Dylex

Riemann Hypothesis Hopefully, Finally, Resolved

2012-01-08T07:57:00.000-05:00

Let us assume that all the primes to infinity lie on a horizontal line . While it is acknowledged that the primes lie on this horizontal line to infinity and are in order, we don't know precisely where the primes lie on this horizontal line in terms of their distance from each other. Let us assume that wherever the infinite primes are on the horizontal line at varying distances from each other, we have a vertical line ( y = ½ ) off the horizontal line which forms an upside down “T” ( ! ! ! ! etc. ) . The infinite primes are at the intersection of a vertical line ( y = ½ ) and an infinite line holding all the prime numbers . Riemann said all his zeros are on the line ( y = ½ ) and have a value of ( ½ ) when they are on this line ( y = ½ ) . At the present time we are calculating to prove that all of Riemann's non-trivial zeros line on the line ( y = ½ ) and so far so good . If we can establish that the calculation of the position of these primes use ( ½ ) and Riemann's zero's ( 0 ) , then we have established that Riemann's zeros are all on the line ( y = ½ ) because ( y = ½ ) intersects with the horizontal line holding the infinite primes . Riemann also said his zeros can be added or subtracted or placed in different positions in order to adjust the position of the primes from the beginning of the horizontal line . This adjustment as an integer also establishes the number of primes preceding that prime number .The first prime numbers from 1 to 12 in order are 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, 23, 29, 31. If we multiply these numbers by ( .509999999 ) our answer is very close to their actual position ( 23 X .509999999 = 11.72999999 ). The actual position of prime number 23 is 10. There are 9 prime numbers preceding 23 ( 1, 2, 3, 5,7,11,13, 17, 19 ). The prime numbers from position 13 to 26 in order are ( 37, 41, 43, 47, 53, 59, 61, 67, 71, 73, 79, 83, 89, 97 ). If you multiply these primes by ( .509999999 ) you will find that the prime number positions are hugely incorrect. You will see from the “ In summary “ list that I indicated under ( 3. ) that the error term in the prime number theorem is related to the position of the zeros. You can increase the number of zeros by either adding them between ½ and 9 (for instance .5000999999) or by raising ( .509999999 ) to the power of 2 ( .509999999 X.509999999 = ( .2600999 )). You will see from ( .2600999 ) that we have adjusted the error term in the prime number theorem by adjusting the zeros ( 0 ) from one to two. Multiply the prime numbers by ( .2600999 ) to obtain the prime number location.

If you do the multiplication, you will find that some of the prime number locations are still out. For instance, ( 37 X .2600999 = 9.623699981). The actual location is 13. For some inexplicable reason if you add Pi ( 3.141592654 ) to this number you get ( 12.76529263 ). This trick of either adding or subtracting Pi works in the majority of cases. In some cases adding or subtracting the natural number ( 2.718281828 ) also works.

Here’s how the system works for numbers in general.

1. Count the number of digits in a prime number. For instance 7919 has 4 digits. Subtract 1 from the number of digits ( 4 - 1 = 3 ) for 7919. Form another number equal to the number of digits in 7919 ( 4 ) by putting ( .5 ) in the far left column and 9 in the far right column. ( .5—9 ). Fill the middle with Riemann Hypothesis zeros ( 0 ) forming a four digit number ( .5009 ). Raise ( .5009 ) to the power of 3 ( which is the number of digits in 7919 ( 4 ) minus 1 ( 4 - 1 = 3 ). ( .5009 ) ^ 3 = .125676215. Multiply 7919 X .125676215 = 995.2299524. 7919 is the 1000th prime number. The calculation is short by approximately the value of Pi ( 3.141592654 ). Pi + 995.2299524 is 998.3715451 which is very close to 1000.

It can be seen from these calculations that the magnitude of the oscillations of the primes around their expected position is controlled by the zeros ( 0’s) in the multiplier. The error term is closely related to the position of the zeros in the number ( .509999999 ). The error term can be controlled by either adding zeros ( .500999999, .50009999 ) or by raising these numbers to a power ( multiply the numbers by themselves ) thereby increasing the zeros. The power zeros can also be adjusted. For instance (( .5099999999 ) ^2 = (..260099999 )). If we change the digit 6 to zero ( 0 ) creating ( .200099999 ) and multiplying it by the prime number 347 we get ( 69.43469965 ) Prime number 347 is the 69th prime. A further adjustment can be made by adding or subtracting Pi ( 3.141592654 ) or the natural number “e” ( 2.718281828 ).thereby creating a range if the calculated answer is close but too far out.

In Summary:

1. ( .509999999 ) may be adjusted using Riemann zeros.

2. ( .509999999 ) may be raised to a power to increase the zeros.

3. ( .509999999 ) raised to a power may have its' power zeros adjusted.

4. Tweaking can be done by adding or subtracting Pi or “e”.

Primes, Fractions & The Riemann Hypothesis

2012-01-07T10:04:00.000-05:00

The Riemann Hypothesis involves an understanding of fractions . The largest fraction you can have is ( ½ ) or ( .5 ) . This may seem counter-intuitive, but to prove it simply subtract any ( 1 / number ) fraction from ( ½ ) and you will end up with a positive fraction . The Riemann Hypothesis uses the formula ( 1 + ½ ^s + 1/3 ^s + ---- ) to infinity . In this formula you have ( s = ½ + it ) . You may be familiar with calculus , but if you aren't calculus is concerned with how close you can get a fraction to a number without actually touching ( reaching ) the number. This getting close as a numerical figure is called a limit . You can think of it as how close you can get your nose to a brick wall without touching / hurting your nose . If you add fractions to infinity, you will find that the distance from ( ½ ) becomes smaller and smaller . If you add fractions to infinity that have been raised to a power, you will find that the distance from ( ½ ) is closer to ( ½ ) then by simply adding unraised fractions . Since the distance from ( ½ ) is getting closer, you can think of all the added fractions as getting closer to the line ( y = ½ ) . You may not know this, but if you raise a fraction to the power of zero ( 0 ), you get one ( 1 ) ( ½ ^0 = 1 ) . Zero ( 0 ) functions more as a placeholder than a value . Of course, you can argue that if you don't have anything you have something which is zero ( 0 ) . If the raised fraction to a power is getting closer and closer to ( ½ ), then the power to which it is being raised is getting closer and closer to zero ( 0 ) since ( ½ ) raised to the power of zero ( 0 ) is one ( 1 ) which means in the extreme ( ½ ) doesn't change because it becomes one or itself ( think philosophically here ) . One of the problems in mathematics is that you can't graph zero . You can, of course, draw a line and say this is line zero ( 0 ) meaning something you are considering starts here . If the power to which a fraction ( ½ ) is getting closer and closer to zero ( 0 ), then that zero ( 0 ) is getting closer and closer to ( ½ ) which is on the line ( y = ½ ) . Therefore it can be argued that zero ( 0 ) has the value of ( ½ ) on the line ( y = ½ ) . This is what Riemann said. Calculations have been done and continue to be done to prove that Riemann's zeros ( 0 ) lie on the line ( y = ½ ) and so far, so good. Riemann also said that his zeros ( 0 ) had something to do with primes . A prime is a number that can only be evenly divided by itself and one ( 1 ) . He also went on to say that the zeros can be manipulated ( positions changed or zeros added ) in order to get the primes closer to their true location. If we can calculate the location of a prime, we know how many primes precede it because the primes would be in order . To state the obvious , the position of any prime in a series is less than the prime itself. For instance, the first one ( 1 ) digit primes are 1, 2, 3, 5, 7 . The primes ( 1, 2, 3 ) are in the positions ( 1, 2, 3 ) . The primes 5 and 7 are in positions 4 and 5 . The primes ( 1, 2, 3 ) can be multiplied by one ( 1 ) ( 1 X 1, 2 X 1, 3 X 1 ) to get their true position ( 1, 2, 3 ) . If we multiply prime 5 by .9099 we get ( 5 X ..9099 = 3.63996) which is mathematically close to 4 . If we multiply prime 7 by .70999 we get ( 7 X .70999 = 4.96993 which is mathematically close to 5 . These zeros ( 0 ) are Riemann zeros .

Obviously, you can diddle the multiplier any way you want to get the answer, but since we are dealing with the Riemann Hypothesis , Riemann zeros and the number ½ on the line ( y = ½ ) it generally works like this:

The first prime numbers from 1 to 12 in order are 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, 23, 29, 31. If we multiply these numbers by ( .509999999 ) our answer is very close to their actual position ( 23 X .509999999 = 11.72999999 ). The actual position of prime number 23 is 10. There are 9 prime numbers preceding 23 ( 1, 2, 3, 5,7,11,13, 17, 19 ). The prime numbers from position 13 to 26 in order are ( 37, 41, 43, 47, 53, 59, 61, 67, 71, 73, 79, 83, 89, 97 ). If you multiply these primes by ( .509999999 ) you will find that the prime number positions are hugely incorrect. You will see from the “ In summary “ list that I indicated under ( 3. ) that the error term in the prime number theorem is related to the position of the zeros. You can increase the number of zeros by either adding them between ½ and 9 (for instance .5000999999) or by raising ( .509999999 ) to the power of 2 ( .509999999 X.509999999 = ( .2600999 )). You will see from ( .2600999 ) that we have adjusted the error term in the prime number theorem by adjusting the zeros ( 0 ) from one to two. Multiply the prime numbers by ( .2600999 ) to obtain the prime number location.

If you do the multiplication, you will find that some of the prime number locations are still out. For instance, ( 37 X .2600999 = 9.623699981). The actual location is 13. For some inexplicable reason if you add Pi ( 3.141592654 ) to this number you get ( 12.76529263 ). This trick of either adding or subtracting Pi works in the majority of cases. In some cases adding or subtracting the natural number ( 2.718281828 ) also works.

Here’s how the system works for numbers in general.

Count the number of digits in a prime number. For instance 7919 has 4 digits. Subtract 1 from the number of digits ( 4 - 1 = 3 ) for 7919. Form another number equal to the number of digits in 7919 ( 4 ) by putting ( .5 ) in the far left column and 9 in the far right column. ( .5—9 ). Fill the middle with Riemann Hypothesis zeros ( 0 ) forming a four digit number ( .5009 ). Raise ( .5009 ) to the power of 3 ( which is the number of digits in 7919 ( 4 ) minus 1 ( 4 - 1 = 3 ). ( .5009 ) ^ 3 = .125676215. Multiply 7919 X .125676215 = 995.2299524. 7919 is the 1000th prime number. The calculation is short by approximately the value of Pi ( 3.141592654 ). Pi + 995.2299524 is 998.3715451 which is very close to 1000.
It can be seen from these calculations that the magnitude of the oscillations of the primes around their expected position is controlled by the zeros ( 0’s) in the multiplier. The error term is closely related to the position of the zeros in the number ( .509999999 ). The error term can be controlled by either adding zeros ( .500999999, .50009999 ) or by raising these numbers to a power ( multiply the numbers by themselves ) thereby increasing the zeros. The power zeros can also be adjusted. For instance (( .5099999999 ) ^2 = (..260099999 )). If we change the digit 6 to zero ( 0 ) creating ( .200099999 ) and multiplying it by the prime number 347 we get ( 69.43469965 ) Prime number 347 is the 69th prime. A further adjustment can be made by adding or subtracting Pi ( 3.141592654 ) or the natural number “e” ( 2.718281828 ).thereby creating a range if the calculated answer is close but too far out.

In Summary:

1. ( .509999999 ) may be adjusted using Riemann zeros.

2. ( .509999999 ) may be raised to a power to increase the zeros.

3. ( .509999999 ) raised to a power may have its' power zeros adjusted.

4. Tweaking can be done by adding or subtracting Pi or “e”.

Fractions & The Riemann Hypothesis

2012-01-05T17:59:00.000-05:00

Fast Calculation Of Prime Numbers

2011-12-31T12:02:00.000-05:00

1. Take any number which is a multiple of 9 starting at zero ( 0 ) ( 0, 9, 18, 27, etc. ) .

2. Add 1, 2, 4, 5. 7, 8 to the number so that the first column of the number ends in ( 1, 3, 7, 9 ) . For example ( 11, 13, 17, 19 ) .

3. Test to see if it is a prime . A prime number is defined as being only evenly divisible by itself and 1.

Time Is Gravity, Entropy, Chaos In Disguise

2011-12-25T06:26:00.000-05:00

Gravity appears to us as a weak force, but it is really the effects of time in disguise. Einstein said that mass bends space around the mass and that mass and energy are the same thing in two forms. The more that the mass / energy flexes the space string, the greater the gravity which is seen by us as a force . Time follows the flexed space string at differing velocities depending on the amount of flex in the space string near the mass / energy . Time has a numerical value of nine ( 9 ) and can be broken up into 9 segments ( 1/9 ). The 9 segments can have different velocities and can effect what happens. We can see this phenomena in our own life. Each of us, have adventures in life which may appear spontaneous or random . The things that happen to you or I aren't always at the same time. This is because the energy around us is flexed arbitrarily by either outside , random , or self induced actions that flexes the energy string . If you and I experience the same thing, the length of time may be different because the time segments travel at different speeds. In addition, if something bad happens, it usually follows in units of three ( 3 ), because the universe runs on the number three ( 3 ) and tries to stabilize around the number three ( 3 ) when things get out of whack.

In summary:

1. Mass
2. Weight
3. Time

are all related to space strings. If the space strings flex, time follows the flexed string at different velocities and we see the effects of this flexing as gravity if a mass is involved or entropy / chaos if a mass isn't involved but the results are mild or severe.

Being Good

2011-12-09T15:41:00.000-05:00

I got to thinking about being good. For most people, the connotation of being good is equivalent to having a dull and boring life. Most religions stress the need to be good in life and to help others. I also got to thinking about God or in other words the person who designed this universe so you and I would have a reasonable chance of survival. Looking at it from a science perspective it suddenly occurred to me, that being good is necessary to survive. Our universe is filled with energy and mass. Einstein said that energy and mass are equivalent which means that energy and mass can be converted from one to the other and back again. String theory says that all the energy is basically in the format of a string. A vibrating string in a loop gives the mass including us its' properties and behavior. A flexed string around a mass, such as the earth gives the earth its' gravity. The wind or other force is simply strings of energy or mass in motion. Velocity or acceleration is just a form of rolled up energy string ( think car here ) disturbing the energy fields as the mass ( car ) moves along. You and I are essentially a mass doing its' own thing by moving in a space occupied by strings. If we design something such as a car we have to round out its' rough edges so it won't cause any disturbance to the energy strings commonly known as turbulence. Similarly we want to round out our own rough edges in order to be acceptable to other people. Time in our universe is just energy that is still creating strings of space from dark energy and dark matter as it moves in a forward direction. Sometimes dark energy and dark matter break off from time before it gets converted into space. This broken off dark energy and dark matter sometimes brings disaster to ordinarily good people. This is the chance that keeps our world from getting too dull.

The Quantum World

2011-11-30T16:45:00.000-05:00

The quantum world is made up of individual particles that don't have to travel through space to go somewhere. This world looks like foam continuously bubbling away. Travel in the quantum world is through the action of cloning, superposition and entanglement. Cloning is the method by which the individual particle reproduces itself at new locations. Superposition means that more than one particle can occupy the same space at the same time because space hasn't a physical reality in the quantum world. Quantum particles don't have to travel through space to get from A to B because space doesn't exist. Entanglement is the method by which a particle transfers information from one point to another point . A quantum particle can bubble many copies of itself at the same approximate location. This means that the bubbling quantum particle at the new location forms a cloud. This cloud may also appear as a wave which we can measure. We can also measure the position of the quanta, but we can't do both measurements at the same time. Different quanta may come together to form units of something else. If these quanta can't be separated out then we say a strong nuclear ( cloud ) force exists between them. This strong nuclear ( cloud ) force can also be considered as an unbreakable wave. If these quanta can be separated out in a reaction then we can say it has a weak nuclear force and a breakable wave that forms relationships with other quanta. Sometimes quanta form a rotational cloud with each other and these clouds carry plus and minus charges. These are your electromagnet quanta forces.

Time

2011-11-22T15:41:00.001-05:00

Time is the basis of everything. When the universe was initially created, time separated out into dark matter, dark energy and string space. Dark matter acts like a thick honey which tends to keep everything in its' place like inertia. Dark Energy acts as an accelerator for the universe. String space when forming circles creates things and the string's circular vibration creates different characteristics which we see as that thing's properties. Unattached curved strings, when vibrating, appear to us a waves which when modulated transmit information. Radios use that technology. A non-vibrating curved string is gravity or mass. Inertia is related to the mass of the object. Spaceless time from another universe that existed before the creation of our universe is now our quantum world. In the quantum world there is time but not space. Einstein spoke of spooky action at a distance which is true in the abstract but not existing physically. If space doesn't exist in the quantum world, you don't have any delays. The absence of space means you can have superposition because more than one thing can exist literally on / in the same spot. You can also have entanglement which means that if something happens in one location the something immediately happens / clones in the other location. This happens because the something doesn't have to travel through physical space. The speed of change is infinite ( timeless ), because the limitation on the speed of light only applies when it is moving through space and not time. To take it one step further, suppose that something went wrong and spaceless time in another universe cloned space creating an expanding bubble resulting in our universe. Since our space includes classical time, and at the time of the creation of our universe everything wasn't immediately converted there would be more space than we first calculated from our perspective of logical events. Also not all the time would be converted which meant dark time, dark matter and dark energy still exists. In fact there is much more dark time, dark matter and dark energy in comparison to matter and anti-matter.

Holographic Projections, Black Holes & Event Horizons

2011-11-18T16:41:00.001-05:00

The whole universe is organized and run by time which has a mathematical value of nine ( 9 ). Space is composed of a series of strings whose basic value is one to nine ( 1 – 9 ). The zero ( 0 ) string holds imaginary numbers. Everything that isn't time, is associated with a string that is equal to the one digit sum of its' digits . For instance ( 97 ) contains the digits 9 and 7 which total 16 ( 9 + 7 = 16 ) 16 contains the digits 1 and 6 which total 7 ( 1 + 6 = 7 ). Therefore something with the value of 97 rests on the 7th string. If you take the numbers from 1 to 99, and add the digits until one digit is left you will find that the sequence of the one digit numbers go from 1 to 9 and then repeat themselves. These strings can be thought of as strings of space. These space strings rest on a complex woven background string whose value is zero ( 0 ) and is equivalent to imaginary numbers since you can't show any values on string zero ( 0 ) except zero ( 0 ). The world around us ,including you and I, appears to be solid because our vision can't see finer detail on its' own. You and I including the quantum world is really like a swarm of flies. If you look at a swarm of flies, and someone asks you its' location, you tend to answer in terms of where the densest part of the fly swarm is located. In essence when someone asks you where someone or something is located, you answer in terms where the densest part of someone or something is located. Obviously in this instance the someone or something appears solid because that is where our sight begins and ends. If everything is basically similar to a fly swarm, you can also say it is a holograph of what exists on the average at that location. Dark matter in which the universe rests is really sticky time acting as inertia and gravity while dark energy is the force of time or entropy pulling / accelerating the expansion of the universe. Dark matter as disguised time also appears to us as time or inertia which tends to keep things from falling apart. Dark energy or expanding time appears to us as entropy which tends to pull things apart which we also see as aging, force or deterioration. If you think of the universe as having direction, west to east is the expansion of the strings ( 1 to 9 ) into larger numbers totaling the value of that particular string . For instance the east to west expansion of string seven could create the value of 250 ( 2 + 5 + 0 = 7 ). The value of 250 would be on string seven ( 7 ) since the digits of ( 250 ) would total 7 ( 2 + 5 + 0 = 7 ). This east to west expansion would form a holographic pattern of information or processes which time would then project north and south which we would see as an image, process or new facts depending on our location. Time only moves outward in our universe which we see as entropy, otherwise called deterioration, force and aging. If a holographic projection reaches a black hole, the first thing it sees is an event horizon. At this point the holographic projection is changed because only time and location enter the black hole while space information stays at the event horizon. If time and location leave the holographic projection, the only thing left is the space information string 7 since ( 2 + 5 + 0 = 7 ). Thus the information at the event horizon is proportional to the area of the event horizon rather than the volume of the black hole since the black hole doesn't contain space except from our perspective. The time and location which enters the black hole from the holographic projection is a non – physical distorted quantum representation of the holographic projection without the space string which represents physical space in our seen world. Thus in a spaceless quantum world represented by time and location you get superposition, entanglement and cloning which is instantaneous. If the black hole contracts in size, time and location reverses itself and rejoins its' string which appears to us as Hawking radiation due to the creation of , to us , a new holographic projection. Time and location for the old particle is destroyed in the black hole so conservation of energy is preserved.

Holographic Universe

2011-11-16T11:50:00.001-05:00

Let's suppose the whole universe is organized and run by time which has a value of nine ( 9 ). Everything that isn't time, is associated with a string that is equal to the one digit sum of its' digits . For instance ( 97 ) contains the digits 9 and 7 which total 16 ( 9 + 7 = 16 ) 16 contains the digits 1 and 6 which total 7 ( 1 + 6 = 7 ). Therefore something with the value of 97 rests on the 7th string. If you take the numbers from 1 to 99, and add the digits until one digit is left you will find that the sequence of the one digit numbers go from 1 to 9 and then repeat themselves. These strings can be thought of as strings of space. These space strings rest on a complex woven background string whose value is zero ( 0 ) and is equivalent to imaginary numbers since you can't show any values on string zero ( 0 ) except zero ( 0 ). The world around us ,including you and I, appears to be solid because our vision can't see finer detail on its' own. You and I including the quantum world is really like a swarm of flies. If you look at a swarm of flies, and someone asks you its' location, you tend to answer in terms of where the densest part of the fly swarm is located. In essence when someone asks you where someone or something is located, you answer in terms where the densest part of someone or something is located. Obviously in this instance the someone or something appears solid because that is where our sight begins and ends. If everything is basically similar to a fly swarm, you can also say it is a holograph of what exists on the average at that location. Dark matter in which the universe rests is really sticky time acting as inertia and gravity while dark energy is the force of time or entropy pulling / accelerating the expansion of the universe. Dark matter as disguised time also appears to us as time or inertia which tends to keep things from falling apart. Dark energy or expanding time appears to us as entropy which tends to pull things apart which we also see as aging, force or deterioration. If you think of the universe as having direction, west to east is the expansion of the strings ( 1 to 9 ) into larger numbers totaling the value of that particular string . For instance the east to west expansion of string seven could create the value of 250 ( 2 + 5 + 0 = 7 ). The value of 250 would be on string seven ( 7 ) since the digits of ( 250 ) would total 7 ( 2 + 5 + 0 = 7 ). This east to west expansion would form a holographic pattern of information or processes which time would then project north and south which we would see as an image, process or new facts depending on our location. Time only moves outward in our universe which we see as entropy, otherwise called deterioration, force and aging.

Riemann's Hypothesis – Calculating Zeros On ( y = ½ )

2011-11-06T17:58:00.000-05:00

Sometimes in life you stumble upon something that is basically true and it's up to other people to prove it. Riemann, in his Riemann's Hypothesis, said that the zeros in his hypothesis all have the value of ½ and lie on the line ( y = ½ ) . Riemann also said that the zeros can be manipulated ( positions changed or zeros added ) in order to get the primes closer to their true location. Riemann provided a formula to prove his belief which was ( s = ½ + it ). The current method of calculating the position of the zeros is by plugging numbers into the formula and calculating. I don't have any quarrel with this method except that there isn't any guarantee that you haven't missed a zero which is supposed to be on the line ( y = ½ ) and is actually off the line ( y = ½ ) . The rub in the calculation is that if you miss a “t” or an “i”, it might be the number that proves Riemann's Hypothesis is incorrect. Personally, I don't think it matters because Riemann accidentally stumbled onto something that is correct so missed numbers in “t” or “i” are academic. I don't know what numbers they are using but the available literature says the first few zeroes were calculated around 14.1344725, 21.022040, 25.010858, 30.424876, 32.935062, and 37.586178. Even if you proved that all the zeros lay on the line ( y = ½ ), that proof still doesn't tell you how all these zeros relate to the position of the primes on the line ( y = ½ ) in useable terms.

Here's my proof for what it is worth:

Riemann said that all his non – trivial zeros lie on the line ( y = ½ ) . These zeros are at the location that the primes form a right angle line to ( y = ½ ) or in other words, are vertical to the line ( y = ½ ) . Prime numbers are defined as numbers that can only be divided by themselves and ( 1 ). An example of one digit primes are ( 1, 2, 3, 5, 7 ). You can see from these numbers that primes aren't linear ( 1, 2, 3, 4 ) but form harmonics. If all the primes were played musically, you would get a tune. The physical distance between the primes would be similar to the value of the rests in a musical piece. Calculations have been done on the location that some of Riemann's zeros lie on the line ( y = ½ ) using Riemann's formula ( ½ + it ). The first few zeroes were calculated around 14.1344725, 21.022040, 25.010858, 30.424876, 32.935062, and 37.586178. These numbers are not close to the position of the beginning one digit primes ( 1, 2, 3, 5, 7 ). You will see that the distance between ( 1, 2, 3, ) is ( 1 ) and the distance between 3 & 5, 5 & 7, is 2. Riemann, in his Riemann's Hypothesis, said that the zeros in his hypothesis all have the value of ½ and lie on the line ( y = ½ ) . Riemann also said that the zeros can be manipulated ( positions changed or zeros added ) in order to get the primes closer to their true location. This manipulation changes the physical distance between the primes which is equivalent to altering the value of the rests in a musical piece.

1. 1 X .99 = .99 ( 1 )

2. 2 X .99 = 1.98 ( 2 )

3. 3 X .99 = 2.97 ( 3 )

If we add the digit ( ½ ) or ( .5 ) in Riemann's line ( y = ½ ) and Riemann's zero ( 0 ) to .99, we form the number ( .509999 ).

1. 5 X ( .509999 ) = 2.549995 (4)
2. 7 X ( .509999 ) = 3.569993 ( 5 )
3. 11 X ( .509999 ) = 5.609989 ( 6 )

This basic principle calculates the position of the primes fairly accurately up to prime 31.

Using the same multipliers on the next prime ( 37 ) we get ( 37 X .509999 = 18.869963. Prime ( 37 ) is actually the 13th prime. Riemann said that the zeros can be manipulated ( positions changed or zeros added ). We still need the ( ½ ) in Riemann's line ( y = ½ ) and the ( 9's ). If we take ( .509999 ) and multiply it by itself ( ( .509999 X .509999 = .26009898 ).

1. ( 37 X .509999 X ,509999 = 9.62366226 ( 13 )

This calculation shows that the calculated position is short of the true position by about ( 13 – 9.62366226 = 3.37633774 ). The difference is approximately equal to Pi ( 3.141592654 ). In some calculations the difference is about the natural number ( e ) ( 2.71828`828 ).

