with a tail. That particle / object vibrates at a frequency which we see as life / characteristics. The vibrating particle / object gives off energy which affects its’ surroundings. This effect is charisma. A string can also be a physical particle / object building or an event which happens out of the blue. A string can form frames which we see as dimensions including time. A string can form dimensions which we can’t see but can experience in the form of quantum effects when strings as objects appear out of nowhere and leave trails which are characteristic of a particle / object. An object / particle with its’ string moving through space / time distorts space / time which we physically see as orbits / paths or in time as events. The same equivalent effect occurs in our dimension when someone leaves a mess or an particle / object collapses. String as time can also stretch or curve on a random basis. We experience stretched string time as a hardship as in waiting for someone or as a task which is annoying. Curved string time is experienced by us as something pleasant which is far too short. At the moment of the Big Bang, it took time for the rules / laws of the creating universe to change into the rules / laws of the created universe and during that interval the dark matter strings stretched causing effects which we can’t explain in 4 dimensional terms. A string has the same characteristics / effects along its’ entire length which we can’t explain in terms of our 4 dimensional existence in terms of our 4 dimensional equations. Thus gravity, space and time are throughout the universe.

Location Of Primes

If you look at a table of Prime Numbers, you will notice that they aren’t evenly spaced which raises the question of how many primes precede any arbitrarily selected number. On the other hand, if you look at a table of prime numbers they seem to follow a pattern. You will also notice that the prime numbers get rarer, as you look at higher and higher numbers. Most formulas that have been developed to find the location of any prime number seem to be a hit and miss affair because the prime numbers aren’t evenly spaced. George Riemann, who formulated the Riemann Hypothesis, found that his formula produced the occasional zero as an answer which he hypothesized lay on the line ( y = ½ ). So far, calculating on an individual basis, it has been found that over a billion zeros using Riemann’s formula lie on this line but since Riemann hypothesized all zeros the search goes on. So far, no one has developed a proof that definitely establishes all zeros lie on the line ( y = ½ ). Here’s a way of resolving the conundrum concerning Riemann’s zeros (0’s) using the concept of strings. If we add the digits of any number (N) like ( 7919 ), for example, we get a total ( 7 + 9 + 1 + 9 = 26 ) which represents its’ string ( 26 ) or line ( y = 26 ). If we continue the addition of the digits ( 26 ) we get ( 2 + 6 = 8 ) or a line ( y = 8 ) for number ( 7919 ). Riemann had the idea that when his equation produced a zero (0) in the calculation, that zero for non- trivial numbers was on the line ( y = ½ ). Working in reverse, we can take any arbitrary line ( y = k ), with ( k = ( 0 to 9 )), because all numbers ( N ) sum to a number from ( 0 to 9 ) as one digit. Any line ( y = k ) can contain an infinite number of numbers, since zero ( 0 ) does not change the value of ( y = k ). For instance, if ( y = 2 ), it can hold the numbers ( 2, 11, 101, 110, etc. ) since the total digits do not exceed (2). It can readily be seen that all zeros lie on the line ( y = k ) no matter what the value of k whether it be one digit or multiple digits and thus Riemann was correct when he said all zeros lie on the line ( y = ½ ), since ( y = ½ ) is the reciprocal of ( y = 2 ) and contains the numbers ( ½, 1/11, 1/101, 1/110, etc.. The same conclusion can be applied to any arbitrary line ( y = k ) or ( y = 1/k ) for values of k from ( zero (0) to infinity ) of any number (N) which has an infinite number of digits (D) If Riemann had changed his formula to produce zeros ( 0’s ) for other non-trivial values for other lines ( y = k ) or ( y = 1/k ) he would have ended up hypothesizing that all zeros ( 0’s ) also lie on these lines. There is also the suggestion that the line ( y = ½ ) has a relationship to a formula for locating the position of any prime / number of primes preceding that particular prime. If ( y = 2 ), then the line ( y = 2 ) contains the numbers (2, 11, 101, 1001, 10001, 100001, etc.) since the sum of the digits does not exceed 2. If ( y = ½ ), then the line ( y = ½ ) contains the numbers ( ½, 1/11, 1/101, 1/1001, 1/10001, 1/100001, etc. ) since the sum of the digits does not exceed ½ and ½ is the reciprocal of 2 or ( y = 2 ) . Raise each number ( ½, 1/11, 1/101, 1/1001, 1/10001, 1/100001, etc. ) to the power of 2. Sum the numbers which have a limit of (0.258363501). The square root of (0.258363501) is (0.508294698). Similarly, If ( y = ½ ), then the line ( y = ½ ) contains the numbers ( ½, 1/11, 1/110, 1/1100, 1/11000, 1/110000, etc. ) since the sum of the digits does not exceed ½ and ½ is the reciprocal of 2 or ( y = 2 ) . Raise each number ( ½, 1/11, 1/110, 1/1100, 1/11000, 1/110000, etc. ) to the power of 2. Sum the numbers which have a limit of (0.258347942). The square root of (0.258347942) is (0.508279394). The important number is (.508) to 3 figures. The calculation of the location of any prime probably involves the adding of zeros (0’s) to the middle of (.508) to equal the number of digits in the probable prime after 3 digits. For instance ( 7919 has 4 digits so therefore extend ( .508 ) to ( .5008 )) by adding 1 zero to the middle and then raising (.5008) to the power equal to one less than the digit in the probable prime ending in ( 1, 3, 7, 9 ).

The general approach is the following:

Extend ( .508) to equal the number of digits in the probable prime starting after 3 digits and then raise ( .508 extended ) to a power equal to the number of digits in the probable prime minus 1. For instance ( 7919 ) contains 4 digits so extend ( .508 ) to 4 digits by adding zero (0) to the middle ( .5008 ). (7919) has 4 digits, so raise ( .5008 ) to the power of 3 ( 4 digits - 1 = 3 ). ( .5008 ^ 3 = .12560096 ) Multiply ( 7919 X .12560096 ) which equals ( 994.6340063 ). 7919 is the 1000th prime which means this method is approximately 5 short of 1000. The same method can be used using ( ½ or .5 ) but the answer is less accurate (7919 X (.5^3) = 989.875) which is ( 10.125 ) short of 1000 ( 7919 is the 1000th prime).

For numbers, 3 digits or under, such as ( 97 ) multiply ( 97 X (.508^2)) which equals approximately 25. As a matter of interest ( 97 ) is the 26th prime.

For 1 digit numbers multiply by ( .508 ).

Riemann Hypothesis Resolved Using Strings

If you look at a table of Prime Numbers, you will notice that they aren’t evenly spaced which raises the question of how many primes precede any arbitrarily selected number. On the other hand, if you look at a table of prime numbers they seem to follow a pattern. You will also notice that the prime numbers get rarer, as you look at higher and higher numbers. Most formulas that have been developed to find the location of any prime number seem to be a hit and miss affair because the prime numbers aren’t evenly spaced. George Riemann, who formulated the Riemann Hypothesis, found that his formula produced the occasional zero as an answer which he hypothesized lay on the line ( y = ½ ). So far, calculating on an individual basis, it has been found that over a billion zeros using Riemann’s formula lie on this line but since Riemann hypothesized all zeros the search goes on. So far, no one has developed a proof that definitely establishes all zeros lie on the line ( y = ½ ). Here’s a way, of resolving the conundrum concerning Riemann’s zeros (0’s) using the concept of strings. If we add the digits of any number (N) like ( 7919 ), for example, we get a total ( 7 + 9 + 1 + 9 = 26 ) which represents its’ string ( 26 ) or line ( y = 26 ). If we continue the addition of the digits ( 26 ) we get ( 2 + 6 = 8 ) or a line ( y = 8 ) for number ( 7919 ). Riemann had the idea that when his equation produced a zero (0) in the calculation, that zero for non- trivial numbers was on the line ( y = ½ ). Working in reverse, we can take any arbitrary line ( y = k ), with ( k = ( 0 to 9 )), because all numbers ( N ) sum to a number from ( 0 to 9 ) as one digit. Any line ( y = k ) can have an infinite number of numbers, since zero ( 0 ) does not change the value of ( y = k ). For instance, if ( y = 2 ), it can hold the numbers ( 11, 101, 110, etc. ) since the total digits do not exceed (2). It can readily be seen that all zeros line on the line ( y = k ) no matter what the value of k whether it be one digit or multiple digits and thus Riemann was correct when he said all zeros lie on the line ( y = ½ ), since ( y = ½ ) is the reciprocal of ( y = 2 ) and contains the numbers ( 1/11, 1/101, 1/110, etc.. The same conclusion can be applied to any arbitrary line ( y = k ) or ( y = 1/k ) for values of k from ( zero (0) to infinity ) of any number (N) which has an infinite number of digits (D) If Riemann had changed his formula to produce zeros ( 0’s ) for other non-trivial values for lines ( y = k ) or ( y = 1/k ) he would have ended up hypothesizing that all zeros ( 0’s ) also lie on these lines.