In summary, Riemann's intuition told him that the zeros had a real value of ( ½ ) which was true since the digit ( ½ ) is used in the calculation. Riemann's intuition also told him that the zeros can be manipulated ( position changed or zeros added ) which is also true. What Riemann missed was that the calculation involved the number 9 and that Pi ( 3.141592654 ) and the natural number ( e ) ( 2.718281828 ) might have to be added or subtracted from the final answer. Riemann also missed that powers would also have to be used.

In general for calculating the location of any prime you:

1. Count the number of digits in a prime number. For instance 7919 has 4 digits. Subtract 1 from the number of digits ( 4 - 1 = 3 ) for 7919. Form another number equal to the number of digits in 7919 ( 4 ) by putting ( .5 ) in the far left column and 9 in the far right column. ( .5—9 ). Fill the middle with Riemann Hypothesis zeros ( 0 ) forming a four digit number ( .5009 ). Raise ( .5009 ) to the power of 3 ( which is the number of digits in 7919 ( 4 ) minus 1 ( 4 - 1 = 3 ). ( .5009 ) ^ 3 = .125676215. Multiply 7919 X .125676215 which equals 995.2299524. 7919 is the 1000th prime. The answer is out by approximately 5. Adjust the error by adding or subtracting Pi or (e).

The Clay Mathematics Institute is offering a $1,000,000 prize for the solution to the Riemann Hypothesis. From my reading, it seems to involve proving whether or not all the zeros lie on the line ( y = ½ ) . Since I have shown how the Riemann Hypothesis relates to the location of the primes and by extension how many primes precede that prime ( counting 1, 2, 3, 4 ), it seems to me it is largely academic as to whether all the zeros lie on the line ( y = ½ ) . I have also found the missing pieces to Riemann's Hypothesis which was correct as far as it went.

The Riemann Hypothesis Resolved ( Hopefully finally)

2011-10-31T08:32:00.000-04:00

Riemann said that all his non – trivial zeros lie on the line ( y = ½ ) . These zeros are at the location that the primes form a right angle line to ( y = ½ ) or in other words, are vertical to the line ( y = ½ ) . Prime numbers are defined as numbers that can only be divided by themselves and ( 1 ). An example of one digit primes are ( 1, 2, 3, 5, 7 ). You can see from these numbers that primes aren't linear ( 1, 2, 3, 4 ) but form harmonics. If all the primes were played musically, you would get a tune. The physical distance between the primes would be similar to the value of the rests in a musical piece. Calculations have been done on the location that some of Riemann's zeros lie on the line ( y = ½ ) using Riemann's formula ( ½ + bi ). The first few zeroes were calculated around 14.1344725, 21.022040, 25.010858, 30.424876, 32.935062, and 37.586178. These numbers are not close to the position of the beginning one digit primes ( 1, 2, 3, 5, 7 ). You will see that the distance between ( 1, 2, 3, ) is ( 1 ) and the distance between 3 & 5, 5 & 7, is 2. Riemann, in his Riemann's Hypothesis, said that the zeros in his hypothesis all have the value of ½ and lie on the line ( y = ½ ) . Riemann also said that the zeros can be manipulated ( positions changed or zeros added ) in order to get the primes closer to their true location. This manipulation changes the physical distance between the primes which is equivalent to altering the value of the rests in a musical piece.

1. 1 X .99 = .99 ( 1 )

2. 2 X .99 = 1.98 ( 2 )

3. 3 X .99 = 2.97 ( 3 )

If we add the digit ( ½ ) or ( .5 ) in Riemann's line ( y = ½ ) and Riemann's zero ( 0 ) to .99, we form the number ( .509999 ).

1. 5 X ( .509999 ) = 2.549995 (4)

2. 7 X ( .509999 ) = 3.569993 ( 5 )

3. 11 X ( .509999 ) = 5.609989 ( 6 )

This basic principle calculates the position of the primes fairly accurately up to prime 31.

Using the same multipliers on the next prime ( 37 ) we get ( 37 X .509999 = 18.869963. Prime ( 37 ) is actually the 13th prime. Riemann said that the zeros can be manipulated ( positions changed or zeros added ). We still need the ( ½ ) in Riemann's line ( y = ½ ) and the ( 9's ). If we take ( .509999 ) and multiply it by itself ( ( .509999 X .509999 = .26009898 ).

1. ( 37 X .509999 X ,509999 = 9.62366226 ( 13 )

This calculation shows that the calculated position is short of the true position by about ( 13 – 9.62366226 = 3.37633774 ). The difference is approximately equal to Pi ( 3.141592654 ). In some calculations the difference is about the natural number ( e ) ( 2.71828`828 ).

In summary, Riemann's intuition told him that the zeros had a real value of ( ½ ) which was true since the digit ( ½ ) is used in the calculation. Riemann's intuition also told him that the zeros can be manipulated ( position changed or zeros added ) which is also true. What Riemann missed was that the calculation involved the number 9 and that Pi ( 3.141592654 ) and the natural number ( e ) ( 2.718281828 ) might have to be added or subtracted from the final answer. Riemann also missed that powers would also have to be used.

In general for calculating the location of any prime you:

1. Count the number of digits in a prime number. For instance 7919 has 4 digits. Subtract 1 from the number of digits ( 4 - 1 = 3 ) for 7919. Form another number equal to the number of digits in 7919 ( 4 ) by putting ( .5 ) in the far left column and 9 in the far right column. ( .5—9 ). Fill the middle with Riemann Hypothesis zeros ( 0 ) forming a four digit number ( .5009 ). Raise ( .5009 ) to the power of 3 ( which is the number of digits in 7919 ( 4 ) minus 1 ( 4 - 1 = 3 ). ( .5009 ) ^ 3 = .125676215. Multiply 7919 X .125676215 which equals 995.2299524. 7919 is the 1000th prime. The answer is out by approximately 5. Adjust the error by adding or subtracting Pi or (e).

The Clay Mathematics Institute is offering a $1,000,000 prize for the solution to the Riemann Hypothesis. From my reading, it seems to involve proving whether or not all the zeros lie on the line ( y = ½ ) . Since I have shown how the Riemann Hypothesis relates to the location of the primes and by extension how many primes precede that prime ( counting 1, 2, 3, 4 ), it seems to me it is largely academic as to whether all the zeros lie on the line ( y = ½ ) . I have also found the missing pieces to Riemann's Hypothesis which was correct as far as it went.

The Universe Is Built On Strings

2011-10-30T11:38:00.000-04:00

There is an old joke which said that all the things I needed to know were covered in kindergarten. Strings appear to be in that category. If you try to measure the definitive length of a string you will find that the task is impossible. First of all the string isn't rigid so you don't know where it begins and ends. Secondly, the length of the string depends on your measuring instrument. Different measuring instruments give different results. To add to the fun, the measuring instrument is not always accurate. Lastly the measurer may need glasses or alternately disturbs the measurement when he observes it ( quantum measurement ). If you tie the ends of a string so it forms a loop and vibrate it, you have illustrated that vibrating strings have different properties when they vibrate and by extension represent different things. For instance, metals, bricks, sand, etc. all look different to each of us because we can't see all their detail. If you hold a string straight it represents quantum time which doesn't have space. Therefore, without space to travel through, in the quantum world, you have cloning, entanglement and superposition .Everything is instantaneous and reproducable without space,having to be traveled and superposition because everything can be in the same location because there is no space to interfere with location. If you hold a string in an arc without moving it, you have gravity which is otherwise inertia. The closer the ends of the string are together in a loop the stronger the gravity ( inertia ). If a string is held in a loop and moved while in a loop, the movement of the string represents entropy, force, acceleration and velocity. The best demonstration of this phenomena is watching a car accelerate from a standing start. First of all the back end dips until the force of gravity or inertia is broken. Then entropy, force, acceleration and velocity happen. You can see this phenomena as soon as the front end of the car comes down and entropy, acceleration and velocity begin. Entropy is the deterioration of the car from position to position as it goes down the track. You and I can't see it because we can't see fine detail.

In summary:

1. A straight string represents spaceless quantum time leading to cloned copies, entanglement and superposition.

2. A tied vibrating looped string represents various properties which we see as things ( bricks, buildings, people ).

3. A static untied looped string represents gravity and inertia.

4. A dynamic, moving untied looped string represents entropy, force, velocity and acceleration.

Patterns, Harmonics, Disorder, Chaos

2011-10-26T11:55:00.000-04:00

Our universe is based on fundamental patterns. The use of fundamental patterns in our universe is necessary because they help us to organize our surroundings into something that is understood. An example of patterns is language, mathematics and speech. We may have variations on the fundamental pattern such as language, accents and spelling. Mathematics is broken down into adding, subtracting, multiplying and dividing as well as algebra, geometry, calculus and trigonometry. Speech is broken down into sounds that convey a message. Wild animals use speech in the form of sound to communicate. These variations on the fundamental patterns could be called harmonics, similar to harmonics in music as a common example. We also have the opposite to patterns which could be called disorder or in the extreme, chaos. Disorder can be as innocuous as designing a different type of car, building, or inventing a new word. Chaos is basically extreme disorder. An example of this is death or other forms of extensive destruction. Common examples of disorder leading to eventual chaos is aging in ourselves, our possessions or the environment ( read climate change here ). The problem with chaos is that you don't always know it is present unless you can see it or are in the midst of it. Our universe is based on mathematics. Theoretically if you mapped all the incoming data, you could see when chaos is about to start or has started. That is a great theory but it breaks down in its' applicability when the incoming data is overwhelming. A simple example is counting from one ( 1 ) to infinity. If you graph all the numbers you will see it climbs up in one direction like climbing a hill. A simple method is to add all the digits in a number until you get a one column number ( for instance 476, ( 4 + 7 + 6 = 17, ( 1 + 7 =8 ) ). You will find that all the numbers from one to infinity total from ( 1 to 9 ) and then repeat themselves in a pattern. The resulting pattern looks like a saw tooth. You could call this a fractal pattern since it repeats itself indefinitely. Prime numbers are an example of a seemingly patternless chaos in our world, but they have an underlying complicated fractal pattern . Prime Numbers are defined as numbers that can be only divided by themselves and one ( 1 ). Prime Numbers follow a complicated fractal pattern. First of all, if you look at a list of prime numbers you will find that they always have the numbers 1, 3, 7, 9 in column zero or otherwise known as the far right column ( 11, 13, 17, 19 ). The second thing you will notice is that all numbers ending in ( 1, 3, 7, 9 ) aren't prime numbers ( 21, 33, 27, 39 ). This is our first pattern. The second thing you will notice is that if the sum of the digits of any number ending in 1, 3, 7, 9 total a multiple of 3 , except for prime number 3, ( for instance 6, 9, 12, etc. ) it isn't a prime number. If a number ending in 1, 3, 7, 9 in column zero ( far right column ) isn't a prime number it can usually be evenly divided by a number with 1, 3, 7, 9 in column zero ( far right column ). These are more patterns. Lastly, except for the one digit prime number 3 in the one digit prime number series ( 1, 2, 3, 5, 7 ), you will find if you continuously add the digits of a prime number you will find the column zero or far right column one digit totals for prime numbers are ( 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 8 ). These numbers ( 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 8 ) are the strange attractors of the prime numbers.

In summary:

1. Prime numbers, if they are prime numbers, have the pattern numbers 1, 3, 7, 9 in column 0 ( farthest right column ).

2. If the sum of the digits of any number ending in 1, 3, 7, 9, total a multiple of 3, except for prime number 3, ( for instance total 6, 9, 12, etc. ) it isn’t a prime number.

3. If a number ending in 1, 3, 7, 9 in column zero (0), isn’t a prime number it can usually be evenly divided by a number with 1, 3, 7, 9 in column (0).

4. If you add the digits and there is more than one total ( for instance 97 has a first digit total of 16 ( 9 + 7 = 16 )) then 16 is a harmonic of ( 7 ), since ( 1 + 6 = 7 ).

5. The column zero or far right column one digit totals for primes are ( 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 8 ).

6. The one digit totals ( 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 8 ) are all strange attractors of the complex prime number fractals.

The adding of these digits is a neat way of quantizing energy levels or Riemann numbers, which really is only a series of numbers in which we simplify the pattern in order to study it. Any chaotic system can be quantized in this manner similar to any harmonic oscillator or anything else for that matter.

The Riemann Digits ½ , Zero ( 0 ) & My 9.

2011-10-20T12:02:00.002-04:00

Prime numbers and the Riemann Hypothesis digits are all intertwined. A prime number is defined as a number that can only be divided by itself and one ( 1 ) ( 1, 2, 3, 5, 7 ).

Here's the skinny on prime numbers:

1. Prime numbers, if they are prime numbers, have the digits 1, 3, 7, 9 in column 0 ( farthest right column ) ( 11, 13, 17, 19 ).

2. If the sum of the digits of any number ending in 1, 3, 7, 9, total a multiple of 3, except for 3, ( for instance total 6, 9, 12, etc. ) it isn’t a prime number.

3. If a number ending in 1, 3, 7, 9 in column zero (0), isn’t a prime number it can usually be evenly divided by a number with 1, 3, 7, 9 in column (0). If not try other numbers.

The calculation of the location of the prime numbers on a line or calculating the number of previous primes on a line involve the digits ( ½, 0 & 9 ). Riemann in his Riemann's Hypothesis said that the zeros in his hypothesis all have the value of ½ and lie on the line ( y = ½ ) . Riemann also said that the zeros can be manipulated ( positions changed or zeros added ) in order to get the primes closer to their true location. I have separately discovered that the location of the prime numbers on the line ( y = ½ ) or any other line for that matter involves the digit 9.

The primary number for the location of a prime on any line from the Riemann Hypothesis is ( .509999 ). For the primes ( 1, 2, 3, ) you multiply them by ( .99 ) since their actual positions are ( 1, 2, 3 ). For the primes (5 to 23 ) you multiply them by ( .509999 ). For the primes 29 & 31 you multiply them by ( .509999 ) and subtract Pi ( 3.141592654 ) to bring them closer to their true position.

For the rest of the primes up to 97 you raise ( .509999 ) to the power of 2 and adjust using either Pi or the natural number e ( 2.718281828 ).

In summary, Riemann anticipated the number ( ½ ) & ( zero ( 0 ) and zero adjustment, but missed my discovery of the number 9 and the necessity of Pi and ( e ).

For calculating the location of any prime you:

1. Count the number of digits in a prime number. For instance 7919 has 4 digits. Subtract 1 from the number of digits ( 4 - 1 = 3 ) for 7919. Form another number equal to the number of digits in 7919 ( 4 ) by putting ( .5 ) in the far left column and 9 in the far right column. ( .5—9 ). Fill the middle with Riemann Hypothesis zeros ( 0 ) forming a four digit number ( .5009 ). Raise ( .5009 ) to the power of 3 ( which is the number of digits in 7919 ( 4 ) minus 1 ( 4 - 1 = 3 ). ( .5009 ) ^ 3 = .125676215. Multiply 7919 X .125676215 which equals 995.2299524. 7919 is the 1000th prime. The answer is out by approximately 5. Adjust the error by adding or subtracting Pi or (e).

It would seem from the above, that Riemann anticipated the zeros ( 0 ) and the value of those zeros being ( ½ ) since they were on the line ( y = ½ ). Riemann didn't anticipate the number 9 or the option of adjusting the calculation by adding Pi or ( e ).

The Clay Mathematics Institute is offering a $1,000,000 prize for the solution to the Riemann Hypothesis. From my reading, it seems to involve proving whether or not all the zeros lie on the line ( y = ½ ) . Since I have shown how the Riemann Hypothesis relates to the location of the primes and by extension how many primes precede that prime ( counting 1, 2, 3, 4 ), it seems to me it is largely academic as to whether all the zeros lie on the line ( y = ½ ) .

The Riemann Hypothesis Resolved Using ½ , 0 and 9

2011-10-18T15:22:00.000-04:00

Like a lot of people, I've been fooling around trying to prove Riemann's Hypothesis without much success. Let's suppose for the sake of argument that all the zeros lie on the line ( y = ½ ) . If they do, the solution for the Riemann Hypothesis brings us no closer to showing what the deep connection is between the zeta function and the distribution of the primes. My reading of the literature on the Riemann Hypothesis indicates that the zeros lie on the line ( y = ½ ) and that if the zeroes are manipulated in some fashion you can calculate the location of the primes to a greater and greater accuracy. If you know the location of one prime you know how many primes precede it because you are counting ( 1, 2, 3, 4 etc. ). Riemann's genius or intuition was that the distribution of the primes involve the number zero ( 0 ) and ½. The line is important because if you count something, that something is being placed on a line. If the something is a prime it lies on a line. Riemann's Hypothesis says that all the zeros lie on a line so for the sake of argument you have primes on a line and zeros ( 0 ) on a line. Riemann said that if you manipulate the zeros ( 0 ), you can bring the prime sitting on the line closer and closer to its' true position. What the line ( y = ½ ) means is a mystery, although the number ( ½ ) may prove useful. The Riemann Hypothesis equation brings the zeros ( 0 ) to the line ( y = ½ ) depending on what you are using for ( t ) or the other variables. Let's suppose the primes lie on a straight line which also has zeros ( 0 ) on it.

The first five primes are:

1. 1 ( Yeah, I know it shouldn't be included )
2. 2
3. 3
4. 5
5. 7

The closest you can get these primes to their true position is multiplying them by ( .99 ) if we ignore multiplying them by 1 which will tend to distort their position after prime 3 .

1. 1 X .99 = .99
2. 2 X .99 = 1.98
3. 3 X .99 =2.97
4. 5 X .99 = 4.95
5. 7 X .99 = 6.93

The primes from 6 to 10 are:

6. 11
7. 13
8. 17
9. 19
10. 23

Up to this point we have the number 9, and the Riemann Hypothesis numbers zero ( 0 ) and ( ½ ) . Riemann said we can also manipulate the zeros ( 0 ) to bring the calculated location of the primes closer to their true location.

For example prime number 11's true location is 6. If we multiply ( 11 X Riemann's Number ( ½ ) including Riemann's ( 0 ) and some of the missed number ( 9 ) we get ( 11 X .5099999 = 5.609989 ). Riemann said that we can also manipulate the zeros ( 0 ) which means we can add zeros or put them somewhere else in the multiplier. ( 11 X .5909999 = 6.5009989 ) or (11 X .50990099 = 5.608910891). You will see from these calculations that the best multiplier is .5099999 since the multiplication ( answer ) is the closest to 6.

The above example is ridiculous because the prime number is so small, but the principle is the same. The calculation of a prime's true position is more complicated, but this is the basic idea.

In summary you need:

1. ½
2. 0
3. 9

I calculate that the best usable number for the location of a prime is ( .5099999 ). Riemann said that the proportion of primes is about ( 1 / ln (x) ) where ( ln(x) is the natural logarithm of x to base ( e ) or ( 2.718281828 ) . Using Riemann's formula the proportion of primes below prime number 11 is ( 1 / ln(11) or ( .417032391 ). The number of primes below ( 11 ) using this formula is ( 11 X .4107032391 = 4.587356306) or in round numbers ( 5 ). My calculation using ( .5099999 ) is ( 6 ) in round numbers which is the exact location of prime number ( 11 ). Riemann worked out that if the zeros really do lie on the critical line, then the primes stray from the ( 1/ln(x) ) distribution exactly as much as a bunch of coin tosses stray from the 50:50 distribution law. I have proved that the non-trivial zeros have to lie on the line, because my calculation for the location of the primes uses Riemann's non-trivial zeros that have to be on the line ( y = ½ ) or a line since you are calculating the location of the primes in a sequence ( or the number of preceding primes ).

The Clay Mathematics Institute is offering a $1,000,000 prize for the solution to the Riemann Hypothesis. So far no one has solved it. From my limited understanding of the Riemann Hypothesis the available calculations don't always show where the zeros cross the line ( y = ½ ) in terms of where each prime is situated. The Riemann Hypothesis only conjectures the zeros are on the line ( y = ½ ) . The primes aren't evenly spaced so it is doubtful that one equation is going to provide a decent formula for the location of all the primes. My solution is strictly arithmetic so it isn't as elegant as a function, but it works with some tweaking which is exactly what Riemann conjectured when he said the zeros can be manipulated. I believe that I have proved that the Riemann zeros are all on the line whether it be ( y = ½ ) or some other line, because those zeros have to be used in a calculation while being on a line to prove that the location of the primes are on a straight line and not somewhere else in space.

The Position Of Primes Using The Riemann Hypothesis Numbers & The One That Was Missed

2011-10-16T13:28:00.000-04:00

Like a lot of people, I've been fooling around trying to prove Riemann's Hypothesis without much success. Let's suppose for the sake of argument that all the zeros lie on the line ( y = ½ ) . If they do, the solution for the Riemann Hypothesis brings us no closer to showing what the deep connection is between the zeta function and the distribution of the primes. My reading of the literature on the Riemann Hypothesis indicates that the zeros lie on the line ( y = ½ ) and that if the zeroes are manipulated in some fashion you can calculate the location of the primes to a greater and greater accuracy. If you know the location of one prime you know how many primes precede it because you are counting ( 1, 2, 3, 4 etc. ). Riemann's genius or intuition was that the distribution of the primes involve the number zero ( 0 ) and ½. The line is important because if you count something, that something is being placed on a line. If the something is a prime it lies on a line. Riemann's Hypothesis says that all the zeros lie on a line so for the sake of argument you have primes on a line and zeros ( 0 ) on a line. Riemann said that if you manipulate the zeros ( 0 ), you can bring the prime sitting on the line closer and closer to its' true position. What the line ( y = ½ ) means is a mystery, although the number ( ½ ) may prove useful. The Riemann Hypothesis equation brings the zeros ( 0 ) to the line ( y = ½ ) depending on what you are using for ( t ) or the other variables. Let's suppose the primes lie on a straight line which also has zeros ( 0 ) on it.

The first five primes are:

1. 1 ( Yeah, I know it shouldn't be included )
2. 2
3. 3
4. 5
5. 7

The closest you can get these primes to their true position is multiplying them by ( .99 ) if we ignore multiplying them by 1 which will tend to distort their position after prime 3 .

1. 1 X .99 = .99
2. 2 X .99 = 1.98
3. 3 X .99 =2.97
4. 5 X .99 = 4.95
5. 7 X .99 = 6.93

The primes from 6 to 10 are:

6. 11
7. 13
8. 17
9. 19
10. 23

Up to this point we have the number 9, and the Riemann Hypothesis numbers zero ( 0 ) and ( ½ ) . Riemann said we can also manipulate the zeros ( 0 ) to bring the calculated location of the primes closer to their true location.

For example prime number 11's true location is 6. If we multiply ( 11 X Riemann's Number ( ½ ) including Riemann's ( 0 ) and some of the missed number ( 9 ) we get ( 11 X .5099999 = 5.609989 ). Riemann said that we can also manipulate the zeros ( 0 ) which means we can add zeros or put them somewhere else in the multiplier. ( 11 X .5909999 = 6.5009989 ) or (11 X .50990099 = 5.608910891).

The above example is ridiculous because the prime number is so small, but the principle is the same. The calculation of a prime's true position is more complicated, but this is the basic idea.

In summary you need:

1. ½
2. 0
3. 9

The Clay Mathematics Institute is offering a $1,000,000 prize for the solution to the Riemann Hypothesis. So far no one has solved it. From my limited understanding of the Riemann Hypothesis the available calculations don't always show where the zeros cross the line ( y = ½ ) in terms of where each prime is situated. The Riemann Hypothesis only proves the zeros either cross the line or are on the line ( y = ½ ). The primes aren't evenly spaced so it is doubtful that one equation is going to provide a decent formula for the location of all the primes. My solution is strictly arithmetic so it isn't as elegant as a function, but it works with some tweaking which is exactly what Riemann conjectured when he said the zeros can be manipulated. The most fascinating part is that the tweaking involves Pi and the natural number ( e ) but that is another story.

Riemann Hypothesis & Strings

2011-10-08T10:59:00.000-04:00

Riemann's Hypothesis is that all the non-trivial zeros lie on the line ( y = ½ ) and these zeros have something to do with prime numbers. The calculations done up to the present time have shown that the zeros are on the line ( y = ½ ) and there are yet more calculations to go. Let us suppose that each of Riemann's zeros are part of separate strings of numbers and each time the Riemann equation crosses the line ( y = ½ ) it does so where a zero is located. To make it simple, suppose that the zeros are in the middle of the number and the number 1 is on both ends ( 101, 1001, 10001 etc. ). If we add up the digits in these numbers we find the total is always 2 ( 1 + 0 + 1 = 2 ), ( 1 + 0 + 0 + 1 = 2 ), ( 1 + 0 + 0 + 0 +1 = 2 ). To take it one step further we could say these numbers are on the line ( y = 2 ) since all the numbers total 2. Riemann's Hypothesis is that the non- trivial zeros lie on the line ( y = ½ ). If we flip our analogy, the numbers on the line ( y = ½ ) become ( 1 / 101, 1/1001, 1/ 10001, etc. ). Riemann's equation still crosses the line ( y = ½ ) where the zeros are located. Riemann's equation isn't exact in terms of the positions of the zeros. It has been calculated that the first position of the zeros is around 14 and the second calculated position around 21. Our analogy is exact because we can create these numbers to infinity and the principle is the same. Riemann said that the zeros have a real value of ½ or .5 . If we add ( ½ + 1/101 ) we obtain ( .50990099 ). Prime number ( 11 ) is the 6th prime ( 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 11 ). ( 11 X .50990099 = 5.6089108911 ) or 6 rounded to one digit. The zeros in these numbers are Riemann Zeros and the 9's are Riemann 9's and can be adjusted to get a more accurate estimate. As a matter of interest prime number 97 is the 26th prime. If you multiply ( 97 X ( .50990099 ) X ( .50990099 )) you get ( 25.22969903 )which is very close to 26. If you adjust the Riemann zeros to form the number ( .509999 ) and do the multiplication ( 97 x (.509999 X .509999) ) you get ( 25.22960106 ) which is further away from 26. You can see from these calculations that if the Riemann zeros are manipulated as Riemann has suggested to obtain the location of the prime ( or calculate the number of primes up to that point ) you can vary the distance to the true position of the prime. As a matter of interest Riemann's equation first cuts the line ( y = ½ ) at a position just over 14. The 14th prime is 41. ( 41 X ( ½ + 1/ 101) X ( ½ + 1 / 101 ) is ( 10.664099959 ) which is just off 14 by the value of Pi ( 3.141592554 ). The 21st prime is 71. It's position is calculated at 18 using the same method ( 71 X ( ½ + 1/ 101 ) X ( ½ + 1 / 101 )) which is very close to 21. The calculation of the prime numbers and their positions are a little bit more complicated than this illustration but this is the basics.

Riemann Hypothesis Solved Using A Quantum Mechanical System ( Revised )

2011-10-05T07:07:00.000-04:00

Riemann's Hypothesis is that all the non-trivial zeros lie on the line ( y = ½ ) and these zeros have something to do with prime numbers. Since Riemann's Hypothesis includes the line ( y = ½ ), let's chose a quantum energy system in which the energy levels are 2. Riemann's equation also included complex numbers. In a quantum energy system Riemann's complex numbers could be represented by zero's ( 0 ) since ( 2 + 0 = 2 ). ( 1 + 1= 2 ) also equals 2. Riemann also went on to say that the prime number locations were influenced by the position of the zeros. To extend our ( 1 + 1 = 2 ) analogy, we now have ( 1 + 0 + 1 = 2 ). We can convert these additions to numbers ( 11, 101, etc. ). We can now say that we have a real axis ( y = 2 ) with infinite numbers with zeros between their ones ( 11, 101, 1001, 10001, etc. ) on an infinite real axis line ( y = 2 ). We can also say that each of the zero's in ( 101, 1001, 10001, etc. ) are on the line ( y = 2) since the numbers ( 101, 1001, 10001, etc. are also on this line. Riemann also said that the values of the zeros ( 0's ) on the line are equal to ( ½ ) which is also true when the line ( y = 2 ) is flipped. We could also extend this argument to one which says that the value of the ones ( 1's ) are also ( ½ ) since the reciprocal of one ( 1 ) is ( 1 ) and the fraction ( 1 / 1 ) when added ( 1 / 101 ) has the value ½ on the line ( y = ½ ) . These numbers would also be evenly spaced on the real axis line ( y = 2 ) since each infinite number would total energy level 2 which means the distance between the numbers would be ( 2 + 2 = 4 ) or a spacing of 4. Flipped the distance between the numbers would be one ( 1 ) since ( ½ + ½ = 1 ). Riemann's Hypothesis says that all his formula's non-trivial zero's are on the line ( y = ½ ) and this is what we've proved up to now since the non-trivial zeros are in the numbers ( 101, 1001, 10001, etc. ). If we flip our infinite real axis line ( y = 2 ), we create a real axis line ( y = ½ ) with flipped infinite real numbers ( 1/11, 1/ 101, 1/1001, etc. ) all the way to infinity. If we add ( ½ + 1/101 ) we obtain ( .50990099 ). Prime number ( 11 ) is the 6th prime ( 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 11 ). ( 11 X .50990099 = 5.6089108911 ) or 6 rounded to one digit. The zeros in these numbers are Riemann Zeros and the 9's are Riemann 9's and can be adjusted to get a more accurate estimate.. As a matter of interest prime number 97 is the 26th prime. If you multiply ( 97 X ( .50990099 ) X ( .50990099 )) you get ( 25.22969903 )which is very close to 26. If you adjust the Riemann zeros to form the number ( .509999 ) and do the multiplication ( 97 x (.509999 X .509999) you get ( 25.22960106 ) which is further away from 26. You can see from these calculations that if the Riemann zeros are manipulated as Riemann has suggested to obtain the location of the prime ( or calculate the number of primes up to that point ) you can vary the distance to the true position of the prime. The calculation of the prime numbers and their positions are a little bit more complicated than this illustration but this is the basics.

Riemann Hypothesis Solved Using A Quantum Mechanical System

2011-10-02T11:44:00.000-04:00

The Complicated Fractal Nature Of Prime Numbers

2011-09-27T08:34:00.000-04:00

Mandelbrot, the inventor of fractals, when he worked for IBM was presented with a problem involving interference in the transmission of information. Every so often parts of the transmitted information would seem to randomly drop off / scramble which, needless to say, caused problems with the transmitted informational message. The problem had to be fixed, but as the information drop off / scramble appeared to be random , everyone was flummoxed because of the lack of a recognizable pattern. Mandelbrot thought about it and started experimenting. One time he decided to take a straight line and divide it into 1/3rd . He discarded the middle 1/3rd and kept the other 2/3rd separated by a space ( ------ ------ ). He continued on and discovered that the pattern produced by this method matched the pattern of the informational message drop off / scramble. This discovery proved that the informational drop off / scramble wasn't random but followed a fractal pattern.

Prime Numbers also follow a fractal pattern. Prime Numbers are defined as numbers that can be only divided by themselves and one ( 1 ).

Prime Numbers follow a complicated fractal pattern. First of all, if you look at a list of prime numbers you will find that they always have the numbers 1, 3, 7, 9 in column zero or otherwise known as the far right column ( 11, 13, 17, 19 ). The second thing you will notice is that all numbers ending in ( 1, 3, 7, 9 ) aren't prime numbers ( 21, 33, 27, 39 ).

The second thing you will notice is that if the sum of the digits of any number ending ending in 1, 3, 7, 9 total a multiple of 3 ( divide by 1/3rd and discard the potential prime just like Mandelbrot discarded his string sections ), except for 3, ( for instance 6, 9, 12, etc. ) it isn't a prime number. If a number ending in 1, 3, 7, 9 in column zero ( far right column ) isn't a prime number it can usually be evenly divided by a number with 1, 3, 7, 9 in column zero ( far right column ).

Lastly, except for the one digit prime number 3 in the one digit prime number series ( 1, 2, 3, 5, 7 ) you will find if you continuously add the digits of a prime number ( for instance 97 = ( 9 + 7 = 16 ) ( 1 + 6 = 7 ) you will find the column zero or far right column one digit totals are ( 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 8 ). All the rest of the columns are zero ( 01, 02, 04, 05, 07, 08 ).

In summary:

1. Prime numbers, if they are prime numbers, have the numbers 1, 3, 7, 9 in column 0 ( farthest right column ).

2. If the sum of the digits of any number ending in 1, 3, 7, 9, total a multiple of 3, except for 3, ( for instance total 6, 9, 12, etc. ) it isn’t a prime number. If a number ending in 1, 3, 7, 9 in column zero (0), isn’t a prime number it can usually be evenly divided by a number with 1, 3, 7, 9 in column (0).

3. Except for the one digit prime number 3 in the one digit prime number series ( 1, 2, 3, 5, 7 ) if you add the digits of a prime number ( for instance 97 = ( 9 + 7 = 16 ) ( 1 + 6 = 7 ) the column zero or far right column one digit totals are ( 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 8 ).

One Small Step For The Riemann Hypothesis

2011-09-22T07:06:00.000-04:00

Theory Of Everything

2011-09-19T15:11:00.001-04:00

Here's The Theory Of Everything in a nutshell without the mathematics. The classical world that you and I see every day consists of:

1. Time
2. Energy / Weight / Mass
3. Space

Einstein in his equation E = MC^2 said that energy and mass were equivalent. Weight is the pull of gravity on an object. That is why Newton's apple fell from the tree since the pull of the earth ( gravity ) is greater than the pull of the apple ( gravity ) on the earth. Mass is the same thing as weight without gravity pulling on you and I. As far as space is concerned, Einstein said that space doesn't exist unless something extends into it. If you look at something you are extending your sight ( observation ) into space. If you drive a car you are extending it into space ( distance ). If we didn't have space there wouldn't be velocity, acceleration or force ( Force = Mass X Acceleration ( into space) ). Time is a marker for something happening ( The apple fell from the tree at 2:00 a.m.. ). Time is also a measure of distance ( I traveled 30 kilometers / miles in 30 minutes ).

In the quantum world there is time but not space. Einstein spoke of spooky action at a distance which is true in the abstract but not existing physically. If space doesn't exist in the quantum world, you don't have any delays. The absence of space means you can have superposition because more than one thing can exist literally on / in the same spot. You can also have entanglement which means that if something happens in one location the something immediately happens / clones in the other location. This happens because the something doesn't have to travel through physical space. The speed of change is infinite ( timeless ), because the limitation on the speed of light only applies when it is moving through space and not time. Information also travels using the same principle. If we attempt to measure the quantum / spaceless world from our classical / space world, by using particles ( light / x-ray etc. ) we disturb the something we are measuring by adding quanta / energy ( particles ) to it. This energy addition changes the original quantum something so that we aren't measuring the original.

In summary quantum time world without classical space is:

1. Cloning
2. Superposition
3. Entanglement

In summary our classical world is:

1. Time
2. Space
3. Energy / Weight / Mass

Quantum Gravity

2011-07-06T06:29:00.000-04:00

One of the mysteries of life is gravity. Gravity is a peculiar form of energy but you can't do much with it because all it does is curve string space around a mass to create a force. Essentially, the denser the mass, the more the string space around the mass is curved and the stronger the force of gravity. The further you travel from the mass with its' gravity, the less the string space is curved and hence the weaker the force of gravity but it never goes away. Time in our reality is primarily used as a marker for the passing of, presence of, or future of, objects, particles, actions and events . Space in our universe is composed of flexible strings. Einstein says that space doesn't exist until something extends itself into it. That extension into space causes the string space to flex creating gravity. In the quantum world strings do not function as space. Strings function as quantum gravity which connects rolled up quantum Time that appears to us as various particles. This phenomena creates a graininess below the Planck length. Quantum gravity provides instantaneous entanglement and superposition. Entanglement means everything is instantaneous because there isn't any space which has to be traveled. Superposition means that more than one thing can be in the same location, because string space doesn't exist. This was the situation at the instance of the birth of our universe. Quantum Time connected by quantum gravity which we see as quantum particles. Once our universe started, quantum time converted into particles, objects, actions and events. Quantum gravity converted into string space, string forces and string energy. All of quantum time and quantum gravity wasn't converted, so we now see quantum gravity as nuclear force and quantum time as various nuclear particles.

The Helping Principle

2011-06-22T09:59:00.001-04:00

One of the toughest principles is the helping principle. It could also be called the father's principle, the mother's principle, the ex-lover's principle, the friend's principle or any other principle with an appropriate adjective. Thinking about it, it seems to me it also could be called the God Principle. Whether we like it or not, each of us is programmed to help each other. Most of us are also Jack or Jill Average. This means that most of us will live in obscurity, be known only to our families and associates and when we die, unremembered except for our family on odd occasions. Thinking about it, the helping principle, to work effectively, requires you to have guts, fortitude, and the realization that there isn't any glory. The helping principle isn't about you. It also means that most of the time you will have to eventually let go, yet be available for any stumbles. One of the toughest components is the realization that you mustn't let them consciously realize that you are helping them. The helping principle demands that you, yourself, open up emotionally and empathetically. Another part, is that you can't screw up their life, for the self gratification of staying around. If you think that what I'm saying is all mostly airy – fairy just look at the social media. One of the social media's advantages is that you can make it private or eliminate friends. It is one thing in life to suspect that you don't quite measure up to someone's idea of perfection, but quite another to have to cope with the idea that someone's private doesn't include you and to rub it in you are no longer a friend or alas, moved further into the friendless column. One of the most debilitating aspects, is that you may be extremely sensitive to what is coming next, yet you have no chance of bailing. The easiest example, is the Christians that were thrown to the lions for their principles. I, like you, have principles, but if I were about to be thrown to the lions, I'd start to think that maybe I should have been slightly less principled. I'm a Christian. You may be of another faith, but the principle may be the same. One of the people in my faith is Jesus Christ. The older I get, the more I suspect he had more guts than most of us will ever have. I sense that God told him what was going to happen in excruciating detail and that furthermore, that he had no choice in the matter. I'm told that Jesus spent 40 days in the desert but the Bible doesn't say why. I sense that Jesus wanted to discuss what was coming and was it absolutely necessary that he had to do it. Perhaps, Jesus pointed out to God that he wasn't particularly qualified. I, sad to say, am following in Jesus' footsteps. I'm telling God that I'm too old for The Helping Principle and she's telling me, that I've got too much experience to retire. God is going to be the death of me, yet.

Quantum Gravity

2011-06-19T11:05:00.000-04:00

One of the mysteries of life is gravity. Gravity is a peculiar form of energy but you can't do much with it because it is a property of mass. Essentially, the bigger the mass, the more the space around the mass is curved and the stronger the gravity according to Einstein. The further you travel from the mass with its' gravity, the weaker the force of gravity but it never goes away. Time in our reality is primarily used as a marker for the passing of, presence of, or future of, objects, particles, actions and events . Space in our universe is also unique. Einstein says that space doesn't exist until something extends itself into it. In the quantum world space doesn't exist at all. This means that quantum time doesn't have any space yet we have entanglement and superposition. If space doesn't exist, yet we have entanglement and superposition, then we need a spaceless quantum force. The spaceless quantum force is quantum gravity because it's instantaneous and spaceless. This was the situation at the instance of the birth of our universe, but as soon as space was created, quantum gravity or at least the part we see, became a property of mass.

Quantum Time

2011-06-13T20:21:00.000-04:00

The hardest thing to grasp about quantum time is that it hasn't any associated space. If quantum time doesn't have space, it means that anything existing in time, exists anywhere in all places and combinations at the same time. This phenomena is at the root of the multi-universe argument. This phenomena is also at the root of the concept of God in the christian religion. This concept is that God is everywhere at the same time and knows everything. I'm not familiar with all religions, but I suspect that most religions have the same expressed belief. Similarly, if you or I exist in quantum space, we exist everywhere and know everything at the same time. The knowing everything at the same time is due to quantum entanglement because knowledge hasn't any space to travel through from one point to another. Death doesn't exist in quantum time, because death requires space in which to operate and space doesn't exist in quantum time. That is why you and I would live forever. This concept is also the basis of heaven in the christian religion and probably in other religions too. Quantum Time also involves superposition, which is different things existing literally at the same location. The different things can be possibilities as well as things. This is possible because space doesn't exist in quantum time.

Quantum Time can be summarized as :

1. Space less.
2. Entanglement
3. Superposition

The Quantum World In A Nutshell

2011-03-20T12:35:00.001-04:00

In our everyday universe, we all have to travel through space to get from A to B. Our travel through space essentially involves our making a decision about:

1. Velocity
2. Acceleration
3. Trajectory ( direction ).

The quantum world doesn't require us to travel through space to get from A to B. To get around this problem, the quantum world uses a phenomena called entanglement. Entanglement is basically a reproductive mechanism which reproduces us / information from point A to point B's without travel through space being involved. Since travel through space isn't an option, entanglement reproduces us / information in all directions:

1. Past
2. Present
3. Future

In the quantum world, we can exist in all places at the same time, whereas in our everyday universe, we can only exist in all places at the same time through our imagination. This means that if we can exist in all places at the same time in a quantum world we can choose a preferred location from the locations generated by quantum entanglement, while our other selves choose their locations and proceed on their own paths and adventures.

Existing in all places at the same time, means that we are now subject to probability ( ½ ), possibility ( yes, no, maybe = 1/3rd ) and Likelihood ( 1/9 ( When does Time ( equal to 9 ) kick in ??? )).

Probability, possibility, and likelihood, in the quantum world relies on randomness for a decision. These random happenings in the quantum world appear in our familiar universe as bad or good luck. A probability, possibility and likelihood choice is also instigated as soon as we observe / try to measure the quantum world because we have to use energy in some form to do it.

In summary:

1. Entanglement
2. Probability, Possibility, Likelihood
3. Randomness / outside forces.

Quantum Slits, Quantum Information & Schrodinger's Cat

2011-03-16T14:49:00.000-04:00

Suppose we have a quantum photon whose electron volt value is 632 electron volts. The quantum photon can be represented by a ball of string. It's surrounding electromagnetic wave can be represented by curved strings. This ball of string ( photon ) with its' surrounding waves ( curved strings ) represent a quantum electron particle and its' waves create an electromagnetic field. The surrounding electromagnetic field has a value of 11 ( add the digits in 632 ( 6 + 3 + 2 = 11 ). The electromagnetic field ( value = 11 )will radiate out forever in a circle from the photon unless something interferes with its' path. If you put a single vertical slit in a barrier, you will find that the electromagnetic field ( value 11 ) shows the most light behind the slit and dimmer light to the side since the electromagnetic wave starts to radiate outward after it leaves the back of the slit.

If you add more slits beside the first one, you will see bright bars and dark bars where no light seems to hit at all. The electromagnetic wave ( value 11 ) went through all the slits and it started to radiate outward after it left the slits. Unfortunately, the radiating wave from each of the slits either interfered with other slits or reinforced other slits. Thus you either got light ( reinforcement ) or dark bands ( interference ).

The fun starts after you decide to measure the electromagnetic field behind some slits as the electromagnetic field comes through all the slits. The problem arises over how you intend to do it. In our universe we have to use energy in some form to measure something. This energy usually comes in the form of a particle ( electrons or photons ). If the electromagnetic field is strong enough the use of electrons or photons or anything else, usually doesn't prevent ( or significantly corrupt ) our measurement. If we try to measure something in the quantum world, our added measurement energy changes the electromagnetic field we are trying to measure. In this case, our measurement destroys the electromagnetic field coming through some slits and we get a series of one slit results ( shows the most light behind the non-interfered slit and dimmer light through the interfered with slit since the electromagnetic wave starts to radiate outward after it leaves the back of the non-interfered slit ).

Most things in our universe is either yes or no. One choice out of 2 possibilities ( either yes or no ). One choice out of two possibilities is ( ½ ) . There is a third choice, which I like to think of as an unknown result ( one choice out of 3 possibilities ( 1/3rd ). So poor old Schrodinger’s cat goes into the old box. After awhile, the old cat is either alive or dead or maybe somewhere in between or not there at all. Anyway there is a third unknown ( can't guess ) possibility. In our universe, we don't know until we look. If Schrodinger's cat has shrunk into a quantum state, we'll never know for sure, because we can't measure without destroying the state of the electromagnetic field containing the information surrounding the cat.

The most interesting part is that if there are many possibilities contained in the third possibility ( sort of all things to all people ) then we can extract different possibilities ( information ) from the same electromagnetic field. Of course, what is right and what is wrong, is the question. It is sort of like a crowd of people coming to different conclusions after seeing the same thing in our world .

Particles & Waves

2011-03-14T10:39:00.000-04:00

Both the real and the quantum world consists of:

1. Particles
2. Waves
3. Time

In the quantum world a particle generates electromagnet waves and electron waves. In the real world a particle ( us ) generates charisma which is the equivalent to an electromagnet wave. Sometimes a particle ( us ) generates a confidence and belief aura which is equivalent to an electron wave. What we call it is dependent on our language and culture but it is basically the same thing in two universes. The quantum world hasn't any space and in our world Einstein says that something extends into space, but space doesn't exist on its' own even though you and I instinctively see space. There isn't any space in the quantum world, so Time operates like a possibility or probability. That means that Time automatically comes into existence and at that point something statistically happens. The general concept of Time in our universe is that Time marks events when it is used as a clock ( meet me at 1:00 pm. at Frank's ) or as a measure of distance. ( 50 minutes in the oven at 350 degrees ). Quantum Particles or Atoms are also associated with their own personal waves. These quantum particles or mass can be represented by a ball of string. Surround the ball of string with curved strings which represent the ball of string's wave. This ball of string with its' surrounding waves ( curved strings ) represent a quantum particle and its' waves creating an electromagnetic field. Let's assume for the sake of argument that the quantum particle mass is 23. Since it has surrounding curved strings representing an electromagnetic field ( because quantum particle masses are measured in electron volts ) we can let this electromagnetic field be represented by 5 ( add the digits in 23 ( 2 + 3 = 5 ). Since we now have a quantum particle mass of 23 electron volts with a surrounding personal electromagnetic field of 5 we can assume it will interact with other quantum particle masses and their personal electromagnetic fields forming new particles and fields. Suppose we have another quantum particle whose mass is ( 47 ). Its' electromagnet string wave is ( 11 ) ( 4 + 7 = 11 ) or 2 ( 1 + 1 = 2 ). The electromagnet wave fields of the 23 mass electron ( 5 ) and the 47 mass electron ( 2 ) become intertwined. The combined electromagnetic fields have a value of ( 5 + 2 ) = 7. If Space – less quantum Time doesn't switch on, we will continue to have two separate quantum particles whose value is 23 and 47 with separate intertwined electromagnetic fields of 5 and 11(or 2). If Space-less quantum Time, with a quantum value of (9) and a possibility / probability of ( 1/9 ), switches on the two electron volt masses will combine into one mass of 70 electron volts ( 23 + 47 = 70 ). The new electron volt mass of 70 will have an electromagnetic wave of 7 ( 7 + 0 = 7 ).

Quantum Atom Theory

2011-03-10T09:34:00.000-05:00

Quantum Atom Theory is associated with both Quantum Chaos and the Nature Of Reality. Each is organized and run by Time moving in a forward direction. A minor offshoot of these processes is entropy, a process which allows us to disassemble things / processes and rearrange them into new forms of usefulness like communication. The opposite of entropy is gravity which tends to hold things together. The general concept of Time in our universe is that Time marks events when it is used as a clock ( meet me at 1:00 pm. at Frank's ) or as a measure of distance. ( 50 minutes in the oven at 350 degrees ). Quantum Particles or Atoms are also associated with their own personal waves. These quantum particles or mass can be represented by a ball of string. Surround the ball of string with curved strings which represent the ball of string's wave. This ball of string with its' surrounding waves ( curved strings ) represent a quantum particle and its' waves creating an electromagnetic field. Let's assume for the sake of argument that the quantum particle mass is 23. Since it has surrounding curved strings representing an electromagnetic field ( because quantum particle masses are measured in electron volts ) we can let this electromagnetic field be represented by 5 ( add the digits in 23 ( 2 + 3 = 5 ). Since we now have a quantum particle mass of 23 electron volts with a surrounding personal electromagnetic field of 5 we can assume it will interact with other quantum particle masses and their personal electromagnetic fields forming new particles and fields. The problem is we don't know when ( Time ). This is the so called arrow of Time because Time is unidirectional in an outward ( forward ) direction. We can see the same phenomena in our real world. In the quantum world it is called Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle and in our real world fate or bad luck. In addition, everything in our universe is associated with Space ( particles, actions, events extended into space ) and Time ( when did it happen ??? ). Time itself is being extended outward in a unidirectional direction, but due to the electromagnetic nature of quantum particles, our space per time or Space / Time is being curved. It can be said that Time is a hidden variable of Quantum Mechanics. Each interaction creates an individual Space / Time or reference Frame relative to its' energy and mass. The greater the mass, the slower Time will run in that reference frame ( not speed ( distance / time ) because there is no space in the quantum world ). Going back to our example, the quantum particle mass is 23. Its' electromagnetic field is 5 ( 2 + 3 = 5 ). Subtract ( mass – string ( 23 – 5 = 18 ) to get the Space / Time Frame of 18. The Time string is rather unique. It doesn't have any space in the traditional sense, but the Time string is related to the number 9. The number 9 in the Time string can pop up at any time which means we neither know when it will happen nor the consequences ( Heisenberg again ). Mathematically ( Particle 23 – wave 5 = Space / Time Frame 18 ). ( Frame 18 / Time Value 9 = Space 2 ). The Space that must be covered in the Space / Time Frame is 2. So the dimensions of this Space / Time Frame is Constant Time Value ( 9 ) X Space ( 2 ) = Frame ( 18).

If we have a greater quantum mass particle ( 47 ), its' electromagnet string wave is ( 11 ) ( 4 + 7 = 11 ). Frame ( 47 – 11 = 36 ). The Space / Time Frame is 36 and the Space is ( 36 / 9 = 4 ) in the Space / Time Frame. Therefore it can be seen that the greater the mass ( 47 vs. 23 ), the slower Time ( not speed ( distance / time )) because there is no space in the quantum world. The slower part isn't speed ( distance / time ) but rather the length of Time the phenomena will take to appear in both the quantum and our real world before generating the division ( Frame / Time ) or in this case (36 / 9 = 4 ).

You can also look at it in terms of Space in our real world. If we have a greater quantum mass particle ( 47 ), its' electromagnet string wave is ( 11 ) ( 4 + 7 = 11 ). Frame is ( 47 – 11 = 36 ). The Space / Time Frame is 36 and the Space is ( 36 / 9 = 4 ) in the Space / Time Frame. Therefore it can be seen that the greater the mass ( 47 vs. 23 ), the slower Time ( not speed ( distance / time )) will appear to happen in terms of Space ( 2 vs. 4 ). The slower part isn't speed ( distance / time ) but rather the length of Time the phenomena will take to appear in both the quantum and our real world before generating the division ( Frame / Time ) or in this case (36 / 9 = 4 ).

This basic principle is why things that are better made last longer, because the thing's quantum world can hold together longer before Time generates the ( Frame / Time ) division creating a Space for things to happen.

This principle also generates uncertainty, probability, what will happen ( future ) in both our world and the quantum world because:

1. Don't know when ( Frame / Time = Space ) division will happen.
2. Probability – ½.
3. What will happen ( future particle / event / action ).

Here's another generator of uncertainty:

If we have a mass particle ( 47 ), it can have two electromagnetic waves of 11 and 2 ( 4 + 7 = 11 ), ( 1 + 1 = 2 ). Frame 1 is ( 47 – 11 = 36 ). Frame 2 is ( 47 – 2 = 45 ).The Space / Time Frame 1 is 36 and the Space is ( 36 / 9 = 4 ) in the Space / Time Frame 1 . The Space / Time Frame 2 is 45 and the Space is ( 45 / 9 = 5) in the Space / Time Frame 2 . Therefore we have two potential outcomes and the probability that either one will occur is 1 result out of two ( 2 ) choices or ½. Most decisions / processes / choices in our world are calculated on the probability of ½ or one (1 ) out of two ( 2 ) choices .

Lastly, future events in terms of what will happen in the quantum world ( Heisenberg ) and our real world ( bad luck / good luck ) is based on the interaction of electron volt quantum particles and their electromagnetic waves which can have different values and consequently different actions.

The funniest part is that in most religions we are taught to love ( help ) one another and to be generally good. The reason for it is the way God set up the universe's real and quantum worlds. The key to success and less aggravation is to prevent the electromagnetic fields of the quantum particles from being disturbed to our detriment. Yoga, anyone?????

Oh by the way, telling your ( hyperactive ) friend to “Chill” is based on Quantum Atom Theory and science in general, much to everyone's surprise, including my own!!!