The Theory Of Everything

This universe is organized into particles / objects, strings and frames. Particles / objects are physical things that you and I can see and touch. Frames are concerned with the Theory Of Relativity when frames are either stationary or moving / changing relative to each other. Strings are the forces, time and space which we experience in various forms in our day to day activities. Strings functioning as gravity are slightly different because the strings also keep other dimensions in place which we can’t see / experience. This means that strings functioning as gravity are substantially weaker when compared to strings functioning as forces, time and space confined to our dimensions. Each particle / object which includes us and mathematics have an associated string. If we are stationary, our string tends to hold us in place and this holding in place we call gravity. If we start to move, our string starts to change from a primarily gravity function to one giving us a path / energy to travel. The faster we travel up to the speed of light, the more we convert from a particle / object into a string. At the speed of light we become a complete string. Velocity in terms of our string is the uniform change in the position of our string. Acceleration in terms of our string is the increasing / decreasing changes in the position of our string . The space in which we travel is made up of layered strings which we experience as a sheet of space. The forces which we experience on ourselves or apply to others is really the vibrations of our personal strings or the vibrations of our personal strings on others. Events which we experience are caused by our strings disturbing strings of space and time which we may see as beneficial happenings or not so beneficial happenings. The vibrations of strings are seen by us as properties of particles / objects which define them and allow us to interact with particles / objects in different ways. Chemistry and metallurgy is an example of the use of vibrating strings to create other particles / objects through bonds which are strings by another name. Strings on a nuclear basis are the strong and weak nuclear forces. If a particle / object moves through string space, the particle / objects strings tend to pull string space out of alignment causing string space to warp which we experience as orbits or paths. The vibration of strings also cause other strings to vibrate which we call fields. Electromagnetism, radiation and communication are examples of controlled or uncontrolled string vibrations to convey benefits, havoc or information. Since strings are also time and space, everything everywhere is instantaneous in time and distance although we, as particles / objects don’t experience it that way due to the delay in translating strings into reality we can experience.

Largest Prime Number

If you want to wile away an afternoon, try finding the largest prime number. For those that may have forgotten, a prime number is a number that is only evenly divisible by itself and 1. This definition eliminates all the even numbers that are evenly divisible by 2, leaving the odd numbers. The usual method of finding a prime number is to multiply 2 umpteen dozen times by itself and then subtracting 1 from that number, thereby creating an odd number (( 2 X 2 = 4), ( 4 - 1 = 3 )). You then take that odd number ( 3 ) and see if you can find a previous whole number up to 3, ( 1, 2, ) which will divide into it evenly leaving no remainder. There is a faster method. Numbers are written into a series of columns. Number 13 has 3 in column 0 and 1 in column 1. You will soon realize that any larger number can be easily created by adding another column For instance 3, 13, 213 etc.. It can also be seen that the total number of numbers is infinite because you just keep putting a number from 0 to 9 inclusive in the column to the left of a filled column.

Here are some rules:

A prime number, if it is a prime number , ends in 1, 3 , 7, 9 in column 0 ( far right column ). For instance 11, 13, 17, 19 are all prime numbers.

Any number whose digits, except for number 3, adds to 3 or an even multiple of 3 isn’t a prime number. For instance 39 isn’t a prime number because its’ digits ( 3 and 9 ) total 12 ( 3 + 9 = 12 ). ( 12/ 3 = 4 ).

A number, not a prime number, ending in 1, 3, 7, 9 in column 0 ( far right column ) is only evenly divisible by a number ending in 1, 3, 7, 9 in column 0 ( far right column ). For instance 39 is evenly divisible by 3 and 13 ( 3 X 13 = 39 ).