Strings Solve The Riemann Hypothesis

2011-03-07T07:44:00.001-05:00

Let's look at the Riemann Hypothesis from the aspect of a string. Suppose we have 9 strings numbered from one to nine ( 1 – 9 ). The only rule for any number on any particular string is that the total of the digits total the value of that string. For instance, string 2, would have digits totaling 2 ( 2, 11, 101, 1001, etc. ) since the digits in all the numbers total 2 ( 1 + 0 + 1 = 2 ) etc.. The question remaining is what do we do about string zero ( 0 ). String zero ( 0 ) in strings has the same function as √ -1 in particle math using numbers, formulas, and symbols. This is so because string zero ( 0 ) cannot be realistically graphed so it means anything as a real string. If string ( 0 ) is imaginary it is on the imaginary plane at right angles to string 2 or any other string for that matter. Each string number ( 2, 11, 101, 101 ) has a tail ( 2 ) on string 2 because the digits total 2 ( 101 = ( 1 + 0 + 1 = 2 )). The next question is concerning the distance between each number that is on string 2. If we add the number 11 ( 2 ) and 101 ( 2 ) number we get 4 ( 2 + 2 = 4 ) so we have a distance of 4 between each number similar to the distance in Calculus. At each location of 4 units we have an imaginary String 0 running vertically from String 2. The Riemann Hypothesis says that all the non-trivial zeros ( 0 ) are on the line ( y = ½ ) running off a line represented by the equation 1/2 + it. Our non-trivial zeros ( 0 ) become real when they cross string 2 at the “4” locations. If we can add zero to the addition of the digits without changing the digit total our zeros ( 0 ) are real. The Riemann Hypothesis, on the other hand, using particle math of numbers, formulas and symbols has to prove the zeros ( 0 ) have to cross ( y = ½ ) . Riemann's formula also uses fractions and imaginary numbers which he adds. Strings can also use fractions and imaginary String 0 which is equivalent to Riemann's method.

String 2 Whole Numbers:

2
101
1001
10001
100001
etc.

String 2 Fractions:

½
( 1/101)
(1 / 1001)
( 1 / 10001)
( 1/ 100001)
etc.

Take the fractions ( 1 / 101 ) etc. and raise them by the power of 2, since the numbers are on string 2. Fraction ( 1 / 101 ) ^ 2 = .2583624924.

Sum the powers which peak around .2583635005.

Prime number ( 97 ) which is the last of the two digit primes is the 26th prime. If we multiply ( 97 X .2583635005 ) we get ( 25.0612595501).

The Riemann Hypothesis says that the location of the prime numbers is dependent on the position of the zeros in the calculation.

If we take the square root of ( 25.0612595501) we get ( .5082946985 ).

Experimentation will show that the square root containing the most accurate zero (s) for the calculation is ( .509999999 ).
Prime number ( 97 ) which is the last of the two digit primes is the 26th prime. If we take the new square root ( .509999999 ) and raise it to the power of 2 ( .509999999 ^2 ) we get ( .260099999). If we multiply ( 97 X .260099999 ) we get ( 25.229699995) which is closer to 26 than using ( .5082946985) in the calculation.

Prime number 29 is the 11th prime. If we multiply ( 29 X (( .50999999 )^1) we get ( 14.78999997 ) which is approximately off 11 by the value of Pi ( 3.141592654 ). Therefore subtract the value of Pi.

Prime number 43 is the 15th prime. If we multiply ( 43 X (( .50999999 )^1) we get ( 11.18429998 ) which is approximately off 15 by the value of Pi ( 3.141592654 ). Therefore add the value of Pi.

Prime number 149 is the 36th prime. If we multiply ( 149 X (( .50999999 )^2) we get ( 38.75489992) which is approximately off 36 by the value of e^1 ( 2.718281828 ). Therefore subtract ( 2.718281828 ).

In summary:

1. The Riemann Hypothesis says that the location of the prime numbers is dependent on the position of the zeros in the calculation. The basic number which involves zero(s) in the calculation is the number ( .50999999 ). The prime number 191 is the 44th prime number The basic number which involves zero(s) in the calculation for the position ( 44th ) of the prime number 191 is the number ( .50099999 ).

2. You may have to add or subtract Pi ( 3.141592654 ) from the calculated position to obtain the most accurate position.

3. You may have to add or subtract the natural number ( e ) or ( 2.718281828 ) from the calculated position to obtain the most accurate position.

Energy / Time Theory

2011-03-04T13:54:00.000-05:00

Space / Time generally means that you can't travel through space without traveling through time. Space in our universe is length, width and height. Time in our universe is a marked by a measure of time ( clock ) or a distance in time. Einstein extended this idea when he brought observation into the picture explaining what happened when two observers saw the same phenomena when either at rest or moving in the same frame or different frames. Later on, Einstein brought in his famous equation ( E = mc^2 ) which said that Mass and Energy were the same thing in different forms.

So in summary we now have:

1. Space / Time.
2. Mass / Energy.

But there is something missing and that is Energy / Time. Time and Energy don't contain any space. This may seem very hard to believe because if you and I look out a window we can see time and energy existing in various forms in space. In our world everything has the illusion of being solid simply because our eyes don't have the ability to see into the quantum world without assistance. Even if we could see into the quantum world, the information that we would gain would be very limited because our eyes run on photons for information and photons are so large that they can't always bounce off of what they hit and return to our eye. Sometimes the photons smother the quantum object which we want to see and therefore can't bounce back to our eye with information. It seems to me that in a quantum world all we have are strings which appear to us as Time and Energy. Strings do not contain space in the sense that strings have to travel through it in order to go from A to B. Rolled up Energy strings are a mass in our world and electron volts in a quantum world which we call atoms or particles because there isn't any space in a quantum world. Since the rolled up strings are flexed in a ball you get gravity without movement or inertia with movement. Also, the rolled up energy string ball we call Mass flexes the surrounding strings that aren't part of the ball thus creating gravity that distorts the path of passing photons causing things to appear to be elsewhere. Time is a unidirectional outward going string that doesn't react with the seen universe. Energy is also a string which when moving outward provides force, velocity and acceleration and when acting inward provides the strong and weak nuclear force depending on its' location. If the energy string flexes rapidly you get frequency or different property characteristics if associated with a mass ( energy string ball ). If you attempt to get information from the quantum world you are adding energy strings to it which affects what you are trying to measure or alternately changes its' characteristics ( properties ) so it now appears to be either a wave ( string ) or particle ( a ball of energy string we call a mass ). Since quantum space doesn't exist, how does Energy /Time work together ???? You can think of Energy, and Time as being parallel strings when they are quiescent in a quantum world. If you could see into a quantum world you would notice that the quantum world had areas of cloudiness which we call nuclear particles and atoms ( rolled up energy strings ). These nuclear particles and atoms are rolled up energy strings joined together by energy strings which we call the strong and weak nuclear force. There is no quantum space in the quantum world so everything is instantaneous because of the Time string which hasn't space. In addition because there isn't any space we measure energy in electron volts. An electron is a rolled up energy string with an electron charge on it. The Time string is rather unique. It doesn't have any space in the traditional sense, but the Time string is related to the number 9. The number 9 in the Time string can pop up at any time and so we can relate it to an infinite number of space measurements in our world.

Here's an example:

The common battery which you can readily buy at a store is 1.5 volts or 1.5 electron volts. If you put the 1.5 volt battery in something you will find that over time ( Time string ) it will cease to operate. If you measure the remaining voltage in the battery you will find it is approximately 1.34 volts. If you add the digits in 1.34 volts it will total ( 1 + 3 + 4 = 8 ). Adjust the number 8 so it can be subtracted from 1.34 volts ( 1.34 – 0.08 = 1.26 ). The value of the Time / Energy Frame is 1.26. Divide the Time / Energy Frame ( 1.26 ) by 9 which is the value of the Time String when it appeared ( how long did the battery last ??? ) ( 1.26 / 9 = 0.14 ). If you add ( 1.34 + 0.14 = 1.48 ) which is approximately 1.5.

You can see what happened, but it is an illusion because it actually happened in the quantum world where there isn't any ( quantum ) space. The most interesting thing of all is that probability is birthed in the quantum world when the Time String pops a nine and energy is released into the quantum world. This energy is seen by us as energy, action and events. There are many Time strings in the quantum world busy popping 9's at any time from our space / time perspective. Since the result of all this popping has to go somewhere in a quantum spaceless world we see the results as dark matter, dark mass and dark energy because we can't use our Space / Time to react with it. It is also interesting that our whole universe was created when one of the Time strings in the quantum world popped and didn't do what it was supposed to do.

So, in summary:

1. Space / Time.
2. Energy / Time.
3. Mass / Energy.

Theory Of Everything

2011-03-01T14:33:00.000-05:00

The Theory Of Everything presupposes that there is one standard equation which when the right numbers are inserted, you have a mathematical explanation for everything. I think the one standard mathematical equation for the explanation for everything is the mathematical representation of a string. I'm not bright enough to write that equation, but I can tell you how the common string represents / can explain everything in our 4 dimensional universe as well as our quantum universe.

The basic construction of the universe in terms of a string is:

1. Energy
2. Mass
3. Time

If you hold out a piece of string in front of you, you will see that the string occupies space, but the string itself has no space because you can't stretch it. Einstein said that things occupy space, but space doesn't exist on its' own as a separate entity. If you try to stretch the string, you are applying an outward motion or force. Eventually, if you are strong enough, it will suddenly break and at the instance of the breakage, you will experience acceleration of the string. The string won't accelerate forever, but it will reach a constant speed which we call velocity ( distance / time ). Conversely, if you take a string and push it inward, you will see that you can't break it. This happens because the string on a quantum level is being held together by a strong nuclear force. Lastly if the string can be combined chemically to make something, then the new combination of whatever you are making is held together by the weak nuclear force on a quantum level. All this is energy in some form or another.

Mass is demonstrated by creating a ball of string. Each string in the ball of string is curved in some degree and not all of the strings are equally curved. A curved or flexed string represents gravity. This is why gravity is notoriously weaker than any other energy force associated with a ball of string. Also, since the curve in all the strings in the ball of string aren't exact you get a different gravity pull just like it happens on earth. Lastly, if you lay out a series of strings in any direction around the ball you will find that the strings surrounding the ball are generally curved representing the pull of gravity for anything traveling close to the ball of curved strings. Finally, if you could make the ball of curved string vibrate you could read its' characteristics. If you could make a string extended into space vibrate in a pattern you could transmit information at a designated frequency. This is the basis of electronics which uses a charged particle ( electron ) to vibrate its' string in a pattern which we call communication.

Time seems to me to be dark matter. It moves outward in one direction. We can't interact with it in terms of changing its' direction or stopping it. We also can't travel backward or forward along a string of time. You can think of Energy, and Time as being parallel strings when they are quiescent in a quantum world. If you could see into a quantum world you would notice that the quantum world had areas of cloudiness which we call nuclear particles and atoms. These nuclear particles and atoms are rolled up mass strings joined together by energy strings which we call the strong and weak nuclear force. There is no quantum space in the quantum world so everything is instantaneous because of the Time string which hasn't space. In addition because there isn't any space we measure energy in electron volts. An electron is a rolled up mass string with an electron charge on it. The Time string is rather unique. It doesn't have any space in the traditional sense, but the Time string is related to the number 9. The number 9 in the Time string can pop up at any time and so we can relate it to an infinite number of space measurements in our world.

Here's an example:

The common battery which you can readily buy at a store is 1.5 volts or 1.5 electron volts. If you put the 1.5 volt battery in something you will find that over time ( Time string ) it will cease to operate. If you measure the remaining voltage in the battery you will find it is approximately 1.34 volts. If you add the digits in 1.34 volts it will total ( 1 + 3 + 4 = 8 ). Adjust the number 8 so it can be subtracted from 1.34 volts ( 1.34 – 0.08 = 1.26 ). The value of the Time / Energy Frame is 1.26. Divide the Time / Energy Frame ( 1.26 ) by 9 which is the value of the Time String when it appeared ( how long did the battery last ??? ) ( 1.26 / 9 = 0.14 ). If you add ( 1.34 + 0.14 = 1.48 ) which is approximately 1.5.

You can see what happened, but it is an illusion because it actually happened in the quantum world where there isn't any ( quantum ) space. The most interesting thing of all is that probability is birthed in the quantum world when the Time String pops a nine and energy is released into the quantum world. This energy is seen by us as space, energy, action and events. There are many Time strings in the quantum world busy popping 9's at any time from our space / time perspective. Since the result of all this popping has to go somewhere in a quantum spaceless world we see the results as dark matter, dark mass and dark energy because we can't use our Space / Time to react with it. It is also interesting that our whole universe was created when one of the Time strings in the quantum world popped and didn't do what it was supposed to do.

So, in summary:

1. Space / Time.
2. Energy / Time.
3. Mass / Energy.

It's interesting that Einstein proved that Mass / Energy were the same thing and that Space / Time are related. Since Time has the common value of 9 in the quantum world it seems that Space / Time and Energy / Time are the same thing since both can be divided by Time which has the same value ( 9 ).

So, once again:

1. Space
2. Energy
3. Mass

are three peas in the same pod called Time whose value is 9.

Pity, No Quantum Space

2011-02-26T17:02:00.000-05:00

Quantum Space doesn't exist. Mass, Time and Energy doesn't contain any space. This may seem very hard to believe because if you and I look out a window we can see mass, time and energy existing in various forms in space. In our world everything has the illusion of being solid simply because our eyes don't have the ability to see into the quantum world without assistance. Even if we could see into the quantum world, the information that we would gain would be very limited because our eyes run on photons for information and photons are so large that they can't always bounce off of what they hit and return to our eye. Sometimes the photons smother the quantum object which we want to see and therefore can't bounce back to our eye with information. It seems to me that in a quantum world all we have are strings which appear to us as Mass, Time and Energy. Strings do not contain space in the sense that strings have to travel through it in order to go from A to B. Rolled up strings are a lump or mass. Since the rolled up strings are flexed in a ball you get gravity. Also, the rolled up string ball we call Mass flexes the surrounding strings that aren't part of the ball thus creating gravity that distorts the path of passing photons causing things to appear to be elsewhere. Time is a unidirectional outward going string that doesn't react with the seen universe. I sense that Time is really dark matter, dark energy, and dark force which is pulling our universe outward and as dark matter, provides extra drag to the seen universe. Energy is also a string which when moving outward provides force, motion and acceleration and when acting inward provides the strong and weak nuclear force depending on its' location. If the energy string flexes rapidly you get frequency or different property characteristics if associated with a mass ( string ball ). If you attempt to get information from the quantum world you are adding energy strings to it which affects what you are trying to measure or alternately changes its' characteristics so it now appears to be either a wave ( string ) or particle ( ball of string or mass ). Since quantum space doesn't exist, you have spooky ( instantaneous ) action at a distance because neither Quantum Energy nor Quantum Time have to travel through space to go from A to B. In summary, if you are trying to understand anything quantum the prime thing to remember is that anything quantum doesn't have to go through space first to accomplish something so everything is instantaneous and immediate and hence spooky action at a ( time ) distance.

Weak & Strong Nuclear Force, Electromagnetism & Gravity

2011-02-19T12:19:00.001-05:00

It all has to do with spaceless strings. Mass, Time, & Energy are spaceless strings in various disguises. If we look at a ball of yarn we can see that the yarn is made up of rolled strings of yarn. The rolled strings of yarn are flexed into a circle or volume and as the rolled strings of yarn aren't moving they are the equivalent of ( yarn ) gravity. This principle applies to every particle in the universe irrespective of what we call it. Time is essentially a dark spaceless string which we label as dark matter, dark energy and dark mass depending on how we see it at the time. Time doesn't react with anything in our world as it moves outward in a unidirectional direction. The Energy string has various disguises. The tip of the string is where we measure velocity and acceleration. If the energy string is flexing rapidly, we label what is happening as frequency which is usually caused by the vibration of string fields surrounding the electron agited by electricity and driven by magnetism and called electromagnetism. The Strong Nuclear Force is the force of an unbroken spaceless string acting inwardly towards its' center thus holding one single atom together which can't be broken unless extreme measures are used. The weak nuclear force is the spaceless string between the cloud of energy ( atoms ) and the cloud of energy ( electrons ) which counteracts its' orbital force.

Quantum Valentines & Quantum Entanglement

2011-02-15T09:09:00.000-05:00

I got to thinking of old girlfriends on Valentines day. Since I don't know where they are and due to present long term commitments due to unthoughtout and unappreciated consequences of promises, I can only use my imagination. Without getting into religion or atheism, it seems to me that whomever or whatever designed this universe gave us an outstanding gift when she gave us imagination. Imagination in our mind, occupies our Time, Energy, and Space for thinking time. Einstein once made the comment that Space doesn't exist unless something expands into it. While sitting here, churning my brain, it suddently occurred to me that I may be occupying my space, but I wasn't occupying her space as I wasn't extending my presence into it according to Einstein. I was however, involving Time and Energy which from a quantum viewpoint doesn't have any space associated with it. Now imagination can make anything seem real and imagination can construct all kinds of theories but just like my quantum valentine it has nothing to do with the real world or what passes for it. If Time and Energy in the quantum world have no associated space, then it seems to me that quantum entanglement would be instantaneous since no space travel is involved since quantum space doesn't exist on that level. Similarly Energy on a quantum level has no associated space, so if we measure something on a quantum level we are either adding energy or taking away energy from the quantum thing. Also when we add or subtract energy from the quantum thing, we change its' form so we get particle and wave debates. If you remember that anything quantum has no space, when you study something of a quantum nature, you will soon see that a lot of it makes sense.

Time

2011-02-13T16:47:00.001-05:00

Time is one of the conundrums of this universe. Generally we use time to mark events in our life, or for measurement from one point to another. We know that time in our universe moves outward in a unidirectional path. We also cannot interact with time in the same way we can interact with mass or energy. Einstein has linked mass and energy as being different forms of the same thing in his equation ( E = mc^2 ). I sense that mass, energy and time are all different forms of strings. We also know that our universe is expanding outwardly which may have something to do with time as it moves outward. Time may also be at the root of dark matter, dark energy, and dark force. If this is true, time may be dragging the universe outward rather than the universe dragging time outward. In other words, our emphasis is on the wrong thing. If you agree with this premise, it seems that time would also be the dark matter which helps to hold the planets in position, the dark energy which helps to move the planets as well as the dark force which flummoxes our calculations when we try to calculate what happens next.

In summary Strings are:

1. Mass
2. Energy
3. Time

Mass is a rolled up ball of string. If the rolled up ball of string vibrates, it is seen by us as the properties of the mass. Energy is a rolled out string which when still and flexed is seen by us as gravity. If the energy flexes continuously we see it as a frequency or as a linear ( stretching ) force when it has velocity or acceleration. If the time string stretches it is seen as dark matter, dark energy, or dark force since we don’t have the ability to interact with time except as a marker or a measurement.

Time, Space, Gravity, Motion

2011-02-08T07:04:00.000-05:00

We generally think of space, gravity, and motion as being variable, whereas time is physically invariable and unidirectional. Time is variable and directional from a thinking and philosophical viewpoint, because we can think of our past experiences in terms of time and imagine traveling back and forth in time. If we could exist in a black hole, it is generally thought that time would no longer be physically invariable and unidirectional. If you agree with this premise it stands to reason that Time must have a physical form even though in our everyday existence Time is invariable and unidirectional. Einstein said that mass and energy are different forms of the same thing ( E = mc^2 ). It is generally accepted that large masses will bend light ( photons ). Einstein has also said that large masses curve space which is why planets have orbits. If large planets will curve space it tends to reason that space must be something physical although we don’t see space physically. If you think about it the only thing that time and space could be is unseen strings as in String Theory. Einstein has developed the concept of Space / Time and if Space / Time are strings then they must be mathematically related. If Space / Time were a ratio ( Space divided by Time ), then one would be a fraction of the other. Since Time marches on at a steady pace it would be the denominator and space would be the numerator. The ( Space / Time ) ratio would be the curvature of the space in time and if still, would appear to us as gravity. If the ( Space / Time ) ratio was in motion the curvature of the space would change therefore creating the illusion of motion / acceleration when force in the form of energy or its’ equivalent mass was added.

Dark Matter

2011-01-27T11:49:00.000-05:00

Dark Matter is the fundamental part of the universe on which our real ( seen ) universe is built. It consists of these three ( 3 ) parts.

1. The number 3. Most things can be broken down into 3 parts. For instance you and I consist of a frame ( skeleton ), a string distribution network ( veins ) and a hardware / software communication system ( brain / how to operate ( for instance arms ) and neuron connectors for signals.

2. Energy - The number 3 divided by 2 ( 3 / 2 = 1.5 ) is the common battery voltage. There is also a 9 volt battery which is really the number 3 multiplied by itself ( 3 X 3 ). The number 3 can be subdivided into the numbers ( 1, 2, 3 ). The number 1 represents the whole or completeness. The number 2 represents 2 choices ( yes or no ). The fraction of 2 ( ½ ) represents chance when nothing else is known or the word "maybe". The number 3 as a fraction is ( 1/3rd ). 1/3rd , for example, goes to the wholesaler, 1/3rd profit to the retailer, and 1/3rd for expenses.

3. Force - There is an outward force which is really an inflexible string. An inwardly directed string force which is unbreakable ( nuclear ) and a breakable chemistry force. If a force is still and is also flexed you have gravity. If a force has motion you have velocity and acceleration. A still force initially has resistance to movement which is inertia.

The Third Mathematics

2010-10-25T17:46:00.003-04:00

You can make long lists of just about everything, but when it comes down to a serious decision the lists can be grouped into three essentials. For instance, if you are considering going into business it all comes down to:

1. Product
2. Market
3. Financing

Similarly, you and I, structurally, come down to:

1. Skeleton - Frame
2. Nerves - Electrical
3. Blood Supply – Tubing

Mathematics also comes down to:

1. Numbers
2. Symbols
3. Formulas

Reading comes down to:

1. Words - Numbers
2. Letters - Symbols
3. Meaning - Formula

The interpretation of mathematics and reading is generally linear or in other words straight across. Some languages are read vertically which is essentially linear in a vertical direction. If you have the number 7918 in front of you and someone comes along and says the number is wrong and should be 7916, you generally rub it out and write 7916. You do it this way because you have been taught to think of numbers linearly. The third mathematics is thinking of a number as a string which in the case of number 7916 is the number 7, 9, 1, 6 linked together in a string. If you link them together in a string you can add the numbers 7, 9, 1, 6 which in this case total 23.

Number------String 1

7916----------23

You can also keep adding the string number digits until they are in one column .

String 1-------String 2

23--------------5

The number 7916 has the strings 23 and 5 as its' tail.

The string can be subtracted from the Number which forms the frame.

Number-----String 1--Frame 1

7916--------23--------789
The frame is also the area in which the number is located.

The universe consists of 3 strings:

1) Time String
2) Energy String
3) Space String

The time string which has neither energy or space has the value 9 while the universe, in general is based on the number 3.

If you divide the frame by 9 you get the space string or height for that particular number.

Frame 1------Space 1

7893-----------877

Frame 2-------Space 2

7911-----------879

The space string is also the height of the field around the number ( 7916 ) on its' string 23 or 5. The number 7916 can be anywhere in the frame which brings in Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle. The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle says that it is impossible to simultaneously determine both the position and momentum of an electron or any other particle with any great degree of accuracy or certainty. This principle is not a statement about the the researcher's limitations but is a statement about the system's limitations due to quantum mechanic equations. The energy string is associated with quantum mechanics and quantum theory. The energy string has quantum force, but neither time nor space. If the energy string has inward quantum force ( >------< ) then it is the strong nuclear force holding atoms together. If the energy string has outward quantum force ( <-----> ) then it is the weak nuclear force which allows reactions to happen without destroying the nucleus of the atom. If the energy string is flexed then it acts as gravity. This principle is similar to Einstein's Theory Of Relativity except that he explained it in terms of large masses ( particles / objects ) whereas I explain it in terms of strings, however, the overall principle is the same.

In The Beginning

2010-10-22T09:19:00.000-04:00

The initial expansion of the universe was the result of time strings. Time strings are action at a distance even though time strings don’t contain energy or space. The expansion using time strings was instantaneous and far reaching. Some of the time strings remained and other time strings were converted into potential energy strings. Potential energy strings are essentially static force strings. Inward operating static force potential energy strings are the strong nuclear force. Outward operating static force potential energy strings are the weak nuclear force which allows molecules to interact with other molecules in chemistry and metallurgy. Potential energy strings are not absolutely straight but tend to flex which creates the phenomena of gravity. The last string to form from some of the time strings was the space string. The space string is the dynamic force string. The space string gives us velocity, acceleration and inertia. The formation of the space string allowed all the strings to form bumps. These bumps could be particles, objects, actions or events. Each particle, object, action or event has a string associated with it. These tails allow the particle, object, action or event to interact with its’ surroundings. The tails also mean that the particle, object, action, or event can be examined through their respective tails. For instance, light which is mostly seen as a particle or quanta, also can be seen as a wave which is essentially its’ tail vibrating. The universe is based on the number 3. In mathematics you have numbers / formulas, lengths / calculus, and lastly digits / strings. Digits / strings link numbers to their strings and frame or state / space. Digit /strings are similar to the action of time strings. If you change digit(s) in the digit string through observation / measurement you change the number / string / frame which is similar to the action at a distance in a time string. The universe is based on the number 3, which means you have essentially 3 possibilities to consider, yes ( 1 ), no ( 0 ) and maybe ( ½. ) . The Schrodinger thought experiment considered two possibilities, that being whether or not the cat was alive or dead ( 1 or 0). The third possibility was that the cat was neither alive nor dead which was ( ½ ) . The universe didn’t close after the big bang so we see time, energy, and space strings as they initially existed which is the basis of quantum theory and quantum mechanics. Time has the value 9. The potential energy string has the value of the particle / length of height which usually has a value just over 9.. The space height is calculated by dividing the frame by 9. The frame has the same area but can have any shape through which it can vibrate properties.

Riemann Hypothesis Resolved Using Prime Numbers

2010-10-17T08:09:00.001-04:00

The Riemann Hypothesis says that all the non-trivial zeros ( 0 ) are on the line ( y = ½ ) and that this hypothesis has something to do with prime numbers. Another way of expressing it, is by saying that the magnitude of the oscillations of primes around their expected position is controlled by the real parts of the zeros of the zeta function. In particular, the error term in the prime number theorem is closely related to the position of the zeros. It is known that there are infinitely many zeros on the line 1/2 + it as t ranges over the real numbers. A prime number is any number that is evenly divided by itself and 1. Therefore, a prime number is a specialized real number which exists on the x axis. It is also known that any prime number can create a real number that isn’t a prime. A real number is a number that is sequentially placed on the x - axis and therefore has a specific location that can be calculated through subtraction. A prime number, however, cannot be specifically located on the x - axis because the distance between the prime numbers aren’t consistent. Riemann extended his equation into complex numbers which oscillate on a vertical plane at right angles to the x - axis or in other words across the line ( y = ½ ). The non-trivial zeros do not become real until the oscillating complex zero crosses ( y = ½ ) and becomes real. The complex zero is really on an imaginary string before it lies along the line ( y = ½ ). At this point the real zero can be used to calculate the location of the prime number on the x - axis. It is also known that there are an infinite number of prime numbers and by extension an infinite number of real numbers because prime numbers can be used to construct real numbers. So far the calculated zeros lie on the critical line, but the prime’s location strays because the calculation process behaves just like a 50:50 coin toss. The 50:50 distribution law says that coins will divide themselves proportionately over the long term, but on the specific terms they generally will not distribute themselves evenly. There are always exceptions. The most important thing that Riemann said was that the magnitude of the oscillations of primes around their expected position is controlled by the real parts of the zeros of the zeta function and the error term in the prime number theorem is closely related to the position of the zeros.