Numbers As A Fractal

Three Main Categories Of Mathematics

The universe is based on the number 3. If you ever have listened to Sesame Street you will remember that the Count always started the program by saying " This program is being brought to you by the number ????. The Count when welcoming you into this universe when you were born could have said " This universe is brought to you by the number 3". If you believe in a higher power simply because this universe is too complex to be random then you now know the higher power pushed her pen towards the number 3 . If you don’t believe me how do you account for the natural number "e" (2.718281828) and Pi (3.141592654) which is close to 3 ??? Mathematics is no different. At the moment we have 2 known main categories of Mathematics. What’s the 3rd???

They are:

1. Particle / object

2. Geometry

Particle / object mathematics is the mathematics that we use all the time. We add, subtract, multiply and divide these numbers. We use equations with knowns, unknowns and variables commonly known as algebra and calculus. Geometry has to do with diagrams and from the diagrams you calculate things such as angles and distances. This is trigonometry and geometry. There is a third category called strings. Strings are everywhere in the universe. Sometimes strings are called waves or dark energy. Quantum mechanics talks of quantum particles and wave like behavior which is strings by another name. We have something called String Theory. Each mathematical particle / object has an associated string attached with it. Most of the time we only calculate things using the particle / object and ignore the string. Mathematics can also use the string part and ignore the particle / object part.

This is how it works:

1. Total the number of digits in a number. For instance ( 39 ) has two digits whose total is 12 ( 3 + 9 = 12 ). This means that the particle / object (39) has a string or tail equal to 12.

2. The string contains numbers, whose digits, when added can’t exceed the value of the string which in the example (39) is (12). Higher numbers can be formed by adding zeros ( 0 ) between the numbers. For instance for particle / object (39) which has a string / tail ( 12 ) also contains the number ( 10902 ) because ( 1 + 0 + 9 + 0 + 2 = 12 ).

3. A string can hold more than one number of the same value and contains an infinite value of numbers because of the ability to place a zero ( 0 ) in the number without changing the string total ( 12 ).

4. Any mathematical operation that can be used by particles / objects can be used with strings.

The Mathematical Categories are:

1. Particles / Objects

2. Geometry

3. Strings

Riemann Hypothesis Resolved Geometrically

The easiest way to solve the Riemann Hypothesis is by using geometry. Fractions in geometry are actually one line drawn over another line. For instance, ½ , is line ( y = 1 ) drawn over line ( y = 2 ). The distance ( s ) between the line ( y = 1 ) and line ( y = 2 ) is the power to which the fraction ( ½ ) is raised (( ½) ^ (s)). The addition sign ( + ) is the distance between the lines ( y = 1 ) and the line ( y = 2 ) representing ½ and the lines ( y = 1 ) and the line ( y = 3 ) representing 1/3rd etc.. If you measure from Line (1) over Line ( 2 ) representing ½ then the distance is consistent from that line to the other lines and for all intents and purposes the zeros ( 0 ) which are the starting measuring points, are on the geometric line ( y = ½ ). Using individual particle arithmetic its’ been established that the first 100 billion zeros do lie on the line ( y = ½ ).

Reimann accidentally touched on a new way of looking at mathematics and fractions when he said:

All the zeros of the Riemann zeta function lie on the line y = ½.

Riemann Hypothesis Resolved

The Riemann Hypothesis is all about location since Riemann said all the zeros of his function lie on the line ( y = ½ ). Let’s assume they all do lie along the line ( y = ½ ). Up to the present time using Riemann’s equation of trail it has been established that the first 100 billion zeros do lie on the line ( y = ½ ) calculating each value at a time, but there is a possibility one or several don’t lie on the line. In any event no one has developed a simple solution to prove that the trail of all zeros ( 0 ) end up on the line ( y = ½ ) no matter what values are used in the calculation. Perhaps in some way, as yet not understood, Riemann’s equation is flawed even though it has been proved right. The question arises because imaginary numbers are used and although we can work them mathematically to get real solutions, perhaps our understanding of them isn’t really complete and that incompleteness is showing itself in the Riemann formula. There is also a belief that the Riemann Zeta Function has a relationship to the distribution of prime numbers. Prime numbers are numbers that can only be divided evenly by themselves and 1. An example of primes are 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 11, however, they aren’t evenly distributed and no one formula up to the present time has been discovered that will calculate the position of any prime.