Here are some facts about prime numbers.

1. Prime numbers, if they are prime numbers, have the numbers 1, 3, 7, 9 in column 0 ( farthest right column ).

2. If the sum of the digits of any number ending in 1, 3, 7, 9, total a multiple of 3, except for 3, ( for instance total 6, 9, 12, etc. ) it isn’t a prime number. If a number ending in 1, 3, 7, 9 in column zero (0), isn’t a prime number it can usually be evenly divided by a number with 1, 3, 7, 9 in column (0).

3. A prime number is defined as being only evenly divisible by itself and one ( 1 ).

Here’s the proof:

A prime number is defined as any number that can be only divided evenly by itself and one. Furthermore a prime number, if it is a prime number, only has the digits, 1, 3, 7, 9 in column 0 which is the farthest right column. I have also discovered that if the sum of the digits of any number ending in 1, 3, 7, 9 total a multiple of 3, except for prime number 3 ( for example total 6, 9, 12, etc. ) then it isn’t a prime number. The single digit prime numbers are 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, if we ignore the convention of no longer considering 1 as a prime number. A real number which includes prime numbers are located somewhere on the x - axis. If we multiply each single digit prime number ( 1, 2, 3, 5, 7 ) by ½ we get 1 at approximately ½, 2 at approximately 1, 3 at approximately 1.5, 5 at approximately 2.5 and 7 at approximately 3.5. 1 is actually at 1, 2 at 2, 3 at 3, 5 at 4 and 7 at 5. 97 is a prime and if we multiply 97 by ½, we get 48.5. The prime 97 isn’t anywhere close to being the 48th prime. The Riemann Hypothesis says that the magnitude of the oscillations of primes around their expected position is controlled by the real parts of the zeros of the zeta function. In particular, the error term in the prime number theorem is closely related to the position of the zeros. Our initial calculation indicated that the prime number 97 was oscillating around position 48.5 on the x axis which isn’t correct. The Riemann Hypothesis says that the magnitude of the oscillations of primes around their expected position is controlled by the real parts of the zeros of the zeta function. In particular, the error term in the prime number theorem is closely related to the position of the zeros. What to do???? We know that the prime number 97 lies on the x axis as it is a specialized real number. The Riemann Hypothesis says that the magnitude of the oscillations of primes around their expected position is controlled by the real parts of the zeros of the zeta function. Therefore we make up a multiplier. The first digit is ½ or .5. The second digit is one of the Riemann Hypothesis zeros so we now have ( .50 ) . ( .50 ) X 97 is no better off than multiplying 97 X ( .5 ). We know that the prime numbers have 1, 3, 7, or 9 in column 0. Therefore arbitrarily add the 9 digit to ( .50 ) forming ( .509 ). If we multiply prime 97 X ( .509 ) the answer is worse. If, however, we take ( .509 ^ 2 ) we get ( .259081 ) and 97 X ( .259081 ) = 25.130857. Prime number 97 is in actuality the 26th prime. The Riemann Hypothesis says that the magnitude of the oscillations of primes around their expected position is controlled by the real parts of the zeros of the zeta function. In particular, the error term in the prime number theorem is closely related to the position of the zeros. Using the Riemann Hypothesis zeros between .5 and 9 ( .5----9 ) and raising it to a power we can oscillate the prime 97 around its’ position. Thus the error can be controlled by adjusting the Riemann Hypothesis zeros.

Here’s how the system works for numbers in general.

1. Count the number of digits in a prime number. For instance 7919 has 4 digits. Subtract 1 from the number of digits ( 4 - 1 = 3 ) for 7919. Form another number equal to the number of digits in 7919 ( 4 ) by putting ( .5 ) in the far left column and 9 in the far right column. ( .5—9 ). Fill the middle with Riemann Hypothesis zeros ( 0 ) forming a four digit number ( .5009 ). Raise ( .5009 ) to the power of 3 ( which is the number of digits in 7919 ( 4 ) minus 1 ( 4 - 1 = 3 ). ( .5009 ) ^ 3 = .125676215. Multiply 7919 X .125676215 which equals 995.2299524. 7919 is the 1000th prime. The answer is out by approximately 5. Adjust error accordingly using Riemann Hypothesis zeros.

As a matter of interest, if we are looking for the largest prime number in existence, the simplest way of doing it is to add digits to the left of any number ending in 1, 3, 7, 9 in column zero ( 0 ). Find the total of all the digits added together and divide by 3. If the result is an integer with no remainder, it is not a prime number. This truth can be verified by seeing if the number is only evenly divisible by itself and 1. It is also interesting that any number ending in 1, 3, 7, 9, if it isn’t a prime, is usually divisible by some number ending in 1, 3, 7, 9 in column 0.

If all the zeros used for calculating the position of primes on strings are real, then the primes themselves are real. Primes can be combined to create real numbers as well as fractions, so all the zeros for those numbers are real. Therefore the Riemann Hypothesis is true.

Actual Location Primes Multiplier 2 To Power 2 Power 2 Calculated Location
1 1 0.509999999 1 0.509999999 0.509999999
2 2 0.509999999 1 0.509999999 1.019999999
3 3 0.509999999 1 0.509999999 1.529999998
4 5 0.509999999 1 0.509999999 2.549999997
5 7 0.509999999 1 0.509999999 3.569999996
6 11 0.509999999 1 0.509999999 5.609999994
7 13 0.509999999 1 0.509999999 6.629999993
8 17 0.509999999 1 0.509999999 8.669999991
9 19 0.509999999 1 0.509999999 9.68999999
10 23 0.509999999 1 0.509999999 11.72999999
11 29 0.509999999 1 0.509999999 14.78999997
12 31 0.509999999 1 0.509999999 15.80999998
13 37 0.509999999 2 0.260099999 9.623699981
14 41 0.509999999 2 0.260099999 10.66409998
15 43 0.509999999 2 0.260099999 11.18429998
16 47 0.509999999 2 0.260099999 12.22469998
17 53 0.509999999 2 0.260099999 13.78529997
18 59 0.509999999 2 0.260099999 15.34589997
19 61 0.509999999 2 0.260099999 15.86609997
20 67 0.509999999 2 0.260099999 17.42669997
21 71 0.509999999 2 0.260099999 18.46709996
22 73 0.509999999 2 0.260099999 18.98729996
23 79 0.509999999 2 0.260099999 20.54789996
24 83 0.509999999 2 0.260099999 21.58829996
25 89 0.509999999 2 0.260099999 23.14889995
26 97 0.509999999 2 0.260099999 25.22969995

The position of the primes was calculated by multiplying the primes ( 1 to 31 ) by ( .509999999 ^ 1). From ( 37 to 97 ) the primes were multiplied by ( .509999999 ^ 2 ) to keep the calculated distance close to the actual distance.

Actual Location Primes String 1 String 2 Multiplier 2 To Power 2 Power 2 Calculated Location
27 101 2 2 0.509999999 2 0.2601 26.27009995
28 103 4 4 0.509999999 2 0.2601 26.79029995
29 107 8 8 0.509999999 2 0.2601 27.83069994
30 109 10 1 0.509999999 2 0.2601 28.35089994
31 113 5 5 0.509999999 2 0.2601 29.39129994
32 127 10 1 0.509999999 2 0.2601 33.03269993
33 131 5 5 0.509999999 2 0.2601 34.07309993
34 137 11 2 0.509999999 2 0.2601 35.63369993
35 139 13 4 0.509999999 2 0.2601 36.15389993
36 149 14 5 0.509999999 2 0.2601 38.75489992
37 151 7 7 0.509999999 2 0.2601 39.27509992
38 157 13 4 0.509999999 2 0.2601 40.83569992
39 163 10 1 0.509999999 2 0.2601 42.39629992
40 167 14 5 0.509999999 2 0.2601 43.43669991
41 173 11 2 0.509999999 2 0.2601 44.99729991
42 179 17 8 0.509999999 2 0.2601 46.55789991
43 181 10 1 0.509999999 2 0.2601 47.07809991
44 191 11 2 0.500999999 2 0.251001 47.9411909
45 193 13 4 0.500999999 2 0.251001 48.4431929
46 197 17 8 0.500999999 2 0.251001 49.4471969
47 199 19 1 0.500999999 2 0.251001 49.9491989

The position of the primes was calculated by multiplying the primes ( 101 to 181 ) by (.5099999999^2) From (191 to 199 ) the primes were multiplied by ( .5009999999 ^ 2 ) to keep the calculated distance close to the actual distance.

The most important thing that Riemann said was that the magnitude of the oscillations of primes around their expected position is controlled by the real parts of the zeros of the zeta function and the error term in the prime number theorem is closely related to the position of the zeros. If you multiplied the primes from ( 191 to 199 ) by ( .509999999^2 ) the answer would be further from their real locations and hence the error would be greater.

It is also interesting that by either adding or subtracting Pi or ( e^1 ) depending on what is required you can get the Riemann Zero calculation closer to the actual location of the primes.

Actual Location Calculated Location Add / Subtract Total
1 0.509999999 0 0.509999999
2 1.019999999 0 1.019999999
3 1.529999998 0 1.529999998
4 2.549999997 0 2.549999997
5 3.569999996 0 3.569999996
6 5.609999994 0 5.609999994
7 6.629999993 0 6.629999993
8 8.669999991 0 8.669999991
9 9.68999999 0 9.68999999
10 11.72999999 0 11.72999999
11 14.78999997 -3.141592654 11.64840732
12 15.80999998 -3.141592654 12.66840733
13 9.623699981 3.141592654 12.76529263
14 10.66409998 3.141592654 13.80569263
15 11.18429998 3.141592654 14.32589263
16 12.22469998 3.141592654 15.36629263
17 13.78529997 3.141592654 16.92689263
18 15.34589997 3.141592654 18.48749262
19 15.86609997 3.141592654 19.00769262
20 17.42669997 3.141592654 20.56829262
21 18.46709996 3.141592654 21.60869262
22 18.98729996 3.141592654 22.12889262
23 20.54789996 3.141592654 23.68949261
24 21.58829996 3.141592654 24.72989261
25 23.14889995 0 23.14889995
26 25.22969995 0 25.22969995
27 26.27009995 0 26.27009995
28 26.79029995 0 26.79029995
29 27.83069994 0 27.83069994
30 28.35089994 0 28.35089994
31 29.39129994 0 29.39129994
32 33.03269993 0 33.03269993
33 34.07309993 0 34.07309993
34 35.63369993 0 35.63369993
35 36.15389993 0 36.15389993
36 38.75489992 -2.718281828 36.03661809
37 39.27509992 -2.718281828 36.55681809
38 40.83569992 -2.718281828 38.11741809
39 42.39629992 -3.141592654 39.25470726
40 43.43669991 -3.141592654 40.29510726
41 44.99729991 -3.141592654 41.85570726
42 46.55789991 -3.141592654 43.41630725
43 47.07809991 -3.141592654 43.93650725
44 47.9411909 -3.141592654 44.79959825
45 48.4431929 -3.141592654 45.30160025
46 49.4471969 -3.141592654 46.30560425
47 49.9491989 -2.718281828 47.23091707

It can be seen from these calculations that the magnitude of the oscillations of the primes around their expected position is controlled by the zeros ( 0’s) in the multiplier. The error term is closely related to the position of the zeros since ( .509999999 ) and (.599999990) both hold the same digits but the zero ( 0 ) position has been shifted thus putting the position of the primes further out of alignment. It can be seen that the calculation of the position of a prime and the number of primes preceding that prime all depend on the Riemann Hypothesis real zeros. Thus the Riemann Hypothesis has been proved by illustrating its’ real relationship to the position of the primes and the number of primes preceding it.

Time Travel Without Paradoxes

2010-06-12T11:52:00.000-04:00

There are no paradoxes in time travel. Energy and Time are the same thing in our universe although we may call them different things at different times. Energy and Time do not possess space although they do travel through space according to our perceptions. Here is a way to look at it. If a murder is committed, that murder leaves traces in energy and time that it was committed. The investigators in the present come in and if their skills are sufficient, they can reconstruct what happened. If we could move backward in time, we could see the murder committed in that particular backward space even though the murdered person in our present existing space no longer existed. This is true because what we would be seeing is the residual image of that murdered person in that space and time and not how he or she was dead in present time. Similarly, if we went backward in time and saw ourselves, we would only be looking at our residual image. It would be similar to looking at a movie which had a long dead star in it. We would be seeing him or her how he or she existed in the time and space of that shot movie. We couldn’t physically destroy ourselves in the past because what we are seeing / experiencing is only an image in time and energy similar to a hologram. Paradoxically, our future selves may be observing ourselves, which we can’t see as we are only an energy and time image to them. Similarly moving forward in time, we would only be seeing an image of ourselves in the future.

Baggy Diapers

2010-06-09T07:33:00.000-04:00

Particles are at the root of our understanding and explanation of the universe. Energy and Time are the same thing in our universe although we may call them different things at different times. Energy / Time in our universe is represented by the single digit number ( 9 ). Particles are really rolled up strings. Each particle has a surrounding frame which we see as a wave if it is moving, or weight (mass) if it is still. We can travel through space but we can’t travel through time or energy. Our space is anchored at both ends of time and energy. If space is longer than time and energy it curves like baggy diapers. The baggy diaper curve is weight / mass or gravity depending on its’ location in the universe. The baggy diaper curve edge is a trajectory in space irrespective of the location of that space in the universe. If space is shorter than time and energy, then time and energy adjusts its’ unit lengths. We see this phenomena as the common battery voltages of 1.5, 3 and 9.

Thus you will see that:

1. Weight
2. Mass
3. Gravity

are essentially the same thing under different names depending on the circumstances.

String Theory Explains Special Relativity

2010-05-08T12:51:00.000-04:00

String Theory involves:

1 . Particles / Objects / Actions / Events / Messages.
2. Space
3. Time.

Particles / Objects / Actions / Events / Messages have an associated string in real space and in dark time. Dark Time associated with particles / objects / actions / events and messages has no associated space but does have a constant straight time value of 9. The real space value of particles / objects / actions / events / messages have various values.

The three principles of Special Relativity are:

1) length contraction
2) time dilation or time contraction / expansion.
3) failure of simultaneity at a distance or change in space over a distance.

Particles, when still, have a straight string and the effects of dark time aren’t noticed. If a particle starts to move its’ string lengthens to account for the velocity / acceleration. The particle / velocity / acceleration string starts to curve and the particle starts to lose its’ volume which we see as length contraction at sufficiently high speeds. The time string still has a no space value , but does have a non space value of 9. The space string must match the length of the straight time string whose constant value is 9. It does that by curving. This curving creates a series of waves at a frequency. This frequency may vary because the particle / object is accelerating. We see these waves / space curving as time dilation which we experience psychologically since we can’t see them. Failure of simultaneity at a distance or change in space over a distance is caused by our brain’s failure to interpret real time / space over a distance. This phenomena created by the brain is necessary or we wouldn’t be able to orient ourselves in space as far as distance from objects are concerned. If you don’t believe me, try orienting yourself in a dark room or in space without seeing any object.

Time and Everything Dark

2010-05-05T07:19:00.000-04:00

The basic construction of the universe is:

1. Particles
2. Strings
3. Frames

Each particle has its’ own string. Particles and their strings can combine with other particles and strings to create quantum objects and also physical objects which we can see such as buildings. Particles can travel along their own strings which causes the strings to flex which we see as:

1. Gravity.
2. Properties.
3. Forces.

Each string and particle travels / lives within a frame. This frame is seen as:

1. Waves.
2. Feelings
3. Influence

Time strings consist of:

1. Particles of Dark Matter.
2. Dark Energy which is the Time string itself
3. Dark Force which is contained in a Dark Wave.

Just before the Big Bang, the universe from which our universe was created, consisted solely of a Time String which contained everything rolled into one string. At the moment of the Big Bang everything broke into different types of particles, strings and frames which we see today. Remnants of the Time String exist today which due to its’ containing Dark Matter, Dark Energy and Dark Force drag us forward which we see personally as aging and physically as the expansion of our universe. We cannot reverse time, nor can we alter it as we can do to other particles, strings and frames. Time is not affected by our present day technology. We have no influence over dark matter, dark energy and dark force. If we could find a way to manipulate Time Strings beyond using them as a day to day marker of events, we could travel throughout the universe without aging.

Strings & Force

2010-05-02T10:16:00.000-04:00

The universe is primarily organized around:

1. Particles, Objects, Events, Messages.
2. Strings
3. Frames

Particles, objects and events are rolled up strings whereas messages are unrolled strings containing frames. Particles, objects and events follow paths which are a form of strings. These strings form forces when they are angled, straight or curved.

The four fundamental forces of physics are:

1. Gravity
2. Electromagnetism
3. Weak Nuclear Force
4. Strong Nuclear Force.

When particles, objects and events follow unorganized string paths you get random motion which is another form of probability, possibility and likelihood based on observed experience.

Frames are essentially a form of space / time. If the space dimension of a frame becomes curved while time remains straight it also curves the string paths of the particles, objects and events which is seen by us as gravity.

If inanimate strings containing particles such as electrons vibrate they create frames surrounding the strings which we see as electrical fields / waves and gravity which we call magnetism.

If animate strings vibrate which is primarily us than we get properties which we call personality and emanating waves we call charisma.

Physical chemistry is possible because the particle and object strings can be joined to form different particles and objects. This string force is stronger than gravity but not as strong as an electoweak force.

Biochemistry is possible because strings form bonds of varying strengths at angles which are readily rearranged by our bodies and allow us to live and function.

Weak nuclear interaction is associated with isotopes and beta decay which is a form of chaos or decay which we all experience at one time or another.

Strong nuclear force happens when the space in the frame is squeezed out and only time is left because it doesn’t have any space associated with it. In quantum theory only time is present although we like to think in terms of force in small spaces because that is the world with which we are familiar.

The fundamental forces are really just strings that are just space in one dimension and space / time when they form two dimensional frames.

Dark Stuff, Light Stuff & Lastly Strings

2010-04-21T11:14:00.000-04:00

Space is composed of strings and strings are composed of dark matter, dark energy and dark force. Our seen universe is composed of light matter, light energy, and light force. Space is composed of dark matter in the form of strings which we can’t see but can experience. Strings also have dark energy which hold what we can see in position. The dark force stretches the strings, but it doesn’t stretch them evenly so over vast distances the galaxies seem to be accelerating from each other but it is only an illusion from our space viewpoint. The light force which we can see is gravity which allows us to move in our light space. Light force also causes entropy which is a gentle falling apart of light matter, light energy and light force which results in our ability to move, to transmit information and to deteriorate gracefully which we call aging. Dark force is equivalent to light gravity. Heavy dark forces are caused by the flexing of dark space strings. Heavy Light force is caused by matter moving at a velocity and acceleration. Light matter tends to contract when moving at a velocity or acceleration. This phenomena is not noticeable at low speeds. Space at high string speed tends to contract which we see as time dilation which occurs in Black Holes. All information about the black hole is in its’ event horizon because that is the border between light and dark. Our seen universe is based on the number 3, whereas dark space seen by us as time is based on 9. What we see as light is primarily space. What we see as dark is primarily time. More advanced civilizations have learned to connect light matter to dark space which means they can travel in time rather than space. Time has no dimension so there is nothing to transverse which results in everything being done instantly. That is why we can see what has happened astronomically speaking in the past when we look out into the heavens.

Three, Nine & Time

2010-04-14T14:49:00.000-04:00

The universe tries to stabilize around the number 3. The range of potential stability is the difference between Pi ( 3.141592654 ) and e^1 ( 2.718281828 ) or ( .423310825 ). One unit of Time is equal to 9 units of Space. These 9 units of space do not have to be uniform spaces in terms of width. They can be random widths with different spacing between them. These differing units of appearing space / frames cause the illusion of random things happening at different intervals. These random happenings may or may not affect you. This process is Random Time. We can also use Time for counting as we mark certain events in our lives. This is Artificial Time based on years / days / hours / minutes / seconds. Real Time is when something out of the blue affects you.

In summary, Time can be:

1. Random
2. Artificial
3. Real

String Theory Explains Special Relativity

2010-04-09T13:21:00.000-04:00

The three principles of Special Relativity are:

1) length contraction
2) time dilation or time contraction / expansion with a constancy of 9 units.
3) failure of simultaneity at a distance or change in space over a distance.

Length contraction is essentially space expanding or contracting the faster it moves. Time dilation or time contraction / expansion is harder to grasp. Time always has 9 units in total. Each unit can expand or contract in size but when the resultant expanded or contracted units are counted they are always 9 in number which is equal to 1 unit of time. The failure of simultaneity at a distance is really the result of the expansion or contraction of individual units of space in time ( space-time ) whose total number must equal 9 of time before time can be seen / felt.

There also is the Law Of Conservation Of Momentum which states that linear momentum doesn’t change unless an external force acts upon it. The Law Of Conservation Of Energy states that energy can neither be created or destroyed.

Suppose we have a particle which is equal to 84. The string associated with particle 84 is obtained by adding its’ digits ( 8 + 4 = 12 ). The string associated with particle 84 can be also obtained by adding its’ first string number ( 12 ) to obtain 3 ( 1 + 2 = 3 ). Therefore particle 84 has the strings 12 and 3. If we subtract particle 84’s first string ( 12 ) from the value of the particle we get ( 84 - 12 = 72 ). If we subtract particle 84’s second string ( 3 ) from the value of the particle we get ( 84 - 3 = 81 ). 72 and 81 is the value of the frame in which the particle 84 exists at some location in two dimensional space. In one dimensional space 84 exists somewhere on its’ first one dimensional string 12 or somewhere on its’ second one dimensional string of 3. If we divide 84’s frames ( 72, 81 ) by 9 which represents 1 unit of time we get 8, or 9 units of space as in space / time. ( 72 / 9 = 8 ) ( 81 / 9 = 9 ). Depending on how you want to look at it, we have 9 units of space divided into a frame area of 72 or 81 ) giving us more space as an answer ( 8 or 9 ). Alternately you can look at it as one unit of time giving you 8 or 9 units of space as in time / space or space / time.

Length contraction involves the Law of Conservation of Energy and the Law of Conservation of Momentum. Suppose the universe is the size of the frame ( 72 or 81 ). The particle starts to move. Energy for that movement has to be taken from the particle because of the Law of Conservation Of Energy. That movement causes the particle ( 84 ) to contract to a lower number ( 69 ) and the resulting calculations change which is equivalent to a length contraction.

The Law Of Conservation Of Momentum says the total momentum can’t change in a closed system not affected by external forces. The particle 84 has a closed system ( frame ) of 81 or 72. If we observe the particle from outside the system that external ( observational ) force is acting to change the momentum of that particle. If we calculate the momentum from our position the answer will not match the observation of someone else from another position. That is why we cannot measure momentum and position of a particle at the same time because our act of observing changes the momentum and position of the particle. This is failure of simultaneity at a distance. It is also time dilation because the two observers are observing from different frames which have different space unit lengths totaling 9 ( equal to one unit of time ).

In summary, Time consists of 9 units of space before you have 1 countable unit of time. Each unit of these 9 units of space can expand or contract thereby giving Time the illusion of dilation. Failure of simultaneity at a distance is the result of the different frames from which the observation took place and the effects of the Law Of Conservation Of Momentum ( molecular vibration also ) on the relevant frame.

If Einstein Had Been A Social Scientist

2010-04-03T17:36:00.000-04:00

It occurred to me the other day that if Einstein had been a social scientist rather than a physicist, the equation of E = MC^2 would have been explained as follows:

All organizations create as well as absorb energy. The organization in order to successfully accomplish a task must commit a minimum amount of resource to that project. This minimum amount of resource can be designated "M". Management, being management, must micromanage the project which is usually measured in the amount of time they run around thrusting their nose into things and demanding progress reports. The maximum speed of Time cannot be faster than the speed of light. Let the maximum speed of light be "C". Management in their hurry to get things done usually demand that work goes faster. Occasionally they add resources which will increase "M". Too much resource ( M ) in an insufficient space ( Time as in Space / Time ) increases the gravity of the situation. The effects of increased gravity "bends" the space devoted to the project thereby curving it further inward preventing any "light" or results escaping.(i.e.: Onlookers see nothing happening) The effects of this contraction concentrates the resources devoted to the project thereby increasing the gravity of the situation which-tends to promote more contraction until a singularity is reached at which point no "light" escapes thereby leading onlookers to assume that nothing is happening-. Massive E or Energy develops at the point of singularity after which everything beyond the horizon of that project is absorbed and if severe enough results in the ruining of careers as well as the organization itself.

Intelligent Computers

2010-03-16T14:56:00.001-04:00

The problem with intelligent computers is that we don’t know how to successfully program them. Our present computers are programmed on:

1. Rules
2. If
3. While / When.

Rules use the choice yes / no system. Yes is equal to 1 ( one ). No is equal to 0 ( zero ). The yes / no system is basically a two ( 2 ) dimensional system, whereas we live in a 4 dimensional world.

Our world is:

1. Rules.
2. Maybe
3. Statistical

Maybe involves the third dimension or the number 3. Maybe involves situations where rules are not clear cut.

Maybe is concerned with:

1. Intelligence
2. Experience
3. Culture / Training.

Functioning intelligence in the real word is essentially the ability to see:

1. Patterns
2. Relationships.
3. Exceptions.

The fourth ( 4th ) dimension is the future. The future in our universe always moves forward. The future involves choosing paths. There are infinite paths, but only 9 strings or dimensions. The future is based on statistics. Our statistical sample is rooted in our intelligence, experience, culture / training. Whether or not our statistical sample can be successfully translated into choosing the right future population of choices is the question. Fortunately the future for most of us has a normal curve of reasonable success with reasonable ups and downs with only minor irritations. This, in other words, is the old sine curve in action.

The trick,my friends, is to design an intelligent computer which is on 24 / 7 to absorb experience, establish relationships and patterns, to run in 9 dimensions including the future and to deal with the occasional random event. Oh yeah, don’t forget statistics, for which there are no rules but plenty of pitfalls.

Space / Time Strings & Entropic Forces

2010-02-03T08:06:00.000-05:00

Particles, objects, events and messages are rolled up strings containing unknown information . Each string has its’ own value. If the strings are unrolled you can see the information which is organized in layers / surfaces on that particular string. The space / time string has a value of 9. The information is held in place on each string because of the actions of inertia / gravity force which is the same thing under different names. There is also an opposing entropic force which tends to pull gravity / inertia forces apart. This entropic force is seen in our real world as randomness / deterioration / events out of the blue. The upside of this entropic force allows us to function / move / write / walk / do things in general.. If the entropic force didn’t exist we couldn’t have any controlled / controllable deterioration which is at the foundation of our functioning in time / space. Writing / walking / communicating / thinking are all examples of controlled / controllable deterioration leading to good / acceptable results.. The length of single digit strings are one to nine. Space / time strings have a length of 9 which means that our world is curved if the perceived string distance is less than nine since our world is the child of the quantum world. We call this entropic force different names using language because the basic entropic force is seen in different ways. Weather is an excellent example of calling this basic entropic force different names. This is also why sometimes bad things happen to good people. They simply get caught up in random entropic forces .. Lastly, entropic force is the reason that life follows a sine curve with random ups and downs.

Quantum Theory In A Nutshell

2010-01-22T23:25:00.000-05:00

Particles, objects, events and messages are rolled up strings containing unknown information . If the strings are rolled out they contain unlimited information in holographic form which occupies a unit of space / time equal to nine. The information is held in space / time due to the actions of inertia. An opposing entropic force acts on the information which tends to pull it apart. The back and forth pull flexes the constant length of the string . This action creates a phenomena which we see as heat / temperature and gravity.. The heat and temperature is similar to thermodynamics and the entropic forces similar to hydrodynamics since the information on the string is disturbed / scrambled., It can therefore be said that gravity depends on the infinite information contained in the string. An example of information on a string is a word. Each letter is equivalent to a particle which strung together on a string creates information which we call a string.. If the word is written on a piece of paper , inertia holds it together. Eventually the entropic forces tear the paper apart leaving scrambled or no information. The string can be stretched on the horizon of a Black Hole but paradoxically its’ value doesn’t change. This action is similar in principle to a red or blue shift. In the world we see strings containing information function as forces, gravity and bonds. Particles are the molecules containing rolled up properties which aren’t easily discernible. Particles can be assembled in any configuration such as strings and lattices. Nuclear energy .is an extreme example of particles held together by extreme inertial forces that can only be ripped apart by highly heated entropic forces. This is why an atomic bomb is required to set off a hydrogen bomb. This process is nuclear fission which releases vast amounts of energy when the inertial string is broken . The opposite extreme is nuclear fusion which is the joining of strings which results in the controlled / gradual release of energy. Nuclear fusion is difficult to achieve because the strings are flexible and don’t want to join. Therefore, Quantum Theory is essentially all about information in a ball or spread out into a string. The manipulation of this information by inertia and entropic forces results in gravity, and everything else we need on a macroscopic scale including civilization

Strings As Gravity, Force, Velocity and Acceleration.

2010-01-20T15:23:00.000-05:00

Space / Time has a string length of 9. If space / time flexes along its’ length as a string it becomes gravity. If space / time, as a string length of 9, attaches its’ ends it becomes a force. This phenomena is found in the bonds of chemistry and the nucleus of nuclear energy. If the string moves it has a velocity. If the string changes its’ velocity you have acceleration.

Theory Of Everything ( Again )

2009-11-07T18:11:00.001-05:00

The following may be called different things at different times, but at its’ simplest the Universe is composed of:

1. Particles / Objects / Events / Messages.

2. Strings

3. Frames

The Theory Of Everything

2009-09-25T12:19:00.000-04:00

The Theory Of Everything is really space / time in its’ various forms. If an object or a particle is at rest in space / time it deforms the space / time surrounding it creating a phenomena that we call gravity. If an object / particle vibrates, this action causes space / time to repeatedly flex which we call a frequency. If an object / particle travels it causes space / time to flex at a velocity which we see as a wave. If an object / particle accelerates which is really a change in the velocity we see it as a change in the wave which we call acceleration. Space / Time also has 9 as a unit of length which doesn’t contain anything until it exists / arrives at that location. Einstein’s Theory Of Relativity is simply different perspectives of a similar frame in space / time from various positions. We do the same thing when we interpret something happening in space / time. Since space / time seems to have a unit of length then it's logical that eventually we can discover how to travel in all directions in both space and time which would include forward and backwards.

Investing

2009-07-08T13:49:00.000-04:00

In the interests of full disclosure, I will start by saying that I’ve never made any significant money in the stock market which could not be duplicated by moving funds around in savings accounts / GIC’s and other instruments that are guaranteed to return something above the principle no matter what. With that said, I’ll now proceed to give some investment advice for you to mull over in your mind. Whether we like it or not, the universe is mathematically based on the number 2. The number 2 as a fraction is ½. The fraction ½ means that everything tends to even out over Time. Evening out over Time, which is the 4th dimension, means that while you and I may have different adventures in life, our lives tend to even out in terms of results. Some people may have horseshoes and some people may never get anything right, but about 68% of us end up in the middle of the old Bell Curve as average. The primary goal of investing is finding something that is above average. To start, stocks are broken out into different sectors such as financial for example. The theory behind these groupings is that while these groups average out like everything else, they tend to go up and down like a wave over time just like your and my life adventures. This behaviour is the basis of the next great invention called diversification. Diversification means that if one group of stocks is going into the toilet another group is climbing out of the toilet so spread your money over the sectors . Overall you will once again tend to average out over ½. The last great invention is Sector Rotation. If you are an all eggs in one basket sort of gal or guy and since nothing lasts over Time, Sector Rotation means that if your once hot sector is going down like the Titanic then find the lifeboat which is another sector. Now let’s suppose you find the right sector. Not all the stocks in that sector are going to make money. Once again about ½ on average. If the sector is hot its’ returns on average will be above average or once again above ½. The trend line which is all the stock increases together should have an upward trend line. The optimum trend line angle is 45 degrees which you will never meet but the closer the better. The first thing is to calculate the average returns for that sector. The next step is to find the sector stocks that are going up. This might sound silly but we live in a real world where we can only invest in concrete things. If we could afford to invest in all the stocks or some scheme which represents all the stocks we are going to average out at ½ faster over time. The next step is to find 3 stocks that are related in some concrete way beyond a sector relationship that are increasing since the universe tends to stabilize around the number 3. If you can find 9 stocks that are primarily related in groups of 3 that are trending up in terms of stock increases your sector is healthy over the immediate future. If you can’t find any bonded stocks in groups of 3’s the sector is starting to fail. The failing benchmark fractions in terms of stock price decreases are ¼ and 1/3rd . The positive benchmark fractions in terms of stock market increases are 2/3rd and ¾’s. If stock market increases start to double, this result will start to attract competitors for that company’s markets, since market product profitability is reflected eventually in stock prices.

Space / Time / Perception

2009-06-25T13:41:00.000-04:00

Einstein said that physical objects are not in space, but these objects are spatially extended. In other words, space does not exist, but only the perception of space. This observation by Einstein is quite profound as it extends way beyond objects in space because it can be applied to what artists call perspective. If you look at a painting that has perspective you will swear up and down and sideways that you are looking into space because the space that your mind sees has been spatially extended but doesn’t physically exist. In other words, you can’t walk into that painting. Spatial extensions are also done with light and shadow. In general, perspective in painting is built by using triangles or combinations of triangles (squares / rectangles ) and light and shadow. In a more abstract sense, perspective is how you view the world. Here your perspective is generally based on life experiences / culture / beliefs. Your mind, after considering what you see, draws ( spatial ) conclusions. Once again space doesn’t exist.

Yes, No, Maybe

2009-06-16T14:54:00.000-04:00

Most of us, if asked, would probably say that the world is based on the number 2. We have the fraction ½. Most of algebra, which we can solve without going nuts, is based on a function of x ( f(x)) raised to the power of 2. Probability based on a gut feeling without facts is usually represented by ½. Most of us can remember 2 things without any problem. Rules are based on two choices ( 2 ) which are either you follow them or you don’t follow them. On the other hand most of us realize that nothing is 100%. Someone once said that the impossible does happen. One of the Impossibles is meeting a member of the opposite sex and following in love immediately. If a stranger immediately handed you a piece of paper and asked you to write down why you feel the way you do in concrete terms most of what you’d write would also apply to a friend of the opposite sex that you know you’d never marry in a million years because you don’t love them like you love this stranger in front of you. The worst thing is that for the first time in your life you realize that you have no control over it when this stranger is in front of you. If you turn into a klutz in front of this stranger then you’re in love. Most of us will try to regain our life by ignoring them but sooner or later you will realize that no one else matters like they did before you met this stranger. Sometimes we even try to studiously ignore them over time but sooner or later we realize that isn’t going to solve the problem. Worst of all if they crooked their finger at you, you’d be off with them like a shot abandoning all your principles. You have just been conked by a maybe. The universe is based on the number 3 and in this case the number 3 is (yes, no,) maybe. Maybe is the possible which has no attached facts or at least no facts until it happens to you. Most of us treat the fraction ½ as our maybe. Maybe has the fractions ¼, 1/3rd , ½ , 2/3rds and ¾’s associated with it. ¼, 1/3rd is the possibility it will never happen. 2/3rds and ¾’s is the possibility it will happen. ½ is the safe calculation that even outs over time.

Fuzzy Probability / Possibility

2009-06-12T12:18:00.002-04:00

Probability is based on the real world and what may happen if something is related or unrelated. Possibility is based on the likelihood of something happening without any mathematical proof. Fuzzy Probability / Possibility is based on the maximum probability / possibility that two things may happen simultaneously which are unconnected minus the sureness of two things happening at once which are unconnected. Possibility is based on the maximum probability / possibility minus the sureness of something happening. Possibility is based on ¼, 1/3rd, ½, 2/3rds, 3/4ths without any facts. Fuzzy "or" is the maximum probability / possibility on a graph.

P (A or B) = p (a)+p (b)-(p (a)*p (b))

Probability is based on the real world and what may happen if something is related or unrelated. Possibility is based on the likelihood of something happening without any mathematical proof. Fuzzy Probability / Possibility is based on the maximum probability / possibility that two things may happen simultaneously which are connected minus the sureness of two things happening at once which are connected. Possibility is based on ¼, 1/3rd, ½, 2/3rds, 3/4ths without any facts. Fuzzy "and" is the minimum probability / possibility on a graph.

P(A and B) =((p(a)*p(b) - p(a)+p(b))

War

2009-05-28T14:28:00.000-04:00

I got thinking about war the other day. Most of us are competitive in nature but are constrained by the social mores of our society. Fortunately, most of us also live in the center of the old Bell Curve. Here we are reasonably competitive with each other without being downright unfriendly. Those on the extreme left of the Bell Curve have self esteem issues / are poor / are unfortunate which most of us try to help to the best of our ability and knowledge should we run across them. Those on the right of the Bell Curve are the more competitive people that accumulate more markers of success which we call money. These people become Titans Of Business / politicians / sports heroes which are the three main relatively safe competitive sports. On the extreme right of the old Bell Curve we have the near and outright dictators. Into this mix we add the uncertain future which comes to us in random events, consequences of decisions and perfect storms. Maturing dictatorships that have finally organized themselves are faced with trying to keep their people content without losing their power. Organizing people through fear and terror is relatively easy in principle but there comes a time that the usefulness of this approach has diminishing results so we have the problem of what to do next. In the old days before the invention of atomic weapons we simply started a war through design or miscalculated brinkmanship. Wars gave the people something to do and rallied them around the dictator / instigator. Wars used up excess capacity in the form of industrial goods and lowered unemployment as everyone went into the armed forces. WW1 is an excellent example of using up the capacity of the industrial revolution which needed markets. WW11 is an example of what to do with unemployment. The invention of atomic weapons meant that war could no longer be large scale. This development encouraged the invention of small scale armed insurgencies which weren’t worth atomic bombs. Beginning / developing dictatorships based on fear / terror / isolation have a natural tendency to believe their own propaganda because no one is prepared to risk death to tell the dictator that he / she’s courting disaster. Most dictators eventually become mesmerized by their own importance and start to push outside people / societies around. In the beginning most outside people / societies are willing to tolerate this behaviour in the hopes that it will go away. The dictator fed by his country’s accolades sees this accommodation as weakness and fear on the part of the outside people / societies. The dictator keeps pushing and pushing until finally the outside people / societies decide that the situation has to be permanently remedied no matter what. If this dictatorship has atomic weapons and if the outside people / societies don’t care about the consequences as long as the irritant is removed then ???? Today we have the perfect storm in the offing. World wide unemployment. Loss of success measured in units of money because of bailouts. North Korea with its’ atomic capacity / large army trying to gain respect in the only way it knows how. China with its’ need to maintain power yet let its’ people prosper because they know their society has matured. The United States as the good guys with its’ resources stretched and its’ beliefs / society being hammered externally and internally. The rest of us in the also ran category. Something has to give but where????

The Theory Of Everything

2009-05-05T15:37:00.000-04:00

This universe is presently seen as events / particles / objects, strings and frames. Particles / objects are physical things that you and I can see, feel, and touch. Events are things that happen in our universe. Frames are concerned with Einstein’s Theory Of Relativity on a perspective basis where frames are either stationary or moving / changing relative to each other. Strings are the energy / force, time and space which we experience in various forms in our day to day activities. In the beginning, strings were tightly wound in a ball. The strings were energy, time, and space. Each ball was subject to all probabilities and possibilities. The balls in the mother universe frequently exploded into unwound super strings but remained in the mother universe. Eventually, before the Big Bang, one super ball of held strings hit the probability / possibility of leaving, creating our universe. The Big Bang, as seen by us, is the result of the super ball of held strings breaking apart into the three strings of energy, space and time. The rules of this universe weren’t settled instantaneously so the three strings of energy, space and time expanded under simultaneous possibility and probability according to the rules of the universe the super ball just left. After things started to settle down relatively, the strings started to release events / particles / objects which we see under various names and processes today. Residual strings still exist today, but because of our development of language we call them different things thus obscuring their origins. With the creation of events / particles / objects from strings we developed the habit of associating events / particles / objects with forces which are really energy strings by other names due to language / our effort to understand our environment. The forces are seen by us to have different strengths because our knowledge of energy strings isn’t complete. Today we also have Dark Matter / Dark Energy which may well be a remnant of our mother universe appearing in our universe due to the violent nature of this universe’s creation. Time strings in our universe basically move outward carrying everything with it. Space strings basically bend and flex which we explain in terms of The Theory Of Relativity. Energy strings release events / particles and objects which we see in various forms. Each event / particle / object has a string associated with it which we call different things. Mathematics is concerned with particles / objects which are both known and unknown. Strings can flex and bend which we see in the study of Geometry / Trigonometry. Calculus is associated with change which is basically an offshoot of The Theory Of Relativity. Lastly strings appear in string mathematics which is a new discovery and seems to be related to Primes and other interesting stuff which I don’t quite understand except to say it’s exciting.

After Relativity - What???

2009-02-28T14:31:00.000-05:00

The universe consists of particles / objects / events, strings, and frames. Physics first recognized particles / objects / events when it explained the universe in terms of mechanics. The discovery of electricity brought in the discussion of fields but this was a branch of particles / objects / events. Einstein advanced physics in his discussion of relativity which involved particles / objects / events in frames and how particles which are really you and me and how we related to objects / events in a frame and how we related to objects / events outside a frame when the frames were stationary and moving relative to each other, hence the Theory Of Relativity. The third leg of the stool is strings. Strings are all over the place. In religion, we speak of God knowing all and being everywhere at once. One infinitely long and wide string holding everything together. I believe God exists simply because this universe is too complicated to have happened randomly even though we have evolution now. Your and my life is basically concerned with fitting things together either physically or mentally. This is building strings. We are concerned with building partnerships / finding love / building careers which is really building strings by another name. We speak of finding the path to success which is strings again. Chemistry is mostly about bonds which are strings again. Light is both a particle or a wave. A wave is a vibrating string. String operating vertically is gravity. String operating horizontally is time. String which is stretchable and curves is space. If a string has frequency it has a property which we see as objects / particles / characteristics such as charisma and likeability. If a string stretches or shrinks it changes its’ frequency which we see as red and blue shifts. If a string is accelerating we see it as a dark matter force. If a string has a velocity we experience it as dark matter energy. Occasionally, strings will form a particle / object with a tail. That particle / object vibrates at a frequency which we see as life / characteristics. The vibrating particle / object gives off energy which affects its’ surroundings. This effect is charisma. A string can also be a physical particle / object building or an event which happens out of the blue. A string can form frames which we see as dimensions including time. A string can form dimensions which we can’t see but can experience in the form of quantum effects when strings as objects appear out of nowhere and leave trails which are characteristic of a particle / object. The same equivalent effect occurs in our dimension when someone leaves a mess or an particle / object collapses. String as time can also stretch or curve on a random basis. We experience stretched string time as a hardship as in waiting for someone or as a task which is annoying. Curved string time is experienced by us as something pleasant which is far too short. Strings are the third leg of the stool. Hence, The Theory Of Strings.

Strings, Dark Matter &Physics

2009-02-21T15:06:00.001-05:00

Early physics concerned itself with mechanical movement and what things did when they bumped into or were influenced by each other because physics only saw particles / objects and events. With the discovery of electricity and our development of radio and TV, physics started to explain things in terms of fields, since fields radiated information which we saw as words, ideas, and pictures. Einstein appeared and started to discuss physics in terms of enclosures or frames and how we saw things if we were the occupants of those frames or enclosures. He also discussed frames in relationship to each other when they had velocity, accelerated or when their velocity reached the speed of light. Physics started to be applied to everything and astronomers were the first to notice that the movement of the galaxies and their contents couldn’t be totally explained by matter we could eyeball. This matter was called dark and it still remains a mystery. Here’s a possible answer from string theory. In our everyday world, we experience gravity, space and time. Suppose for the sake of argument, gravity, space, and time were actually strings. In our world, we do not see gravity, space and time as strings because our sight doesn’t have that acuity. If strings were the basis of dark matter, gravity would be an energy string, space a matter string and time a force string. Our physical limitations as a particle / object allows us to experience gravity as something that keeps us in place which is a form of energy. We apply energy to things and convert it, which is really the horizontal application of gravity to allow us to move. We do not experience space as matter because we can’t see space except as something abstract. If we could eyeball space we would see it as a string of dark matter which flexes and curls. Einstein had a hint of strings when he talked of space curving, light following a curve, and plant orbits. Time is a string of dark force. Our closest sensation of time as a dark force is its’ ability to move everything outward in a forward direction.

In short physics had 4 phases:

Mechanical

Field

Relativity

Strings

The 3 primary ones are:

Mechanical

Relativity

Strings

The Universe

2009-02-18T18:37:00.001-05:00

The universe consists of particles / objects and events which we experience in everyday living. We are the particles. The objects are the physical things that we see every day. The events are the things that happen to us good or bad. Behind us, holding things together, are the strings, dark matter, dark energy and dark force. The strings are gravity, space, and time. Space strings are the dark matter. Time strings are the dark force. Gravity strings are the dark energy. The space strings, as dark matter, hold the contents of the universe in place by providing extra unseen mass and by flexing to keep everything in orbit and from bumping into each other more than usual by providing paths. The Time strings are the dark force which combines with the space string or dark matter which is the basis of Einstein’s Space - Time and Relativity Theory. The time string, as dark force, also keeps the universe expanding and balances the gravity string. The gravity strings, as dark energy, holds everything in place. We see gravity strings as gravity or inertia just before we get something to move, accelerate or change in some way. Time strings. as dark force, causes everything to move, accelerate or change in some way which we measure in terms of physical time.

Flexing Time, Space & Gravity Strings

2009-01-29T15:04:00.000-05:00

The universe consists of particles / objects, strings, and frames. Gravity, space, and time are all strings in our universe. If we could flex strings a lot of interesting things would happen. If we could flex gravity, space, and time strings we could travel in Black Holes since there would be no danger of our being injured short of a power failure. If you flexed gravity strings, you could travel indefinitely since gravity would never slow you down. If you developed a gravity engine which could focus on gravity strings using them for power you could accelerate indefinitely. If you could flex space, time, gravity strings at the same time as using the gravity engine you could accelerate indefinitely into other dimensons as space and time would have no effect on us as we traveled. The ability to flex time strings is the most fascinating. You could travel back and forth in time which brings up a perennial question. Can you can alter your existence by changing the past or as they like to say killing your ancestors??? I see it as three possibilities.

They are:

If you return to the past, everything you see and everyone you meet is a an abstraction of their existence in their own frame at that former time and that existence or frame can be seen but not altered because it’s no longer in your dimension or frame of existence.

If you return to the past and wipe it out, you also wipe out yourself, as you are the future of that existence.

If you wipe out the past, you can’t return to your specific future, as you have also destroyed the future time lines emanating from that past.

Time Travel

2009-01-27T16:09:00.000-05:00

The universe consists of particles / objects, strings, and frames. Gravity, Space, and Time are all strings in our universe. If you want to travel through gravity, space, time you have to learn how to flex the strings so you can pass between them. Theoretically, if you could flex gravity strings you could pass through a Black Hole without injury or travel through the universe just by gravity alone as a power source. If you could flex space strings, you could travel into other dimensions. Flexing time strings means that you can travel back and forth in time. This raises the question of whether or not you can alter your existence by changing the past or as we like to say killing your ancestors. The past you are seeing in Time is the residual existence of your ancestors which no longer exist in your reality. It would be similar to viewing a 4 dimensional movie in our present day reality or living in the Holodeck of the Star Trek’s Enterprise . If you went into the future, you’d be in a random likelihood which may or may not happen in the future. There is a possibility that you could see yourself in the future but you couldn’t alter it as the future is only a possible expression of a reality which may or may not exist when your future arrives.

Strings

2009-01-23T12:52:00.000-05:00

The universe consists of particles / objects, strings, and frames. Strings are the most interesting at the moment. String operating vertically is gravity. String operating horizontally is time. String which is stretchable and curves is space. If a string has frequency it has a property which we see as objects / particles / characteristics such as charisma and likeability. If a string stretches or shrinks it changes its’ frequency which we see as red and blue shifts. If a string is accelerating we see it as a dark matter force. If a string has a velocity we experience it as dark matter energy. Occasionally, strings will form a particle / object with a tail. That particle / object vibrates at a frequency which we see as life / characteristics. The vibrating particle / object gives off energy which affects its’ surroundings. This effect is charisma. A string can also be a physical particle / object building or an event which happens out of the blue. A string can form frames which we see as dimensions including time. A string can form dimensions which we can’t see but can experience in the form of quantum effects when strings as objects appear out of nowhere and leave trails which are characteristic of a particle / object. An object / particle with its’ string moving through space / time distorts space / time which we physically see as orbits / paths or in time as events. The same equivalent effect occurs in our dimension when someone leaves a mess or an particle / object collapses. String as time can also stretch or curve on a random basis. We experience stretched string time as a hardship as in waiting for someone or as a task which is annoying. Curved string time is experienced by us as something pleasant which is far too short. At the moment of the Big Bang, it took time for the rules / laws of the creating universe to change into the rules / laws of the created universe and during that interval the dark matter strings stretched causing effects which we can’t explain in 4 dimensional terms. A string has the same characteristics / effects along its’ entire length which we can’t explain in terms of our 4 dimensional existence in terms of our 4 dimensional equations. Thus gravity, space and time are throughout the universe.

Location Of Primes

2009-01-14T14:29:00.000-05:00

If you look at a table of Prime Numbers, you will notice that they aren’t evenly spaced which raises the question of how many primes precede any arbitrarily selected number. On the other hand, if you look at a table of prime numbers they seem to follow a pattern. You will also notice that the prime numbers get rarer, as you look at higher and higher numbers. Most formulas that have been developed to find the location of any prime number seem to be a hit and miss affair because the prime numbers aren’t evenly spaced. George Riemann, who formulated the Riemann Hypothesis, found that his formula produced the occasional zero as an answer which he hypothesized lay on the line ( y = ½ ). So far, calculating on an individual basis, it has been found that over a billion zeros using Riemann’s formula lie on this line but since Riemann hypothesized all zeros the search goes on. So far, no one has developed a proof that definitely establishes all zeros lie on the line ( y = ½ ). Here’s a way of resolving the conundrum concerning Riemann’s zeros (0’s) using the concept of strings. If we add the digits of any number (N) like ( 7919 ), for example, we get a total ( 7 + 9 + 1 + 9 = 26 ) which represents its’ string ( 26 ) or line ( y = 26 ). If we continue the addition of the digits ( 26 ) we get ( 2 + 6 = 8 ) or a line ( y = 8 ) for number ( 7919 ). Riemann had the idea that when his equation produced a zero (0) in the calculation, that zero for non- trivial numbers was on the line ( y = ½ ). Working in reverse, we can take any arbitrary line ( y = k ), with ( k = ( 0 to 9 )), because all numbers ( N ) sum to a number from ( 0 to 9 ) as one digit. Any line ( y = k ) can contain an infinite number of numbers, since zero ( 0 ) does not change the value of ( y = k ). For instance, if ( y = 2 ), it can hold the numbers ( 2, 11, 101, 110, etc. ) since the total digits do not exceed (2). It can readily be seen that all zeros lie on the line ( y = k ) no matter what the value of k whether it be one digit or multiple digits and thus Riemann was correct when he said all zeros lie on the line ( y = ½ ), since ( y = ½ ) is the reciprocal of ( y = 2 ) and contains the numbers ( ½, 1/11, 1/101, 1/110, etc.. The same conclusion can be applied to any arbitrary line ( y = k ) or ( y = 1/k ) for values of k from ( zero (0) to infinity ) of any number (N) which has an infinite number of digits (D) If Riemann had changed his formula to produce zeros ( 0’s ) for other non-trivial values for other lines ( y = k ) or ( y = 1/k ) he would have ended up hypothesizing that all zeros ( 0’s ) also lie on these lines. There is also the suggestion that the line ( y = ½ ) has a relationship to a formula for locating the position of any prime / number of primes preceding that particular prime. If ( y = 2 ), then the line ( y = 2 ) contains the numbers (2, 11, 101, 1001, 10001, 100001, etc.) since the sum of the digits does not exceed 2. If ( y = ½ ), then the line ( y = ½ ) contains the numbers ( ½, 1/11, 1/101, 1/1001, 1/10001, 1/100001, etc. ) since the sum of the digits does not exceed ½ and ½ is the reciprocal of 2 or ( y = 2 ) . Raise each number ( ½, 1/11, 1/101, 1/1001, 1/10001, 1/100001, etc. ) to the power of 2. Sum the numbers which have a limit of (0.258363501). The square root of (0.258363501) is (0.508294698). Similarly, If ( y = ½ ), then the line ( y = ½ ) contains the numbers ( ½, 1/11, 1/110, 1/1100, 1/11000, 1/110000, etc. ) since the sum of the digits does not exceed ½ and ½ is the reciprocal of 2 or ( y = 2 ) . Raise each number ( ½, 1/11, 1/110, 1/1100, 1/11000, 1/110000, etc. ) to the power of 2. Sum the numbers which have a limit of (0.258347942). The square root of (0.258347942) is (0.508279394). The important number is (.508) to 3 figures. The calculation of the location of any prime probably involves the adding of zeros (0’s) to the middle of (.508) to equal the number of digits in the probable prime after 3 digits. For instance ( 7919 has 4 digits so therefore extend ( .508 ) to ( .5008 )) by adding 1 zero to the middle and then raising (.5008) to the power equal to one less than the digit in the probable prime ending in ( 1, 3, 7, 9 ).