For instance the following primes have the following locations ( 1 to 6 ):

1. 1

2. 2

3. 3

4. 5

5. 7

6. 11

The problem is that it is almost impossible to list all the primes because the primes aren’t readily discernible and for a second part extend to infinity. Therefore the problem arises as to just where does any arbitrarily selected prime fit into a list or conversely how many primes precede this prime. The resolution of this conundrum is within the Riemann Hypothesis. Riemann didn’t realize it when he formulated his hypothesis because it hadn’t been invented but he is really talking about an aspect of string theory when he said:

All the zeros of the Riemann zeta function lie on the line y = ½.

Let’s use string mathematics. Every object has a string or tail associated with it. In string mathematics the tail of any number ( object ) is the sum of its’ digits. The location of each tail of a number is generally unknown, but in the Riemann Hypothesis case, Riemann said the tail lies on the line y = ½ as the result of summing. Before summing, the string or tail existed on the line y = 2 as that was the string tail value of any mathematical object that was 2. For instance 97’s digits total 16 ( 9 + 7 = 16 ) and ( 1 + 6 = 7 ). This means 97 has both a string tail of ( 16 ) and ( 7 ). The string tail of all numbers can be reduced to a figure from 1 to 9. which is its’ tail or string in one digit. The digit tail zero ( 0 ) for the number zero ( 0 ) is imaginary in the sense that you can’t do anything with zero ( 0 ) except use it as a place holder in a number ( ex. 609 ) or treat it as the square root of ( - 1 ). In string theory the equation ( y = 2 ) means that any number ( y ) also has a string equal to 2 as well as a number value 2. Since zeros do not increase the string / tail value of 2, 2 can be any number that contains zeros (0) in the string part. If you accept this premise then any zero remains on the string y = 2 by definition. If a calculation is performed on ( y = 2 ) the string tail is automatically recalculated to reflect the new line. This means if the line ( y = 2 ) is changed to ( y = ½ ), the string / tail values become ( 1 ) over a number containing zeros ( 0 ) so that the total of the denominator is 2 ( y = ½ ).Riemann said that the zeros go into the line y = ½ or their location is on the line y = ½. What Riemann was actually saying even though he didn’t know it was that any number containing zeros whose digits totaled two representing a string had its’ zeros on the line y = ½ which was 2 as a fraction. Here is a solution to Riemann’s Hypothesis based on string theory and limits. If we add 1 + ½ + 1/3 + etc. we find that the fraction gets larger and larger and never reaches a limit from here to infinity. If we add 1 + (½)^2 + (1/3)^2 + etc. we might soon see that the addition soon converges to a value or limit.

Here’s a condensed version of the Riemann Hypothesis proof based on string theory and limits:

1. Write down the number 2 which represents both the string length of number 2 and number 2 itself.

2. Write down the number 11 since ( 1 + 1 = 2 ) and the string length of number 2 is still intact.

3. Put a series of zeros between the two 1’s creating numbers 101, 1001, 10001, ----- 100000001. ( the string length of number 2 is still intact ).

4. Write the fractions ½, 1/11, 1/101, 1/1001, 1/1001, ------ 1/100000001.

5. Raise each fraction to the power of 2 ( this is the value of the string / tail and not the number 2 ).

6. Sum the fractions to the power of string / tail value 2.

7. Depending on the power of your calculator / spreadsheet / perseverance, the limit or convergence will be around (0.258363501).

8. Write down the primes from 1 to 97.

9. Number the primes.

10. If you multiply 97 X (0.258363501) the location of the prime will be approximately at 25 and 97 is at location 26.

11. If you multiply 97 X (½) ^ 2 you get approximately 24.

So what??? When you were doing your calculation involving the zeros between the "1" digits ( 101, 1001, etc. ) you were actually using the string / tail values in the string which was attached to the mathematical value of 2 which was on the line ( y = 2 ). When you wrote the fractions, you were converting the line ( y = 2 ) to the line ( y = ½ ). The summation of the fractions ( ½, 1/11, 1/ 101, etc. ) produced the limit of (0.258363501). The zeros never left the string / tail when the line was converted because they were the zeros in the numbers 101, 1001 etc.. The Riemann Hypothesis is proved.

Primes & The Riemann Hypothesis

Here’s how Primes and The Riemann Hypothesis are connected. If you write down all the primes from 1 to 97 you will find there are 26 of them. All numbers are basically a connected string so you can use String Mathematics on them. Riemann said that all the zeros of his zeta function lay on the line ( y = ½ ). It turns out that the fraction ½ in the equation ( y = ½ ) can be used to estimate the location of any prime in a prime list. The single digit string primes are ( 1, 2, 3, 5, 7 ). If you multiply the single digit primes ( 1, 2, 3, 5, 7 ) by ½ you get the approximate location of these primes in a list of primes. The two digit string primes start at 11 and go to 97. Here it gets trickier because not all numbers ending in 1, 3, 7, 9 in column zero ( the far right column ) are primes. Two digit string primes have two digits. In estimating the location of two digit primes sometimes you multiply the two digit prime by ½ and sometimes by ( ½ X ½ ). If you use string mathematics to solve the Riemann Hypothesis the limit of the sum is (0.258363501). If you multiply the limit of the sum ((0.258363501) X 97) you get 25 in round numbers and 97 is the 26th prime. The square root of the limit of the sum (0.258363501) is ( .508 ) to three digits. If you use ( .508 ) in your calculations of the location of the primes ( 1 to 97 ) you will find your answer is generally closer to the real position in the list. ( 7919 ) is the 1000th prime. Using string mathematics you will see the number of string digits in ( 7919 ) is 4. In this particular case you multiply (½) 3 times to get an answer close to 1000 ( 7919 X .5 X .5 X .5 = 989.875 ). Multiplying ( .508 ) 3 X gives ( 1038 ) but using String Mathematics add a zero between 5 and 8 giving ( .5008 ). ( 7919 X (.5008 X .5008 X .5008 ) = 994.63 ) which is about 5 short of 1000 which is more accurate than multiplying ( 7919 X .5 X .5 X .5 ) = 989.875) The calculation of the location of any prime probably involves the adjustment of zeros (0) in (.508) and then deciding how many times you should multiply the revised figure ( for example (.5008 ) before multiplying it with the suspected prime number ending in 1, 3, 7, 9.

The general approach is possibly the following:

(.508 ) multiplied twice for primes 2 to 3 digits in width since there is an overlap in 3 digit prime numbers.

(.5008 ) multiplied three times for primes 3 to 4 digits in width ( see 7919 example ) since there is an overlap in 4 digit prime numbers.

( .50008 ) multiplied 4 times for primes 4 - 5 digits in width since there is an overlap in 5 digit prime numbers.

( .5 ) multiplied a number of times equal to one ( 1 ) less than the number of digits will give you a rough position ( ex. 7919 has 4 digits, so multiply ( .5 ) 3 times since ( 4 - 1 = 3 ).

Here’s the explanation:

The location of the real part of the not obvious or unseen zeros ( 0 ) is exactly ½ in the equation ( y = ½ ), since the number of primes in this region are denser, so the formula gives a relatively precise location. As the primes spread out, multiplying with ( .5 ) and the not obvious zeros ( .50000 etc. ) becomes increasingly inaccurate, so the obvious zeros ( 0 ) have to be added between (.5 ) and ( .008 ) to form numbers that are less close to ½. ( .508, .5008, .50008, etc. ). If the primes did not spread themselves in comparison to the other numbers you wouldn’t have to spread the obvious zeros ( 0 ) between (.5) and (.008). The not obvious zeros ( 0 ) lie on the vertical complex plane because they aren’t required for the real calculation. Therefore it can be said that the positive zeros ( 0 ) lie on the complex plane on one side of the real line ( y = ½ ) and the negative zeros ( - 0 ) lie on the other side of ( y = ½ ) on the complex plane vertical to ( y = ½ )

Using String Mathematics, the Riemann Hypothesis can be resolved like this:

The universe consists of particles / objects, strings and frames. Each object or particle has a string attached to it which we may call a tail, trail, or highway as well as anything else. Most strings do not have a location unless you state a formula such as ( y = 2 ) or ( y = ½ ). A string is a total of the object’s digits. For instance 97 has a string total of ( 9 + 7 = 16 ) or ( 9 + 7 = 16, 1 + 6 = 7 ). Therefore, as an example, 97 has two strings which are 16 and 7. The formula ( y = 2 ) has a string value of 2 and a particle / object value of 2. Here’s the solution to Riemann’s Hypothesis using string mathematics. Riemann said that all the zeros of his zeta function lie on the line ( y = ½ ) as the result of summing. In the formula ( y = 2 ), the string holds an infinity of numbers providing their sum doesn’t exceed 2. These numbers can be created by adding zeros to a number ( 101, 1001, etc. ). The string can also hold the number 2 and 11 since ( 1 + 1 = 2 ).