The general approach is the following:

Extend ( .508) to equal the number of digits in the probable prime starting after 3 digits and then raise ( .508 extended ) to a power equal to the number of digits in the probable prime minus 1. For instance ( 7919 ) contains 4 digits so extend ( .508 ) to 4 digits by adding zero (0) to the middle ( .5008 ). (7919) has 4 digits, so raise ( .5008 ) to the power of 3 ( 4 digits - 1 = 3 ). ( .5008 ^ 3 = .12560096 ) Multiply ( 7919 X .12560096 ) which equals ( 994.6340063 ). 7919 is the 1000th prime which means this method is approximately 5 short of 1000. The same method can be used using ( ½ or .5 ) but the answer is less accurate (7919 X (.5^3) = 989.875) which is ( 10.125 ) short of 1000 ( 7919 is the 1000th prime).

For numbers, 3 digits or under, such as ( 97 ) multiply ( 97 X (.508^2)) which equals approximately 25. As a matter of interest ( 97 ) is the 26th prime.

For 1 digit numbers multiply by ( .508 ).

Riemann Hypothesis Resolved Using Strings

2009-01-13T15:18:00.000-05:00

The Theory Of Everything

2009-01-10T15:13:00.001-05:00

This universe is organized into particles / objects, strings and frames. Particles / objects are physical things that you and I can see and touch. Frames are concerned with the Theory Of Relativity when frames are either stationary or moving / changing relative to each other. Strings are the forces, time and space which we experience in various forms in our day to day activities. Strings functioning as gravity are slightly different because the strings also keep other dimensions in place which we can’t see / experience. This means that strings functioning as gravity are substantially weaker when compared to strings functioning as forces, time and space confined to our dimensions. Each particle / object which includes us and mathematics have an associated string. If we are stationary, our string tends to hold us in place and this holding in place we call gravity. If we start to move, our string starts to change from a primarily gravity function to one giving us a path / energy to travel. The faster we travel up to the speed of light, the more we convert from a particle / object into a string. At the speed of light we become a complete string. Velocity in terms of our string is the uniform change in the position of our string. Acceleration in terms of our string is the increasing / decreasing changes in the position of our string . The space in which we travel is made up of layered strings which we experience as a sheet of space. The forces which we experience on ourselves or apply to others is really the vibrations of our personal strings or the vibrations of our personal strings on others. Events which we experience are caused by our strings disturbing strings of space and time which we may see as beneficial happenings or not so beneficial happenings. The vibrations of strings are seen by us as properties of particles / objects which define them and allow us to interact with particles / objects in different ways. Chemistry and metallurgy is an example of the use of vibrating strings to create other particles / objects through bonds which are strings by another name. Strings on a nuclear basis are the strong and weak nuclear forces. If a particle / object moves through string space, the particle / objects strings tend to pull string space out of alignment causing string space to warp which we experience as orbits or paths. The vibration of strings also cause other strings to vibrate which we call fields. Electromagnetism, radiation and communication are examples of controlled or uncontrolled string vibrations to convey benefits, havoc or information. Since strings are also time and space, everything everywhere is instantaneous in time and distance although we, as particles / objects don’t experience it that way due to the delay in translating strings into reality we can experience.

Largest Prime Number

2009-01-07T15:52:00.000-05:00

If you want to wile away an afternoon, try finding the largest prime number. For those that may have forgotten, a prime number is a number that is only evenly divisible by itself and 1. This definition eliminates all the even numbers that are evenly divisible by 2, leaving the odd numbers. The usual method of finding a prime number is to multiply 2 umpteen dozen times by itself and then subtracting 1 from that number, thereby creating an odd number (( 2 X 2 = 4), ( 4 - 1 = 3 )). You then take that odd number ( 3 ) and see if you can find a previous whole number up to 3, ( 1, 2, ) which will divide into it evenly leaving no remainder. There is a faster method. Numbers are written into a series of columns. Number 13 has 3 in column 0 and 1 in column 1. You will soon realize that any larger number can be easily created by adding another column For instance 3, 13, 213 etc.. It can also be seen that the total number of numbers is infinite because you just keep putting a number from 0 to 9 inclusive in the column to the left of a filled column.

Here are some rules:

A prime number, if it is a prime number , ends in 1, 3 , 7, 9 in column 0 ( far right column ). For instance 11, 13, 17, 19 are all prime numbers.

Any number whose digits, except for number 3, adds to 3 or an even multiple of 3 isn’t a prime number. For instance 39 isn’t a prime number because its’ digits ( 3 and 9 ) total 12 ( 3 + 9 = 12 ). ( 12/ 3 = 4 ).

A number, not a prime number, ending in 1, 3, 7, 9 in column 0 ( far right column ) is only evenly divisible by a number ending in 1, 3, 7, 9 in column 0 ( far right column ). For instance 39 is evenly divisible by 3 and 13 ( 3 X 13 = 39 ).

Numbers As A Fractal

2008-12-13T14:21:00.000-05:00

Three Main Categories Of Mathematics

2008-11-30T16:57:00.000-05:00

The universe is based on the number 3. If you ever have listened to Sesame Street you will remember that the Count always started the program by saying " This program is being brought to you by the number ????. The Count when welcoming you into this universe when you were born could have said " This universe is brought to you by the number 3". If you believe in a higher power simply because this universe is too complex to be random then you now know the higher power pushed her pen towards the number 3 . If you don’t believe me how do you account for the natural number "e" (2.718281828) and Pi (3.141592654) which is close to 3 ??? Mathematics is no different. At the moment we have 2 known main categories of Mathematics. What’s the 3rd???

They are:

1. Particle / object

2. Geometry

Particle / object mathematics is the mathematics that we use all the time. We add, subtract, multiply and divide these numbers. We use equations with knowns, unknowns and variables commonly known as algebra and calculus. Geometry has to do with diagrams and from the diagrams you calculate things such as angles and distances. This is trigonometry and geometry. There is a third category called strings. Strings are everywhere in the universe. Sometimes strings are called waves or dark energy. Quantum mechanics talks of quantum particles and wave like behavior which is strings by another name. We have something called String Theory. Each mathematical particle / object has an associated string attached with it. Most of the time we only calculate things using the particle / object and ignore the string. Mathematics can also use the string part and ignore the particle / object part.

This is how it works:

1. Total the number of digits in a number. For instance ( 39 ) has two digits whose total is 12 ( 3 + 9 = 12 ). This means that the particle / object (39) has a string or tail equal to 12.

2. The string contains numbers, whose digits, when added can’t exceed the value of the string which in the example (39) is (12). Higher numbers can be formed by adding zeros ( 0 ) between the numbers. For instance for particle / object (39) which has a string / tail ( 12 ) also contains the number ( 10902 ) because ( 1 + 0 + 9 + 0 + 2 = 12 ).

3. A string can hold more than one number of the same value and contains an infinite value of numbers because of the ability to place a zero ( 0 ) in the number without changing the string total ( 12 ).

4. Any mathematical operation that can be used by particles / objects can be used with strings.

The Mathematical Categories are:

1. Particles / Objects

2. Geometry

3. Strings

Riemann Hypothesis Resolved Geometrically

2008-11-29T15:08:00.000-05:00

The easiest way to solve the Riemann Hypothesis is by using geometry. Fractions in geometry are actually one line drawn over another line. For instance, ½ , is line ( y = 1 ) drawn over line ( y = 2 ). The distance ( s ) between the line ( y = 1 ) and line ( y = 2 ) is the power to which the fraction ( ½ ) is raised (( ½) ^ (s)). The addition sign ( + ) is the distance between the lines ( y = 1 ) and the line ( y = 2 ) representing ½ and the lines ( y = 1 ) and the line ( y = 3 ) representing 1/3rd etc.. If you measure from Line (1) over Line ( 2 ) representing ½ then the distance is consistent from that line to the other lines and for all intents and purposes the zeros ( 0 ) which are the starting measuring points, are on the geometric line ( y = ½ ). Using individual particle arithmetic its’ been established that the first 100 billion zeros do lie on the line ( y = ½ ).

Reimann accidentally touched on a new way of looking at mathematics and fractions when he said:

All the zeros of the Riemann zeta function lie on the line y = ½.

Riemann Hypothesis Resolved

2008-11-23T13:00:00.000-05:00

The Riemann Hypothesis is all about location since Riemann said all the zeros of his function lie on the line ( y = ½ ). Let’s assume they all do lie along the line ( y = ½ ). Up to the present time using Riemann’s equation of trail it has been established that the first 100 billion zeros do lie on the line ( y = ½ ) calculating each value at a time, but there is a possibility one or several don’t lie on the line. In any event no one has developed a simple solution to prove that the trail of all zeros ( 0 ) end up on the line ( y = ½ ) no matter what values are used in the calculation. Perhaps in some way, as yet not understood, Riemann’s equation is flawed even though it has been proved right. The question arises because imaginary numbers are used and although we can work them mathematically to get real solutions, perhaps our understanding of them isn’t really complete and that incompleteness is showing itself in the Riemann formula. There is also a belief that the Riemann Zeta Function has a relationship to the distribution of prime numbers. Prime numbers are numbers that can only be divided evenly by themselves and 1. An example of primes are 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 11, however, they aren’t evenly distributed and no one formula up to the present time has been discovered that will calculate the position of any prime.

For instance the following primes have the following locations ( 1 to 6 ):

1. 1

2. 2

3. 3

4. 5

5. 7

6. 11

The problem is that it is almost impossible to list all the primes because the primes aren’t readily discernible and for a second part extend to infinity. Therefore the problem arises as to just where does any arbitrarily selected prime fit into a list or conversely how many primes precede this prime. The resolution of this conundrum is within the Riemann Hypothesis. Riemann didn’t realize it when he formulated his hypothesis because it hadn’t been invented but he is really talking about an aspect of string theory when he said:

All the zeros of the Riemann zeta function lie on the line y = ½.

Let’s use string mathematics. Every object has a string or tail associated with it. In string mathematics the tail of any number ( object ) is the sum of its’ digits. The location of each tail of a number is generally unknown, but in the Riemann Hypothesis case, Riemann said the tail lies on the line y = ½ as the result of summing. Before summing, the string or tail existed on the line y = 2 as that was the string tail value of any mathematical object that was 2. For instance 97’s digits total 16 ( 9 + 7 = 16 ) and ( 1 + 6 = 7 ). This means 97 has both a string tail of ( 16 ) and ( 7 ). The string tail of all numbers can be reduced to a figure from 1 to 9. which is its’ tail or string in one digit. The digit tail zero ( 0 ) for the number zero ( 0 ) is imaginary in the sense that you can’t do anything with zero ( 0 ) except use it as a place holder in a number ( ex. 609 ) or treat it as the square root of ( - 1 ). In string theory the equation ( y = 2 ) means that any number ( y ) also has a string equal to 2 as well as a number value 2. Since zeros do not increase the string / tail value of 2, 2 can be any number that contains zeros (0) in the string part. If you accept this premise then any zero remains on the string y = 2 by definition. If a calculation is performed on ( y = 2 ) the string tail is automatically recalculated to reflect the new line. This means if the line ( y = 2 ) is changed to ( y = ½ ), the string / tail values become ( 1 ) over a number containing zeros ( 0 ) so that the total of the denominator is 2 ( y = ½ ).Riemann said that the zeros go into the line y = ½ or their location is on the line y = ½. What Riemann was actually saying even though he didn’t know it was that any number containing zeros whose digits totaled two representing a string had its’ zeros on the line y = ½ which was 2 as a fraction. Here is a solution to Riemann’s Hypothesis based on string theory and limits. If we add 1 + ½ + 1/3 + etc. we find that the fraction gets larger and larger and never reaches a limit from here to infinity. If we add 1 + (½)^2 + (1/3)^2 + etc. we might soon see that the addition soon converges to a value or limit.

Here’s a condensed version of the Riemann Hypothesis proof based on string theory and limits:

1. Write down the number 2 which represents both the string length of number 2 and number 2 itself.

2. Write down the number 11 since ( 1 + 1 = 2 ) and the string length of number 2 is still intact.

3. Put a series of zeros between the two 1’s creating numbers 101, 1001, 10001, ----- 100000001. ( the string length of number 2 is still intact ).

4. Write the fractions ½, 1/11, 1/101, 1/1001, 1/1001, ------ 1/100000001.

5. Raise each fraction to the power of 2 ( this is the value of the string / tail and not the number 2 ).

6. Sum the fractions to the power of string / tail value 2.

7. Depending on the power of your calculator / spreadsheet / perseverance, the limit or convergence will be around (0.258363501).

8. Write down the primes from 1 to 97.

9. Number the primes.

10. If you multiply 97 X (0.258363501) the location of the prime will be approximately at 25 and 97 is at location 26.

11. If you multiply 97 X (½) ^ 2 you get approximately 24.

So what??? When you were doing your calculation involving the zeros between the "1" digits ( 101, 1001, etc. ) you were actually using the string / tail values in the string which was attached to the mathematical value of 2 which was on the line ( y = 2 ). When you wrote the fractions, you were converting the line ( y = 2 ) to the line ( y = ½ ). The summation of the fractions ( ½, 1/11, 1/ 101, etc. ) produced the limit of (0.258363501). The zeros never left the string / tail when the line was converted because they were the zeros in the numbers 101, 1001 etc.. The Riemann Hypothesis is proved.

Primes & The Riemann Hypothesis

2008-11-22T17:22:00.001-05:00

Here’s how Primes and The Riemann Hypothesis are connected. If you write down all the primes from 1 to 97 you will find there are 26 of them. All numbers are basically a connected string so you can use String Mathematics on them. Riemann said that all the zeros of his zeta function lay on the line ( y = ½ ). It turns out that the fraction ½ in the equation ( y = ½ ) can be used to estimate the location of any prime in a prime list. The single digit string primes are ( 1, 2, 3, 5, 7 ). If you multiply the single digit primes ( 1, 2, 3, 5, 7 ) by ½ you get the approximate location of these primes in a list of primes. The two digit string primes start at 11 and go to 97. Here it gets trickier because not all numbers ending in 1, 3, 7, 9 in column zero ( the far right column ) are primes. Two digit string primes have two digits. In estimating the location of two digit primes sometimes you multiply the two digit prime by ½ and sometimes by ( ½ X ½ ). If you use string mathematics to solve the Riemann Hypothesis the limit of the sum is (0.258363501). If you multiply the limit of the sum ((0.258363501) X 97) you get 25 in round numbers and 97 is the 26th prime. The square root of the limit of the sum (0.258363501) is ( .508 ) to three digits. If you use ( .508 ) in your calculations of the location of the primes ( 1 to 97 ) you will find your answer is generally closer to the real position in the list. ( 7919 ) is the 1000th prime. Using string mathematics you will see the number of string digits in ( 7919 ) is 4. In this particular case you multiply (½) 3 times to get an answer close to 1000 ( 7919 X .5 X .5 X .5 = 989.875 ). Multiplying ( .508 ) 3 X gives ( 1038 ) but using String Mathematics add a zero between 5 and 8 giving ( .5008 ). ( 7919 X (.5008 X .5008 X .5008 ) = 994.63 ) which is about 5 short of 1000 which is more accurate than multiplying ( 7919 X .5 X .5 X .5 ) = 989.875) The calculation of the location of any prime probably involves the adjustment of zeros (0) in (.508) and then deciding how many times you should multiply the revised figure ( for example (.5008 ) before multiplying it with the suspected prime number ending in 1, 3, 7, 9.

The general approach is possibly the following:

(.508 ) multiplied twice for primes 2 to 3 digits in width since there is an overlap in 3 digit prime numbers.

(.5008 ) multiplied three times for primes 3 to 4 digits in width ( see 7919 example ) since there is an overlap in 4 digit prime numbers.

( .50008 ) multiplied 4 times for primes 4 - 5 digits in width since there is an overlap in 5 digit prime numbers.

( .5 ) multiplied a number of times equal to one ( 1 ) less than the number of digits will give you a rough position ( ex. 7919 has 4 digits, so multiply ( .5 ) 3 times since ( 4 - 1 = 3 ).

Here’s the explanation:

The location of the real part of the not obvious or unseen zeros ( 0 ) is exactly ½ in the equation ( y = ½ ), since the number of primes in this region are denser, so the formula gives a relatively precise location. As the primes spread out, multiplying with ( .5 ) and the not obvious zeros ( .50000 etc. ) becomes increasingly inaccurate, so the obvious zeros ( 0 ) have to be added between (.5 ) and ( .008 ) to form numbers that are less close to ½. ( .508, .5008, .50008, etc. ). If the primes did not spread themselves in comparison to the other numbers you wouldn’t have to spread the obvious zeros ( 0 ) between (.5) and (.008). The not obvious zeros ( 0 ) lie on the vertical complex plane because they aren’t required for the real calculation. Therefore it can be said that the positive zeros ( 0 ) lie on the complex plane on one side of the real line ( y = ½ ) and the negative zeros ( - 0 ) lie on the other side of ( y = ½ ) on the complex plane vertical to ( y = ½ )

Using String Mathematics, the Riemann Hypothesis can be resolved like this:

The universe consists of particles / objects, strings and frames. Each object or particle has a string attached to it which we may call a tail, trail, or highway as well as anything else. Most strings do not have a location unless you state a formula such as ( y = 2 ) or ( y = ½ ). A string is a total of the object’s digits. For instance 97 has a string total of ( 9 + 7 = 16 ) or ( 9 + 7 = 16, 1 + 6 = 7 ). Therefore, as an example, 97 has two strings which are 16 and 7. The formula ( y = 2 ) has a string value of 2 and a particle / object value of 2. Here’s the solution to Riemann’s Hypothesis using string mathematics. Riemann said that all the zeros of his zeta function lie on the line ( y = ½ ) as the result of summing. In the formula ( y = 2 ), the string holds an infinity of numbers providing their sum doesn’t exceed 2. These numbers can be created by adding zeros to a number ( 101, 1001, etc. ). The string can also hold the number 2 and 11 since ( 1 + 1 = 2 ).

Here’s a condensed version of the Riemann Hypothesis proof based on string mathematics and the conversion of ( y = 2 ) to ( y = ½ ) :

1. Write down the number 2 which represents both the string length of number 2 and number 2 itself.

2. Write down the number 11 since ( 1 + 1 = 2 ) and the string length of number 2 is still intact.

3. Put a series of zeros between the two 1’s creating numbers 101, 1001, 10001, ----- 100000001. ( the string length of number 2 is still intact ).

4. Write the fractions ½, 1/11, 1/101, 1/1001, 1/1001, ------ 1/100000001.

5. Raise each fraction to the power of 2 ( this is the value of the string / tail and not the number 2 ).

6. Sum the fractions to the power of string / tail value 2.

7. Depending on the power of your calculator / spreadsheet / perseverance, the limit or convergence will be around (0.258363501).

So what??? When you were doing your calculation involving the zeros between the "1" digits ( 101, 1001, etc. ) you were actually using the string / tail values in the string which was attached to the mathematical value of 2 which was on the line ( y = 2 ). When you wrote the fractions, you were converting the line ( y = 2 ) to the line ( y = ½ ). The summation of the fractions ( ½, 1/11, 1/ 101, etc. ) produced the limit of (0.258363501). The zeros never left the string / tail when the line was converted and therefore the Riemann Hypothesis is proved using string mathematics. The same principle applies to any other equation converted to its’ reciprocal. The zeros can be placed anywhere to make a number in the string .

String Mathematics

2008-11-21T13:29:00.000-05:00

The universe consists of particles / objects, strings and frames. Each object or particle has a string attached to it which we may call a tail, trail, or highway as well as anything else. Most strings do not have a location unless you state a formula such as ( y = 2 ) or ( y = ½ ). A string is a total of the object’s digits. For instance 97 has a string total of ( 9 + 7 = 16 ) or ( 9 + 7 = 16, 1 + 6 = 7 ). Therefore, as an example, 97 has two strings which are 16 and 7. The formula ( y = 2 ) has a string value of 2 and a particle / object value of 2. Here’s the solution to Riemann’s Hypothesis using string mathematics. Riemann said that all the zeros of his zeta function lie on the line ( y = ½ ) as the result of summing. In the formula ( y = 2 ), the string holds an infinity of numbers providing their sum doesn’t exceed 2. These numbers can be created by adding zeros to a number ( 101, 1001, etc. ). The string can also hold the number 2 and 11 since ( 1 + 1 = 2 ).

Here’s a condensed version of the Riemann Hypothesis proof based on string mathematics and the conversion of ( y = 2 ) to ( y = ½ ) :

1. Write down the number 2 which represents both the string length of number 2 and number 2 itself.

2. Write down the number 11 since ( 1 + 1 = 2 ) and the string length of number 2 is still intact.

3. Put a series of zeros between the two 1’s creating numbers 101, 1001, 10001, ----- 100000001. ( the string length of number 2 is still intact ).

4. Write the fractions ½, 1/11, 1/101, 1/1001, 1/1001, ------ 1/100000001.

5. Raise each fraction to the power of 2 ( this is the value of the string / tail and not the number 2 ).

6. Sum the fractions to the power of string / tail value 2.

7. Depending on the power of your calculator / spreadsheet / perseverance, the limit or convergence will be around (0.258363501).

So what??? When you were doing your calculation involving the zeros between the "1" digits ( 101, 1001, etc. ) you were actually using the string / tail values in the string which was attached to the mathematical value of 2 which was on the line ( y = 2 ). When you wrote the fractions, you were converting the line ( y = 2 ) to the line ( y = ½ ). The summation of the fractions ( ½, 1/11, 1/ 101, etc. ) produced the limit of (0.258363501). The zeros never left the string / tail when the line was converted and therefore the Riemann Hypothesis is proved using string mathematics. The same principle applies to any other equation converted to its’ reciprocal. The zeros can be placed anywhere to make a number in the string .

Particles, Strings & Dark Stuff

2008-11-18T14:09:00.000-05:00

This universe has particles, strings and dark stuff. At a quantum level, we talk about particles. At an eyeball level we talk about objects which is really the same as particles. Objects are such things as you and me and buildings. Things we can see and touch. Objects can also be abstract concepts like events that just happen. Math has its’ particles which are variables, unknowns, and constants. Computer programming has its’ objects. Just look at Java. Strings are a little harder to grasp. If you look at mathematics, any formula is really a string that holds some objects ( variables, unknowns and constants ) together which can be manipulated into something that provides an answer. Language consists of objects which we call letters. You arrange these letters in some combination and you have a word. The word has a meaning. You take this string of letters ( objects ) and make another string called a sentence or paragraph. This sentence, paragraph, novel, etc. or string has a meaning. The scientists have a string theory which is basically that all matter comes with strings. Ever hear of someone telling you that this gift (object) comes with strings attached??? Same principle. Black Holes, for instance, is just a bunch of compressed or intertwined strings. If that concept is correct, and if Black Holes do crazy things to gravity, time and space than it stands to reason that gravity, time and space are strings. A Black Hole generally sucks everything into it, which means, by extension, that gravity, time, and space exist as strings surrounding us even though we aren’t experiencing their existence in that form. The universe is composed of Dark Matter which we can’t see. This Dark Matter is 90% of the universe and generally keeps things in place. If things are kept in place in the universe by Strings it would seem to me that a string is dark matter and provides a path and tail for a particle or object since we can see where the object has been. A path or highway is another name for a string. Chemical bonds are a form of string acting in the same principle as gravity holding chemicals in place. If an object is an abstract event that won’t move we talk in terms of inertia which is gravity by another name. The chemical bond is formed at the string of each chemical or a compound. Essentially two strings of two different chemicals joining together. At a quantum level we have a nucleus held together by quantum strings. If we tear the string ( nuclear fission ) we create a quick release of energy which is really a series of strings gone berserk. If we develop a method for compressing a string in a nucleus without bending it, we have nuclear fusion which produces a controlled form of energy . On it goes but this essay will give you a quick overview of the concept. Just look around for some examples!!!

Prime Secrets

2008-11-11T18:09:00.000-05:00

1. Primes are defined as any number that can only be divided evenly by itself and 1.

2. Primes end in 1, 3, 7, 9 in column "0" ( far right column ).

3. Not all numbers ending in 1, 3, 7, 9 are prime numbers.

4. Numbers that aren’t prime numbers but end in 1, 3, 7, 9 are evenly divisible by some number ending in 1, 3, 7, 9 in column "0" ( far right column ).

5. Except for the prime number 3, any number ending in 1, 3, 7, 9, say (39), when their digits are totaled ( 3 + 9 = 12 ) are not a prime if the total of their digits can be evenly divided by 3 ( 3 + 9 = 12) ( 12 / 3 = 4 ) ( 39 / 13 = 3 ).

6. The number of primes preceding a prime number can be approximated by first taking a prime number, say (7919), and counting all its’ digits. Prime number ( 7919 ) has 4 digits ( 7,9,1,9 = 4 digits ). The other method is to count all of the prime’s digits and subtract (1). Prime number ( 7919 ) has 4 digits and subtracting ( 1 ) leaves 3 digits. Prime number ( 7919 ) has 4 digits ( 7, 9, 1, 9 = 4 digits ), and subtracting (1) leaves ( 4 - 1 = 3 ) digits. Next take the total number of its’ digits or the total number of its’ digits minus 1 and multiple the prime ((7919) X (½ ^ 4) = 494.94) or ((7919) X (½ ^ 3) = 989.88). Since it’s unlikely that 7919 only has approximately 494 primes behind it, the likelier answer is around 989. Add 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 to 989 to get a closer approximate number. In this case add 10. ( 989.88 + 10 = 999.88 ). 7919 is the 1000th prime according to the tables. The approximation requires some obvious juggling but if you apply points 1 to 5 to the approximation you will come close to a probable answer.