Here’s a condensed version of the Riemann Hypothesis proof based on string mathematics and the conversion of ( y = 2 ) to ( y = ½ ) :

1. Write down the number 2 which represents both the string length of number 2 and number 2 itself.

2. Write down the number 11 since ( 1 + 1 = 2 ) and the string length of number 2 is still intact.

3. Put a series of zeros between the two 1’s creating numbers 101, 1001, 10001, ----- 100000001. ( the string length of number 2 is still intact ).

4. Write the fractions ½, 1/11, 1/101, 1/1001, 1/1001, ------ 1/100000001.

5. Raise each fraction to the power of 2 ( this is the value of the string / tail and not the number 2 ).

6. Sum the fractions to the power of string / tail value 2.

7. Depending on the power of your calculator / spreadsheet / perseverance, the limit or convergence will be around (0.258363501).

So what??? When you were doing your calculation involving the zeros between the "1" digits ( 101, 1001, etc. ) you were actually using the string / tail values in the string which was attached to the mathematical value of 2 which was on the line ( y = 2 ). When you wrote the fractions, you were converting the line ( y = 2 ) to the line ( y = ½ ). The summation of the fractions ( ½, 1/11, 1/ 101, etc. ) produced the limit of (0.258363501). The zeros never left the string / tail when the line was converted and therefore the Riemann Hypothesis is proved using string mathematics. The same principle applies to any other equation converted to its’ reciprocal. The zeros can be placed anywhere to make a number in the string .

String Mathematics

The universe consists of particles / objects, strings and frames. Each object or particle has a string attached to it which we may call a tail, trail, or highway as well as anything else. Most strings do not have a location unless you state a formula such as ( y = 2 ) or ( y = ½ ). A string is a total of the object’s digits. For instance 97 has a string total of ( 9 + 7 = 16 ) or ( 9 + 7 = 16, 1 + 6 = 7 ). Therefore, as an example, 97 has two strings which are 16 and 7. The formula ( y = 2 ) has a string value of 2 and a particle / object value of 2. Here’s the solution to Riemann’s Hypothesis using string mathematics. Riemann said that all the zeros of his zeta function lie on the line ( y = ½ ) as the result of summing. In the formula ( y = 2 ), the string holds an infinity of numbers providing their sum doesn’t exceed 2. These numbers can be created by adding zeros to a number ( 101, 1001, etc. ). The string can also hold the number 2 and 11 since ( 1 + 1 = 2 ).

Here’s a condensed version of the Riemann Hypothesis proof based on string mathematics and the conversion of ( y = 2 ) to ( y = ½ ) :

1. Write down the number 2 which represents both the string length of number 2 and number 2 itself.

2. Write down the number 11 since ( 1 + 1 = 2 ) and the string length of number 2 is still intact.

3. Put a series of zeros between the two 1’s creating numbers 101, 1001, 10001, ----- 100000001. ( the string length of number 2 is still intact ).

4. Write the fractions ½, 1/11, 1/101, 1/1001, 1/1001, ------ 1/100000001.

5. Raise each fraction to the power of 2 ( this is the value of the string / tail and not the number 2 ).

6. Sum the fractions to the power of string / tail value 2.

7. Depending on the power of your calculator / spreadsheet / perseverance, the limit or convergence will be around (0.258363501).

So what??? When you were doing your calculation involving the zeros between the "1" digits ( 101, 1001, etc. ) you were actually using the string / tail values in the string which was attached to the mathematical value of 2 which was on the line ( y = 2 ). When you wrote the fractions, you were converting the line ( y = 2 ) to the line ( y = ½ ). The summation of the fractions ( ½, 1/11, 1/ 101, etc. ) produced the limit of (0.258363501). The zeros never left the string / tail when the line was converted and therefore the Riemann Hypothesis is proved using string mathematics. The same principle applies to any other equation converted to its’ reciprocal. The zeros can be placed anywhere to make a number in the string .

Particles, Strings & Dark Stuff

This universe has particles, strings and dark stuff. At a quantum level, we talk about particles. At an eyeball level we talk about objects which is really the same as particles. Objects are such things as you and me and buildings. Things we can see and touch. Objects can also be abstract concepts like events that just happen. Math has its’ particles which are variables, unknowns, and constants. Computer programming has its’ objects. Just look at Java. Strings are a little harder to grasp. If you look at mathematics, any formula is really a string that holds some objects ( variables, unknowns and constants ) together which can be manipulated into something that provides an answer. Language consists of objects which we call letters. You arrange these letters in some combination and you have a word. The word has a meaning. You take this string of letters ( objects ) and make another string called a sentence or paragraph. This sentence, paragraph, novel, etc. or string has a meaning. The scientists have a string theory which is basically that all matter comes with strings. Ever hear of someone telling you that this gift (object) comes with strings attached??? Same principle. Black Holes, for instance, is just a bunch of compressed or intertwined strings. If that concept is correct, and if Black Holes do crazy things to gravity, time and space than it stands to reason that gravity, time and space are strings. A Black Hole generally sucks everything into it, which means, by extension, that gravity, time, and space exist as strings surrounding us even though we aren’t experiencing their existence in that form. The universe is composed of Dark Matter which we can’t see. This Dark Matter is 90% of the universe and generally keeps things in place. If things are kept in place in the universe by Strings it would seem to me that a string is dark matter and provides a path and tail for a particle or object since we can see where the object has been. A path or highway is another name for a string. Chemical bonds are a form of string acting in the same principle as gravity holding chemicals in place. If an object is an abstract event that won’t move we talk in terms of inertia which is gravity by another name. The chemical bond is formed at the string of each chemical or a compound. Essentially two strings of two different chemicals joining together. At a quantum level we have a nucleus held together by quantum strings. If we tear the string ( nuclear fission ) we create a quick release of energy which is really a series of strings gone berserk. If we develop a method for compressing a string in a nucleus without bending it, we have nuclear fusion which produces a controlled form of energy . On it goes but this essay will give you a quick overview of the concept. Just look around for some examples!!!

Prime Secrets

1. Primes are defined as any number that can only be divided evenly by itself and 1.

2. Primes end in 1, 3, 7, 9 in column "0" ( far right column ).

3. Not all numbers ending in 1, 3, 7, 9 are prime numbers.

4. Numbers that aren’t prime numbers but end in 1, 3, 7, 9 are evenly divisible by some number ending in 1, 3, 7, 9 in column "0" ( far right column ).

5. Except for the prime number 3, any number ending in 1, 3, 7, 9, say (39), when their digits are totaled ( 3 + 9 = 12 ) are not a prime if the total of their digits can be evenly divided by 3 ( 3 + 9 = 12) ( 12 / 3 = 4 ) ( 39 / 13 = 3 ).

6. The number of primes preceding a prime number can be approximated by first taking a prime number, say (7919), and counting all its’ digits. Prime number ( 7919 ) has 4 digits ( 7,9,1,9 = 4 digits ). The other method is to count all of the prime’s digits and subtract (1). Prime number ( 7919 ) has 4 digits and subtracting ( 1 ) leaves 3 digits. Prime number ( 7919 ) has 4 digits ( 7, 9, 1, 9 = 4 digits ), and subtracting (1) leaves ( 4 - 1 = 3 ) digits. Next take the total number of its’ digits or the total number of its’ digits minus 1 and multiple the prime ((7919) X (½ ^ 4) = 494.94) or ((7919) X (½ ^ 3) = 989.88). Since it’s unlikely that 7919 only has approximately 494 primes behind it, the likelier answer is around 989. Add 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 to 989 to get a closer approximate number. In this case add 10. ( 989.88 + 10 = 999.88 ). 7919 is the 1000th prime according to the tables. The approximation requires some obvious juggling but if you apply points 1 to 5 to the approximation you will come close to a probable answer.