Dark Matter, Dark Energy, Dark Force

2008-10-03T07:28:00.000-04:00

Here’s dark matter, dark energy, and dark force in the old nutshell. The universe that you and I see is one of particles, objects and events. Particles / objects are something that you and I see like you and me and objects like cars and buildings. Events are something that happens such as your best friend falling down a flight of stairs. Emotions are something we attach to particles, objects and events. We classify each other as acquaintances, friends or lovers. We classify objects such as buildings as nice or not so nice from an architectural viewpoint. Dark matter, dark energy, and dark force are essentially things that we don’t see, but experience either consciously or unconsciously. For instance we see the effects of wind blowing on the trees or over the ground but we don’t see the wind itself like we see you or me. We don’t physically see a wind except through its’ effects. A wind, therefore can be seen as a wave that affects us. Another type of wave is the wave that brings us our TV, radio, and music. We can generate these types of waves by manipulating electrical particles which we call electrons. We live, therefore, essentially in a particle based world that we can see and manipulate to produce waves / strings which we call sound / emotion and use to convey information in one form or another. Let’s suppose that a particle, object or an event had an invisible string / wave associated with it. If the particle, object, or an event is stationary it is being held in place by an unseen or dark force we call gravity. If the particle, object or event starts to move it follows an invisible string / wave we label as dark matter. If the particle, object or event impacts / strikes us we feel its’ effects which is essentially the edge of the dark matter string / wave hitting us which we label as the dark force. Gravity, Time and Space are essentially dark matter waves or strings depending whether they are stationary or moving at the time. Gravity holds things in space or causes things to move / change direction. Time as a string / wave causes things to age in our universe because our universe is expanding as it falls apart. Space as a wave can warp as things move through it. That is why if you plan something in detail, it seldom follows that detail. Black Holes could not change Time / Space / Gravity if Time / Space / Gravity did not exist as a string or wave. Here’s another example. Our English language is made up of 26 letters from A to Z. When we take each letter particle and write a word we convey an agreed upon meaning like car or book. If we take those words which are essentially a string of letters and write a sentence / paragraph we convey ideas / emotions / etc. which can be thought of as a string or wave.

Theory Of Everything

2008-09-07T16:41:00.000-04:00

Here’s the poop on The Theory Of Everything. The simple world is based on particles and strings. The complex world is just a complicated arrangement of particles and strings. Particles are anything that we can see, sometimes under different names, such as you, me and different structures such as buildings. Particles can be things that we can’t see like events. When an event happens the event string is the seen and unseen consequences of that event. Strings are dark matter which we can’t see. Strings are dark energy when they move, force when they accelerate, and paths for particles / planets / people etc. when they do nothing. Gravity, Time and Space are all strings. Each particle has a string. A string can create a particle. A particle can disappear into a string. Black Holes are compressed strings without particles. That’s why you and I are destroyed if we enter a black hole. You and I, as particles disappear into our own strings. Gravity, Time and Space become distorted in Black Holes because they are strings and are compressed / extended / warped in Black Holes. Strings as Dark Matter, Dark Energy, are occasionally kicked out of Black Holes and sometimes decompress becoming particles with a string tail. Each string is mathematically related to its’ particle and carries information. That is why in quantum physics we can relate a path to a particle or why a photon has wave / string qualities . It just depends on what part of a photon we are examining. Strings in different fields such as art, chemistry, biochemistry, physics, electricity, electronics, investments and mathematics, music etc. have different names, but any of these names are still only simple strings. We call strings in different fields different names through chance, choice and also to help define what we specifically mean in that field.

A Conundrum

2008-03-25T17:03:00.000-04:00

If there is no such thing as perpetual motion, then what does or how is light propelled at a constant 186,000 mph without losing energy and therefore naturally slowing down????

Theory Of Everything

2008-03-20T18:08:00.000-04:00

A Theory Of Everything has to have a basic structure that can be applied to everything. Mathematicians see it as a generalized mathematical formula that can be applied to all situations. Philosophers see it as a basic principle that you can apply to everything if you change the words to correspond to whatever you are writing / explaining whether it be physical / social / relationships / etc.. In short, no matter who you are it can be used for everything. The universe is primarily made up of particles, waves and frames. Particles have physical properties. You and I can be considered as a collection of living particles. Buildings and anything that physically exists whether solid, liquid, gas, plasma etc. is a particle or composed of particles. A wave is harder to define. It is something that doesn’t have properties that we can see. A wave is energy when stationary and a force when it is moving. Frames are something which holds particles and waves in a framework. For instance you and I are in a frame consisting of a skeleton. Hanging on the skeleton is waves / paths / wires / tubes distributing blood, air and electrical signals for communication / commands. On top of everything is a particle type brain for reasoning and automatic controls . All particles have an associated wave like a tail. In living things the tail is our charisma, personality or that mysterious thing called a life force. Things that move / accelerate lose form because as things move the energy holding them together has to be used for movement / acceleration. At low velocities this phenomena is not readily seen. Things that don’t move such as buildings tend to deteriorate because the energy holding the buildings together moves elsewhere over time since the universe cycles through order, chaos and restoration / resurrection. Where physical objects are concerned such as buildings you have to restore / repair them. Where something living is concerned and something goes wrong it’s off to the doctor or hospital. The faster you travel the more you change into a wave, until you are a wave at the speed of light. Over the speed of light you become the equivalent to a frame or in other words a Spirit or a Soul or whatever is equivalent in your religious belief system.

Frames

2008-03-12T08:12:00.000-04:00

The three types of frames in this universe are space, gravity and time frames. The frame in the centre is the space frame. You and I and everything else exist / move in the space frame. Moving outwards from the centre the next frame is the gravity frame. The gravity frame’s main function is to keep everything in the space frame in place while still allowing it to move around. Lastly, we have the time frame. The time frame’s main function is to move the space and gravity frame horizontally outward. The space frame is occupied by particles, strings and modified frames which are collections of particles and strings. Particles have properties and appear as solids, liquids and gases. Strings have no properties but appear to us as forces which hold particles together in mixtures of solids, liquids and gases. At extremely low temperatures strings can appear as Bose Einstein Condensates which can leak through solid containers because they exist as forces in solid form. Everything within the space frame is based on the number 3. The space frame’s measurements are ( 3 X 3 = 9) or (3^2) ) or 9 units. The gravity frame’s measurements are Pi X Pi ( 3.141592654 X 3.141592654 = 9.869604401or (Pi ^2) ) or slightly off 3 (3.141592654 ). The gravity frame tends to curve the surrounding string space which is a type of force as the particle with it’s attached string moves along the strings causing the particle to also curve following / dragging its’ individual string. If the particle isn’t moving gravity tends to hold the particle and string in place in a string - space depression. The time frame’s measurements are ( 9 X 9 = 81) or (3^4 ) ). The time frame’s primary function is to both move the particles and strings horizontally outward as a unit while expanding the universe outward at the same time. The time frame’s other function is to introduce an element of stress in the space / gravity frames which appear to us as randomness / aging which is caused when string energy for expansion is taken from the particles and strings as the time frame moves horizontally outward in a forward direction. All particles are converted into strings in the space frame by the time the speed of light is reached. Over the speed of light only the time frame exists and has no reference to space or gravity. Below the speed of light, particles, strings and frames exist together. Strings, particles, frames below the speed of light are spatially altered and / or flexed under velocity, acceleration or inertia but more about that phenomena next time.

Male / Female Primer

2008-01-08T19:24:00.000-05:00

1. The female calls the shots / makes the rules.

2. The rules are subject to arbitrary change at any time without prior notification / logic.

3. The rules are too complex for simple male minds.

4. If the male should inadvertently learn the rules or the female suspects the male knows all the rules, she must immediately change / randomize some or all of the rules .

5. The female is never wrong / the male is never right.

6. If the female is wrong, it is due to a misunderstanding which was a direct result of something the male did or said wrong or even worse, didn’t anticipate.

7. If Rule 6 applies, the male must apologize immediately for being insensitive.

8. The female may change her mind at any time without notice.

9. The male must never change his mind without the expressed written consent of the female which he’s not going to get in a month of Sundays..

10. The female has every right to be angry or upset at any time. No reason is required.

11. The male must remain calm at all times, unless the female wants him to show concern / remorse. She expects you to know when. So pay attention.

12. The male is expected to be a mind reader.

13. The male who doesn't abide by the rules, also doesn’t understand / appreciate / is incapable of a serious relationship.

14. Any attempt by the male to document the rules shows a lack of trust / faith on his part.

15. If the female has PMS, everything is off for the foreseeable future.

16. The female is ready when she is ready. Never irritate her by asking if she is ready ( yet ).

17. The male must be ready at all times.

Prime Number Pattern

2007-12-26T07:05:00.000-05:00

A Prime Number is a number that is defined as only being divisible by itself and 1. On the surface it would seem that this simple definition should produce a simple, predictable pattern for Prime Numbers but it doesn’t happen. It doesn’t happen because this simple definition is subject to about 4 rules that complicate the location of a Prime Number.

Here are the rules:

1. Numbers that are evenly divisible by 2 aren’t Prime Numbers. These numbers end in 0, 2, 4, 6, 8 in the far right column.

2. Numbers that are evenly divisible by 5 aren’t Prime Numbers. These numbers end in 5 and 0 in the far right column. (25, 40)

3. Numbers ending in 1, 3, 7, 9 may or may not be Prime Numbers. (11, 13, 17, 19) are Prime Numbers since they are only divisible by themselves and 1. (21, 33, 27, 99) are not Prime Numbers because they are divisible by some number having 1, 3, 7, 9 in the far right column

4. Except for the single digit Prime Number 3, any number whose digits total 3 or a multiple of 3 and has 1, 3, 7, 9 in the far right column isn’t a Prime Number ( 69, 6 + 9 = 15, 15 / 3 = 5 ) isn’t a Prime Number

If only the first two rules existed then Prime Numbers always ending in 1, 3, 7, 9 would be evenly distributed. Unfortunately, some numbers ending in 1, 3, 7, 9, in the far right column can be evenly divisible by some other numbers ending in 1, 3, 7, 9. In addition, except for the single digit Prime Number 3, any number having 1, 3, 7, 9 in the far right column and whose digits total 3 or a multiple of 3 isn’t a Prime Number. The 3rd rule is bad enough but the 4th rule really scrambles the Prime Number Pattern.

How Many Primes Precede------???

2007-12-14T17:41:00.000-05:00

One of the things that drive mathematicians crazy is trying to figure out how many prime numbers precede a number. For example if you look up a table of Prime Numbers you will find Prime Number 7919 is the 1000th Prime Number. A prime number is defined as any number that can only be divided evenly by itself and 1. This means that if you suspect a number is a prime then you have to divide it by all the numbers that precede it to see if any number divides into it evenly. The current way of finding the number of Primes preceding any number is by taking the number (7919 for instance) and dividing it by its’ LN or the Log of the Natural Number. The LN or Log of the Natural Number (7919) is (8.977020214). For those of you that don’t have a clue what I’m talking about LN or the Log of the Natural Number (2.718281828) is the number of times that the Natural Number (2.718281828) has to be multiplied by itself to create (7919) which is our present example. Naturally, (2.718281828), doesn’t always multiply by itself evenly to create the number which you want so hence the fraction ( 977020214). I have discovered another way which appears to be consistently closer to the number of primes up to any chosen random number. If you take a look at a list of prime numbers you will discover that, excluding the single digit primes, 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, the far right column of primes end in 1, 3, 7 or 9 once you get to primes of more than one digit. As an example, the following two digit numbers (11, 13, 17, 19) are all primes. Unfortunately, you will soon realize that all numbers ending in 1, 3, 7, 9 aren’t prime numbers. For instance, 21, 33, 27, 39 aren’t prime numbers because each one is divisible evenly by 3. Crazy as it may seem, there is a neat way to get it almost right. I don’t know why it works this way but it seems to be related to chance. You know if you flip a coin it will come up on average over time and many flips as 50% heads or 50% tails. The same principle seems to apply to prime numbers on average. For instance 7919 has 4 digits ( 7, 9, 1, 9 ). Therefore you multiply 7919 by ½ or .5, 3 X. ( 7919 X .5 = 3959.5, 3959.5 X .5 =1979.75, 1979.75 X .5 = 989.875 ) is almost 990 or 10 short of 1000. The secret of how many times to multiply by ½ or .5 is to count the number of digits ( 4 are in 7919 (7, 9, 1, 9 ) and subtract 1 from the total ( 4 - 1 = 3 ). To add to the fun, prime numbers aren’t evenly spaced so for more accuracy choose any arbitrary number ending in 1, 3, 7, 9 in the end column as that arbitrary number may itself be a prime number!!!

If you want to be even more accurate follow these rules for choosing the original number ( 7919 for example )

Prime Numbers have the numerals 1, 3, 7, 9 in their farthest right column which eliminates a lot of numbers that you might think are primes. So choose a number ending in 1, 3, 7, 9.

Not all numbers having 1, 3, 7, 9 in their farthest right column are Prime Numbers, but these numbers can be divided evenly by numbers ending in 1, 3, 7, 9 in the far right column ( 21, 33, 27, 39 ). Try dividing your number by numbers ending in 1, 3, 7, 9 to see if your number is a Prime.

Except for Prime Number 3, the sum of the digits of Prime Numbers never total 3 or multiples of 3. ( 21, 33, 27, 39 ). Add the digits in your chosen number to see of those numbers are divisible by 3. For instance the digits of 69 ( 6 + 9 = 15 ) are divisible evenly by 3 ( 15 / 3 = 5 ). Therefore you know it isn’t a Prime Number.

If you are still curious 7919 / LN (7919) or 7919 / 8.977020214 comes to 882.1412686 or 882 in round figures. 882 is 118 primes short of 1000 which is the number of primes before and including 7919 which is also a prime. My method 7919 X .5 X .5 X.5 = 989.875 or in round figures 990 which is 10 short of the true number of 1,000 or 9 short if you want to think of 999 primes before 7919 which is also a Prime.

Weird Spread

2007-12-07T17:47:00.000-05:00

One of the things that drive people nuts that enjoy puzzles are Primes. Primes are any number that can be divided evenly by only itself and 1. If you ever look at a Table Of Primes, you will see they seem to have a pattern but there isn’t any readily recognizable rhyme or reason to it. Logically, you would think that the spaces that would separate Primes would be even or at the most not far off even. Here’s what I mean. The simplest Primes are the single digits 1, 2, 3, 5, 7. Looks relatively simple to me, but the larger the numbers, the more the Primes’ locations seem to be completely disorganized. Since Primes are defined as numbers divisible by themselves and 1 you can eliminate some numbers immediately. Two (2) divides evenly into any number that has 0, 2, 4, 6, 8 in the far right column ( 10, 12, 24, 36, 48, for example ). Five (5) is the only other number that divides evenly into any number that has 5 or 0 in the far right column (125, 155, 175 ), ( 120, 150, 180). The remaining prime numbers are 1, 3, 7. They may or may not divide evenly into any number that has a 1, 3, 7 in the far right column. The only other number not discussed is 9 which isn’t a prime number because it’s divisible by 3 ( 9 / 3 = 3 ) Weird as it is, you will find that the numbers 1, 3, 7, and 9 are in the farthest right column of Prime Numbers. For example, ( 11, 13, 17, 19 ) are all Prime Numbers. If you divide any number ending in 1, 3, 7, 9 in the far right column into any number ending in ( 1, 3, 7, 9 ) in the far right column sometimes it divides evenly which means that particular number that ends in ( 1, 3, 7, 9 ) isn’t a Prime Number, For example, ( 21, 33, 27, 39 ) are all divisible by 3. You will see that the Prime Number locations would now start to spread out because not all numbers ending in ( 1, 3, 7, 9 ) in the far right column are only divisible by themselves and 1. The final randomizer is due to the fact that, except for single digit prime number 3, the total of the digits forming a Prime number ending in 1, 3, 7, 9, will never total 3 or a multiple of 3. For instance 69 is not a Prime because its’ digits 6 and 9 total 15 which is divisible evenly by 3. ( 69, 6 + 9 = 15, 15 / 3 = 5 ).

So, in summary, randomizing occurs because:

Prime Numbers have 1, 3, 7, 9 in their farthest right column leaving spaces of 1, 2, multiples of 2 or even odd or even powers of 2 between Prime Numbers.

Not all numbers having 1, 3, 7, 9 in their farthest right column are Prime Numbers ( 21, 33, 27, 39 ).

Except for Prime Number 3, the sum of the digits of Prime Numbers never total 3 or multiples of 3. ( 21, 33, 27, 39 )

Just A Thought

2007-11-30T07:28:00.000-05:00

Most people only use Time as an event marker as in "Such and such happened here". Since Time only moves outward in only one direction, it seems to me that it only has one dimension. Physically, we all move outward. We can’t move backward in Time except through memory. Memory is very unique. If we were particularly close / in love with someone and he / she are now gone, our memory glamorizes his / her virtues and ignores / forgets the downsides / history of the relationship. Frequently, we go through a litany of would of’s, could of’s and should of’s. All completely normal. The downside of all this reverse emoting is that the grieving person is more interested in penance for some perceived indiscretion, stupidity on their part. Whether or not any indiscretion or stupidity on their part did in fact exist is a mute point. Perhaps the now gone person pulled the plug on the relationship through their own stupidity, but you and I inherit the guilt because God / Fickle Finger Of Fate moved that person permanently and physically away from our reach. Life is full of all kinds of choices and paths. Most of our choices and paths are accidental.. While we can make a conscious decision to go in one direction, there is no guarantee our choice is right in terms of benefits. Perhaps most of our life’s paths aren’t all that great because the universe cycles through order, chaos, resurrection / redemption. Sometimes God drafts us into something for her purpose and isn’t exactly thrilled when our choices cause her a gigantic headache. I sense that sometimes God gets so vexed at what we’ve done, that she removes the impediment so we can get on with the things God wants us to do during our life. Just a thought!!!.

We’ve Been Framed

2007-11-27T16:20:00.000-05:00

You and I live in frames. The three types of frames in this universe are space, gravity and time. You and I, at our simplest, are essentially particles attached to strings which are really our personalities / charisma’s / life force which we generally drag / whip around to attract other particles / people / things. Our universe is based on the number 3, so we naturally live in a space frame of 3 units X 3 units and our personal space, which we all love to talk about, is 9 units. ( 3 X 3 = 9 ). The gravity frame measurements are slightly larger than 3 because gravity must hold us in place, but not be so strong that we can’t move around. The gravity frame’s measurements are slightly off / more than 3 or Pi X Pi ( 3.141592654 X 3.141592654 = 9.869604401 ). The strength of gravity tends to curve our personal space as well as our personality / charismatic string into a slight curve / depression. If we start to move we move in a curve / depression due to gravity, even though we may swear up down and across that we are moving in a straight line. The curve of the earth is a good example of this phenomena. We think we are straight up and down as we walk but eventually if we walk far enough we are upside down. Time, which can only move in one direction, is in the 4th dimension. The time frame’s measurements are ( 9 X 9 = 81 ). 81 is (3 X 3 X 3 X 3 = 81 or 4 - 3’s because everything in this universe is constructed on the number 3. The time frame’s primary function is to both move the particles and strings horizontally outward as a unit while expanding the universe outward at the same time. The time frame’s other function is to introduce an element of randomness which is caused when energy for expansion is taken from the particle and string as the time frame moves horizontally in a forward direction. That is why you and I age and everything, in general, falls apart or deteriorates over time. If velocity or acceleration occurs when we move around or ride in vehicles all the particles which are us / vehicles / etc. are converted into strings by the time the speed of light is reached. Over the speed of light the space and gravity frames are converted to time frames and the time frames only holds us / things as energy or spirits / souls if you want to look at it that way.

Oh, Incidentally, Primes In Patterns!!!

2007-11-18T06:40:00.000-05:00

1. A Prime Number is defined as any number that can only be divided evenly by itself and 1. One digit Primes are 1, 2, 3, 5, 7 since they can only be divided evenly by 1 and themselves. .

2. A Prime Number, if it is a Prime Number, has 1, 3, 7, 9 in its’ far right column. (11, 13, 17, 19) are all Primes since they can only be divided by 1 and themselves..

3. Except for single digit prime number 3 ( see 1.), if you add the digits forming a prime number ending in 1, 3, 7, 9, a prime number’s digits will never total 3 or be a multiple of 3. For instance 69 is not a Prime because its’ digits 6 and 9 total 15 which is divisible evenly by 3. ( 69, 6 + 9 = 15, 15 / 3 = 5 ).

More Confusion:

1. Not all numbers having 1, 3, 7, 9 in their far right column are Prime Numbers. ( 21, 33, 27, 39 ) are all divisible by 3 (My lazy example). The rule is divisible by any old number except 1, since 1 never changes the number it’s dividing. The total of their digits ( 3, 6, 9 12 ) are all divisible by 3 ( see 3, last section ).

2.A number which ends in 1, 3, 7, 9 and isn’t a prime, is divisible by a number ending in 1, 3, 7, or 9 in its’ first column ( 469, 469 / 7 = 67, 7909, 7909 / 11 = 719 ).

Positive Thoughts, Frames, Triangles & Balance

2007-11-14T06:48:00.000-05:00

We, and everything in this universe exists in a series of individual triangles whose sides are one side of a Time, Gravity or Space Frame. Our chief function, among other things, is to maintain a balance between all three frames. We do this juggling act by maintaining our life in balance. A space frame provides us with dimensions in which to exist. A gravity frame’s function is to hold us / things in place. A time frame’s function is to provide a future and room for us to grow. As time moves forward, stresses / distortions appear in the triangles in the form of changes such as aging, deterioration, randomness or chaos. This happens because energy is taken out of the time frame to expand the universe thereby providing us with a future. This removal of energy causes the time side of the triangle to distort which, in turn causes us and everything else to loose its’ balance / position in the center of the triangle. We must therefore readjust our position / balance within the triangle. Sometimes, we cause our own stresses by obsessing over some problem causing a greater distortion than usual. The key to balance in our personal triangle is to control the surrounding energy fields by thinking positive thoughts at every opportunity.

Who Made It So????

2007-11-07T06:50:00.000-05:00

It occurred to me that past is memory. We can’t change what has past. Some Wit said "Past is prologue" but my Financial Adviser ( bless her ) tells me that past performance doesn’t predict future performance. My investments have a handle on that concept but it continues to elude me. I tend to go with her statement because anyone that has been married long enough for ennui to set in can readily grasp that insight at least where sex is concerned. On the other hand, ennui doesn’t apply to house cleaning. Go figure!!! The present is Slices Of Now. If you have ever had the misfortune to study Calculus you will readily see it’s chock full of slices which you are either slicing again or reassembling to figure out whether things are coming together of not ( think sets / love / romance / all that icky stuff ). Same principle as life!!! Future is statistical. You obviously have lots of choice when you think of the future as in the universal marriage question "How have you planned your day????" Think "work" here!!! Statistics takes a small sample ( history / old news / world shenanigans etc.) and applies it to a large population ( the old future ). Statistics even throws in math to give you that warm fuzzy feeling that you are actually doing something organized / meaningful / intelligent and not that dreaded guessing!!! Sometimes, of course, something completely wonderful / unexpected happens and that future perfect which you didn’t think was going to ever happen becomes Present Perfect in all its’ glory!!! Just don’t mess up the surrounding energy fields with a lot of stray thought or worst of all annoy God who " Made it so".

Life By Exception

2007-11-04T13:14:00.000-05:00

Learning is complicated. Let’s take the study of Statistics for example. If you know nothing about statistics, you first have to learn the words and their meaning. Usually, the book is filled with diagrams because some people learn visually. The book’s words are important because some people learn aurally. Statistic books are loaded with examples to give you an idea about how the diagrams / words are used to solve problems. There are also illustrations of exceptions to the statistical patterns. After thinking about it for awhile it suddenly occurred to me that everything around us is based on patterns. While you can argue that the essence of life can be many things, it seems to me patterns should be on that list. Patterns aren’t static. They evolve over time. God / whatever designed this universe on basic patterns that have the capacity to evolve over time. She did it that way, because our brains only have the capacity to notice exceptions. You can argue that people are creative, but they are only creative in simplistic ways. They are not creative in complex ways. For instance the development of the atomic bomb during WW11 took many creative people working in teams along with support staff solving relatively minute parts of the puzzle. Pattern evolution applies to everything. Language evolved. For instance the word "gay" is a word that has an entirely different meaning to what it meant 40 - 60 years ago. You and I evolve in many ways. For instance all of us age, which is essentially an evolution of a pattern commonly known as appearance. If you go down the street, thinking of nothing / looking at nothing in particular, you will only notice something if the pattern is different / broken. You and I try to stand out in our work. That is breaking a pattern. If you decorate your home, you try for something unique which is breaking a pattern. Therefore my readers, life is patterns and our management of our lives is noticing exceptions or in essence Life By Exception!!!

Patterns

2007-11-03T08:19:00.000-04:00

Excluding time, we all live in three dimensional space and everything in our three dimensional space involves three primary things like our 3 dimensions length , width and height. Particles, strings and frames are the basic names for everything that exists in our universe. Particles are us. Strings are energy. Frames are our patterns. Patterns can be our personality / behavior. Imagine writing a report for work. You start out with a blank page / frame to fill with particles ( letters / numbers ) to make sentences ( strings of energy conveying ideas (force)) within a frame ( pattern - introduction, middle, end ). In life everything cycles through order, chaos, restoration / resurrection. You start with a first draft. Order begins in your mind and you start to type. The more you type chaos rears its’ ugly head. First it is limited because you start with typos. Next your facile ideas start to disintegrate because you suddenly think of this or that exception. Resurrection / restoration has begun. Finally order is successfully restored when particles / strings / frames all come together in the ultimate pattern!!!! That, my friends / readers is the essence of life!!!!

Organized Fumbling

2007-10-31T07:30:00.000-04:00

God ain’t interested in doing a lot of unnecessary / repetitive work so here is one of her designs so you and I can fumble our way through life without bothering her!!! All living things have a Soul. All inanimate things have a Spirit. Life is built on patterns. We mange our lives by looking for exceptions to the patterns. If you don’t believe me try writing down / keeping a mental note of why you notice something. Many years ago there used to be a management philosophy called Management By Exception. Little did the proponents realize they were talking about one of the fundamentals of life.

Wrong Headed

2007-10-26T19:22:00.000-04:00

There is something wrong headed about life!!! You’re born young, forced to work like crazy to accumulate, then spend like crazy, worry that you’re going to outlive your money, deteriorate over time, get old, stupider than usual and then finally die. All very depressing.!!! It seems to me, after careful and thoughtful consideration, that whomever or whatever runs this universe got her / its’ directions confused!! Now it would seem to me, as an unsophisticated struggler in this life that things would be better going in reverse.

Let’s see:

You start out dead and get that out of the way.

You wake up in an old age home feeling better every day.

You get kicked out for being too healthy. Enjoy your retirement and collect your pension.

You start work, you get a gold watch on your first day as a kind of incentive to do well and be successful.

You work 40 years until you're too young to work.

You go to High School, drink alcohol, party, study sex in class disguised as "health education" and chase girls.

You graduate into primary school, forget about sex, girls, become a kid, play and have no responsibilities.

Graduate primary school as a baby educated and prepared for a life of pooping with no further education or education expense required. Also servants readily available and price - less at your beck and call.

Your last 9 months are spent floating peacefully in luxury, in spa-like conditions, with central heating, room service, no worries and no bills!!

You finish off as a highly pleasant orgasm.